Time to negative PCR conversion amongst high-risk patients with mild-to-moderate Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 COVID-19 treated with sotrovimab or nirmatrelvir.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to compare the clinical and virological outcomes in Omicron BA.1- and BA.2-infected patients who received sotrovimab with those in patients who received nirmatrelvir for the prevention of severe COVID-19. METHODS: In this multi-centric, prospective ANRS 0003S CoCoPrev cohort study, patients at a high risk of progression of mild-to-moderate BA.1 or BA.2 COVID-19 who received sotrovimab or nirmatrelvir were included. The proportion of patients with progression to severe COVID-19, time between the start of treatment to negative PCR conversion, SARS-CoV-2 viral decay, and characterization of resistance variants were determined. A multi-variable Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the time to negative PCR conversion and a mixed-effect model for the dynamics of viral decay. RESULTS: Amongst 255 included patients, 199 (80%) received ≥3 vaccine doses, 195 (76%) received sotrovimab, and 60 (24%) received nirmatrelvir. On day 28, new COVID-19-related hospitalization occurred in 4 of 193 (2%; 95% CI, 1-5%) sotrovimab-treated patients and 0 of 55 nirmatrelvir-treated patients (p 0.24). One out of the 55 nirmatrelvir-treated patients died (2%; 95% CI, 0-10%). The median time to negative PCR conversion was 11.5 days (95% CI, 10.5-13) in the sotrovimab-treated patients vs. 4 days (95% CI, 4-9) in the nirmatrelvir-treated patients (p < 0.001). Viral decay was faster in the patients who received nirmatrelvir (p < 0.001). In the multi-variable analysis, nirmatrelvir and nasopharyngeal PCR cycle threshold values were independently associated with faster conversion to negative PCR (hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.56-3.56; p < 0.0001 and hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; p 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Early administration of nirmatrelvir in high-risk patients compared with that of sotrovimab was associated with faster viral clearance. This may participate to decrease transmission and prevent viral resistance.

Impact of Casirivimab-Imdevimab on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Delta Variant Nasopharyngeal Virus Load and Spike Quasispecies.

Background: The increasing use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to treat coronavirus disease 2019 raises questions about their impact on the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mAb-resistant variants. We assessed the impact of Casirivimab-Imdevimab on SARS-CoV-2 mutations associated with reduced mAb activity in treated patients. Methods: We measured the nasopharyngeal (NP) viral load and sequenced the haplotypes of spike gene of 50 patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant and treated with Casirivimab-Imdevimab using single-molecule real-time sequencing. Results: The NP SARS-CoV-2 viral load of patients treated with Casirivimab-Imdevimab decreased from 8.13 (interquartile range [IQR], 7.06-8.59) log10 copies/mL pretreatment to 3.67 (IQR, 3.07-5.15) log10 copies/mL 7 days later (P < .001). Of the 36 patients for whom follow-up timepoints Spike sequencing were available, none of the Spike mutations that reduced mAb activity were detected. Conclusions: Casirivimab-Imdevimab is an effective treatment for patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant. Despite selective pressure on SARS-CoV-2 Spike quasispecies, we detected no key mutations that reduced mAb activity in our patients.

Case Report: Cerebral Nocardiosis Caused by Nocardia cyriacigeorgica Detected by Metagenomics in an Apparently Immunocompetent Patient.

We report a case of meningoencephalitis due to Nocardia cyriacigeorgica diagnosed with metagenomics, while all the standard methods were negative. This diagnosis made adaptation of antimicrobial treatment possible and led to the discovery of a rare, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

The Clinical Spectrum and Outcome of Uveomeningitis: A Comprehensive Analysis of 110 Cases.

PURPOSE: Uveitis can be associated with meningitis (uveomeningitis) and the inflammation shared with the central nervous system. We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcome of uveomeningitis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 110 consecutive adult patients with uveomeningitis. RESULTS: The main causes of uveomeningitis were Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (31%), syphilis (16%), sarcoidosis (12%), Behçet's disease (7%), and multiple sclerosis (5%). Sixteen percent of uveomeningitis remained of undetermined origin. Compared to etiology-matched uveitis without meningitis, patients with uveomeningitis were younger, had more frequent neurological manifestations, and had more frequent abnormal cerebral magnetic resonance imaging findings. In contrast, no ocular feature upon examination was significantly associated with the presence of meningitis. Patients with uveomeningitis were more frequently treated with immunosuppressants but uveitis relapse and systemic complications did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Uveomeningitis is associated with a limited spectrum of diseases. Meningitis does not seem to impact ocular and extraocular outcomes. Therefore, lumbar puncture should be performed on an individual basis during the diagnostic workup of uveitis.

Temocillin versus carbapenems for urinary tract infection due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a multicenter matched case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of temocillin with carbapenems for extended spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae urinary tract infections (ESBL-E UTI). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective case-control study of adults with ESBL-E UTI was conducted between January 2015 and October 2019. Cases received temocillin ≥ 50% of the effective antibiotic therapy duration and controls exclusively received carbapenem; they were statistically matched (1:1 ratio) on 6-month period, sex and age. The clinical cure at the end of antibiotic therapy was analysed using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Seventy-two temocillin cases were matched to 72 carbapenem controls. Most (67%) were male, median age was 69.4 years, 81 (56%) were immunocompromised, including 44 (31%) solid organ transplant recipients. There was no difference between cases and controls for baseline characteristics and microorganisms involved: Klebsiella pneumoniae in 59 (41%), Escherichia coli in 57 (40%), and Enterobacter spp. in 24 (17%). The median time from admission to effective antibiotic therapy was 0 days [range, 0-2]. Among cases, first-line antibiotic therapy (≤ 72 hours) was temocillin in six (8%) and carbapenems in 39 (54%). Temocillin was given at the median daily dose of 4 g [range, 2-4] after 3 days [range, 2-5] of carbapenems. Patients received temocillin for 81% [range, 70-93] of the effective antibiotic course duration over 11 days [range, 8-14]. The effective antibiotic duration was similar in cases and controls (P = 0.067). Clinical cure at the end of antibiotic therapy was 94% (68/72) in cases vs. 99% (71/72) in controls (P = 0.206), with no difference among immunocompromised and solid organ transplant patients (P > 0.050). CONCLUSIONS: Temocillin effectively relayed ß-lactams, including carbapenems, to treat (complicated) ESBL-E UTI. Its efficacy was consistent among kidney transplant recipients.

Characterization of HIV-1 diversity in various compartments at the time of primary infection by ultradeep sequencing.

We used next-generation sequencing to evaluate the quantity and genetic diversity of the HIV envelope gene in various compartments in eight patients with acute infection. Plasma (PL) and seminal fluid (SF) were available for all patients, whole blood (WB) for seven, non-spermatozoid cells (NSC) for four, and saliva (SAL) for three. Median HIV-1 RNA was 6.2 log10 copies/mL [IQR: 5.5-6.95] in PL, 4.9 log10 copies/mL [IQR: 4.25-5.29] in SF, and 4.9 log10 copies/mL [IQR: 4.46-5.09] in SAL. Median HIV-1 DNA was 4.1 log10 copies/106 PBMCs [IQR: 3.15-4.15] in WB and 2.6 log10 copies /106 Cells [IQR: 2.23-2.75] in NSC. The median overall diversity per patient varied from 0.0005 to 0.0232, suggesting very low diversity, confirmed by the clonal aspect of most of the phylogenetic trees. One single haplotype was present in all compartments for five patients in the earliest stage of infection. Evidence of higher diversity was established for two patients in PL and WB, suggesting compartmentalization. Our study shows low diversity of the env gene in the first stages of infection followed by the rapid establishment of cellular reservoirs of the virus. Such clonality could be exploited in the search for early patient-specific therapeutic solutions.

Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Opportunistic Infections after Kidney Allograft Transplantation in the Era of Modern Immunosuppression: A Monocentric Cohort Study.

Epidemiology of opportunistic infections (OI) after kidney allograft transplantation in the modern era of immunosuppression and the use of OI prevention strategies are poorly described. We retrospectively analyzed a single-center cohort on kidney allograft adult recipients transplanted between January 2008 and December 2013. The control group included all kidney recipients transplanted in the same period, but with no OI. We analyzed 538 kidney transplantations (538 patients). The proportion of OI was 15% (80 and 72 patients). OI occurred 12.8 (6.0-31.2) months after transplantation. Viruses were the leading cause (n = 54, (10%)), followed by fungal (n = 15 (3%)), parasitic (n = 6 (1%)), and bacterial (n = 5 (0.9%)) infections. Independent risk factors for OI were extended criteria donor (2.53 (1.48-4.31), p = 0.0007) and BK viremia (6.38 (3.62-11.23), p < 0.0001). High blood lymphocyte count at the time of transplantation was an independent protective factor (0.60 (0.38-0.94), p = 0.026). OI was an independent risk factor for allograft loss (2.53 (1.29-4.95), p = 0.007) but not for patient survival. Post-kidney transplantation OIs were mostly viral and occurred beyond one year after transplantation. Pre-transplantation lymphopenia and extended criteria donor are independent risk factors for OI, unlike induction therapy, hence the need to adjust immunosuppressive regimens to such transplant candidates.