Ghrelin and its unacylated isoform stimulate the growth of adrenocortical tumor cells via an anti-apoptotic pathway.

Ghrelin is expressed in normal human adrenocortical cells and induces their proliferation through growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHS-R1a). Consequently, it was of interest to us to determine whether acylated ghrelin and its predominant serum isoform, unacylated ghrelin, also act as factors for adrenocortical carcinoma cell growth. To examine a potential ghrelin-regulated system in adrenocortical tumors, we measured proliferative effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin in the adrenocortical carcinoma cell lines SW-13 and NCI-H295R. We also examined the expression of ghrelin, GHS-R1a, and corticotrophin-releasing factor receptor 2 (CRF-R2). Acylated and unacylated ghrelin in the nanomolar range dose-dependently induced adrenocortical cell growth up to 200% of untreated controls, as measured by thymidine uptake and WST1 assay. The proliferative effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin in SW-13 cells was blocked by [D-Lys(3)]growth hormone-releasing peptide 6 (GHRP6), but a CRF-R2 antagonist had no effect on unacylated ghrelin growth stimulation. Cell cycle analysis suggests that acylated and unacylated ghrelin suppress the sub-G(0)/apoptotic fraction by up to 50%. Measurement of DNA fragmentation and caspase-3 and -7 activity in SW-13 cells confirmed that acylated and unacylated ghrelin suppress apoptotic rate. SW-13 cells express preproghrelin mRNA and secrete ghrelin, and [D-Lys(3)]GHRP6 suppresses their basal proliferation rate, strongly suggesting that ghrelin could act as an auto/paracrine growth factor. Acylated and unacylated ghrelin are potential auto/paracrine factors acting through an antiapoptotic pathway to stimulate adrenocortical tumor cell growth. Unacylated ghrelin-stimulated growth is suppressed by an antagonist of GHS-R1a, suggesting either that unacylated ghrelin is acylated before its action or that ghrelin, unacylated ghrelin, and [D-Lys(3)]GHRP-6 bind to a novel receptor in these cells.

Ghrelin and unacylated ghrelin stimulate human osteoblast growth via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways in the absence of GHS-R1a.

Recent studies demonstrate widespread expression of ghrelin among tissues and have uncovered its pleiotropic nature. We have examined gene expression of ghrelin and its two receptor splice variants, growth hormone secretagogue receptors (GHS-R) 1a and 1b, in human bone biopsies and in the human pre-osteoblastic SV-HFO cell line during differentiation. Additionally, we examined proliferative effects of ghrelin and unacylated ghrelin (UAG) in differentiating and non-differentiating cells. We detected GHS-R1b mRNA in human bone and osteoblasts but not ghrelin's cognate receptor GHS-R1a, using two different real-time PCR assays and both total RNA and mRNA. In osteoblasts GHS-R1b mRNA expression remained low during the first 14 days of culture, but increased 300% in differentiating cells by day 21. Both human bone biopsies and osteoblasts expressed ghrelin mRNA, and osteoblasts were found to secrete ghrelin. Overall, ghrelin gene expression was greater in differentiating than non-differentiating osteoblasts, but was not increased during culture in either group. Ghrelin and UAG induced thymidine uptake dose-dependently, peaking at 1 and 10 nM respectively, at day 6 of culture in both non-differentiating and differentiating osteoblasts. The proliferative response to ghrelin and UAG declined with culture time and state of differentiation. The proliferative effects of ghrelin and UAG were suppressed by inhibitors of extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and phosphoinositide-3 kinase, and both peptides rapidly induced ERK phosphorylation. Overall, our data suggest new roles for ghrelin and UAG in modulating human osteoblast proliferation via a novel signal transduction pathway.

Somatostatin, cortistatin, ghrelin and glucose metabolism.

At first sight, the title is confusing as it seems to try to merge four unrelated topics into a single presentation. Somatostatin, cortistatin (CST) and ghrelin display broad biological activities, including metabolic effects. However, although apparently unrelated, these peptides entities have more in common than it might be expected and their reciprocal interactions give a new perspective to the hormonal regulation of glucose metabolism. Let's analyze the ghrelin receptor subtype GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor 1a (R1a). Taking into account the GHS-R1a as receptor of reference, acylated ghrelin is one of its natural ligands. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that also CST, a neuropeptide, binds with high affinity to the GHS-R1a in human hypothalamus and pituitary tissues. CST is a recently described neuropeptide showing high structural homology with somatostatin that binds to all somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTRs) with an affinity (1-2 nM). In fact, CST and somatostatin exhibit the same endocrine activities. The existence of specific receptors which selectively bind somatostatin or CST has been hypothesized, based on evidence that CST possesses an action profile different from somatostatin and that CST and somatostatin are often co-expressed in the same neurons but are regulated by different stimuli. Given these findings, the ability of CST to bind the GHS-R1a is of particular relevance because somatostatin and its fragments do not bind the same receptor. Interestingly, the classical synthetic somatostatin analogs, i.e. octreotide, lanreotide and vapreotide bind the GHS-R1a with an affinity lower than that of CST. These findings have generated the hypothesis that CST, because of its ability to bind both SSTRs and GHSRs, would represent the link between ghrelin and "somatostatin/CST" system that had not previously been demonstrated. On the other hand, the GHS-R1a is unlikely to be the only GHS-R. It has been already demonstrated that a GHS-R subtype able to bind non-acylated as well as acylated ghrelin exists and likely mediates biological activities. Another GHS-R subtype likely mediates the influence of unacylated ghrelin on glucose metabolism, since it does not bind nor activates the GHS-R1a. Given this complexity, it is clear that further studies are required to clarify whether ghrelin is the sole ligand or one of a number of ligands activating the GHS-R 1a and whether that receptor used for ghrelin isolation is the sole receptor or one of a group of receptors for such ligands.

Pituitary function during severe and life-threatening illnesses.

The catabolic state of prolonged critical illness is associated with a low activity of anterior pituitary functions. Before considering endocrine intervention in these conditions, a detailed understanding of the neuroendocrinology of the stress response is warranted. It is now clear that the acute phase and the later phase of critical illness behave differently from an endocrinological point of view. When the disease process becomes prolonged, there is a uniformly-reduced pulsatile secretion of anterior pituitary hormones with proportionally reduced concentrations of peripheral anabolic hormones. Apparently, there is a constant interaction between neuroendocrine and internal immunoregulatory mechanisms that assures the fine tuning of both the neuro-endocrine and the immune system, so that both are able to preserve homeostasis of patients during severe and life-threatening illnesses.

Administration of acylated ghrelin reduces insulin sensitivity, whereas the combination of acylated plus unacylated ghrelin strongly improves insulin sensitivity.

We investigated the metabolic actions of ghrelin in humans by examining the effects of acute administration of acylated ghrelin, unacylated ghrelin, and the combination in eight adult-onset GH-deficient patients. We followed glucose, insulin, and free fatty acid concentrations before and after lunch and with or without the presence of GH in the circulation. We found that acylated ghrelin, which is rapidly cleared from the circulation, induced a rapid rise in glucose and insulin levels. Unacylated ghrelin, however, prevented the acylated ghrelin-induced rise in insulin and glucose when it was coadministered with acylated ghrelin. Surprisingly, the injection of acylated ghrelin induced an acute increase in unacylated ghrelin and therefore total ghrelin levels. Finally, acylated ghrelin decreased insulin sensitivity up to the end of a period of 6 h after administration. This decrease in insulin sensitivity was prevented by coinjection of unacylated ghrelin. This combined administration of acylated and unacylated ghrelin even significantly improved insulin sensitivity, compared with placebo, for at least 6 h, which warrants studies to investigate the long-term efficacy of this combination in the treatment of disorders with disturbed insulin sensitivity.

Cortistatin-17 and -14 exert the same endocrine activities as somatostatin in humans.

Cortistatin (CST) is a neuropeptide, which binds with high affinity all somatostatin (SS) receptor subtypes and shows high structural homology with SS itself. A receptor specific for CST only, i.e., not recognized by SS, has been recently described in agreement with data reporting that not all CST actions are shared by SS. Interestingly, CST but not SS also binds ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a) in vitro, suggesting a potential interplay between CST and ghrelin system. The aim of this study was to investigate in humans the endocrine and metabolic activities of human CST-17 in comparison with rat CST-14 that has previously been shown to exert the same endocrine actions of SS in healthy volunteers. To this aim, in six healthy male volunteers (age [median, 3rd-97th centiles]: 28.5; 23.6-34.3 years; Body Mass Index: 23.5; 21.0-25.1 kg/m(2)), we studied the effects of human CST-17 (2.0 microg/kg/h iv over 120 min), rat CST-14 (2.0 microg/kg/h iv over 120 min) and SS-14 (2.0 microg/kg/h iv over 120 min) on: (a) spontaneous GH, ACTH, PRL, cortisol, insulin and glucose levels; (b) the GH responses to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg iv at 0 min); (c) the GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg iv at 0 min). CST-17 inhibited (p < 0.01) basal GH secretion to the same extent of CST-14 and SS-14. Spontaneous PRL, ACTH and cortisol secretion were not significantly modified by CST-17, CST-14 or SS-14. CST-17 as well as CST-14 and SS-14 also inhibited (p < 0.05) spontaneous insulin secretion to a similar extent. None of these peptides modified glucose levels. The GH response to GHRH was inhibited to the same extent by CST-17 (p < 0.01), CST-14 (p < 0.01) and SS-14 (p < 0.05 ). The ghrelin-induced GH response was higher than that elicited by GHRH (p < 0.01) and inhibited by CST-17 (p < 0.05) as well as by CST-14 (p < 0.05) and SS-14 (p < 0.01). The PRL, ACTH and cortisol responses to ghrelin were unaffected by CST-17, CST-14 or SS-14. On the other hand, the inhibitory effect of ghrelin on insulin levels was abolished by CST-17, CST-14 or SS-14 (p < 0.05) that, in turn, did not modify the ghrelin-induced increase in glucose levels. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that human CST-17 and rat CST-14 exert the same endocrine activities of SS in humans. The endocrine actions of human and rat CST therefore are likely to reflect activation of classical SS receptors.

Non-acylated ghrelin counteracts the metabolic but not the neuroendocrine response to acylated ghrelin in humans.

Ghrelin possesses strong GH-releasing activity but also other endocrine activities including stimulation of PRL and ACTH secretion, modulation of insulin secretion and glucose metabolism. It is assumed that the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R) 1a mediates ghrelin actins provided its acylation in Serine 3; in fact, acylated ghrelin only is able to exert endocrine activities. Acylated ghrelin (AG) is present in serum at a 2.5 fold lower concentration than unacylated ghrelin (UAG). UAG, however, is not biologically inactive; it shares with AG some non-endocrine actions like cardiovascular effects, modulation of cell proliferation and even some influence on adipogenesis. Thus, these actions are likely to be mediated by GHS-R subtypes able to bind ghrelin independently of its acylation. In order to further clarify whether UAG is really devoid of any endocrine action, we studied the interaction of the combined administration of AG and UAG (1.0 microg/kg i.v.) in 6 normal young volunteers (age [mean +/- SE]: 25.4 +/- 1.2 yr; BMI: 22.3 +/- 1.0 kg/m2). As expected, AG induced marked increase (p < 0.01) in circulating GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels. AG administration was also followed by a decrease in insulin levels (-285.4 +/- 64.8 mU*min/l; p < 0.05) and an increase in plasma glucose levels (1068.4 +/- 390.4 mg*min/dl; p < 0.01). UAG alone did not induce any change in these parameters. UAG also failed to modify the GH, PRL, ACTH and cortisol responses to AG. However, when UAG was co-administered together with AG, no significant change in insulin (-0.5 +/- 40.9 mU*min/l) and glucose levels (455.9 +/- 88.3 mg*min/dl) was recorded anymore, indicating that the insulin and glucose response to AG has been abolished by UAG. In conclusion, non-acylated ghrelin does not affect the GH, PRL, and ACTH response to acylated ghrelin but is able to antagonize the effects of acylated ghrelin on insulin secretion and glucose levels. These findings indicate that unacylated ghrelin is metabolically active and is likely to counterbalance the influence of acylated ghrelin on insulin secretion and glucose metabolism. As GHS-R1a is not bound by unacylated ghrelin, these findings suggest that GHS receptor subtypes mediate the metabolic actions of both acylated and unacylated ghrelin.

The endocrine response to acute ghrelin administration is blunted in patients with anorexia nervosa, a ghrelin hypersecretory state.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a gastric-derived natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor (GHS-R), strongly stimulates GH secretion but also possesses other neuroendocrine actions, stimulates food intake and modulates the endocrine pancreas and energy homeostasis. Ghrelin secretion is negatively modulated by food intake. Similarly, glucose and also insulin probably exert an inhibitory effect on ghrelin secretion. Fasting ghrelin levels are reduced in obesity, elevated in anorexia nervosa and restored by weight recovery. The chronic elevation of circulating ghrelin levels in anorexia suggested the hypothesis of an alteration of the sensitivity to the orexigenic action of ghrelin in this condition. The aim of this study was to define the endocrine actions of ghrelin in patients with anorexia nervosa. DESIGN: We enrolled nine women with anorexia nervosa of restricter type [AN; age (mean +/- SEM) 24.2 +/- 1.8 years; body mass index (BMI) 14.7 +/- 0.4 kg/m2] and seven normal young women in their early follicular phase as control group (NW; age 30.6 +/- 3.1 years; BMI 20.3 +/- 0.5 kg/m2). MEASUREMENTS: In all the subjects we studied the GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg as i.v. bolus). The GH response to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg as i.v. bolus) and basal ghrelin and IGF-I levels were also evaluated in all the subjects. RESULTS: Basal morning ghrelin and GH levels in AN (643.6 +/- 21.3 ng/l and 10.4 +/- 0.5 microg/l, respectively) were higher (P < 0.05) than in NW (233.5 +/- 14.2 ng/l and 0.7 +/- 0.7 microg/l, respectively). However, IGF-I levels in AN (145.3 +/- 10.9 microg/l) were lower (P < 0.05) than in NW (325.4 +/- 12.6 microg/l). The GH response to GHRH in AN was higher (P < 0.05) than that in NW, but in AN the GH response to ghrelin was lower (P < 0.05) than that in NW. In AN and NW ghrelin also induced similar increases (P < 0.05) in PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels. Ghrelin administration was followed by significant increase in glucose levels in NW (P < 0.05) but not in AN. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that anorexia nervosa, a clinical condition of ghrelin hypersecretion, shows a specific reduction in the GH response to ghrelin, despite the hyper-responsiveness to GHRH administration. The impaired GH response to ghrelin in anorexia nervosa agrees with previous evidence of blunted GH response to synthetic GH secretagogues and could reflect desensitization of the GHS receptor induced by the chronic elevation of ghrelin levels in this pathological state.

Ghrelin: a link between eating disorders, obesity and reproduction.

Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid acylated peptide predominantly produced by the stomach, displays strong GH-releasing activity mediated by the hypothalamic-pituitary GH secretagogues (GHS) receptors (GHS-R) which had been shown specific for a family of synthetic, orally active molecules known as GHS. However, ghrelin and GHS, acting on central and peripheral receptors, also exert other actions. These include influence on pituitary functions, orexigenic action, influence on exocrine and endocrine gastro-entero-pancreatic functions, cardiovascular and anti-proliferative effects. In particular, the effect of ghrelin in promoting food intake and modulating energy metabolism strongly suggested that ghrelin has a key role in managing the neuroendocrine and metabolic response to starvation and that could be involved in the pathogenesis and/or in the metabolic and neuro-hormonal alterations of obesity and eating disorders. Although specific alterations in ghrelin secretion and/or action in obesity and anorexia nervosa (AN) have already been reported, the possibility that ghrelin analogues acting as agonists or antagonists has clinical perspectives for treatment of eating disorders presently remains a dream.

Effects of cortistatin-14 and somatostatin-14 on the endocrine response to hexarelin in humans.

Cortistatin (CST)-14, a neuropeptide with high structural homology with somatostatine (SS)-14, binds all SS receptor subtypes but also shows activities not shared by SS. CST and SS are often co-expressed in the same neurons but are regulated by different stimuli. Moreover, CST, but not SS, also binds the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor. We compared the effects of CST-14 and SS-14 (2.0 microg/kg/h i.v. from -30 to +90 min) on the endocrine response to hexarelin (HEX, 1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min), a synthetic GHS, in 6 normal volunteers [age (mean+/-SEM): 28.7+/-2.9 yr; body mass index: 23.4+/-0.8 kg/m2]. GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose levels were measured at each time point. CST-14 inhibited spontaneous GH secretion [delta-areas under curves (-AUC): -83.57+/-44.8 vs 2.3+/-2.7 microg/l/h, p<0.01] to the same extent of SS-14 (-186.1+/-162.9 microg/l/h, p<0.01). CST-14 as well as SS-14 also inhibited insulin secretion (p<0.05). The GH response to HEX was similarly inhibited by either CST-14 (AUC: 3814.1+/-924.2 vs 1212.9+/-379.8 microg/l/h, p<0.05) or SS-14 (720.9+/-158.6 microg/l/h, p<0.05). HEX significantly increased PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels but these responses were not modified by either CST-14 or SS-14. The effects of CST-14 and SS-14 on insulin and glucose levels were not modified by HEX. In conclusion, this study shows that CST-14 inhibits the GH response to HEX to the same extent of SS-14. Like SS-14, CST-14 also inhibits insulin secretion but both do not modify the stimulatory effects of HEX on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. Thus, CST-14 exerts full SS-14 activity in humans.

Neuroendocrine and metabolic effects of acute ghrelin administration in human obesity.

Ghrelin stimulates appetite and plays a role in the neuroendocrine response to energy balance variations. Ghrelin levels are inversely associated with body mass index (BMI), increased by fasting and decreased by food intake, glucose load, insulin, and somatostatin. Ghrelin levels are reduced in obesity, a condition of hyperinsulinism, reduced GH secretion, and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity. We studied the endocrine and metabolic response to acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg i.v.) in nine obese women [OB; BMI (mean +/- SD) 36.3 +/- 2.3 kg/m(2)] and seven normal women (NW; BMI 20.3 +/- 1.7 kg/m(2)). Basal ghrelin levels in NW were higher than in OB (P < 0.05). In NW, ghrelin increased (P < 0.05) GH, prolactin (PRL), ACTH, cortisol, and glucose levels but did not modify insulin. In OB, ghrelin increased (P < 0.01) GH, PRL, ACTH, and cortisol levels. The GH response to ghrelin in OB was 55% lower (P < 0.02) than in NW, whereas the PRL, ACTH, and cortisol responses were similar. In OB, ghrelin increased glucose and reduced insulin (P < 0.05). Thus, obesity shows remarkable reduction of the somatotroph responsiveness to ghrelin, suggesting that ghrelin hyposecretion unlikely explains the impairment of somatotroph function in obesity. On the other hand, in obesity ghrelin shows preserved influence on PRL, ACTH, and insulin secretion as well as in glucose levels.

Effects of ghrelin on the insulin and glycemic responses to glucose, arginine, or free fatty acids load in humans.

Ghrelin possesses central and peripheral endocrine actions including influence on the endocrine pancreatic function. To clarify this latter ghrelin action, in seven normal young subjects [age (mean +/- SEM), 28.3 +/- 3.1 yr; body mass index, 21.9 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2)), we studied insulin and glucose levels after acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg i.v.) alone or combined with glucose [oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), 100 g orally], arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.) or free fatty acid (FFA, Intralipid 10%, 250 ml). Ghrelin inhibited (P < 0.05) insulin and increased (P < 0.05) glucose levels. OGTT increased (P < 0.01) glucose and insulin levels. FFA increased (P < 0.05) glucose but did not modify insulin levels. ARG increased (P < 0.05) both insulin and glucose levels. Ghrelin did not modify both glucose and insulin responses to OGTT as well as the FFA-induced increase in glucose levels; however, ghrelin administration was followed by transient insulin decrease also during FFA. Ghrelin blunted (P < 0.05) the insulin response to ARG and enhanced (P < 0.05) the ARG-induced increase in glucose levels. In all, ghrelin induces transient decrease of spontaneous insulin secretion and selectively blunts the insulin response to ARG but not to oral glucose load. On the other hand, ghrelin raises basal glucose levels and enhances the hyperglycemic effect of ARG but not that of OGTT. These findings support the hypothesis that ghrelin exerts modulatory action of insulin secretion and glucose metabolism in humans.

Non-acylated ghrelin does not possess the pituitaric and pancreatic endocrine activity of acylated ghrelin in humans.

Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid peptide predominantly produced by the stomach, displays strong GH-releasing activity mediated by the GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor (GHS-R) type 1a at the hypothalamus-pituitary level. Ghrelin and synthetic GHS also possess other GH-independent peripheral endocrine and non-endocrine activities via the activation of peripheral GHS-R subtypes. In rats in vivo non-acylated ghrelin has been reported devoid of any endocrine activity; however, in vitro, it has been shown as effective as ghrelin in exerting anti-proliferative activity on tumor cell lines. The aim of the present study was to clarify whether non-acylated human ghrelin shares some of the endocrine activities of its acylated form in humans. To this goal, the effects of acylated or non-acylated ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) on GH, PRL, ACTH, F, insulin and glucose levels were studied in two different testing sessions in 7 normal young volunteers (age [mean +/- SE]: 24.3 +/- 1.7 yr; BMI: 21.5 +/- 0.9 kg/m2). The effects of placebo administration were also studied. The administration of acylated ghrelin induced prompt and marked increase in circulating GH levels (AUC: 5452.4 +/- 904.9 microg*min/l; p < 0.01 vs placebo) and significant increase in PRL (1273.5 +/- 199.7 microg*min/l; p < 0.01 vs placebo), ACTH (4482.7 +/- 954.4 pg*min/ml; p < 0.01 vs placebo) and F levels (15985.0 +/- 1141.9 microg*min/l; p < 0.01 vs placebo). Its administration was also followed by decrease in insulin levels (1448.67 +/- 137.9 mU*min/l; p < 0.05 vs placebo) that was coupled with an increase in plasma glucose levels (10974.2 +/- 852.5 mg*min/dl; p < 0.05 vs placebo). The administration of non-acylated ghrelin and that of placebo did not induce any change in the hormonal parameters or in glucose levels. In conclusion, this study shows that in humans nonacylated ghrelin does not possess the pituitaric and pancreatic endocrine activities of human ghrelin octanoylated in Serine 3.

Both fasting-induced leptin reduction and GH increase are blunted in Cushing's syndrome and in simple obesity.

BACKGROUND: Simple obesity and Cushing's syndrome (CS) are two clinical models of leptin hypersecretion coupled with GH hyposecretion. Fasting inhibits leptin while stimulating GH secretion in normal human subjects. OBJECTIVES: To clarify the effect of fasting on leptin and GH secretion in obesity and CS. PATIENTS AND PROTOCOL: We studied six women with CS [age 17-66 years; body mass index (BMI) 28.6 kg/m2], seven women with visceral obesity (OB; 20-41 years; BMI 42.9 kg/m2) and seven normal women (NS; 25-31 years; BMI 19.3 kg/m2). The effects of 36-h fasting on 8-h diurnal mean leptin, GH, insulin and glucose concentrations (mLEPTc, mGHc, mINSc and mGLUc) as well as on the IGF/IGFBP system were studied. RESULTS: Before fasting, mLEPTc in OB and in CS were similar and both were higher (P < 0.01) than in NS. OB and CS showed similar mGHc, which were lower (P < 0.05) than in NS. Fasting induced a reduction in mLEPTc that was significant in NS and CS (P < 0.04) but not in OB. The mLEPTc in OB and CS after fasting remained higher (P < 0.05) than in NS. After fasting, OB and CS showed no increase in mGHc, although this clearly increased (P < 0.02) in NS. IGF-I but not IGFBP-3 levels decreased in all groups (P < 0.05). Fasting reduced mINSc and mGLUc while increasing IGFBP-1 in all groups. After fasting, mINSc in OB and CS remained higher (P < 0.03) than in NS. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term fasting has less inhibitory effect on leptin and no stimulatory effect on GH secretion in patients with Cushing's syndrome as well as simple obesity. After fasting, insulin levels in hypercortisolaemic and also in obese patients remained higher than in normal subjects suggesting that hyperinsulinism could play a role in the altered response of leptin and GH to starvation in these conditions.

Standard light breakfast inhibits circulating ghrelin level to the same extent of oral glucose load in humans, despite different impact on glucose and insulin levels.

Ghrelin levels are increased by fasting and energy restriction, decreased by food intake, glucose load and insulin but not by lipids and amino acids. Accordingly, ghrelin levels are elevated in anorexia and cachexia and reduced in obesity. Herein we compared the effects of a standardized light breakfast (SLB) on morning circulating ghrelin levels with those of oral glucose load (OGTT) in normal subjects. Specifically, 8 young adult volunteers [age (mean+/-SEM): 28.0+/-2.0 yr; body mass index (BMI): 22.4+/-0.6 kg/m2] underwent the following testing sessions: a) OGTT (100 g p.o. at 0 min, about 400 kcal); b) SLB (about 400 kcal, 45% carbohydrates, 13% proteins and 42% lipids at 0 min) on three different days; c) placebo (100 ml water p.o.). In all sessions, at baseline, blood samples were withdrawn twice at 5-min interval to characterize the inter- and intra-individual reproducibility of the variables assayed. After placebo and OGTT, blood samples were withdrawn every 15 min up to +120 min. After SLB, blood samples were taken at 60 min only. Ghrelin, insulin and glucose levels were assayed at each time point in all sessions. Similarly to insulin and glucose levels, at baseline, ghrelin showed remarkable intra-subject reproducibility both in the same sessions and among the different sessions. Placebo did not significantly modify ghrelin, insulin and glucose. OGTT increased (p<0.01) glucose (baseline vs peak: 80.0+/-3.6 vs 140.5+/-6.3 mg/dl) and insulin (20.2+/-6.2 vs 115.3+/-10.3 mU/l) levels. SLB increased (p<0.05) both insulin (16.3+/-1.8 vs 48.3+/-6.3 mU/l) and glucose (74.5+/-3.7 vs 82.9+/-3.1 mg/dl) levels. Notably both the insulin and glucose increases after OGTT were significantly higher (p<0.01) than that induced by SLB. After OGTT, ghrelin levels underwent a significant reduction (baseline vs nadir: 355.7+/-150.8 vs 243.3+/-98.8 pg/ml; p<0.05) reaching the nadir at time +60 min. Similarly, ghrelin levels 60 min after SLB (264.8+/-44.8 pg/ml) were significantly (p<0.01) lower than at baseline (341.4+/-54.9 pg/ml). No significant differences in the reduction of ghrelin levels after OGTT and SLB were observed. In conclusion, these findings show that light breakfast inhibits ghrelin secretion to the same extent of OGTT in adults despite lower variations in glucose and insulin levels.

Concomitant impairment of growth hormone secretion and peripheral sensitivity in obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

To clarify the impairment of the GH/IGF-I axis in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), in 13 adult male patients with OSAS (OSA) as well as 15 weight-matched patients with simple obesity (OB) and 10 normal lean male subjects (NS), we studied: 1) the GH response to GHRH (1 micro g/kg iv) plus arginine (30 g iv); and 2) the IGF-I and IGF binding protein-3 responses to a very low dose recombinant human (rh)GH treatment (5.0 microg/kg sc per day for 4 d). The GH response to arginine plus GHRH in OSA was lower than in OB (P < 0.05), which in turn was lower than in NS (P < 0.001). Basal IGF-I levels in OSA were lower than in OB (P < 0.05), which in turn were lower than in NS (P < 0.03). As opposed to OB and NS, in OSA a very low rhGH dose did not affect IGF-I. Adjusting for age and basal values, rhGH-induced IGF-I rise in OSA was lower than in OB (P < 0.01). IGF binding protein-3, glucose, and insulin levels in the three groups were not modified by rhGH. OSA show a more marked impairment of the maximal secretory capacity of somatotroph cells together with reduced IGF-I sensitivity to rhGH stimulation. These findings suggest that OSAS is connoted by a concomitant impairment of GH secretion and sensitivity.

Glucagon administration elicits blunted GH but exaggerated ACTH response in obesity.

Reduction in both spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion in obesity has been clearly demonstrated. Mild hyperactivity of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis has been also reported. Glucagon, at least after im administration, induces clear increase in either GH or ACTH and F levels but its effect on somatotroph and corticotroph secretion in obesity has never been studied. In 7 patients with abdominal obesity (OB, aged 24-42 yr, BMI: 29.1-43.9 kg/m2, waist/hip ratio [WHR]: 0.86-1.00) we studied the GH, ACTH and F responses to the im administration of glucagon (0.017 mg/kg at 0 min). The results in OB were compared with those in a group of 6 age-matched controls normal subjects (Ns aged 26-32 yr, BMI 19.7-22.5 kg/m2). In Ns glucagon administration induced clear increase in GH (peak vs baseline, mean+/-SE: 11.6+/-3.4 vs 3.3+/-0.7 microg/l, p<0.02), and ACTH (52.9+/-15.2 vs 19.0+/-1.5 pg/ml, p<0.02) levels which peaked at +150 and +165 min, respectively. Increase in F levels (222.3+/-23.8 vs 158.3+/-7.0 ng/ml, p<0.05) was also recorded but peaked at +180 min. In OB glucagon administration induced GH response (7.4+/-2.3 vs 0.8+/-0.6 microg/l) lower (p<0.05) than that recorded in Ns; when the GH responses were evaluated by co-variance analysis, a significant difference between the 2 groups was recorded in term of peaks but not of AUCs. On the other hand, the ACTH response to glucagon in OB was higher than that in Ns (11452.6+/-2447.7 vs 4892.2+/-719.4 pg/ml x min, p<0.05). The F response to glucagon in OB and Ns was, however, similar (24057.9+/-4109.1 vs 29835.9+/-1566.0 ng/ml x min). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that in obese patients the im administration of glucagon elicits blunted GH response but exaggerated ACTH increase which is uncoupled with the adrenal response. These findings agree with the existence of concomitant GH insufficiency and altered corticotroph function in obesity.

Neuroendocrine and metabolic determinants of the adaptation of GH/IGF-I axis to obesity.

Obese patients show marked impairment in spontaneous secretion as well as in the somatotroph responsiveness to all provocative stimuli. GH insufficiency in obese patients has been reported reversible after long-term diet and marked weight loss but somatotroph secretion is not restored by fasting. Among potential neuroendocrine causes, GHRH hypoactivity has been shown but it is likely that alterations in the influence of ghrelin, the gastric-derived natural ligand of the GHS-R, and or of the NPY/leptin interplay could have a role. Among metabolic alterations, the chronic elevation of FFA levels and hyperinsulinism probably have a key role in causing GH insufficiency in obesity. Despite marked GH insufficiency, total IGF-I levels are basically preserved while free IGF-I levels are even increased thus questioning real hypoactivity of GH/IGF-I axis in obesity. Peripheral GH hypersensitivity due to increased GH receptor status, hyperinsulinism and reduced IGFBP-I levels likely explain almost normal total IGF-I and increased free IGF-I levels which, in turn, probably exert an increased negative feedback action on somatotroph cells.