Comparison of biopsy devices in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: A correct characterization of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) lesions is fundamental to appropriately select patients suitable for endoscopic management. We analyzed the diagnostic yield of three different biopsy tools for the histology evaluation of the UTUC. Furthermore, the concordance between biopsy grading and final UTUC pathology results at specimen (i.e., after ureterectomy or radical nephroureterectomy-RNU) was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three different devices were evaluated: 3F biopsy forceps, 6F BIGopsy® Backloading biopsy forceps and the 2.2F Nitinol Basket. Data were collected between January 2015 and October 2017 and retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the variables related to diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 302 biopsies were taken: lesions could be characterized in 236 (78.2%) specimens by the pathologist. Positive biopsies for UTUC were found in 140 specimens. In 66 biopsies (21.8%), the quality of the tissue sampled was inadequate for a histological characterization; of these, 55 (83.3%) were taken using 3F forceps and 11 (16.7%) using BIGopsy forceps. No inadequate specimen arose using the 2.2F Nitinol Basket. Among 28 patients who underwent distal ureterectomy or RNU, the tumor was upgraded to high grade in 9 (32%), while in 19 (68%) the grading was confirmed. CONCLUSION: In comparison to 3F forceps, the BIGopsy forceps showed to be more accurate in obtaining sufficient specimen for pathologic examination. In papillary lesions, the 2.2F Nitinol basket achieves a final histology characterization in 100% of the cases. For tumor < 2 cm, there is a high concordance between URS biopsy grade and final pathology (distal ureterectomy or RNU).

Diagnosis and kidney-sparing treatments for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: state of the art.

INTRODUCTION: Conservative management of upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) is becoming increasingly popular: the key to success is correct selection of patients with low-risk UTUC based on size (≤2 cm), focality (single lesion), stage (< T2), and grade (low grade). Despite the recent growing interest in the conservative approach to UTUC, the diagnostic process is still a challenge, and kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) is traditionally reserved for patients with contraindications to radical nephroureterectomy. In order to explore the "state of the art" in the diagnosis and conservative treatment of UTUC, a systematic review of the literature was performed. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane search for peer-reviewed studies was performed using the keywords "upper tract urothelial carcinoma" OR "UTUC" OR "upper urinary tract" AND "biopsy" OR "diagnosis" OR "endomicroscopy" OR "imaging" AND "URS" OR "ureteroscopy" OR "kidney-sparing surgery" OR "laser ablation" OR "ureterectomy". We considered as relevant comparative prospective studies (randomized, quasi-randomized, no randomized), retrospective studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and case report series written in the English language. Letters to the editor and contributions written in languages other than English were not considered of value for this review. Eligible articles were reviewed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Two hundred and sixty-three (263) records were identified using the above-mentioned keywords. Overall, 30 studies were considered relevant for the purpose of this systematic review and for the evidence evaluation process during qualitative synthesis. The outcomes evaluated in this review were the current diagnostic methods and the KSS approaches in UTUC. Furthermore, we included in the review the emerging technology for distinguishing between normal tissue, low-grade UTUC, and high-grade UTUC. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusive diagnosis is fundamental to the decision-making process in patients who could benefit from conservative treatment of UTUC. The most relevant diagnostic modalities are computed tomography urography, local urine cytology, and ureteroscopy with acquisition of an adequate biopsy sample for histology. KSS includes the endourological approach and segmental ureterectomy. Promising technology in the endourological management of UTUC helps in providing intraoperative information on UTUC grading and staging, with a high accuracy. Patients treated conservatively have to undergo stringent postoperative follow-up in order to detect and, if necessary, treat any recurrence promptly. Further larger and multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Correlation Between Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (Cellvizio®) and Histological Grading of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Step Forward for a Better Selection of Patients Suitable for Conservative Management.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent growing interest in the conservative management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), the diagnostic process is still a challenge for the risk of tumor undergrading. Real-time confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) provides in vivo microscopic images of tissues using a low-energy laser light source. OBJECTIVE: To describe our initial experience with CLE for the real-time characterization of UTUC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen flexible ureteroscopies (f-URS) were performed at our center with CLE for UTUC. Lesions were preoperatively identified at computed tomography-intravenous urography. Cellvizio system was used during f-URS to perform CLE on the targeted lesions. Biopsies were then performed. INTERVENTION: f-URS with CLE. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Surgeon's CLE readings (low-grade/high-grade/carcinoma in situ [CIS]) were documented in the operation notes. A dedicated genitourinary pathologist-blinded to the surgeon reading-examined all specimens. A third person collected prospectively the CLE readings and the histopathological reports. Cohen's Kappa analysis was performed to test interobserver agreement. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The mean diameter of tumors at computed tomography scan was 26mm (range, 5-50mm). In eight patients, CLE allowed to obtain images compatible with low-grade UTUC, in five patients with high-grade UTUC, and in one case with CIS. We found correspondence between the CLE images and the final histopathological results in seven out of seven cases of low-grade UTUC (100%), in five out of six cases of high-grade UTUC (83%), and in one out of one case of CIS (100%). Substantial agreement was found at interobserver agreement (k=0.64) between CLE and histological reading. No complications and/or limitations related to the use of CLE were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: CLE is a promising new technology in providing a reliable real-time histological characterization of UTUC lesions. Ideal targets might be UTUC patients potentially candidates for conservative management. PATIENT SUMMARY: We believe that a conservative treatment for low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma is an option that must be considered. The diagnostic process is still lacking of accurate tools. In this study, we find that confocal laser endomicroscopy, using the Cellvizio system, seems to help the clinician to have a real-time histological characterization of upper tract urothelial carcinoma lesions. This could better select patients for a conservative treatment.

'Trifecta' after radical prostatectomy: is there a standard definition?

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent of variability in the definitions of the 'trifecta' after radical prostatectomy (undetectable PSA, urinary continence and potency) to be found in the literature. To establish a consensus definition of the trifecta in an effort to standardize criteria and reporting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of published articles found in the PubMed database for the period from January 2003 to March 2012 was performed. The search queries included the keywords 'radical prostatectomy,' 'prostatectomy outcome,' and 'trifecta'. RESULTS: A total of 86 publications were identified of which 14 were used for analysis. Eight different definitions of biochemical recurrence were reported, the most common definition being PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL. The definition of potency was the most variable. Ten different definitions of potency were found, with the most common being 'having erections sufficient for intercourse with or without a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor'. Nine different definitions of continence were found. The most common definition of continence was 'wearing no pads'. Only six of the 14 articles used validated questionnaires in their outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The definitions of trifecta reported in the literature are highly variable. We propose the following consensus definition based on our analysis: (1) PSA >0.2 ng/mL with confirmatory value; (2) attainment of erections sufficient for intercourse with or without oral pharmacological agents; (3) wearing zero pads. This consensus definition should be considered when designing studies and reporting outcomes of radical prostatectomy.

[Limits of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of renal tumors]. / Límites de la cirugía laparoscópica en el tratamiento del tumor renal.

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is considered to be the technique of choice in the mangement of stage T1 and T2 renal cancer, though increased mastery of this alternative type of surgery has served to expand its indications. In any case, these procedures have a series of limitations which are tied to the intrinsic characteristics of laparoscopic surgery, and which are associated with the patient and tumor characteristics, and the experience of the surgeon. The present study discusses the different indications and establishes the current limits of laparoscopic surgery applied to the management of renal tumors. Its role in cell-reducing therapy in metastatic disease, and the methods available for reducing tumor implantation in the surgical ports are also commented.

Límites de la cirugía laparoscópica en el tratamiento del tumor renal / Limits of laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of renal tumors

Actualmente se considera la nefrectomía radical laparoscópica como la técnica de elección en el tratamiento del cáncer renal en estadios T1 y T2, aunque el dominio de este tipo de alternativa quirúrgica han ido ampliando sus indicaciones. De todas formas existen límites a este tipo de técnicas que van ligadas a la propia idiosincrasia de la laparoscópica; límites que están en relación con las características del paciente, las características del tumor y la experiencia del cirujano. Se discuten las distintas indicaciones y se establecen los límites actuales de la cirugía laparoscópica en el tratamiento del tumor renal, así como su papel en la terapia citoreductora en enfermedad metastásica y los métodos para disminuir el implante tumoral en los puertos de entrada (AU)

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is considered to be the technique of choice in the mangement of stage T1 and T2 renal cancer, though increased mastery of this alternative type of surgery has served to expand its indications. In any case, these procedures have a series of limitations which are tied to the intrinsic characteristics of laparoscopic surgery, and which are associated with the patient and tumor characteristics, and the experience of the surgeon. The present study discusses the different indications and establishes the current limits of laparoscopic surgery applied to the management of renal tumors. Its role in cell-reducing therapy in metastatic disease, and the methods available for reducing tumor implantation in the surgical ports are also commented (AU)