Nelarabine, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide in relapsed pediatric T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia and T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (study T2008-002 NECTAR).

Children with relapse of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) have a dismal prognosis, largely due to difficulty attaining second remission. We hypothesized that adding etoposide and cyclophosphamide to the nucleoside analog nelarabine could improve response rates over single-agent nelarabine for relapsed T-ALL and T-LBL. This phase I dose-escalation trial's primary objective was to evaluate the dose and safety of nelarabine given in combination with etoposide at 100 mg/m2 /day and cyclophosphamide at 330-400 mg/m2 /day, each for 5 consecutive days in children with either T-ALL (13 patients) or T-LBL (10 patients). Twenty-three patients were treated at three dose levels; 21 were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and response. The recommended phase II doses (RP2D) for this regimen, when given daily ×5 every 3 weeks, were nelarabine 650 mg/m2 /day, etoposide 100 mg/m2 /day, and cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 /day. DLTs included peripheral motor and sensory neuropathies. An expansion cohort to evaluate responses at the RP2D was terminated early due to slow accrual. The overall best response rate was 38% (8/21), with 33% (4/12) responses in the T-ALL cohort and 44% (4/9) responses in the T-LBL cohort. These response rates are comparable to those seen with single-agent nelarabine in this setting. These data suggest that the addition of cyclophosphamide and etoposide to nelarabine does not increase the incidence of neurologic toxicities or the response rate beyond that obtained with single-agent nelarabine in children with first relapse of T-ALL and T-LBL.

Temsirolimus combined with cyclophosphamide and etoposide for pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia Consortium trial (TACL 2014-001).

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling is commonly dysregulated in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The TACL2014-001 phase I trial of the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus in combination with cyclophosphamide and etoposide was performed in children and adolescents with relapsed/refractory ALL. Temsirolimus was administered intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 8 with cyclophosphamide 440 mg/m2 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV daily on days 1-5. The starting dose of temsirolimus was 7.5 mg/m2 (DL1) with escalation to 10 mg/m2 (DL2), 15 mg/m2 (DL3), and 25 mg/m2 (DL4). PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibition was measured by phosphoflow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood specimens from treated patients. Sixteen heavily-pretreated patients were enrolled with 15 evaluable for toxicity. One dose-limiting toxicity of grade 4 pleural and pericardial effusions occurred in a patient treated at DL3. Additional dose-limiting toxicities were not seen in the DL3 expansion or DL4 cohort. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities occurring in three or more patients included febrile neutropenia, elevated alanine aminotransferase, hypokalemia, mucositis, and tumor lysis syndrome and occurred across all doses. Response and complete were observed at all dose levels with a 47% overall response rate and 27% complete response rate. Pharmacodynamic correlative studies demonstrated dose-dependent inhibition of PI3K/mTOR pathway phosphoproteins in all studied patients. Temsirolimus at doses up to 25 mg/m2 with cyclophosphamide and etoposide had an acceptable safety profile in children with relapsed/refractory ALL. Pharmacodynamic mTOR target inhibition was achieved and appeared to correlate with temsirolimus dose. Future testing of next-generation PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibitors with chemotherapy may be warranted to increase response rates in children with relapsed/refractory ALL.

Survival of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, and cyclophosphamide (ABVE-PC) versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD), the de facto standard of care in adult-onset Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), has not been directly compared to doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, and cyclophosphamide (ABVE-PC), a pediatric-aimed regimen designed to reduce late effects. We aimed to describe the single-institution experience of using both regimens in patients with pediatric HL. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated a total of 224 patients diagnosed with HL between 1999 and 2018 at Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA), of which 93 patients were eligible having received ABVD (n = 46) or ABVE-PC (n = 47) chemotherapy as their initial treatment. Descriptive analyses were performed using the Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test. Survival analysis used the Kaplan-Meier method. Events included death, relapse, and secondary malignancy. We also describe the use of radiation therapy, pulmonary toxicity, and cardiomyopathy determined by shortening fraction <29%. Analyses followed an intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the patients receiving ABVE-PC or ABVD in regard for stage, risk group, or prognostic variables, such as the presence or absence of "B" symptoms, bulky disease, and extra-nodal involvement. A greater proportion of patients treated with ABVE-PC received consolidating external beam radiation treatment (XRT) either by randomization or by response compared to ABVD (59.6% vs. 32.6%, respectively, p = .01). While not statistically significant, response to therapy, assessed by positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) where available, mirrored the use for radiation (rapid response 58.3% vs. 90.0%, n = 34, p = .11). The median dose of anthracycline (doxorubicin) was the same in patients receiving ABVE-PC versus ABVD (200 vs. 200 mg/m2 , interquartile range 200-250 vs. 200-300 mg/m2 , p = .002). There was no difference in event-free survival (p = .63) or overall survival (p = .37) with a median follow-up length of 3.9 years. CONCLUSIONS: ABVD and ABVE-PC achieved similar survival outcomes in our single-institution cohort.

Acute myeloid leukemia with t(X;6)9p11;q23);MYB-GATA1 and female sex: GATA1 insufficiency may be insufficient for pathogenesis.

Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is genetically heterogenous (Olsson et al., 2016). t(X;6)(p11;q23) is a rare but recurrent chromosomal translocation in infant AML thought to be associated with male sex and basophilic differentiation (Dastugue et al., 1997). Here we report molecular characterization of AML with t(X;6)(p11;q23);MYB-GATA1 in two female infants and demonstrate preserved GATA1 expression in the sample tested. These findings further debunk a concept that this fusion was restricted to males, in whom it disrupts the only copy of the X-linked GATA1 gene, causing presumable complete loss of GATA1 function. Our data also demonstrate the power and efficiency of RNA sequencing for subclassification of leukemia on a clinically relevant timeline.

Excellent long-term survival of children with Down syndrome and standard-risk ALL: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

The Children's Cancer Group 1991 study was a clinical trial for children with National Cancer Institute standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This trial demonstrated that 5 doses of vincristine and escalating IV methotrexate (MTX) without leucovorin rescue in the interim maintenance (IM) phases resulted in superior event-free survival (EFS) when compared with 2 doses of vincristine, oral (PO) MTX, PO mercaptopurine, and dexamethasone. This report describes a favorable outcome of this regimen in patients with Down syndrome (DS). Forty-four patients with DS were randomized to the arms containing PO MTX during IM, and 31 to those containing IV MTX. Ten-year EFS rates for patients with DS randomized to IV MTX vs PO MTX were 94.4% ± 5.4% vs 81.5% ± 6.6%, respectively. IV methotrexate with strict escalation parameters, as given in this study, was well tolerated, although the mean total tolerated dose received was lower in patients with DS than in those without DS. There was no increase in hepatic toxicity, systemic infections, or treatment-related deaths in patients with DS during IM on either the IV or PO MTX arms, as compared with those without DS. The incidence of mucositis was increased in patients with DS as compared with patients without DS, particularly among patients who received IV MTX. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00005945.

Treatment of higher risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in young people (CCG-1961), long-term follow-up: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Children's Cancer Group CCG-1882 improved outcome for 1-21-year old with high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia and Induction Day 8 marrow blasts ≥25% (slow early responders, SER) with longer and stronger post induction intensification (PII). This CCG-1961 explored alternative PII strategies. We report 10-year follow-up for patients with rapid early response (RER) and for the first time details our experience for SER patients. A total of 2057 patients were enrolled, and 1299 RER patients were randomized to 1 of 4 PII regimens: standard vs. augmented intensity and standard vs. increased length. At the end of interim maintenance, 447 SER patients were randomized to idarubicin/cyclophosphamide or weekly doxorubicin in the delayed intensification phases. The 10-year EFS for RER were 79.4 ± 2.4% and 70.9 ± 2.6% (hazard ratio = 0.65, 95% CI 0.52-0.82, p < 0.001) for augmented and standard strength PII; the 10-year OS rates were 87.2 ± 2.0% and 81.0 ± 2.2% (hazard ratio = 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.86, p = 0.003). Outcomes remain similar for standard and longer PII, and for SER patients assigned to idarubicin/cyclophosphamide and weekly doxorubicin. The EFS and OS advantage of augmented PII is sustained at 10 years for RER patients. Longer PII for RER patients and sequential idarubicin/cyclophosphamide for SER patients offered no advantage. CCG-1961 is the platform for subsequent COG studies.

Improved Survival for Children and Young Adults With T-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results From the Children's Oncology Group AALL0434 Methotrexate Randomization.

PURPOSE: Early intensification with methotrexate (MTX) is a key component of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy. Two different approaches to MTX intensification exist but had not been compared in T-cell ALL (T-ALL): the Children's Oncology Group (COG) escalating dose intravenous MTX without leucovorin rescue plus pegaspargase escalating dose, Capizzi-style, intravenous MTX (C-MTX) regimen and the Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster (BFM) high-dose intravenous MTX (HDMTX) plus leucovorin rescue regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: COG AALL0434 included a 2 × 2 randomization that compared the COG-augmented BFM (ABFM) regimen with either C-MTX or HDMTX during the 8-week interim maintenance phase. All patients with T-ALL, except for those with low-risk features, received prophylactic (12 Gy) or therapeutic (18 Gy for CNS3) cranial irradiation during either the consolidation (C-MTX; second month of therapy) or delayed intensification (HDMTX; seventh month of therapy) phase. RESULTS: AALL0434 accrued 1,895 patients from 2007 to 2014. The 5-year event-free survival and overall survival rates for all eligible, evaluable patients with T-ALL were 83.8% (95% CI, 81.2% to 86.4%) and 89.5% (95% CI, 87.4% to 91.7%), respectively. The 1,031 patients with T-ALL but without CNS3 disease or testicular leukemia were randomly assigned to receive ABFM with C-MTX (n = 519) or HDMTX (n = 512). The estimated 5-year disease-free survival ( P = .005) and overall survival ( P = .04) rates were 91.5% (95% CI, 88.1% to 94.8%) and 93.7% (95% CI, 90.8% to 96.6%) for C-MTX and 85.3% (95% CI, 81.0%-89.5%) and 89.4% (95% CI, 85.7%-93.2%) for HDMTX. Patients assigned to C-MTX had 32 relapses, six with CNS involvement, whereas those assigned to HDMTX had 59 relapses, 23 with CNS involvement. CONCLUSION: AALL0434 established that ABFM with C-MTX was superior to ABFM plus HDMTX for T-ALL in approximately 90% of patients who received CRT, with later timing for those receiving HDMTX.

Myeloid lineage switch following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in a patient with TCF3-ZNF384 fusion-positive B-lymphoblastic leukemia.

A pediatric patient diagnosed initially with B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) relapsed with lineage switch to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplant. A TCF3-ZNF384 fusion was identified at diagnosis, persisted through B-ALL relapse, and was also present in the AML relapse cell population. ZNF384-rearrangements define a molecular subtype of B-ALL characterized by a pro-B-cell immunophenotype; furthermore, ZNF384-rearrangements are prevalent in mixed-phenotype acute leukemias. Lineage switch following CAR-T therapy has been described in patients with KMT2A (mixed lineage leukemia) rearrangements, but not previously in any patient with ZNF384 fusion.

Bortezomib, Dexamethasone, Mitoxantrone, and Vinorelbine (BDMV): An Active Reinduction Regimen for Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Asparaginase Intolerance.

BACKGROUND: Children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) typically receive vincristine-prednisone-L-asparaginase-doxorubicin reinduction chemotherapy similar to contemporary induction regimens. However, up to 20% of patients are unable to receive vincristine-prednisone-L-asparaginase-doxorubicin secondary to asparaginase intolerance. We report our experience with a promising reinduction regimen for children with relapsed ALL who are unable to receive asparaginase. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a single institution, retrospective review of the safety and activity of bortezomib, dexamethasone, mitoxantrone, and vinorelbine (BDMV) in patients with relapsed ALL. Complete remission and adverse events after reinduction were study endpoints. Patients treated with BDMV between 2012 and 2015 were identified. Response and adverse events (AEs) were assessed by review of medical records. Standard response criteria were used and AEs were graded based on NCI CTCAEv4.0. RESULTS: Seven of 10 patients achieved complete remission after 1 cycle of BDMV, with 4 achieving minimal residual disease negativity. The most common ≥grade 3 nonhematological toxicities were infection (91%), gastrointestinal (45%), metabolic (45%), and cardiovascular (9%). CONCLUSIONS: BDMV is an active reinduction regimen for children with relapsed ALL who cannot receive asparaginase. The toxicity profile is as expected for this patient population. Further prospective clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BDMV.

Oligoclonality and new agent evaluation in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

New agent development rests on the fundamental assumption that candidate agents or drug combinations that induce objective responses after relapse will prevent relapse, if applied prior to relapse. However, cumulative experience now includes at least 5 examples of interventions with post-relapse objective response rates greater than 50% that failed to improve outcomes when applied prior to relapse. Emerging insights into oligoclonality provide some explanation. In acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, the predominant clones at relapse differ from the predominant clones at presentation. Arguably, the more highly proliferative clones that predominate at relapse differ in drug sensitivity from the less proliferative clones that escape primary therapy. Interventions effective against the predominant clones at relapse may have no effect on the antecedent escapee clones. Response is not sufficient in new agent development. Duration of response has attracted less attention because of variability in post-remission therapy but some patient subsets have such a uniformly dismal outcome that details of post-remission therapy may be irrelevant. Benchmarks are needed. Are recovering blasts members of the same clone or do they represent a new clone? When you eradicate the predominant clones you get a response. When you eradicate all clones, you get a cure.

Outcome of Children with Standard-Risk T-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia--Comparison among Different Treatment Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Children with T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia ALL (T-ALL) historically have had inferior outcomes compared with the children with precursor-B ALL (B-ALL). After 1995, the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) treated patients with B- and T-ALL according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) risk criteria, basing risk stratification on age and white blood cell (WBC) count regardless of immunophenotype. The Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) treated all the patients with T-ALL on separate, generally more intensive protocols than those used to treat the patients with B-ALL. PROCEDURE: We compared the outcomes of children with T-ALL and NCI standard-risk (SR) criteria treated on CCG and POG trials between 1996 and 2005. CCG SR-ALL 1952 and 1991 enrolled 80 and 86 patients with T-ALL, respectively, utilizing a reduced intensity Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster backbone. Treatment was intensified for slow early responders and only patients with overt central nervous system leukemia received cranial irradiation. Eighty-four patients with T-ALL and SR features were enrolled on POG 9404 comprising more intensive therapy with all patients receiving cranial irradiation. RESULTS: The 7-year event-free survival (EFS) for patients with SR T-ALL on CCG 1952, CCG 1991, and POG 9404 were 74.1 ± 5.8%, 81.8 ± 5.3%, and 84.2 ± 4.3%, respectively (P = 0.18). Overall 7-year survivals were 86.1 ± 4.6%, 88.3 ± 4.4%, 89.1 ± 3.6%, respectively (P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Comparable high rates of EFS and long-term survival were achieved with all three regimens, with the CCG regimens utilizing a less intensive chemotherapy backbone without prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with SR T-ALL.

ALL and osteonecrosis.

In this issue of Blood, Karol et al establish a link between glutamate receptor polymorphisms and osteonecrosis, using a large discovery cohort and 2 validation cohorts. One validation cohort included patients under treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and the second is patients receiving glucocorticoid treatment of various other indications.