Critical updates in neuroendocrine tumors: Version 9 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for all cancer sites, including gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), is meant to be dynamic, requiring periodic updates to optimize AJCC staging definitions. This entails the collaboration of experts charged with evaluating new evidence that supports changes to each staging system. GEP-NETs are the second most prevalent neoplasm of gastrointestinal origin after colorectal cancer. Since publication of the AJCC eighth edition, the World Health Organization has updated the classification and separates grade 3 GEP-NETs from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. In addition, because of major advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies for GEP-NETs, AJCC version 9 advocates against the use of serum chromogranin A for the diagnosis and monitoring of GEP-NETs. Furthermore, AJCC version 9 recognizes the increasing role of endoscopy and endoscopic resection in the diagnosis and management of NETs, particularly in the stomach, duodenum, and colorectum. Finally, T1NXM0 has been added to stage I in these disease sites as well as in the appendix.

Biliary Drainage in Hilar and Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma; 25-Year Experience at a Tertiary Cancer Center.

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzes the optimal biliary stenting strategy for palliation in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with CCA who underwent biliary drainage from 1997-2023. A per-patient analysis of percutaneous biliary drainage (PTBD) rates, the median number of ERCPs, overall survival (OS), and a per-procedure analysis of clinical success (CS), stent-specific Adverse Events (AEs), and mean time to reintervention by stent type and laterality (unilateral(u) & bilateral(b)) is presented. RESULTS: A total of 333 patients underwent 1,050 ERCPs; 85% with plastic stents (PS). PTBD was eventually done in 23% of PS patients, 35% of whom had PS removed prior to PTBD. ERCPs with SEMS/uniSEMS use had higher CS (89%/91%) vs PS/uPS (85% both) and PS within SEMS (PS-SEMS)/uPS-SEMS (71%/74%;p=0.013/p=0.054). Compared to PS, SEMS and PS-SEMS were associated with higher stent-specific AEs (OR SEMS 4.85; 3.23-7.27; PS-SEMS 9.99; 5.33-18.71;p<0.001). Straight PS were associated with more stent-specific AEs compared to double-pigtail stents (OR 6.74; 3.95-11.45;p<0.001). More 7 Fr stents were used in cases with balloon dilation (BD, 109 vs. 88 with no BD; p<0.001). BD had 79% CS rate vs 87% without BD (p<0.001). Cases with pus on ERCP and those with BD had a shorter mean time to reintervention. On regression analyses, higher Bismuth class, PS use, and PS-SEMS use were associated with a shorter mean time to repeat ERCP. 52% of patients in the bSEMS arm died from cholangitis (p=0.005). CONCLUSION: The relatively higher clinical success of SEMS is countered by the higher stent-specific complication rate. PS can be removed and may better facilitate PTBD. Within PS types, DPTs may have fewer stent-specific AEs. Cases requiring balloon dilation and with endoscopic evidence of pus may benefit from earlier reintervention.

Management of aero-digestive fistulas: the gastroenterologist's perspective, a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Esophagorespiratory fistulas (ERFs) are pathologic communications between the esophagus and respiratory tract that may be congenital or acquired, and benign or malignant. ERFs can lead to significant respiratory compromise and increased mortality through recurrent respiratory infections. As the condition spans multiple organ systems, ERFs pose unique diagnostic and management challenges to pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, and thoracic surgeons. The aim of this manuscript is to provide an up-to-date review of the management of aero-digestive fistulas from the gastroenterologist's perspective. Methods: Relevant studies regarding the management of ERFs through August 2022 were identified and data was extracted based on the relevance to the topic of the manuscript. Key Content and Findings: Endoscopy has a pivotal role in the management of these patients. Multiple endoscopic options are currently available that involve either closure, covering, or draining techniques. Studies evaluating strategies for the management of ERFs are limited to small retrospective studies while head-to-head studies comparing different endoscopic options are lacking. Therefore, a standardized evidence-based algorithm for the management of this challenging pathology is not available. Selection of the management strategy depends on operator preference, location and size of the fistula, viability of the surrounding tissue, and patient's comorbidities. Conclusions: Successful management of ERFs requires a tailored and multidisciplinary approach including surgery, pulmonology, gastroenterology, and oncology. Future studies comparing the effectiveness of different endoscopic strategies for the management of ERFs could help standardize management and potentially improve patient outcomes.

Endoscopic and imaging outcomes of PD-1 therapy in localised dMMR colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (IO) is emerging as a therapeutic option for patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) given high pathological response rates. The aim of the study was to characterise imaging and endoscopic response to IO. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with localised dMMR CRC that received at least one cycle of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy was conducted. Endoscopy, imaging, and pathological outcomes were reviewed to determine response to treatment according to standardised criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients had received IO for the treatment of localised CRC (median eight cycles). Among evaluable cases (n = 31 for endoscopy and n = 34 for imaging), the best endoscopic response was complete response (CR) in 45% of cases, and the best radiographic response was CR in 23% of cases. Imaging CR rate after ≤4 cycles of IO (n = 1) was 6% compared to 44% after >4 IO cycles (n = 7). Among 28 patients with imaging and endoscopy available, a discrepancy in best response was noted in 15 (54%) cases. At a median follow-up of 28.2 months from IO start, 18 patients underwent surgical resection of which 11 (61%) had pathological CR (pCR). Despite pCR or no evidence of progression ≥6 months after completion of IO among non-operatively managed patients, 72% and 42% of patients had non-CR on imaging and endoscopy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies between imaging and endoscopy are prevalent, and irregularities identified on these modalities can be identified despite pathological remission. Improved clinical response criteria are warranted.

Nasal continuous positive pressure versus simple face mask oxygenation for adult obese and obstructive sleep apnea patients undergoing colonoscopy under propofol-based general anesthesia without tracheal intubation: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if a nasal positive airway pressure (nasal CPAP) mask would decrease the number of hypoxemic events in obese and obstructive sleep apnea patients undergoing colonoscopy. DESIGN: Single-center prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary academic center. PATIENTS: We enrolled 109 patients with diagnosis of obesity and/or obstructive sleep apnea scheduled to undergo colonoscopy under propofol general anesthesia without planned tracheal intubation. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to receive supplementary oxygen at a flow of 10 L/min, either through a nasal CPAP or a simple facemask. MEASUREMENTS: The primary endpoint was the difference in the mean percentage of time spent with oxygen saturation below 90% between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included the need for airway maneuvers/interventions, average SpO2 during the case, duration and severity of oxygen desaturation, incidence and duration of procedural interruptions, and satisfaction and tolerance scores. MAIN RESULTS: 54 were allocated to the simple face mask and 55 to the nasal CPAP mask arms, respectively. A total of 6 patients experienced a hypoxemic event. Among these patients, the difference in the percentage of time spent with oxygen saturation below 90% was not clinically relevant (p = 1.0). However, patients in the nasal CPAP group required less chin lift (20% vs. 42.6%; p = 0.01) and oral cannula insertion (12.7% vs.29.6%; p = 0.03). The percentage of patients with at least one airway maneuver was higher in the simple face mask arm (68.5% vs. 41.8%; p = 0.005). Patient tolerance to device score was lower in the nasal CPAP group (8.85 vs. 9.56; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A nasal CPAP did not prevent hypoxemia and should not be used routinely for colonoscopy in obese or OSA patients if a simple face mask is an alternative therapy. However, potential advantages of its use include fewer airway maneuvers or interventions, which may be desirable in certain clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT05175573.

Clinical Features and Management of Acute and Chronic Radiation-Induced Colitis and Proctopathy.

BACKGROUND: RICAP is a recognized adverse effect of radiation therapy (RT) that can adversely affect cancer patients' quality of life. Data on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of RICAP are scarce. We aimed to analyze the clinical and endoscopic characteristics of acute or chronic radiation-induced colitis and proctopathy (ARICAP and CRICAP) based on symptom onset after RT (≤ or >45 days, respectively). METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of a single tertiary cancer center, from January 2010 and December 2018, of cancer patients with endoscopically confirmed ARICAP and CRICAP. We conducted univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to associate clinical variables with endoscopic and medical outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve patients were included (84% Caucasian; 55% female; median age of 59 years); 46% had ARICAP with non-bloody diarrhea as the predominant symptom, whereas 55% had CRICAP with mostly bloody diarrhea. Neovascularization was the most frequent finding on endoscopy, followed by bleeding. ARICAP patients more often received medical management (p < 0.001), whereas CRICAP patients with bleeding more often received argon plasma coagulation (APC) (p = 0.002). Female sex and undergoing less-intense RT treatments were more associated with medical treatment; bleeding clinically and during the endoscopy was more associated with APC treatment. However, APC treatment did not significantly reduce bleeding recurrence or RICAP symptoms. CONCLUSION: Patients with ARICAP and CRICAP experience different symptoms. Medical management should be considered before endoscopic therapy. APC may be useful in patients with endoscopically apparent bleeding.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection of a right colonic polypoid arteriovenous malformation.

Video 1Endoscopic full-thickness resection of a right colonic polypoid arteriovenous malformation.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection using an integrated needle-type knife and insulated-tip knife in a single device.

Video 1Endoscopic submucosal dissection using a multifunctional endoscopic submucosal dissection knife.

Performance and attitudes toward real-time computer-aided polyp detection during colonoscopy in a large tertiary referral center in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Computer-aided detection (CADe) has been shown to improve polyp detection in clinical trials. Limited data exist on the impact, utilization, and attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy in daily clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved CADe device for polyp detection in the United States and the attitudes toward its implementation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing colonoscopy at a tertiary center in the United States before and after a real-time CADe system was made available. The decision to activate the CADe system was at the discretion of the endoscopist. An anonymous survey was circulated among endoscopy physicians and staff at the beginning and conclusion of the study period regarding their attitudes toward AI-assisted colonoscopy. RESULTS: CADe was activated in 52.1% of cases. Compared with historical control subjects, there was no statistically significant difference in adenomas detected per colonoscopy (1.08 vs 1.04, P = .65), even after excluding diagnostic and therapeutic indications and cases where CADe was not activated (1.27 vs 1.17, P = .45). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in adenoma detection rate (ADR), median procedure, and withdrawal times. Survey results demonstrated mixed attitudes toward AI-assisted colonoscopy, of which main concerns were high number of false-positive signals (82.4%), high level of distraction (58.8%), and impression it prolonged procedure time (47.1%). CONCLUSIONS: CADe did not improve adenoma detection in daily practice among endoscopists with high baseline ADRs. Despite its availability, AI-assisted colonoscopy was only activated in half of the cases, and multiple concerns were raised by staff and endoscopists. Future studies will help elucidate the patients and endoscopists that would benefit most from AI-assisted colonoscopy.

A decade's experience of managing suspected pancreatic adenocarcinoma at a tertiary cancer center.

Background: We present our experience and established management strategy for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in diagnosing suspected pancreatic neoplasms at a tertiary referral cancer hospital. Method: Relevant data were extracted from our database for patients who underwent EUS-FNA for suspected pancreatic neoplasms at our institution between 2007 and 2016. Results: Among the 309 patients, the median age was 67 years and 56% were men. The most common presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (37%) and jaundice (29%). Concordance between radiographic diagnosis and final pathology was 89%. The mean lesion size was 34.9 mm on computed tomography and 31.5 mm on EUS. There were 197 patients (64%) with localized disease, of whom 115 (58%) had resectable lesions, 61 (31%) had borderline resectable, and 21 (11%) had unresectable lesions (mean CA 19-9 levels 1705 U/mL, 2490 U/mL, and 479 U/mL, respectively). A median of 3 FNA passes were performed to establish a pathologic diagnosis. Two patients (1%) had postprocedural adverse events. Median overall survival was 47 months in those who underwent surgery after EUS and 12 months in those who did not (P<0.001). Conclusions: A multidisciplinary approach is employed for management of suspected pancreatic neoplasm at our tertiary cancer center. A combination of cross-sectional imaging and EUS-FNA serves as a highly effective duo in establishing a tissue diagnosis and staging with a low adverse event rate. Counterintuitively, CA 19-9 is not necessarily higher with resectable lesions than with unresectable lesions, indicating the limitation of CA 19-9 as a pancreatic tumor marker.

High-Risk Features of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Patients for Whom Surgery Should Not Be Delayed.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical predictors of pathological complete response have not reliably identified patients for whom an organ-sparing approach following neoadjuvant chemoradiation be undertaken for esophageal cancer patients. We sought to identify high-risk predictors of residual carcinoma that may preclude patients from a selective surgical approach. BACKGROUND: Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma were identified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Correlation between clinical and pathologic complete responses were examined. Regression models and recursive partitioning were utilized to identify features associated with residual carcinoma. External validation of these high-risk factors was performed on a data set from an independent institution. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients were identified, in whom clinical complete response was noted in 104/326 (32%). Pathologic complete response was noted in only 33/104 (32%) of these clinical complete responders. Multivariable analysis identified that the presence of stricture ( P =0.011), positive biopsy ( P =0.010), and signet ring cell histology ( P =0.019) were associated with residual cancer. Recursive partitioning corroborated a 94% probability of residual disease, or greater, for each of these features. The positive predictive value was >90% for these characteristics. A SUV max >5.4 at the esophageal primary in the absence of esophagitis was also a high-risk factor for residual carcinoma. External validation confirmed these high-risk factors to be implicated in the finding of residual carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical parameters of response are poor predictors of complete pathologic response leading to challenges in selecting candidates for active surveillance. However, we characterize several high-risk features for residual carcinoma which indicate that esophagectomy should not be delayed.

Endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding caused by malignancy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding secondary to malignancy can be challenging. Endoscopy is the gold standard to diagnose and treat gastrointestinal bleeding but clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with malignancy-related bleeding are not well understood. This study aims to look at clinical characteristics, endoscopic findings, safety and clinical outcomes of endoscopic interventions for GI malignancy-related bleeding. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed outcomes of patients with confirmed GI malignancies who underwent endoscopy for GI bleeding at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2010 and 2019. Cox hazard analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with survival. RESULTS: A total of 313 patients were included, with median age of 59 years; 74.8% were male. The stomach (30.0%) was the most common tumor location. Active bleeding was evident endoscopically in 47.3% of patients. Most patients (77.3%) did not receive endoscopic treatment. Of the patients who received endoscopic treatment, 57.7% had hemostasis. No endoscopy-related adverse events were recorded. Endoscopic treatment was associated with hemostasis (P < 0.001), but not decreased recurrent bleeding or mortality. Absence of active bleeding on endoscopy, stable hemodynamic status at presentation, lower cancer stage, and surgical intervention were associated with improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that endoscopy is a safe diagnostic tool in this patient population; while endoscopic treatments may help achieve hemostasis, it may not decrease the risk of recurrent bleeding or improve survival.

Full-thickness resection: troubleshooting, tips, and tricks for success in the colorectum.

Video 1Difficult scenarios encountered during colorectal full thickness resection and their management: (1) Inability to advance device to target lesion; (2) injury to extraluminal structures; (3) anal trauma; (4) anal stenosis; (5) luminal edema after resection; (6) difficulty in grasping lesion; (7) recommendation for "mini time-out"; (8) Summary.

Advanced Endoscopic Resection Techniques: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection.

Endoscopic resection is first-line therapy in the management of superficial neoplasms throughout the gastrointestinal tract, as well as an increasingly viable therapeutic alternative in the resection of selected small deep lesions throughout the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. The mainstay of therapy has traditionally been endoscopic snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection. However, recent innovative advancements in therapeutic endoscopy have provided for the ability to resect large superficial lesions and selected subepithelial lesions in en bloc and margin-negative fashion. In this review, we discuss the current state of the art in advanced endoscopic resection techniques including endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic full-thickness resection.

Adequacy evaluation and use of pancreatic adenocarcinoma specimens for next-generation sequencing acquired by endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA and FNB.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA), especially endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), is the mainstay of tissue acquisition for the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) using flexible biopsy needles has been used for patients with PDAC in an effort to increase diagnostic yields and biomarker testing. However, the role of EUS-TA in biomarker testing for personalized therapy or precise chemotherapy for PDAC is not well established. METHODS: PDAC cases with specimens acquired through concurrent EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB were identified retrospectively. Smears were prepared from EUS-FNA sampling, and cell blocks (CBs) were prepared from EUS-FNB sampling. Rapid onsite evaluation was conducted for all cases for diagnostic adequacy. The adequacy for biomarker testing, including next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays, was evaluated, and cases with smears and CBs adequate for NGS were processed for targeted NGS. RESULTS: There were 26 PDAC cases concurrently sampled by EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB. EUS-FNA smears for all 26 cases and EUS-FNB CBs for 20 cases (77%) were diagnostic for PDAC. Twenty-one smears (81%) and 11 CBs (42%) were adequate for NGS. Nine cases with both smears and CBs adequate for NGS underwent NGS, which identified clinically significant gene mutation variants, including KRAS, TP53, and SMAD4 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Both EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB can provide optimal material for targeted NGS for PDACs. In PDAC cases subjected to concurrent EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB, EUS-FNA specimens had greater diagnostic yields and more adequate material for NGS than EUS-FNB specimens, whereas EUS-FNB was more suitable for IHC-based biomarker testing.