RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacies of two different procedures in the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis. METHODS: From August 2008 to August 2011, 28 patients of lumbar degenerative scoliosis were divided into one group (n = 14) undergoing modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) instrumented surgery and another group (n = 14) undergoing posterolateral fusion (PLF) instrumented surgery. There were 12 males and 16 females with a mean age of 66.2 years (range: 54-79). The operative durations and bleeding volumes of two groups were recorded. The post-operative efficacy was evaluated with VAS (visual analogue scale) for low back pain, ODI (Oswestry disability index), Cobb' angle and lumbar lordosis angle on plain film. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 25.9 months. The operative duration was 192.0 ± 44.7 min in modified TLIF group versus 163.0 ± 39.0 min in PLF group. The bleeding volume was 718.0 ± 197.2 ml in modified TLIF group versus 546.0 ± 226.6 ml in PLF group. All operated lumbar intervertebral achieved bony fusion in modified TLIF group by the last follow-up. Two cases had no bony fusion and there was one case of pseudarthrosis in PLF group. Significant differences existed between two groups in pre-operative and post-operative values of VAS, ODI, Cobb' s angle and lumbar lordosis angle (P < 0.05). There were significant differences between two groups in the values of pre-operative and post-operative VAS and lumbar lordosis angle (P < 0.05) but not in the values of pre-operative and post-operative ODI and Cobb' s angle (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: As an alternative, safe and effective procedure, modified TLIF instrumented is superior to PLF instrumented in the treatment of lumbar degenerative scoliosis.
