The Impact of Dose Rate on the Tumor Microenvironment Using Flattening-filter-free Beams.

AIMS: Recently, dose delivery technology has rapidly evolved with flattening filter-free beams (FFF), and the biological effects of high dose rates are a matter of interest. We hypothesized that FFF beams at different dose rates obtained with modern linear accelerators have different effects on the TME. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The B16-F10 melanoma syngeneic tumor model was established, and mice were randomized to 2 different doses (2 Gy and 10 Gy) and 3 different dose rates (1 Gy/min, 6 Gy/min, and 14 Gy/min) along with the control group. Euthanasia was performed on the seventh day after RT, and intracardiac blood was collected for a comet assay. Tumors were harvested and examined histomorphologically and immunohistochemically. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS: The daily growth rate was uniform, and no difference was observed between tumor volumes across all three dose rates for each dose. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage in blood mononuclear cells was not affected by dose or dose rate. In the TME histomorphological examination, the number of mitosis is less in the 10 Gy arm, whereas the pleomorphism score was greater. Nevertheless, varying dose rates had no effect on the number of mitosis or the pleomorphism score. The severity of the inflammation, cell densities in the TME, and expression of immunohistochemical markers were comparable across all doses and dose rates. CONCLUSION: In our study involving the B16-F10 syngeneic tumor model, varying dose rates obtained with FFF beams had no effect on tumor volume, blood mononuclear cell DNA damage, or TME parameters. However, in order to fully understand the biological impacts of novel techniques, our study should be validated with alternative preclinical setups.

Radiosensitising Effects of Metformin Added to Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy with Cisplatin in Cervical Cancer.

AIMS: The role of metformin on the radiosensitising effect of cisplatin is not clear. Here we investigated the radiosensitising effect of metformin alone and combined with cisplatin in HeLa cells, as well as the implications of the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) pathway on the radiosensitising effect. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HeLa cells were treated with ionising radiation, metformin, cisplatin, A769662 (AMPK activator) and dorsomorphin (AMPK inhibitor) or in combination. A cell proliferation assay, Western blot and flow cytometry were carried out. RESULTS: Metformin potentiated cisplatin cytotoxicity when administered 4 h before ionising radiation. Although the radiosensitising effects of metformin and cisplatin alone were observed, which is more apparent at high ionising radiation doses, the metformin-cisplatin combination did not increase the radiosensitivity of cisplatin at any ionising radiation dose. Dorsomorphin alone significantly decreased cell proliferation and potentiated the radiosensitising effects of cisplatin with ionising radiation. Administration of A769662 24 h prior to cisplatin treatment resulted in an increased AMPK level that yielded resistance to cisplatin, but this effect was not observed in HeLa cells concomitantly treated with A769662 and cisplatin. CONCLUSIONS: Modulation of AMPK may have a role in cervical cancer treatment. Increased AMPK levels result in higher sensitivity to ionising radiation but causes resistance to cisplatin. Dorsomorphin is proven to be a potent radiosensitising agent. The use of metformin alone may be an option as a radiosensitiser during high-dose ionising radiation (e.g. intracavitary brachytherapy).

Modulation of AMPK Significantly Alters Uveal Melanoma Tumor Cell Viability.

INTRODUCTION: Uveal melanoma (UM) responds poorly to targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a pivotal serine/threonine protein kinase that coordinates vital processes such as cell growth. Targeting AMPK pathway, which represents a critical mechanism mediating the survival of UM cells, may prove to be a novel treatment strategy for UM. We aimed to demonstrate the effects of AMPK modulation on UM cells. METHODS: In silico analyses were performed to compare UM and normal melanocyte cells via Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). The effects of AMPK modulation on cell viability and proliferation in UM cell lines with different molecular profiles (i.e., 92-1, MP46, OMM2.5, and Mel270) were investigated via XTT cell viability and proliferation assays after treating the cells with varying concentrations of A-769662 (AMPK activator) or dorsomorphin (AMPK inhibitor). RESULTS: KEGG/GSEA studies demonstrated that genes implicated in the AMPK signaling pathway were differentially regulated in UM. Gene sets comprising genes involved in AMPK signaling and genes involved in energy-dependent regulation of mammalian target of rapamycin by liver kinase B1-AMPK were downregulated in UM. We observed gradual decreases in the numbers of viable UM cells as the concentration of A-769662 treatment increased. All UM cells demonstrated statistically significant decreases in cell viability when treated with 200 µm A-769662. Moreover, the effects of AMPK inhibition on UM cells were potent, since low doses of dorsomorphin treatment resulted in significant decreases in viabilities of UM cells. The half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values confirmed the potency of dorsomorphin treatment against UM in vitro. CONCLUSION: AMPK may act like a friend or a foe in cancer depending on the context. As such, the current study contributes to the literature in determining the effects of therapeutic strategies targeting AMPK in several UM cells. We propose a new perspective in the treatment of UM. Targeting AMPK pathway may open up new avenues in developing novel therapeutic approaches to improve overall survival in UM.

NI-BODIPY-GO Nanocomposites for Targeted PDT.

Three multifunctional targeted NI-BODIPYs (10-12) and GO-(10-12) nanocarriers were fabricated. NI-BODIPYs are designed to facilitate non-covalent interaction with graphene oxide (GO) and target toward cancer cells for specific recognition with glucose moieties while efficiently producing singlet oxygen. We probed detailed characterization, fundamental photophysical/photochemical properties, and interactions with GO of such triplet photosensitizers and nanocarriers. The effect of the formation of nanohybrids with GO on singlet oxygen formation as well as on the efficacies of the molecules in terms of in vitro killing of cancer cells was evaluated with K562 human chronic myelogenous leukemia cells. Amazingly, it was observed that GO exhibited favorable interactions with the NI-BODIPY dyads and promoted the formation of singlet oxygen, while not showing any dark toxicity.

Candidate Angiogenesis-Related Biomarkers in Patients with Laryngeal Carcinoma (AngLaC): A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Angiogenesis is indeed a vital process in the progression of carcinomas, including that of larynx. Therefore, this study (AngLaC) aimed to identify candidate angiogenesis-related biomarkers in laryngeal carcinoma patients. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective controlled cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. METHODS: In silico analyses of angiogenesis-related genes in laryngeal carcinoma were performed to determine candidate biomarkers. Serum levels of candidate biomarkers were determined via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in laryngeal carcinoma patients as well as in an age and gender-matched control group. The associations of the biomarkers with clinical parameters were investigated. RESULTS: The study included 60 laryngeal carcinoma patients and 20 healthy controls. The serum levels of osteopontin, IGFBP-3, VEGF, sVEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 were significantly higher in the patient group (p < .001, p ≤ .001, p < .001, p < .01, p < .01, respectively). High osteopontin and sVEGFR-1 levels were associated with locoregional-recurrence (p = .024, p = .016, respectively). IGFBP-3 had the highest diagnostic sensitivity (81.4%) and specificity (80%) among the molecules that were investigated (p < .001). High sVEGFR-1 and low VEGFR-2 levels were associated with poor overall-survival (p = .037, p = .027, respectively). High osteopontin and sVEGFR-1 levels were associated with poor disease-specific survival rates (p = .035, p = .018, respectively). CONCLUSION: High serum levels of sVEGFR-1 and osteopontin as well as low serum levels of VEGFR-2 proved to be poor prognostic in terms of survival in laryngeal carcinoma. VEGF, sVEGFR1, VEGFR2, IGFBP-3, and osteopontin levels were found to be significantly increased in larynx cancer patients compared to the normal population. Further studies on osteopontin and sVEGFR-1 are required in order to determine their associations with recurrence.

BODIPY-GO nanocomposites decorated with a biocompatible branched ethylene glycol moiety for targeted PDT.

The properties of graphene oxide (GO) have received much attention and been applied to the exploration of potential applications in disease-related diagnostics and non-invasive therapy. One application, photodynamic therapy (PDT), involves the killing of cancer cells where singlet oxygen is generated with light irradiation of the appropriate wavelength. In this work, three new BODIPY derivatives (13-15), decorated with carbohydrate moieties for active targeting and branched ethylene glycol for biocompatibility, and their GO based nanocarriers were designed to study the singlet oxygen production and PDT efficiency. First, BODIPYs were prepared, followed by the fabrication of GO layers with BODIPY dyes via a non-covalent method. Detailed characterizations of the materials were carried out with mass spectrometry, FT-IR spectroscopy, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, elemental analysis, Raman spectroscopies, EDX analysis and TEM and AFM microscopies. The efficiency of singlet oxygen generation in organic and water-based solutions was determined by photobleaching with 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF) and 9,10-anthracenediyl-bis(methylene)dimalonic acid (ABDA), respectively. The results in in vitro PDT analysis against K562 human cancer cells indicate the prepared materials are highly promising in PDT anticancer therapy and the IC50 values of GO loaded BODIPY derivatives bearing heavy atoms, GO-14 and GO-15, were calculated as 40.59 nM and 39.21 nM, respectively.

The impact of stigmatization of psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and mastocytosis in different areas of life-A qualitative interview study.

Background: Stereotypes and false assumptions about chronic and visible skin diseases can determine the behaviour towards affected individuals and result in stigmatization or discrimination. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the perceived disease-related stigmatization of individuals with psoriasis, atopic dermatitis (AD) or mastocytosis. The study also aims to broaden people-centred knowledge of the effects of stigmatization in different areas of life, namely in everyday life, at work, in sports and in relationships. Methods: Qualitative in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted among individuals with either psoriasis, AD or mastocytosis. Participants were recruited via self-help networks and were asked to express their experience of stigmatization in different areas of life. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and evaluated based on Mayring's content analysis. Results: In total, 24 individuals aged 19-79 years and living in Germany were included in the study-eight for each disease. Stigmatization was experienced in all three diseases in all mentioned areas of life as well as in interaction with medical professionals. Self-exclusion, negative self-perception and negative behaviour of others were the most frequent experiences with stigmatization. Conclusion: Stigmatization, both internal and external, is an important factor contributing to the mental burden of people with chronic skin diseases. More research is needed to gain deeper insight into stigmatization and its psychological burden in various contexts to enhance people-centred care in chronic skin diseases.

Amphiphilic Fullerene-BODIPY Photosensitizers for Targeted Photodynamic Therapy.

Nanotheranostic tailor-made carriers are potent platforms for the treatment of cancer that propound a number of advantages over conventional agents for photodynamic therapy (PDT). Herein, four new heavy atom free amphiphilic glucose-BODIPY-fullerene dyads (14-17) endowed with carbohydrate units in the styryl units, which can also form nanomicelles (14-17NM) with Tween 80 for PDT are reported. Glucose-BODIPY-fullerene systems (14-17) and related nanomicelles (14-17NM) have been prepared to emcee efficient singlet oxygen generation upon light irradiation. In vitro anti-tumor effects of the compounds 14-17 and 14-17NM in the presence of light and in darkness have been investigated with K562 human chronic myelogenous leukemia suspension cells. Anti-tumor toxicity upon light irradiation was due to the formation of singlet oxygen and reactive oxygen species (ROS). This study may provide an accomplished example of efficient PDT applications based on nanovehicles fabricated with universal spin converter, fullerene, light harvesting unit, BODIPY dyes conjugated with targeting units to fight against cancer.

Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment and Diagnosis of Cancer-A Review of the Current Clinical Status.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been used as an anti-tumor treatment method for a long time and photosensitizers (PS) can be used in various types of tumors. Originally, light is an effective tool that has been used in the treatment of diseases for ages. The effects of combination of specific dyes with light illumination was demonstrated at the beginning of 20th century and novel PDT approaches have been developed ever since. Main strategies of current studies are to reduce off-target effects and improve pharmacokinetic properties. Given the high interest and vast literature about the topic, approval of PDT as the first drug/device combination by the FDA should come as no surprise. PDT consists of two stages of treatment, combining light energy with a PS in order to destruct tumor cells after activation by light. In general, PDT has fewer side effects and toxicity than chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. In addition to the purpose of treatment, several types of PSs can be used for diagnostic purposes for tumors. Such approaches are called photodynamic diagnosis (PDD). In this Review, we provide a general overview of the clinical applications of PDT in cancer, including the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Assessment of PDT therapeutic efficacy in the clinic will be discussed, since identifying predictors to determine the response to treatment is crucial. In addition, examples of PDT in various types of tumors will be discussed. Furthermore, combination of PDT with other therapy modalities such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery and immunotherapy will be emphasized, since such approaches seem to be promising in terms of enhancing effectiveness against tumor. The combination of PDT with other treatments may yield better results than by single treatments. Moreover, the utilization of lower doses in a combination therapy setting may cause less side effects and better results than single therapy. A better understanding of the effectiveness of PDT in a combination setting in the clinic as well as the optimization of such complex multimodal treatments may expand the clinical applications of PDT.

Photodynamic Therapy-Current Limitations and Novel Approaches.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) mostly relies on the generation of singlet oxygen, via the excitation of a photosensitizer, so that target tumor cells can be destroyed. PDT can be applied in the settings of several malignant diseases. In fact, the earliest preclinical applications date back to 1900's. Dougherty reported the treatment of skin tumors by PDT in 1978. Several further studies around 1980 demonstrated the effectiveness of PDT. Thus, the technique has attracted the attention of numerous researchers since then. Hematoporphyrin derivative received the FDA approval as a clinical application of PDT in 1995. We have indeed witnessed a considerable progress in the field over the last century. Given the fact that PDT has a favorable adverse event profile and can enhance anti-tumor immune responses as well as demonstrating minimally invasive characteristics, it is disappointing that PDT is not broadly utilized in the clinical setting for the treatment of malignant and/or non-malignant diseases. Several issues still hinder the development of PDT, such as those related with light, tissue oxygenation and inherent properties of the photosensitizers. Various photosensitizers have been designed/synthesized in order to overcome the limitations. In this Review, we provide a general overview of the mechanisms of action in terms of PDT in cancer, including the effects on immune system and vasculature as well as mechanisms related with tumor cell destruction. We will also briefly mention the application of PDT for non-malignant diseases. The current limitations of PDT utilization in cancer will be reviewed, since identifying problems associated with design/synthesis of photosensitizers as well as application of light and tissue oxygenation might pave the way for more effective PDT approaches. Furthermore, novel promising approaches to improve outcome in PDT such as selectivity, bioengineering, subcellular/organelle targeting, etc. will also be discussed in detail, since the potential of pioneering and exceptional approaches that aim to overcome the limitations and reveal the full potential of PDT in terms of clinical translation are undoubtedly exciting. A better understanding of novel concepts in the field (e.g. enhanced, two-stage, fractional PDT) will most likely prove to be very useful for pursuing and improving effective PDT strategies.