Effects of Mobile Stroke Unit dispatch on blood pressure management and outcomes in patients with intracerebral haematoma: Results from the Berlin_Prehospital Or Usual Care Delivery in acute Stroke (B_PROUD) controlled intervention study.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) and elevated systolic blood pressure (BP), guidelines suggest that systolic BP reduction to <140 mmHg should be rapidly initiated. Compared with conventional care, Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) allow for earlier ICH diagnosis through prehospital imaging and earlier BP lowering. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ICH patients were prospectively evaluated as a cohort of the controlled B_PROUD-study in which MSU availability alone determined MSU dispatch in addition to conventional ambulance. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for confounding to estimate the effect of additional MSU dispatch in ICH patients. Outcomes of interest were 7-day mortality (primary), systolic BP (sBP) at hospital arrival, dispatch-to-imaging time, largest haematoma volume, anticoagulation reversal, length of in-hospital stay, 3-month functional outcome. RESULTS: Between February 2017 and May 2019, MSUs were dispatched to 95 (mean age: 72 ± 13 years, 45% female) and only conventional ambulances to 78 ICH patients (mean age: 71 ± 12 years, 44% female). After adjusting for confounding, we found shorter dispatch-to-imaging time (mean difference: -17.75 min, 95% CI: -27.16 to -8.21 min) and lower sBP at hospital arrival (mean difference = -16.31 mmHg, 95% CI: -30.64 to -6.19 mmHg) in the MSU group. We found no statistically significant difference for the other outcomes, including 7-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.68 to 3.31) or favourable outcome (adjusted odds ratio = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.67). CONCLUSIONS: Although MSU dispatch led to sBP reduction and lower dispatch-to-imaging time compared to conventional ambulance care, we found no evidence of better outcomes in the MSU dispatch group.

Prospective collection of blood plasma samples to identify potential biomarkers for the prehospital stroke diagnosis (ProGrEss-Bio): study protocol for a multicenter prospective observational study.

Introduction: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are well-established, evidence-based, time-critical therapies that reduce morbidity and mortality in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. The exclusion of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is mandatory and has been performed by cerebral imaging to date. Mobile stroke units (MSUs) have been shown to improve functional outcomes by bringing cerebral imaging and IVT directly to the patient, but they have limited coverage. Blood biomarkers clearly distinguishing between AIS, ICH, and stroke mimics (SM) could provide an alternative to cerebral imaging if concentration changes are detectable in the hyperacute phase after stroke with high diagnostic accuracy. In this study, we will take blood samples in a prehospital setting to evaluate potential biomarkers. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (https://drks.de/search/de) with the identifier DRKS00023063. Methods and analysis: We plan a prospective, observational study involving 300 patients with suspected stroke and symptom onset of ≤4.5 h before the collection of biomarkers. Study participants will be recruited from three sites in Berlin, Germany during MSU deployments. The focus of the study is the collection of blood samples from participants at the prehospital scene and from participants with AIS or ICH at a second-time point. All samples will be analyzed using targeted and untargeted analytical approaches. Study-related information about participants, including medical information and discharge diagnoses from the subsequent treating hospital, will be collected and documented in an electronic case report form (eCRF). Discussion: This study will evaluate whether a single blood biomarker or a combination of biomarkers can distinguish patients with AIS and ICH from patients with stroke and SM in the early phase after symptom onset in the prehospital setting. In addition, the kinetics of blood biomarkers in AIS and ICH patients will be investigated. Our goal is to evaluate new ways to reliably diagnose stroke in the prehospital setting and thus accelerate the application of evidence-based therapies to stroke patients.

Effect of Mobile Stroke Unit Dispatch in all Patients with Acute Stroke or TIA.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of additional mobile stroke unit (MSU) dispatch on functional outcomes among the full spectrum of stroke patients, regardless of subtype or potential contraindications to reperfusion therapies. METHODS: We used data from the nonrandomized Berlin-based B_PROUD study (02/2017 to 05/2019), in which MSUs were dispatched based solely on availability, and the linked B-SPATIAL stroke registry. All patients with final stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) diagnoses were eligible. The intervention under study was the additional dispatch of an MSU, an emergency physician-staffed ambulance equipped to provide prehospital imaging and thrombolytic treatment, compared to conventional ambulance alone. The primary outcome was the 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and the co-primary outcome was a 3-tiered disability scale. We identified confounders using directed acyclic graphs and obtained adjusted effect estimates using inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: MSUs were dispatched to 1,125 patients (mean age: 74 years, 46.5% female), while for 1,141 patients only conventional ambulances were dispatched (75 years, 49.9% female). After confounding adjustment, MSU dispatch was associated with more favorable 3-month mRS scores (common odds ratio [cOR] = 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.94). No statistically significant association was found with the co-primary outcome (cOR = 0.86; 9% CI: 0.72-1.01) or 7-day mortality (OR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.59-1.48). INTERPRETATION: When considering the entire population of stroke/TIA patients, MSU dispatch improved 3-month functional outcomes without evidence of compromised safety. Our results are relevant for decision-makers since stroke subtype and treatment eligibility are unknown at time of dispatch. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:50-63.

Optimization of sensitivity and specificity of a biomarker-based blood test (LVOCheck-Opti): A protocol for a multicenter prospective observational study of patients suspected of having a stroke.

Introduction: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a time-critical medical emergency. For patients with large-vessel occlusions (LVO), mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the gold-standard treatment. Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) provide on-site diagnostic capabilities via computed tomography (CT) and have been shown to improve functional outcomes in stroke patients, but are cost-efficient only in urban areas. Blood biomarkers have recently emerged as possible alternative to cerebral imaging for LVO diagnosis. Prehospital LVO diagnosis offers the potential to transport patients directly to centers that have MT treatment available. In this study, we assess the accuracy of combining two biomarkers, HFABP and NT-proBNP, with clinical indicators to detect LVO using ultra-early prehospital blood samples. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00030399). Methods and analysis: We plan a multicenter prospective observational study with 800 patients with suspected stroke enrolled within 24 h of symptom onset. Study participants will be recruited at three sites (MSUs) in Berlin, Germany. Blood-samples will be taken pre-hospitally at the scene and tested for HFABP and NT-proBNP levels. Additional clinical data and information on final diagnosis will be collected and documented in an electronic case report form (eCRF). Sensitivity and specificity of the combination will be calculated through iterative permutation-response calculations. Discussion: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic capabilities of a combination of the biomarkers HFABP and NT-proBNP in LVO prediction. In contrast to most other biomarker studies to date, by employing MSUs as study centers, ultra-early levels of biomarkers can be analyzed. Point-of-care LVO detection in suspected stroke could lead to faster treatment in both urban and rural settings and thus improve functional outcomes on a broader scale. Clinical trial registration: Deutsches Register klinischer Studien https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00030399, DRKS00030399.

Digitized and structured informed patient consent before contrast-enhanced computed tomography: feasibility and benefits in clinical routine.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility and benefits of digitized informed patient consent (D-IPC) for contrast-enhanced CT and compare digitized documentation with paper-based, conventional patient records (C-PR). METHODS: We offered D-IPC to 2016 patients scheduled for a CT. We assessed patient history (e.g., CT examinations, malignant or cardiovascular diseases) and contraindications (red flags) for a CT (e.g., thyroid hyperfunction, allergies) using a tablet device. We evaluated the success rate of D-IPC and compared patient age between the subgroups of patients who were able or unable to complete D-IPC. We analyzed the prevalence of marked questions and red flags (RF). RF were compared with the documentation from C-PR. We estimated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for paperless workflow and provide a cost-benefit analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 84.4% of patients completed D-IPC. They were younger (median 61 years) than unsuccessful patients (65 years; p < 0.001). Patients who marked questions (21.7%) were older than patients without inquiries (median 63.9 vs 59.5 years; p < 0.001). The most prevalent RF was thyroid disease (23.8%). RF were considered critical for contrast-agent injection in 13.7%, requiring personalized preparation. The detection rate for RF documented with D-IPC was higher than for C-PR (n = 385 vs. 43). GHG emissions for tablet production are 80-90 times higher than for paper production. The estimated costs were slightly higher for D-IPC (+ 8.7%). CONCLUSION: D-IPC is feasible, but patient age is a relevant factor. Marked questions and RF help personalize IPC. The availability of patient history by D-IPC was superior compared to C-PR.

Association Between Dispatch of Mobile Stroke Units and Functional Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke in Berlin.

Importance: Effects of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke are time-dependent. Ambulances that can administer thrombolysis (mobile stroke units [MSUs]) before arriving at the hospital have been shown to reduce time to treatment. Objective: To determine whether dispatch of MSUs is associated with better clinical outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective, nonrandomized, controlled intervention study was conducted in Berlin, Germany, from February 1, 2017, to October 30, 2019. If an emergency call prompted suspicion of stroke, both a conventional ambulance and an MSU, when available, were dispatched. Functional outcomes of patients with final diagnosis of acute cerebral ischemia who were eligible for thrombolysis or thrombectomy were compared based on the initial dispatch (both MSU and conventional ambulance or conventional ambulance only). Exposure: Simultaneous dispatch of an MSU (computed tomographic scanning with or without angiography, point-of-care laboratory testing, and thrombolysis capabilities on board) and a conventional ambulance (n = 749) vs conventional ambulance alone (n = 794). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores (a disability score ranging from 0, no neurological deficits, to 6, death) at 3 months. The coprimary outcome was a 3-tier disability scale at 3 months (none to moderate disability; severe disability; death) with tier assignment based on mRS scores if available or place of residence if mRS scores were not available. Common odds ratios (ORs) were used to quantify the association between exposure and outcome; values less than 1.00 indicated a favorable shift in the mRS distribution and lower odds of higher levels of disability. Results: Of the 1543 patients (mean age, 74 years; 723 women [47%]) included in the adjusted primary analysis, 1337 (87%) had available mRS scores (primary outcome) and 1506 patients (98%) had available the 3-tier disability scale assessment (coprimary outcome). Patients with an MSU dispatched had lower median mRS scores at month 3 (1; interquartile range [IQR], 0-3) than did patients without an MSU dispatched (2; IQR, 0-3; common OR for worse mRS, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58-0.86; P < .001). Similarly, patients with an MSU dispatched had lower 3-month coprimary disability scores: 586 patients (80.3%) had none to moderate disability; 92 (12.6%) had severe disability; and 52 (7.1%) had died vs patients without an MSU dispatched: 605 (78.0%) had none to moderate disability; 103 (13.3%) had severe disability; and 68 (8.8%) had died (common OR for worse functional outcome, 0.73, 95% CI, 0.54-0.99; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective, nonrandomized, controlled intervention study of patients with acute ischemic stroke in Berlin, Germany, the dispatch of mobile stroke units, compared with conventional ambulances alone, was significantly associated with lower global disability at 3 months. Clinical trials in other regions are warranted.

Probability assessment of intracerebral hemorrhage in prehospital emergency patients.

BACKGROUND: Routing of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) to the most appropriate hospital is challenging for emergency medical services particularly when specific treatment options are only provided by specialized hospitals and determination of the exact diagnosis is difficult. We aimed to develop a prehospital score - called prehospital-intracerebral hemorrhage score (ph-ICH score) - to assist in discriminating between both conditions. METHODS: The ph-ICH score was developed with data from patients treated aboard a mobile stroke unit in Berlin, Germany, between 2011 and 2013 (derivation cohort) and in 2018 (validation cohort). Diagnosis of ICH or AIS was established using clinical data and neuroradiological cerebral imaging. Diagnostic accuracy was measured with significance testing, Cohen's d and receiver-operating-characteristics. RESULTS: We analyzed 416 patients (32 ICH, 224 AIS, 41 transient ischemic attack, 119 stroke mimic) in the derivation cohort and 285 patients (33 ICH and 252 AIS) in the validation cohort. Systolic blood pressure, level of consciousness and severity of neurological deficits (i. e. certain items of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) were used to calculate the ph-ICH score that showed higher values in the ICH compared to the AIS group (derivation cohort: 1.8 ± 1.2 vs. 1.0 ± 0.9 points; validation cohort: 1.8 ± 0.9 vs. 0.8 ± 0.7 points; d = 0.9 and 1.4, both p < 0.01). Receiver-operating-characteristics showed fair and good accuracy with an area under the curve of 0.71 for the derivation and 0.81 for the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The ph-ICH score can assist medical personnel in the field to assess the likelihood of ICH and AIS in emergency patients.

Telemedicine in Prehospital Acute Stroke Care.

Background Mobile stroke units ( MSU s), equipped with an integrated computed tomography scanner, can shorten time to thrombolytic treatment and may improve outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Original (German) MSU s are staffed by neurologists trained as emergency physicians, but patient assessment and treatment decisions by a remote neurologist may offer an alternative to neurologists aboard MSU . Methods and Results Remote neurologists examined and assessed emergency patients treated aboard the MSU in Berlin, Germany. Audiovisual quality was rated by the remote neurologist from 1 (excellent) to 6 (insufficient), and duration of video examinations was assessed. We analyzed interrater reliability of diagnoses, scores on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and treatment decisions (intravenous thrombolysis) between the MSU neurologist and the remote neurologist. We included 90 of 103 emergency assessments (13 patients were excluded because of either failed connection, technical problems, clinical worsening during teleconsultation, or missing data in documentation) in this study. The remote neurologist rated audiovisual quality with a median grade for audio quality of 3 (satisfactory) and for video quality of 2 (good). Mean time for completion of teleconsultations was about 19±5 minutes. The interrater reliabilities between the onboard and remote neurologist were high for diagnoses (Cohen's κ=0.86), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale sum scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.87) and treatment decisions (16 treatment decisions agreed versus 2 disagreed; Cohen's κ=0.93). Conclusions Remote assessment and treatment decisions of emergency patients are technically feasible with satisfactory audiovisual quality. Agreement on diagnoses, neurological examinations, and treatment decisions between onboard and remote neurologists was high.

Evaluation of a score for the prehospital distinction between cerebrovascular disease and stroke mimic patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a sudden onset of focal neurological deficits consistent with stroke, who turn out to have alternative conditions, have been labeled stroke mimics. AIMS: We assessed a recently validated telemedicine-based stroke mimic score (TeleStroke mimic score; TM-score) and individual patient characteristics with regard to its discriminative value between cerebrovascular disease and stroke mimic patients in the in-person, pre-hospital setting. METHODS: We evaluated patients cared for in a mobile stroke unit in Berlin, Germany. We investigated whether the TM-score (comprising six parameters), Face Arm Speech Time test, and individual patient characteristics were able to differentiate cerebrovascular disease from stroke mimic patients. RESULTS: We included 423 patients (299 (70.7%) cerebrovascular disease and 124 (29.3%) stroke mimic) in the final analysis. A TM-score > 30 indicated a high probability of a cerebrovascular disease and a score ≤15 of a stroke mimic. The TM-score performed well to identify stroke mimics (area under the curve of 0.74 under receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis). The cerebrovascular disease patients were older (74.8 vs. 69.8 years, p = 0.001), had more often severe strokes (NIHSS > 14 25.8% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.001), presented more often with weakness of the face (70.9% vs. 42.7%, p = 0.001) or arm (60.9% vs. 33.9%, p = 0.001), dysarthria (59.5% vs. 40.3%, p < 0.001), history of atrial fibrillation (38.1% vs. 21.0%, p = 0.001), arterial hypertension (78.9% vs. 53.2%, p < 0.001), and less often with seizure (0.7% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The TM-score and certain patient characteristics can help paramedics and emergency physicians in the field to identify stroke mimic patients and select the most appropriate hospital destination.

Ultraearly Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Mobile Stroke Unit and Hospital Settings.

Background and Purpose- Mobile stroke units (MSUs) are known to increase the proportion of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in the first golden hour (GH) after onset compared with hospital settings (HS). However, because of the low number of AIS patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis within this ultraearly time window in conventional care, characteristics, and outcome of this subgroup of AIS patients have not been compared between MSU and HS. Methods- MSU-GH patients were selected from the Berlin-based MSU (STEMO [Stroke Emergency Mobile]), whereas HS-GH patients were selected from the SITS-EAST (Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke-East) registry. The outcome events of interest included the rates of favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 or 1), distribution of the modified Rankin Scale scores, and mortality after 3 months between MSU-GH and HS-GH groups. Results- We identified 117 MSU-GH (38.4% of 305 MSU-treated patients) and 136 HS-GH (0.9% of 15 591 HS-treated patients) eligible patients without prestroke disability. No significant differences were documented in the rates of favorable functional outcome (51.3% versus 46.2%, P=0.487) and mortality (7.7% versus 9.9%, P=0.576) at 3 months, or in the distribution of 3-month modified Rankin Scale scores between the 2 groups ( P=0.196). In multivariable logistic regression analyses, adjusting for potential confounders, MSU treatment was not associated with a significantly different likelihood of favorable functional outcome (odds ratio, 1.84 for MSU patients; 95% CI, 0.86-3.96) or mortality (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.28-3.20) at 3 months. Conclusions- There is no evidence that safety and efficacy of ultraearly intravenous thrombolysis for AIS differs when used in MSUs or in HS.

Effects of Prehospital Thrombolysis in Stroke Patients With Prestroke Dependency.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Data on effects of intravenous thrombolysis on outcome of patients with ischemic stroke who are dependent on assistance in activities of daily living prestroke are scarce. Recent registry based analyses in activities of daily -independent patients suggest that earlier start of intravenous thrombolysis in the prehospital setting leads to better outcomes when compared with the treatment start in hospital. We evaluated whether these observations can be corroborated in patients with prestroke dependency. METHODS: This observational, retrospective analysis included all patients with acute ischemic stroke depending on assistance before stroke who received intravenous thrombolysis either on the Stroke Emergency Mobile (STEMO) or through conventional in-hospital care (CC) in a tertiary stroke center (Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin) during routine care. Prespecified outcomes were modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 3 and survival at 3 months, as well as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Outcomes were adjusted in multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Between February 2011 and March 2015, 122 of 427 patients (28%) treated on STEMO and 142 of 505 patients (28%) treated via CC needed assistance before stroke. Median onset-to-treatment times were 97 (interquartile range, 69-159; STEMO) and 135 (interquartile range, 98-184; CC; P<0.001) minutes. After 3 months, modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 3 was observed in 48 STEMO patients (39%) versus 35 CC patients (25%; P=0.01) and 86 (70%, STEMO) versus 85 (60%, CC) patients were alive (P=0.07). After adjustment, STEMO care was favorable with respect to modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 3 (odds ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-3.87; P=0.042) with a nonsignificant result for survival (odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-3.16; P=0.07). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 5 STEMO versus 12 CC patients (4.2% versus 8.5%; P=0.167). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that earlier, prehospital (as compared with in-hospital) start of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke may translate into better clinical outcome in patients with prestroke dependency. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02358772.

Functional outcomes of pre-hospital thrombolysis in a mobile stroke treatment unit compared with conventional care: an observational registry study.

BACKGROUND: Specialised CT-equipped mobile stroke treatment units shorten time to intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke by starting treatment before hospital admission; however, direct effects of pre-hospital thrombolysis on clinical outcomes have not been shown. We aimed to compare 3-month functional outcomes after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic who had received emergency mobile care or and conventional care. METHODS: In this observational registry study, patients with ischaemic stroke received intravenous thrombolysis (alteplase) either within a stroke emergency mobile (STEMO) vehicle (pre-hospital care covering 1·3 million inhabitants of Berlin) or within conventional care (normal ambulances and in-hospital care at the Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin in Berlin). Patient data on treatment, outcome, and demographics were documented in STEMO (pre-hospital) or conventional care (in-hospital) registries. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had lived at home without assistance before stroke and had a 3-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 1 or lower. Our multivariable logistic regression was adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, and stroke severity. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02358772. FINDINGS: Between Feb 5, 2011, and March 5, 2015, 427 patients were treated within the STEMO vehicle and their data were entered into a pre-hospital registry. 505 patients received conventional care and their data were entered into an in-hospital thrombolysis registry. Of these, 305 patients in the STEMO group and 353 in the conventional care group met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. 161 (53%) patients in the STEMO group versus 166 (47%) in the conventional care group had an mRS score of 1 or lower (p=0·14). Compared with conventional care, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for STEMO care for the primary outcome (OR 1·40, 95% CI 1·00-1·97; p=0·052) were not significant. Intracranial haemorrhage (p=0·27) and 7-day mortality (p=0·23) did not differ significantly between treatment groups. INTERPRETATION: We found no significant difference between the proportion of patients with a mRS score of 1 or lower receiving STEMO care compared with conventional care. However, our results suggest that pre-hospital start of intravenous thrombolysis might lead to improved functional outcome in patients. This evidence requires substantiation in future large-scale trials. FUNDING: Zukunftsfonds Berlin, the Technology Foundation Berlin with EU co-financing by the European Regional Development Fund via Investitionsbank Berlin, and the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research via the Center for Stroke Research Berlin.

Influence of Distance to Scene on Time to Thrombolysis in a Specialized Stroke Ambulance.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Specialized computed tomography-equipped stroke ambulances shorten time to intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke by starting treatment before hospital arrival. Because of longer travel-time-to-scene, time benefits of this concept are expected to diminish with longer distances from base station to scene. METHODS: We used data from the Prehospital Acute Neurological Treatment and Optimization of Medical Cares in Stroke (PHANTOM-S) trial comparing time intervals between patients for whom a specialized stroke ambulance (stroke emergency mobile) was deployed and patients with conventional emergency medical service. Expected times from base station to scene had been calculated beforehand using computer algorithms informed by emergency medical service routine data. Four different deployment zones with-75% probability-expected arrival within 4, 8, 12, and 16 minutes and total population coverage of ≈1.3 million inhabitants were categorized for stroke emergency mobile deployment. We analyzed times from alarm-to-arrival at scene, to start of intravenous thrombolysis and from onset-to-intravenous thrombolysis. RESULTS: Corresponding to the size of the respective catchment zone, the number of patients cared increased with distance (zone 1: n=30, zone 2: n=127, zone 3: n=156, and zone 4: n=217). Although time to stroke emergency mobile arrival increased with distance (mean: 8.0, 12.5, 15.4, and 18.4 minutes in zones 1-4), time from alarm-to-intravenous thrombolysis (mean: 41.8 versus 76.5; 50.2 versus 79.1; 54.5 versus 76.6; and 59.3 versus 78.0 minutes, respectively; all P<0.01) remained shorter in the stroke emergency mobile group across all zones. CONCLUSIONS: In a metropolitan area such as Berlin, time benefits justify a specialized stroke ambulance service up to a mean travel time of 18 minutes from base station. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01382862.

Chronic sensory stroke with and without central pain is associated with bilaterally distributed sensory abnormalities as detected by quantitative sensory testing.

Approximately 20% of patients suffering from stroke with pure or predominant sensory symptoms (referred to as sensory stroke patients) develop central poststroke pain (CPSP). It is largely unknown what distinguishes these patients from those who remain pain free. Using quantitative sensory testing (QST), we analyzed the somatosensory profiles of 50 patients with chronic sensory stroke, of which 25 suffered from CPSP. As compared with reference data from healthy controls, patients with CPSP showed alterations of thermal and mechanical thresholds on the body area contralateral to their stroke (P < 0.01). Patients with sensory stroke but without CPSP (non-pain sensory stroke [NPSS] patients) exhibited similar albeit less pronounced contralesional changes. Paradoxical heat sensation (PHS) and dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA) showed higher values in CPSP, and an elevated cold detection threshold (CDT) was seen more often in CPSP than in patients with NPSS (P < 0.05). In patients with CPSP, changes in CDT, PHS, dynamic mechanical allodynia, and temporal pain summation (wind-up ratio) each correlated with the presence of pain (P < 0.05). On the homologous ipsilesional body area, both patient groups showed additional significant abnormalities as compared with the reference data, which strongly resembled the contralesional changes. In summary, our analysis reveals that CPSP is associated with impaired temperature perception and positive sensory signs, but differences between patients with CPSP and NPSS are subtle. Both patients with CPSP and NPSS show considerable QST changes on the ipsilesional body side. These results are in part paralleled by recent findings of bilaterally spread cortical atrophy in CPSP and might reflect chronic maladaptive cortical plasticity, particularly in patients with CPSP.

GLM analysis of time resolved NIRS data of motor activation during different motor tasks.

The hemodynamic response to motor activation was investigated by time-resolved NIRS in healthy subjects and patients with unilateral impairment in motor ability. Healthy subjects performed a simple and a complex finger movement task, patients a handgrip task. A General Linear Model approach (GLM) was applied during NIRS data processing. In general, compared to the integral (continuous wave signal), higher significance of activation was found for the variance signal that selectively represents changes in the deep compartment. A discussion of GLM results with respect to task complexity and difficulty is provided.