High-resolution chromoendoscopy for the diagnosis of diminutive colon polyps: implications for colon cancer screening.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A visual, nonbiopsy technique that could reliably determine the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps could greatly reduce the cost of colon cancer screening. This study was designed to report our experience using a high-resolution colonoscope combined with indigo carmine dye to diagnosis diminutive colorectal polyps. METHODS: Colonoscopy using a Fujinon EC-400 HM/HL was performed in 36 patients with polyps <10mm in diameter. Polyps from the first 12 patients (phase 1) were sprayed with 10 mL of 0.2% indigo carmine dye, and a biopsy was performed or a specimen removed and submitted for histological analysis. The morphological data were used to predict polyp histology in the subsequent 24 patients (phase 2). RESULTS: Hyperplastic polyps had a characteristic surface "pit pattern" of orderly arranged "dots" that resembled the surrounding, nonpolypoid mucosa. Adenomatous polyps had surface "grooves" or "sulci." Sensitivity and specificity of our techniques in distinguishing adenomatous from nonadenomatous colorectal polyps were 93% and 95% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution chromoendoscopy provides morphological detail of diminutive colorectal polyps that correlates well with polyp histology. If incorporated into colon cancer screening, these techniques may limit the need for biopsy and/or subsequent colonoscopy and ultimately decrease costs.

The high frequency of upper gastrointestinal pathology in patients with fecal occult blood and colon polyps.

Colon polyps are commonly detected in the workup of fecal occult blood (FOB). It is, however, unclear whether colon polyps can adequately explain FOB. Our aim was to determine the frequency of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) pathology in patients with and without UGI symptoms and with and without risk factors for UGI pathology (such as smoking, drinking alcohol, taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, or the presence of associated chronic diseases) who have colon polyps and FOB. Among our 67 study patients with colon polyps and FOB, 79% had associated UGI lesions. Presence or absence of UGI symptoms, risk factors associated with UGI lesions, and polyp characteristics such as size, location, number, and histology, did not appreciably affect this high frequency. Ulcers were the most common lesions in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. We conclude that patients with colon polyps found in the evaluation of FOB are likely to have concomitant UGI pathology, and UGI workup should be considered in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation.

One hundred thirteen patients were randomized to receive either oral sodium phosphate (Fleet Phospho-Soda), lemon-flavored castor oil (Purge), or standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (GoLYTELY) before elective colonoscopy. The study purpose was to confirm the efficacy of oral sodium phosphate and extend observations to include castor oil. Overall, patients reported that sodium phosphate and castor oil were easier to complete (p < 0.05). Scores for cleansing the entire colon as determined by endoscopists who were blinded to the cathartic agent were highest in patients receiving sodium phosphate (p < 0.02). Scores of left-colon cleansing for flexible sigmoidoscopy were equally high for the three methods. Scores for taste and symptom side effects were similar for each preparation. There were no recognized signs or symptoms of hypocalcemia in the sodium phosphate group. Because of the low cost of oral sodium phosphate combined with the lowest repeat endoscopy rate for inadequate cleansing, patient savings were projected to be $5000 per 100 patients at this center. Oral sodium phosphate is a cost-effective colonoscopy preparation that is better tolerated and more effective than the polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution or castor oil.

The high mortality of gastrointestinal bleeding in HIV-seropositive patients: a multivariate analysis of risk factors and warning signs of mortality in 50 consecutive patients.

The patterns of which human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive patients underwent endoscopy for gastrointestinal bleeding at a university hospital were analyzed in 50 consecutive patients admitted from July 1984 through December 1989, and criteria were developed as to which patients are most likely to benefit from endoscopy. Analyzed patient data included the medical records, follow-up until July 1990 obtained by telephone questionnaire in 46 patients, and autopsy findings in the 11 patients undergoing autopsy. Thirty-seven percent of the patients did not undergo endoscopic or radiographic examinations indicated to determine the cause of bleeding. The adequacy of the evaluation was not related to race, intravenous drug abuse, homosexuality, hemophilia, the diagnosis of known AIDS, or being a public patient. In 21 of the 28 cases in which the cause of bleeding was determined, the diagnosed lesions had a specific, effective therapy. The mortality from gastrointestinal bleeding was 39.0%, compared with 8.3% in 48 controls without known HIV infection (p less than 0.001 by Fisher's exact test, odds ratio = 7.0, odds ratio confidence interval = 5.0-9.7). Statistically significant independent predictors of mortality included leukocytosis, concurrent major diseases, intravenous drug abuse, transfusion of 5 or more units of packed erythrocytes, and the presence of a bloody nasogastric aspirate or hematemesis (Wilk's lambda statistic = 0.369, p less than 0.0001). In particular, 10 of 11 patients (89%) with two or more concurrent major diseases died, whereas only three of 24 patients (13%) with no concurrent diseases died during the hospitalization. We conclude a large percentage of HIV-seropositive patients did not undergo a diagnostic evaluation for gastrointestinal bleeding at a university hospital, and there was no discernible rational pattern as to which patients underwent endoscopy. Endoscopy is an important and indicated procedure in HIV-seropositive patients with no or one concomitant major illness. HIV-seropositive patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and two or more concomitant major illnesses have an exceedingly poor prognosis, and are less likely to benefit from invasive diagnostic tests and aggressive therapy.