RESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of bedside lung ultrasound (LUS) and chest computed tomography (CT) for the de- tection of lung lesions in patients with hematological malignancies and acute respiratory failure (ARF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 39 patients with hematological malignancies and ARF were enrolled in prospective study. The investigation of the patients included LUS, chest C, extravascular lung water index (EVLW) by transpulmonary ther- modilution, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). RESULTS: There was correlation between the total number of B-lines and E VLW index (r = 0,40; p <0,05). The sensitivity, specificity of LUS in the total number of B-lines were 78% and 70%, respectively (and A UC 0,7). There were correla- tions between A-lines and volume of hyperaerated lung regions (r = 0,40; p <0,05) and normally ventilated (r = 0,60; p = 0,001) regions, between A-lines and the total lung volume (r = 0,50; p = 0,001), between A-lines and volume of poorlyventilated lung regions (r = -0,40; p = 0,001), A-lines and weight of normally ventilated lung regions (r = 0,50; p = 0,001), A-lines and weight of poorly ventilated regions (r = -0,35; p <0,05), total count of B-lines and volume of poorly ventilated lung regions (r = 0,4; p = 0,001), between total count of B-lines and weight poorly ventilated lung regions (r = 0,4; p = 0,001). There were associations between USfeathers and etiology ofpneumonia. A-lines were often detected in patients with gram-negative bacterial pneumonia and fungal pneumonia more than in patients with pneu- mocystis pneumonia. B-lines were detected often in patients with Pneumocystis pneumonia. Sensitivity ofLUS pleural effusion assessment was 95%, specificity was 90%. CONCLUSION: LUS is high sensitivity and specificity method to detect lung lesions in patients with ARF.
