RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this systematic review is to assess the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of bipolar disorder (BD) patients that characterize differences in terms of structural, functional, and effective connectivity between the patients with BD, patients with other psychiatric disorders and healthy controls as possible biomarkers for diagnosing the disorder using neuroimaging. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), guidelines a systematic search for recent (since 2015) original studies on connectivity in bipolar disorder was conducted in PUBMED and SCOPUS. RESULTS: A total of 60 studies were included in this systematic review: 20 of the structural connectivity, 33 of the functional connectivity, and only 7 of the studies focused on effective connectivity complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. DISCUSSION: Despite the great heterogeneity in the findings, there are several trends that emerge. In structural connectivity studies, the main abnormalities in bipolar disorder patients were in the frontal gyrus, anterior, as well as posterior cingulate cortex and differences in emotion and reward-related networks. Cerebellum (vermis) to cerebrum functional connectivity was found to be the most common finding in BD. Moreover, prefrontal cortex and amygdala connectivity as part of the rich-club hubs were often reported to be disrupted. The most common findings based on effective connectivity were alterations in salience network, default mode network and executive control network. Although more studies with larger sample sizes are needed to ascertain altered brain connectivity as diagnostic biomarker, there is a perspective that the method could be used as a single marker of diagnosis in the future, and the process of adoption could be accelerated by using approaches such as semiunsupervised machine learning.
RESUMO
Determining the scope of a newborn screening program is a challenging health policy issue. Our study aimed to explore the attitudes of specialists in pediatrics, neonatology, medical genetics, and biochemistry regarding the prospects for expanding the panel of diseases for universal newborn screening in Bulgaria. We conducted an online survey in March-May 2022. The questionnaire listed 35 disorders that could potentially be included in the Bulgarian panel for universal newborn screening. If endorsing a specific condition, participants had to justify their position by judging its performance against the ten principles of Wilson and Jungner. We found a high degree of knowledge about the current universal newborn screening program in Bulgaria. An overwhelming majority (97.4%) supported the expansion of the panel to include more conditions. Four disorders obtained more than 50% approval for inclusion: cystic fibrosis (87.0%), thalassemia (72.7%), spinal muscular atrophy (65.6%), and classical galactosemia (59.1%). The perception of the condition as an important health problem was the most significant factor in this support. The costs of diagnosis and treatment appeared to be the main source of concern. We recommend country-specific economic evaluations and research on the views of other stakeholders, including the government, payers, and patient organizations, to better understand and manage the complex nature of newborn screening policymaking.