Ocular motility and diplopia measurements following orbital floor fracture repair.

PURPOSE: Diplopia and ocular motility restriction following orbital fracture repair are common complications. The reported rates in the literature differ greatly, in part due to varying definitions of diplopia and methods of measurement. The purpose of this study is to describe a practical and efficient in-office method for examining ocular motility and diplopia in orbital trauma patients and to report the outcomes in a series of patients who underwent orbital floor fracture repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review from 2012 to 2019 was conducted in patients who underwent isolated orbital floor fracture repair within 3 weeks of trauma. All patients had examinations to assess extraocular motility and subjective diplopia using the described techniques. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients underwent orbital floor fracture repair and had adequate follow-up. Preoperatively, 71 (76%) patients had some restriction in motility and 59 (63%) patients complained of diplopia. Postoperatively, only 1 patient (1.09%) had clinically significant diplopia. Five (5.4%) additional patients demonstrated mild restriction in supraduction upon detailed ophthalmic examination that was not discovered upon subjective history. No patients had worsening of diplopia or motility after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Diplopia and motility restriction following orbital fracture repair can be a persistent problem for some patients. It is important to perform a careful ophthalmic examination to detect motility deficits and diplopia that can be significant to the patient. The true rate of restriction and diplopia may be higher using detailed ophthalmic diagnostic techniques compared to subjective patient history.

Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of Prolapsed Orbital Fat Resection During Involutional Entropion Repair.

PURPOSE: To assess the recurrence rate of involutional entropion in patients treated with a combined approach including a modified Bick procedure, excision of preseptal orbicularis muscle, and conservative resection of prolapsed orbital fat. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing repair of involutional entropion with the combined procedure including orbital fat resection and a second group with standard entropion repair without orbital fat resection was performed. Only patients with follow-up greater than 6 months were included in the study. RESULTS: Seventy eyelids of 54 patients met all inclusion criteria for the combined procedure group over a 9-year period from 2008 to 2016. Average follow-up was 46.9 months. There was a documented recurrence of entropion in 1 eyelid during the follow-up period (1.4%). The remaining 69 cases had successful subjective and objective results without need for any additional procedures. In the group undergoing entropion repair without fat resection, 22 eyelids of 19 patients had the required follow-up period with a recurrence rate of 4.5% (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The authors demonstrate good surgical success with a combined approach of a modified Bick procedure, preseptal orbicularis excision, and conservative orbital fat resection. Conservative fat resection during entropion repair was found to be safe, and the combined procedure was found to be effective with a rate of recurrent entropion of 1.4% on extended follow-up.The authors propose that orbital fat prolapse contributes to the mechanics of involutional entropion and that conservative orbital fat resection during surgical repair of entropion can be done safely, resulting in low recurrence rates.

Single Suture Müeller Muscle Conjunctival Resection (ssMMCR): A Modified Technique for Ptosis Repair.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy in degree of ptosis correction achieved by single suture Müeller muscle conjunctival resection (ssMMCR) when compared with that of traditional MMCR. METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis of patients who underwent either ssMMCR or traditional MMCR at 2 institutions. Single suture MMCR was performed after using a ptosis clamp to imbricate conjunctiva and Müeller muscle. Margin-to-reflex distance 1 was measured pre- and postoperatively, and the change in margin-to-reflex distance 1 was analyzed for both groups. Patients were monitored in follow up for postoperative complications including lagophthalmos, corneal abrasions, and change in visual acuity. Statistical analysis was performed using the Microsoft Excel and Stata software programs. RESULTS: Twenty-seven and 30 patients underwent single suture and traditional MMCR, respectively. The ssMMCR and MMCR groups were followed postoperatively for approximately 4.2 and 9.7 months, respectively and the average margin-to-reflex distance 1 increased by 2.93 mm and 2.81 mm, respectively. Notably, there was no statistically significant difference in the means identified by t test. Of the 94 eyelid surgeries evaluated, 1 ssMMCR and 3 MMCR eyelids required further surgical revision for persistent ptosis, and 1 ssMMCR developed a transient corneal epithelial abrasion. Surgical revisions were rare with both procedures, and patient satisfaction was high. CONCLUSIONS: Single suture MMCR is an efficient and effective method for ptosis repair. It results in comparable outcomes including elevation in margin-to-reflex distance 1, safety profile, and reoperation rates, when compared with traditional MMCR.