The efficacy and safety of low dialysate sodium levels for patients with maintenance haemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIM: Fluid overload and hypertension frequently results in cardiovascular disease, which is one of the leading causes of death in dialysis patients. It is plausible that low dialysate [Na+] may decrease total body sodium content, thereby reducing fluid overload and hypertension, and ultimately reducing cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using a low (<138 mM) dialysate [Na+] for maintenance haemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science up to August 22, 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), both parallel and cross-over, of low (<138 mM) versus neutral (138-140 mM) or high (>140 mM) dialysate [Na+] for maintenance HD patients were included. Mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values were estimated to compare the outcomes. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed trial quality independently. All statistical analyses were performed using the standard statistical procedures of RevMan 5.2. RESULTS: 12 Randomised controlled trials with 390 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Of these studies, three studies were parallel group, and the remaining nine were crossover. Compared to neutral or high dialysate [Na+], low dialysate [Na+] reduced dialysis mean arterial pressure (MAP) with a pooled MD of -3.38 mmHg (95% CI -4.57 to -2.19; P < 0.00001), reduced interdialytic weight gain with a pooled MD of -0.35 kg (95% CI -0.51 to -0.18; P < 0.0001), reduced predialysis serum [Na+] with a pooled MD of -2.62 mM (95% CI -3.59 to -1.66; P < 0.00001). In contrast, low dialysate [Na+] increased intradialytic hypotension events with a pooled RR of 1.54 (95% CI 1.16 to 2.05; P = 0.003), increased the incidence of intradialytic cramps with a pooled RR of 1.77 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.73; P = 0.01). However, no difference was found between lower and higher dialysate [Na+] in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Though our pooled result indicated that low dialysate [Na+] reduced MAP, interdialytic weight gain and predialysis serum [Na+] significantly, it also indicated that low dialysate [Na+] could increase the incidence of intradialytic hypotension and intradialytic cramps events. Considering the contradiction in efficacy and safety of low dialysate [Na+] in our analysis, future larger and up-to-date definitive studies are needed to evaluate the medium to long-term effects of low sodium levels in dialysis fluid, and better inform clinical practice.

A comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol versus other vitamin D receptor activators in patients undergoing hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 randomized controlled trials.

Paricalcitol, a new vitamin D receptor activator (VDRA), is reported to be more effective than other VDRAs in reducing calcium and phosphorus levels in patients undergoing hemodialysis. However, the efficacy and safety of paricalcitol remain controversial. This analysis compares paricalcitol with other VDRAs in patients undergoing hemodialysis. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CNKI up to April 22, 2019. Standardized mean difference (SMD), risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values were estimated to compare the outcomes of the groups. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed trial quality independently. All statistical analyses were performed using the standard statistical procedures of RevMan 5.2 and Stata 12.0. Fifteen studies (N = 110,544) were included in this meta-analysis. Of these studies, 11 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 were non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSIs). Patients receiving paricalcitol experienced better overall survival (OS) than patients receiving other VDRAs, with a pooled hazard ratio of 0.86 (95% CI 0.80-0.91; P < 0.00001). Intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels were significantly reduced in the paricalcitol group compared to the group receiving other VDRAs, with a pooled SMD of -0.53 (95% CI -0.89- -0.16; P = 0.004). There was a significant increase in serum calcium levels from baseline in the paricalcitol group compared to the other VDRAs group when limiting the analysis to RCTs, with a pooled SMD of 2.14 (95% CI 0.90-3.38; P = 0.0007). Changes in serum calcium levels were significantly lower in the paricalcitol group when the analysis was limited to NRSIs, with a pooled SMD of -0.85 (95% CI -1.34--0.35; P = 0.0008). The NSRI analysis also showed a significant reduction in serum phosphorus levels in the paricalcitol group, with a pooled SMD of -0.57 (95% CI -1.00--0.13; P = 0.01). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, or adverse events. Generally, paricalcitol seems superior to other VDRAs in reducing mortality and iPTH levels in patients undergoing hemodialysis. However, the comparative effectiveness of paricalcitol in reducing serum calcium and phosphorus levels needs further exploration. No significant difference was found in the rate of adverse events.

Multilocus sequence typing of Candida albicans isolates from the oral cavities of patients undergoing haemodialysis.

This study evaluates the prevalence, diversity, and genetic profiles of Candida albicans isolates recovered from the oral cavities of haemodialysis patients. Oral swab samples were obtained from haemodialysis patients (n = 126) and healthy control subjects (n = 233) and Candida species were characterised. There was no significant difference between the haemodialysis and control groups in the prevalence of yeast carriers (23.6% vs. 31.0%, respectively) or C. albicans carriers (19.8% vs. 21.0%, respectively). C. albicans was the most populous species in both cohorts, followed by C. parapsilosis. C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata were more prevalent in the haemodialysis group than in the control group (C. parapsilosis 5.6% vs. 0.9% and C. glabrata 3.2% vs. 0.4%, respectively; P < 0.05). C. albicans isolates were analysed by multilocus sequence typing and the results were used to construct a phylogenetic tree. Most haemodialysis isolates were placed into Clade 4 (20.0%) and Clade 19 (16.0%) and most control isolates into Clade 8 (17%) and Clade 4 (14.9%). Differences in the strain abundance in each clade were not statistically significant between the two groups. Moreover, there was no significant association between the health status or diagnosis and either the sequence types or clades.