Use of Dried Blood Spot Specimens to Monitor Patients with Inherited Metabolic Disorders.

Monitoring of patients with inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs) using dried blood spot (DBS) specimens has been routinely used since the inception of newborn screening (NBS) for phenylketonuria in the 1960s. The introduction of flow injection analysis tandem mass spectrometry (FIA-MS/MS) in the 1990s facilitated the expansion of NBS for IMDs. This has led to increased identification of patients who require biochemical monitoring. Monitoring of IMD patients using DBS specimens is widely favoured due to the convenience of collecting blood from a finger prick onto filter paper devices in the patient's home, which can then be mailed directly to the laboratory. Ideally, analytical methodologies with a short analysis time and high sample throughput are required to enable results to be communicated to patients in a timely manner, allowing prompt therapy adjustment. The development of ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC-MS/MS), means that metabolic laboratories now have the capability to routinely analyse DBS specimens with superior specificity and sensitivity. This advancement in analytical technology has led to the development of numerous assays to detect analytes at low concentrations (pmol/L) in DBS specimens that can be used to monitor IMD patients. In this review, we discuss the pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical variables that may affect the final test result obtained using DBS specimens used for monitoring of patients with an IMD.

Newborn screening for sickle cell disorders using tandem mass spectrometry: three years' experience of using a protocol to detect only the disease states.

Background Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) has recently become an alternative method for the newborn screening of sickle cell disorders (SCD), as it is able to detect haemoglobin (Hb) peptides following digestion of bloodspots with trypsin. Using the SpOtOn Diagnostics Reagent Kit, we previously developed a screening protocol to detect only the disease states of SCD, using action values based on the ratio between the variant Hb peptide to wild-type peptide abundances for the HbS, C, DPunjab, OArab, E and Lepore peptides. Methods Action values using the ratios between the wild type HbA (ßT1-3) peptides and the foetal Hb (γT2) peptide were developed to identify bloodspot samples from premature and transfused infants. An evaluation was undertaken to assess the transferability of the action values onto an additional MS/MS instrument. We report here our experience using this MS/MS protocol. Results During a three-year period, we screened 100,456 babies and identified 10 SCD cases (1 HbS/HPFH, 5 HbS/S and 4 HbS/C) and a case of HbE/ß-thalassaemia that was identified as a by-product. The Hb variant to wild-type peptide ratio action values were transferable to a second MS/MS instrument. Our protocol prevented the identification of an estimated 810 carrier infants. Gestational age-related action values for HbA to HbF peptide ratios were required to minimize the number of samples referred for second-line testing to exclude ß-thalassaemia. Conclusion MS/MS is a robust alternative screening technology for SCD; in addition, it also optimizes the use of equipment and expertise that currently exist in newborn screening laboratories.

Effect of Dried Blood Spot Quality on Newborn Screening Analyte Concentrations and Recommendations for Minimum Acceptance Criteria for Sample Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The analysis of dried blood spots has been used routinely for newborn screening since the early 1970s, and the number of disorders screened has expanded substantially in recent years. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding minimum blood spot quality acceptance criteria for sample analysis. METHODS: Blood pools were spiked with phenylalanine, tyrosine, leucine, methionine, octanoylcarnitine, decanoylcarnitine, isovalerylcarnitine, glutarylcarnitine, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and immunoreactive trypsinogen to concentrations at the analytical cutoffs used in UK screening protocols. We evaluated the effect of sample volume applied to the card (10, 20, 50, 75, and 100 µL), punch location (central vs peripheral), and sample quality (double layering, applying blood to both sides of the filter paper, multispotting, applying insufficient sample, and compressing the sample after application). RESULTS: Compression of blood spots produced significantly lower results (14%-44%) for all analytes measured (P < 0.001). Smaller blood spots produced significantly lower results (15%-24% for 10-µL vs 50-µL sample size) for all analytes at all concentrations measured (P < 0.001). Results obtained from peripheral punches were higher than those from a central punch, although this did not reach statistical significance for all analytes. Insufficient and multispotted samples demonstrated heterogeneous results. CONCLUSIONS: All blood spots containing ≤20 µL (blood spot diameter <8 mm), those in which blood has not fully penetrated the filter paper, and all samples with evidence of compression should be rejected, since there is a risk of producing false-negative results.