Arteriovenous malformation of the uterus.

We present the case of a 54-year-old woman with intermittent right-sided abdominal pain. Ultrasound scans showed an unusual vascular appearance of the uterus with a thinned endometrium. Contrast CT led to a strong suspicion of an arteriovenous malformation of the uterus. The patient was successfully treated with a hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy.

Androgen-secreting tumour in a transposed ovary.

The case of an androgen-secreting tumour in the transposed ovary of a 52-year-old woman is presented. She had undergone radical hysterectomy, pelvic and para-aortic node dissection for stage 1 b1 grade 3 cervical carcinoma and transposition of right ovary in view of possible radiotherapy. She subsequently had chemoradiotherapy for tumour recurrence. There was no definite correlation between her previous treatment and the tumour causation. It was therefore surmised that this was an incidental occurrence rather than a case of iatrogenic causation.

Treatment of symptomatic distal common bile duct stenosis secondary to chronic pancreatitis: comparison of single vs. multiple simultaneous stents.

BACKGROUND: Common bile duct stenosis occurs in up to 30% of patients with chronic pancreatitis. Most such stenoses are found incidentally during ERCP, but others manifest as obstructive jaundice, recurrent cholangitis, secondary biliary cirrhosis, or choledocholithiasis. Operative drainage has been the main treatment despite the potentially high morbidity in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopic biliary drainage with a single stent has been successful in the short term. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term benefit of a single stent vs. multiple simultaneous stents for treatment of patients with chronic pancreatitis and symptoms because of distal common bile duct stenosis. METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients with chronic pancreatitis and common bile duct stenosis underwent endoscopic placement of multiple simultaneous stents and were followed prospectively (Group II). Results were compared with a group of 34 patients in whom a single stent was placed before the start of the present study (Group I). All 46 patients (35 men, 11 women; age range 30-71 years) had chronic pancreatitis and common bile duct stenosis, and presented with symptoms indicative of obstruction (abdominal pain, jaundice, elevated biochemical tests of liver function, acute pancreatitis, cholangitis). The 34 patients in Group I had single stent (10F, 7-9 cm) placement, with exchange at 3 to 6 month intervals (1-4 exchanges) over a mean of 21 months. The 12 patients in Group II underwent placement of multiple simultaneous stents at 3-month intervals (single 10F stents added sequentially) over a mean of 14 months. Mean follow-up was 4.2 years in Group I and 3.9 years for Group II. Factors assessed included symptoms, biochemical tests of liver function, diameter of common bile duct stenosis, and complications. RESULTS: In Group I, (34 patients), a total of 162 single stent placement/exchanges were performed (mean 5/patient). In Group II (12 consecutive patients), 8 patients had 4 (10F) stents placed simultaneously, and 4 patients had 5 (10F) stents. At the end of the treatment period, near normalization of biochemical tests of liver function was observed for all patients in Group II, whereas only marginal benefit was noted for patients in Group I. Four patients in Group I had recurrent cholangitis (6 episodes), whereas no patient in Group II had post-procedure cholangitis. In the 12 patients with multiple stents, distal common bile duct stenosis diameter increased from a mean of 1.0 mm to 3.0 mm after treatment; no change in diameter was noted in patients treated with a single stent. CONCLUSIONS: Distal common bile duct stenosis secondary to chronic pancreatitis can be treated long term by stent placement. Multiple, simultaneous stents appear to be superior to single stent placement and may provide good long-term benefit. The former resulted in near normalization of biochemical tests of liver function and an increase in distal common bile duct diameter. Multiple stent placement may obviate the need for surgical diversion procedures.

Role of osmolality of contrast media in the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a metanalysis.

The role of osmolality of contrast media (CM) in the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is debated. We therefore performed a metanalysis to determine whether osmolality affects the incidence of PEP. A literature search of English-language studies was performed using computerized databases and manual searching of abstracts and article bibliographies. Randomized controlled trials comparing the incidence of PEP associated with high- and low-osmolality contrast media (HOCM, LOCM) were considered. The outcome assessed was clinical pancreatitis as evidenced by both elevation of pancreatic enzymes and pain. Data were analyzed using logistic regression with terms for study and osmolality. Fisher's exact test was done to compare PEP rates. Homogeneity between studies was indicated by the nonsignificance of the study effect in the logistic regression model. Logistic regression also indicated no difference in PEP rates between LOCM and HOCM (P = 0.399). Comparison of PEP rates in both groups using Fisher's exact test did not indicate a difference in any individual study (all P values > 0.05). Due to the large variation of study sample sizes, we repeated the analysis by creating three study groups. The effect of osmolality was invariant to how the data were combined. The results of this metanalysis indicate that there is no significant difference between HOCM and LOCM with respect to clinical PEP.

A descriptive analysis of EUS-FNA for mediastinal lymphadenopathy: an emphasis on clinical impact and false negative results.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been shown to accurately diagnose mediastinal lymph node pathology. We investigated the clinical impact of EUS-FNA in the management of patients with mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and determined the nature and clinical consequences of false negative results. METHODS: We analyzed a cohort of patients who were found to have mediastinal lymph nodes by EUS and underwent FNA. The diagnostic standard included FNA cytology, histopathology, and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty EUS-FNAs of mediastinal lymph nodes were performed on 59 patients (mean age 61 years old, 74.5% men) over a 24-month period. Prior to EUS, 20 (34%) patients had known malignancy. The most frequent indication for EUS was failed diagnosis by bronchoscopy (54%). EUS-FNA of lymph nodes showed malignant cells in 38%. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA was 84%. Among the 47 patients who were available for follow-up, EUS-FNA provided new information by changing the clinical diagnosis, and subsequently changed the management in 18 (38%) patients. The false negative rate was 20% (95% exact CI, 8.4-31.6%). Two of the 7 false negative cases received empiric chemoradiation without tissue diagnosis, and 4 received palliative treatment for advanced malignancy. CONCLUSION: The most common indication for EUS-FNA of the mediastinum in our institution is nondiagnostic transbronchial FNA. EUS-FNA is a valuable diagnostic method for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes and affecting management. False negative results do not appear to delay appropriate treatment or adversely affect clinical outcome.

Is a 15-minute collection of duodenal secretions after secretin stimulation sufficient to diagnose chronic pancreatitis?

BACKGROUND: Standard hormonal stimulation tests of pancreatic function use a 60- to 90-minute collection of pancreatic secretions. A shorter 15-minute collection time has been proposed to increase the feasibility of the secretin stimulation test. The accuracy of this brief collection period for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis has not been well defined. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the accuracy of a 15-minute collection period by comparing the results of 633 complete standard secretin tests (60 minutes) to the result using only the first 15-minute collection of the same test. The gold standard used for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis was the final result of the complete 60-minute secretin stimulation test. RESULTS: The specificity of the first 15-minute collection was 34.6% (95% CI, 30.03%-39.21%). The positive predictive value was 44.9% (95% CI, 40.5%-49.3%). The accuracy was 57.3% (95% CI, 53.01% 59.34%). CONCLUSIONS: Using only the first 15-minute collection period in a standard 60-minute secretin test is inaccurate in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.