RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Unplanned extubations (UEs) in injured patients are potentially fatal, but etiology and patient characteristics are not well described. We have been prospectively characterizing the etiology of UEs after we identified a high rate of UEs and implemented an educational program to address it. This period of monitoring included the years of the COVID-19 pandemic that produced high rates of workforce turnover in many hospitals, dramatically affecting nursing and respiratory therapy services. We hypothesized that frequency of UEs would depend on the etiology and that the workforce changes produced by the COVID-19 pandemic would increase UEs. METHODS: This study was a prospective tracking and retrospective review of trauma registry and performance improvement data from 2012-2021. RESULTS: UE subjects were younger, were more frequently male, were diagnosed more frequently with pneumonia (38% vs 27%), and had longer hospital (19 d vs 15 d) and ICU length of stay (LOS) (12 d vs 10 d) (all P < .05). Most UEs were due to patient factors (self-extubation) that decreased after education, while UEs from other etiologies (mechanical, provider) were stable. Subjects with UEs from mechanical or provider etiologies had longer ICU LOS, higher mortality, and were less likely to be discharged home. The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with more total patient admissions and more days of ventilator use, but the rate of UEs was not changed. CONCLUSIONS: UEs were decreased by education with ongoing tracking, and UEs from patient factors were associated with better outcome than other etiologies. Workforce changes produced by the COVID-19 pandemic did not change the rate of UEs.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hemorrhage is the most common cause of early death in trauma patients. Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) have been designed to accelerate the release of blood products but can result in waste if activated inappropriately. The Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) score has become a widely accepted score for MTP activation. In this study, we compared the use of ABC criteria to physician judgment in MTP activation. METHODS: Adult trauma patients treated at University of Louisville Trauma Center from January 2016 to December 2016 were studied. Activation via ABC score was assessed retrospectively from emergency department (ED) data. Location, timing of activation, percent of patients using more than 5 units of packed red blood cells, amount of product waste, factors associated with early activation by physicians, and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: Three thousand four hundred twenty-one patients were included in this study. Only 33% of the patients who would have had MTP activation based on the ABC criteria used more than 5 units of blood products within 24 hours of admission compared with 65% of the patients in whom clinical judgment was used. Seventy-six percent of all MTP activations from clinical judgment would have been activated by the ABC criteria in the ED. Fifty-five percent of all MTP activations via clinical judgment were activated in the operating room and 41% in the ED. Eighty-one percent of activations that occurred in the operating room by physician judgment could have been activated earlier in the ED if the ABC criteria had been used. However, ABC score can lead to higher potential fresh frozen plasma waste (588 vs. 84 units) compared with physician judgment. CONCLUSIONS: The ABC criteria overestimate need for massive transfusion and can lead to increased product waste compared with physician judgment, but its use leads to earlier MTP activation. Criteria to trigger MT activation should rely on both clinical acumen and validated prediction tools. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, level III.
