Single versus multiple arterial coronary artery bypass grafting in men and women: results from Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this multicenter study aimed to investigate the impact of sex on long-term survival among patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using multiple arterial grafting (MAG) or a single artery with saphenous vein grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures database. This study included 81 136 patients who underwent CABG for multivessel disease between January 2012 and December 2020 (22.9 were women and 77.1% were men). MAG was performed in 8.3 and 11.7% of female and male patients, respectively. A 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matching was performed. Long-term mortality was compared between matched groups of men and women. Subgroup analyses of patients aged <70 and ≥70 years, with an ejection fraction (EF) >40% and ≤40%, and with and without diabetes, obesity, peripheral artery disease (PAD), or chronic lung disease (CLD) were performed separately in women and men. RESULTS: MAG was associated with lower long-term mortality than saphenous vein grafts in 1528 PS-matched female pairs [hazard ratio (HR): 0.74; 95% CI: 0.59-0.92; P =0.007) and 7283 PS-matched male pairs (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.72-0.88; P <0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed the results among female patients aged <70 years, with diabetes and EF >40%, and without PAD or CLD, and of male patients aged <70 and ≥70 years; with EF >40%; with or without diabetes, obesity, or PAD; and without CLD. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing CABG, MAG was associated with significantly improved survival in both sexes. The long-term benefits of MAG observed across subgroups of men and women support the consideration of a multiarterial revascularization strategy for a broader spectrum of patients.

Del Nido vs. Cold Blood Cardioplegia for High-Risk Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Reduced Ventricular Function.

INTRODUCTION: The evidence for using del Nido cardioplegia protocol in high-risk patients with reduced ejection fraction undergoing isolated coronary surgery is insufficient. METHODS: The institutional database was searched for isolated coronary bypass procedures. Patients with ejection fraction < 40% were selected. Propensity matching (age, sex, infarction, number of grafts) was used to pair del Nido (Group 1) and cold blood (Group 2) cardioplegia patients. Investigation of biomarker release, changes in ejection fraction, mortality, stroke, perioperative myocardial infarction, composite endpoint (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events), and other perioperative parameters was performed. RESULTS: Matching allowed the selection of 45 patient pairs. No differences were noted at baseline. After cross-clamp release, spontaneous sinus rhythm return was observed more frequently in Group 1 (80% vs. 48.9%; P=0.003). Troponin values were similar in both groups 12 and 36 hours after surgery, as well as creatine kinase at 12 hours. A trend favored Group 1 in creatine kinase release at 36 hours (median 4.9; interquartile range 3.8-9.6 ng/mL vs. 7.3; 4.5-17.5 ng/mL; P=0.085). Perioperative mortality, rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, or major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were similar. No difference in postoperative ejection fraction was noted (median 35.0%; interquartile range 32.0-38.0% vs. 35.0%; 32.0-40.0%; P=0.381). There was a trend for lower atrial fibrillation rate in Group 1 (6.7% vs. 17.8%; P=0.051). CONCLUSION: The findings indicate that del Nido cardioplegia provides satisfactory protection in patients with reduced ejection fraction undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Further prospective trials are required.

Del Nido vs. Cold Blood Cardioplegia for High-Risk Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Reduced Ventricular Function

ABSTRACT Introduction: The evidence for using del Nido cardioplegia protocol in high-risk patients with reduced ejection fraction undergoing isolated coronary surgery is insufficient. Methods: The institutional database was searched for isolated coronary bypass procedures. Patients with ejection fraction < 40% were selected. Propensity matching (age, sex, infarction, number of grafts) was used to pair del Nido (Group 1) and cold blood (Group 2) cardioplegia patients. Investigation of biomarker release, changes in ejection fraction, mortality, stroke, perioperative myocardial infarction, composite endpoint (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events), and other perioperative parameters was performed. Results: Matching allowed the selection of 45 patient pairs. No differences were noted at baseline. After cross-clamp release, spontaneous sinus rhythm return was observed more frequently in Group 1 (80% vs. 48.9%; P=0.003). Troponin values were similar in both groups 12 and 36 hours after surgery, as well as creatine kinase at 12 hours. A trend favored Group 1 in creatine kinase release at 36 hours (median 4.9; interquartile range 3.8-9.6 ng/mL vs. 7.3; 4.5-17.5 ng/mL; P=0.085). Perioperative mortality, rates of myocardial infarction, stroke, or major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were similar. No difference in postoperative ejection fraction was noted (median 35.0%; interquartile range 32.0-38.0% vs. 35.0%; 32.0-40.0%; P=0.381). There was a trend for lower atrial fibrillation rate in Group 1 (6.7% vs. 17.8%; P=0.051). Conclusion: The findings indicate that del Nido cardioplegia provides satisfactory protection in patients with reduced ejection fraction undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Further prospective trials are required.

Determinants of Inadequate Cardioprotection in Adult Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative cardioprotection is essential for achieving satisfactory clinical outcomes in heart failure patients. It is important to understand the factors affecting perioperative cardioprotection. METHODS: The institutional database was searched for patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF, < 40%) who underwent surgery with cardioplegia-induced arrest. Patients were divided into del Nido cardioplegia (DN) and cold blood cardioplegia (CB) groups. The relationships between age, preoperative blood parameters, creatinine, cross-clamp time (CCT), extracorporeal circulation time (ECT), and postoperative troponin values at 12 hours or deterioration of EF (≥5%) were evaluated. Baseline characteristics, operative parameters, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 508 patients with reduced EF (331 DN and 177 CB). In the entire cohort, anemic patients had greater troponin values (p = 0.004) as well as in the DN group (p = 0.002). However, this was not detected in the CB group (flat regression line; p = 0.674). Patients with high leukocyte values had greater troponin release (entire cohort: p < 0.001; DN group: p < 0.001; CB group: steep regression line with p = 0.042). Longer CCT and ECT were associated with greater troponin release (entire cohort; both groups) and greater risk of fall in EF. In a direct comparison, fewer patients had significant deterioration of EF in the DN group than CB group (3.9 vs. 11.9%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of CB cardioplegia may be beneficial in anemic patients, whereas the use of DN cardioplegia may be beneficial for expected long CCT and high leukocytosis.

The impact of the coronavirus pandemic on patients hospitalized due to acute coronary syndrome.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic significantly increased mortality worldwide. However, only part of the excess mortality is related directly to the infection. Local healthcare accessibility, time to reach medical care and patients' reluctance to seek medical aid strongly affected the treatment results in many fields. The current report aims to analyze mortality and morbidity in patients who suffered from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to investigate the factors that may have a significant impact on their baseline characteristics and outcome. Multiple reports were evaluated. Most of them point to reluctance and longer time to reach medical care, longer pre-hospital delay, lower overall number of ACS admissions, greater percentage of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients and complications. Younger and less ill patients were more likely to suffer from ACS than in the pre-pandemic period. They presented with more prominent biomarker elevation. Further, the number of invasive procedures dropped significantly, which was most prominent in the field of surgical revascularization. Consequently, a higher number of adverse events and greater mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic were noted, which was valid for both patients with and without coronavirus infection. In summary, the pandemic had a great impact on overall populational mortality and morbidity, which was greatly pronounced in patients with cardiovascular disease, particularly in ACS cases. They differed in baseline characteristics, underwent different treatment and their outcome was worse as compared with the period prior to the pandemic.

Comparison of Repair vs Replacement in Calcific and Rheumatic Mitral Disease.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of repair over replacement of rheumatic or calcified mitral valve (MV) is debatable. METHODS: Patients who underwent MV repair or replacement for rheumatic or calcified MV disease between 2006 and 2020 were identified in the Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures. Patients who underwent additional procedures other than coronary artery bypass grafting or tricuspid valve surgery, as well as redo or emergency cases, were excluded. The long-term survival was verified based on National Health Fund registry data. The survival was compared between MV repair and replacement in the whole cohort and after propensity score matching. RESULTS: We included 4338 patients: 1859 (43%) with pure mitral regurgitation and 2479 (57%) with mitral stenosis. MV was repaired in 543 patients (29%) with pure regurgitation and 126 (5.1%) with stenosis (P < .001). In total, 984 (23%) patients underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting and 1358 (32%) tricuspid valve surgery. MV repair improved survival (hazard ratio 0.81; 95% CI 0.68-0.97; P = .022) in patients with no mitral stenosis, and had no effect in mitral stenosis (hazard ratio 1.17; 95% CI 0.85-1.59; P = .332). The results were confirmed in propensity-matched cohorts. The freedom from MV reoperation at 10 years was 95.5% ± 1.2% after repair and 96.0% ± 0.7% after MV replacement (P = .416) in the absence of stenosis and 91.8% ± 3.4% after repair vs 95.9% ± 0.5% after replacement in patients with mitral stenosis (P = .065). CONCLUSIONS: Repair of rheumatic/calcified mitral valve should be a preferred option in patients with no mitral stenosis, but confers no benefit if mitral stenosis is present.

Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery early after drug-eluting stent implantation due to acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The evidence on performing minimally invasive coronary artery surgery early after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is limited. AIM: The study aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of this approach. METHODS: This registry included 115 (78% male) patients treated from 2013 to 2018, who underwent non-left anterior descending (LAD) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to ACS with contemporary DES implantation (39% diagnosed with myocardial infarction at baseline), followed by endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass (EACAB) surgery within 180 days, after temporary P2Y12 inhibitor discontinuation. Primary composite endpoint of MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events), defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular incident, and repeat revascularization was evaluated in long-term follow-up. The follow-up was collected via a telephone survey and in line with National Registry for Cardiac Surgery Procedures. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time interval separating both procedures was 100.0 (62.0-136.0) days. Median (IQR) follow-up duration was 1338.5 (753.0-2093.0) days and was completed for all patients with regard to mortality. Eight patients (7%) died; 2 (1.7%) had a stroke; 6 (5.2%) suffered from MI, and 12 (10.4%) required repeat revascularization. Overall, the incidence of MACCE was 20 (17.4%). CONCLUSIONS: EACAB is a safe and feasible method of LAD revascularization in patients who received DES for ACS within 180 days before surgery despite early dual antiplatelet therapy discontinuation. The adverse event rate is low and acceptable.

Del Nido versus cold blood cardioplegia in adult patients with impaired ejection fraction undergoing valvular and complex heart surgery.

BACKGROUND: There is sparse evidence on the efficacy of del Nido cardioplegia in high-risk patients with reduced ejection fraction undergoing valvular or complex heart surgery, and further investigation is required. METHODS: An institutional registry was searched for patients who underwent valvular or complex heart surgery and had an ejection fraction <40%. Subjects who received del Nido cardioplegia (DNC) and cold blood cardioplegia (CBC) were selected. Propensity matching was performed with age, gender, and number of conducted procedures as matching criteria. A comparative analysis was performed on primary endpoints of the troponin rise and changes in ejection fraction (EF). A composite endpoint of a troponin rise of ≥20× baseline or fall of EF≥5% was assessed in a multivariate analysis. Other perioperative complications are reported. RESULTS: One hundred patients from the DNC group were matched to the 100 patients in the CBC group. There were no differences between groups at baseline. Postoperatively, lower troponin values were observed in the DNC group at 12 hours (median; IQR: 523.2;349.1-740.4 pg/mL vs. 787.6;443.6-1689.0 pg/mL; P=0.016) and 36 hours (median; IQR: 426.1;337.2-492.1 pg/mL vs. 653.7;398.8-1737.5 pg/mL; P=0.044). Fewer patients in the DNC group had a fall in EF≥5% (7% vs. 16%; P=0.046). The multivariable analysis did not reveal a significant predictor of composite endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with impaired contractility undergoing valvular and complex procedures, the use of del Nido cardioplegia as an alternative to cold blood cardioplegia is associated with lower troponin release and improved preservation of ejection fraction.

The impact of del Nido cardioplegia solution on blood morphology parameters.

BACKGROUND: Crystalloid cardioplegic solutions are believed to reduce hemoglobin significantly and increase the transfusion rate. However, recent reports indicate that the del Nido cardioplegia may preserve blood morphology parameters. METHODS: In "The del Nido versus cold blood cardioplegia in aortic valve Replacement" trial patients undergoing aortic valve replacement were randomized into the del Nido (DN) or cold blood cardioplegia (CB) group. For the subanalysis, patients who underwent blood transfusions were excluded from the study. Red blood cell (RBC) count, hemoglobin, white blood cell (WBC) count and platelet (PLT) count were measured before the surgery, 24-, 48-, and 96 hours postoperatively. Furthermore, percental variation in first-last measure was compared in groups. In addition, indexed normalized ratio (INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were compared preoperatively and 24 hours after the surgery. RESULTS: Eighteen (24%) patients from the del Nido group and 22 (29.3%) patients from the CB group received blood product transfusions (p = 0.560) and were excluded from further analysis. As such, 57 patients remained in DN group and 53 patients remained in CB group. No difference was found in RBC, hemoglobin, WBC, and platelet count in time intervals. Percental variation in first-last measure revealed higher fall in RBC (p = 0.0024) and hemoglobin (p = 0.0028) in the CB group. No difference was shown in preoperative and 24-hour postoperative INR and aPTT. CONCLUSIONS: The del Nido cardioplegia does not decrease blood morphology parameters when compared to cold blood cardioplegia and may be used alternatively regardless of bleeding and coagulopathy risk.

One-shot cardioplegia for minimally invasive mitral valve repair-a comparison of del Nido and Bretschneider Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate solutions.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive procedures are demanding in terms of cardioprotection. In many leading centres Bretschneider HTK solution is used for mitral valve surgery. The study was designed to provide comparison of the del Nido and Bretschneider HTK protocol. METHODS: Patients who underwent minimally invasive mitral valve repair for primary mitral regurgitation and received single delivery of either del Nido (Group 1) or Bretschneider HTK cardioplegia (Group 2) were matched on basis of age, gender and length of the cross-clamp time. The groups were compared in terms of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, myocardial infarction, stroke), high sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) and creatine kinase- MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) release at 12 h and 24 h following the surgery, incidence of low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), postoperative arrhythmia, transfusions and postoperative renal function. RESULTS: Case control matching selected 38 pairs of patients. None of patients died, nor suffered from myocardial infarction or stroke. Troponin values did not differ at 12 h (median: 281.0 pg/mL vs 313.0 pg/mL; p = .38) and 24 h (median: 261.0 pg/mL vs 299.0 pg/mL; p = .54), as well as CK-MB at 12 h (median: 25.0 ng/mL vs 29.0 ng/mL; p = .31) and 24 h (median: 11.0 ng/mL versus 9.6 ng/mL; p = .46). Difference in occurrence of LCOS was insignificant (2 vs 7; 5.2% vs 18.4%; p =.15). No difference was shown in incidence of postoperative arrhythmia, transfusions and renal function. CONCLUSIONS: Del Nido cardioplegia can be used safely as an alternative for Bretschneider HTK for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Use of del Nido cardioplegia in acute coronary syndrome cases with decreased ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: There has been increasing interest in using del Nido cardioplegia in adult cardiac surgery. However, there is limited evidence for its efficacy in patients with acute coronary syndrome and reduced ejection fraction. METHODS: This study examined patients with decreased ejection fraction (EF < 40%) who were hospitalized due to acute coronary syndrome and received either del Nido (DN) or cold blood cardioplegia (CB). The patients were matched based on age, gender, myocardial infarction at baseline, and number of conducted surgical procedures. An analysis was conducted on postoperative biomarker release (high-sensitivity troponin T and isoenzyme creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB)), changes in myocardial contractility and perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: 62 pairs of patients with similar baseline characteristics were selected. 51.6% of pairs underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, while 48.4% underwent a complex procedure. Postoperative troponin values did not differ significantly at 12 h (median (IQR): 606.7 (381.4-974.8) pg/mL vs. 552 (231.8-1579.5) pg/mL; p = 0.913), nor did CK-MB (median (IQR): 24.3 (12.6-45.5) ng/mL vs. 23.7 (12.3-49.8) ng/mL; p = 0.972). The postoperative EF was similar between groups (median (IQR): 30% (30-35%) vs. 34% (30-38%); p = 0.323). No difference in perioperative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or composite endpoint was noted. In a multivariate analysis, the cardioplegia protocol did not affect biomarker release or changes in ejection fraction. The first stage of acute kidney injury was more frequent in the CB group (28.5% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Both del Nido and cold blood cardioplegia provide adequate cardioprotection in patients with acute coronary syndrome with decreased ejection fraction.

One-stage hybrid coronary revascularization for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease- Periprocedural and long-term results from the "HYBRID-COR" feasibility study.

Background: The constant growth of interest in hybrid coronary artery revascularization (HCR) is apparent. Yet, few studies report outcomes of the one-stage HCR. Consequently, the status of such procedures is not adequately supported in clinical guidelines. The aim of this study was to report the safety, feasibility, and long term-outcomes of the one-stage HCR. Methods and results: Patients were enrolled in the prospective one-stage hybrid coronary revascularization program (HYBRID-COR). They underwent a one-stage hybrid revascularization procedure while on double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with Ticagrelor: endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass grafting (EACAB) for revascularization of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery and percutaneous intervention in non-LAD arteries with contemporary drug-eluting stents. The composite primary endpoint included MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events: death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeated revascularization) in long-term observation. The study cohort consisted of 30 patients (68% male) with stable coronary artery disease (26.7%) and unstable angina (73.3%). Procedural success was 100%. No death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke were observed in the perioperative period. One patient (3.3%) required chest revision and blood transfusion due to surgical bleeding. Kidney injury was noted in two patients (6.6%). In a long-term follow-up (median; IQR: 4.25; 2.62-4.69 years), two patients (6.6%) underwent repeated revascularization and one patient (3.3%) died due to MI. The overall primary endpoint rate was 9.9%. Conclusion: One-stage hybrid revascularization, on DAPT, is a feasible, safe, and efficient way of achieving complete revascularization in selected patients. The complication rate is low and acceptable. Further randomized trials are required.

Del Nido versus Bretschneider cardioplegic solution in valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis - a case-control pilot study.

Introduction: The adequate protection provided by the del Nido cardioplegia has already been proven in trials comparing the solution with blood cardioplegia. However, evidence regarding comparison to the Bretschneider HTK solution is limited. Aim: To determine the efficacy of the del Nido cardioplegia when compared to Bretschneider HTK solution in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. Material and methods: Ten patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis using the del Nido solution (group 1) were case-control matched to patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) using the Bretschneider solution (group 2). The observation included: cardioplegia dosage, time to cardiac arrest, cross-clamp and extracorporeal circulation time, ventricular fibrillation (VF) after removing the cross-clamp, gasometry parameters, creatinine kinase (MB isoenzyme - CK-MB) at 24 and 48 h following the surgery and troponin (highsensitivity troponin T - hsTnT) at 24 and 48 h. Results: Patients were no different in terms of comorbidities. Higher incidence of VF occurred in group 2 (3 vs. 9, 30% vs. 90%; p = 0.02). Blood sodium measurements after removing the cross-clamp were significantly higher in group 1 (median 137.0 vs. 130.0; p = 0.0004). Biomarker release trended toward lower values in group 1, but not significantly (median troponin at 24 h: 223.1 pg/ml vs. 294.8 pg/ml; p = 0.4 and 48 h: 208.0 pg/ml vs. 242.5 pg/ml; p = 0.7, median CK-MB at 24 h: 16.6 ng/ml vs. 17.3 ng/ml; p = 0.6, and 48 h: 6.7 ng/ml vs. 5.08 ng/ml; p = 0.3). Peak creatinine trended towards lower values in group 2, but not significantly (1.35 mg/dl vs. 1.05 mg/dl; p = 0.09). Conclusions: Both del Nido and Bretschneider cardioplegia provide satisfactory myocardial protection. However, del Nido cardioplegia reduces the incidence of VF after declamping the aorta. Further studies are required.

Age- and gender-related differences in the del Nido cardioprotection protocol.

BACKGROUND: The evidence regarding the impact of patient's age and gender on del Nido cardioplegia cadio-protection capability in adults is strongly limited. METHODS: A group of 75 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) with del Nido cardioplegia was divided into Group 1 (male) and Group 2 (female). Creatine kinase (CK-MB isoenzyme) and high sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) values at 24 hours and 48 hours, occurrence of cardiac activity during crossclamp and ventricular fibrillation (VF) during reperfusion were compared. The impact of age on hs-TnT,CK-MB, VF during reperfusion and cardiac activity during crossclamp was investigated using regression models. RESULTS: No difference between the groups was reported in 24-hour CK-MB (median 15.57 ng/mL; IQR 12.13-22.82 ng/mL vs. 13.97; 12.09-17.147 ng/mL; P=0.168), 48-hour CK-MB (6.19; 4.22-7.71 ng/mL vs. 6.07;4.56-7.06 ng/mL; P=0.707), 24-hour hs-TnT (259.2; 172.0-376.9 pg/mL vs. 193.0; 167.8-351 pg/mL.1; P=0.339), 48-hour hs-TnT (169.1; 124.9-293.0 pg/mL vs. 159.2; 123.12-211.77 pg/mL; P=0.673), VF during reperfusion (25% vs. 18,5%; P=0.774) and cardiac activity during arrest (39.6% vs. 37.1%; p= 1.0). Values of CK-MB at 24 hours, hs-TnT at 24 hours and hs-TnT at 48 hours were not dependent on age. The CK-MB at 48 hours was dependent on age (P=0.039). Probit regression failed to reveal the impact of patients' age on postclamp VF occurrence (P=0.11) or electrical activity during arrest (P=0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Considering our study results, it can be hypothesized that the del Nido cardioplegia provides adequate myocardial protection in AVR patients regardless of age and gender.

Long­term outcomes of transcatheter self-expanding aortic valve implantations in inoperable and high surgical-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: a single-center single-valve registry.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is being increasingly used in patients with longer life expectancy. Data on long­term outcomes are still limited. AIMS: The aim of the study was to assess the clinical outcomes of patients treated with TAVI and identify baseline and procedure­related factors influencing long­term survival. METHODS: Symptomatic patients with critical aortic stenosis who were inoperable or had high surgical risk were qualified for TAVI. Between August 2012 and December 2017, 248 consecutive patients treated with self ­expanding Medtronic valve implantation at American Heart of Poland in Bielsko­Biala were prospectively enrolled. Patients were followed for 30 days after the procedure and subsequently annually. All events were classified according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium­2 (VARC­2) criteria and assessed. Survival was compared between the subgroups defined by the EuroSCORE II (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II) and with matched representatives from the general population. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) follow­up was 3.4 (2.5-4.6) years, and the longest follow­up lasted 7.8 years. A total of 92 patients (37.1%) died during the follow­up. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for cumulative mortality at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were: 11.3%, 26.8%, 42.1%, and 60.6%. Patients with EuroSCORE II greater than 6% experienced worse survival compared with those with EuroSCORE II 6% or less (P = 0.008). Patients with EuroSCORE II 6% or less had similar survival to the general population. Male sex, baseline eGFR of less than 50 ml/min/1.73 m2, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, moderate / severe paravalvular leak, absence of postdilatation, major vascular complication, and stroke at 30 days were independently associated with long­term mortality. CONCLUSIONS: TAVI with a self­expanding Medtronic valve implantation according to a consistent protocol was associated with favorable outcomes. Patients with lower EuroSCORE II scores had the same prognosis as the actuarial survival of the general population.

Long-term echocardiographic evaluation of asymptomatic patients undergoing minimally invasive valve repair for severe primary mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed severe primary mitral regurgitation (MR) may not be candidates for surgery according to clinical guidelines. AIMS: We aimed to determine whether asymptomatic patients with severe primary MR benefit from minimally invasive mitral valve repair. METHODS: This prospective registry study assessed consecutive asymptomatic patients who underwent mitral valve repair using right minithoracotomy. Left ventricular ejection fraction, end­diastolic and end­­systolic volumes, end­diastolic and end­systolic diameters, as well as left atrial (LA) area and volume were measured. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) were assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: The study included 114 patients, of whom 16 (14%) were lost to follow­up (except the endpoint of death). No deaths were reported during follow­up. A comparison of median echocardiographic parameters at baseline and 24 months revealed significant reverse remodeling: left ventricular ejection fraction, 68% vs 60% (P <0.001); end­diastolic volume, 165 cm3 vs 107.5 cm3 (P <0.001); end­systolic volume, 51 cm3 vs 43.5 cm3 (P = 0.02), end­diastolic diameter, 58 mm vs 49 mm (P <0.001); end­systolic diameter, 35 mm vs 30 mm (P <0.001); LA area, 26 cm2 vs 18 cm2 (P <0.001); and LA volume, 96 cm3 vs 49.5 cm3(P <0.001). There were 9 MACCEs (9.2%): 2 reoperations (2%), 1 hospitalization for heart failure (1%), and 6 cases of new­onset atrial fibrillation (6.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive mitral valve repair is safe and effective in asymptomatic patients with severe primary MR. It should be recommended regardless of ventricular and atrial dimensions.

The del Nido versus cold blood cardioplegia in aortic valve replacement: A randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the cardioprotective efficacy of a solution that requires only a single infusion at the start of the ischemic duration versus a solution that requires multiple infusions. METHODS: Aortic valve replacement was performed for 150 patients, who were randomized into the del Nido (DN) cardioplegia group or the cold blood (CB) cardioplegia group. The DN cardioplegia was delivered every 90 minutes and the CB cardioplegia was delivered every 20 to 30 minutes, or whenever cardiac activity was observed. The primary endpoints were electrical cardiac activity during crossclamp, ventricular fibrillation during reperfusion, and postoperative troponin and creatine kinase (CK-MB isoenzyme) at 24 and 48 hours. RESULTS: Electrical activity during crossclamp occurred in 29 (39.7%) patients in the DN group versus 34 (45.3%) patients in the CB group (adjusted P = 1.0). The number of procedures with ventricular fibrillation after removing the crossclamp was 41 (54.7%) in the CB group versus 17 (22.7%) in the DN group (adjusted P = .001; relative risk, 2.41). Troponin values appeared to be lower in the DN group (median, 223.10; interquartile range, 168.35-364.77 pg/mL vs 285.5; 196.20-419.45 pg/mL at 24 hours and 159.60; 125.42-217.20 pg/mL vs 201.60; 160.62-268.45 pg/mL at 48 hours) and CK-MB (median, 14.94; interquartile range, 12.16-20.39 ng/mL vs 17.43; 13.66-22.43 ng/mL at 24 hours and 6.19; 4.41-7.63 ng/mL vs 7.38; 4.74-10.20 ng/mL at 48 hours), but no significance was found. CONCLUSIONS: The del Nido cardioplegia protocol is an acceptable alternative for cold blood cardioplegia in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Six-year single-centre experience in minimally invasive mitral valve repair - impact of the team learning curve on in-hospital clinical outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive mitral repair is less traumatic and more acceptable for the patient than traditional surgery. However, it is a challenging procedure that requires effort from all the personnel involved. AIM: To investigate the results of the minimally invasive mitral valve repair learning curve at the institution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The indication for the surgery was severe mitral regurgitation. Patients with other valvular insufficiency, body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2, ejection fraction (EF) < 45%, aortic dilatation, reoperation, pleural adhesions, coronary artery disease requiring invasive treatment, and pregnant women were disqualified. The patients were assigned to one of three groups regarding their surgery date - group 1 (2012-2013), group 2 (2014-2015) and group 3 (2016-2017). The primary endpoints were death, myocardial infarction, stroke, an reoperation for mitral dysfunction. The investigation was performed to determine preoperative parameters (EuroSCORE, age, sex, BMI, arrhythmias, EF), intraoperative parameters (procedure, cross-clamp, extracorporeal circulation), and postoperative parameters (chest revision, transfusion, drainage, ventilation time, pleurocentesis, hospitalization time). RESULTS: There were 173 patients in total. One patient from group 1 (0.6% overall) died. No myocardial infarction or stroke was observed in any of the three groups. Chest revision count (5 vs. 1 vs. 1; p = 0.0004), total drainage (797.20 vs. 517.92 vs. 449.69; p = 0.0018) and hospitalization time (7.89 vs. 7.18 vs. 6.73; p = 0.0005) were significantly different among the groups. The ventilation time, transfusion number and pleurocentesis count did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure is safe and ensures optimal perioperative results. The number of complications is low and acceptable.