Treatment of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension with cafedrine/theodrenaline versus ephedrine during caesarean section: Results from HYPOTENS, a national, multicentre, prospective, noninterventional study.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, hypotension induced by spinal anaesthesia is commonly treated with a combination of cafedrine hydrochloride (C, 200 mg) and theodrenaline hydrochloride (T, 10 mg) in 2 ml. We compared the effectiveness of C/T with ephedrine. OBJECTIVES: The primary objectives were to assess the speed of onset and the ability to restore blood pressure without an increase in heart rate. Secondary objectives were to evaluate maternal/foetal outcomes and the number of required additional boluses or other additional measures. DESIGN: HYPOTENS was a national, multicentre, prospective, open-label, two-armed, noninterventional study comparing C/T with ephedrine in two prospectively defined cohorts. This study relates to the cohort of patients receiving spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. SETTING: German hospitals using either C/T or ephedrine in their routine clinical practice. PATIENTS: Women aged at least 18 years receiving spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. INTERVENTIONS: Bolus administration of C/T or ephedrine at the discretion of the attending anaesthesiologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Endpoints within 15 min after initial administration of C/T or ephedrine were area under the curve between the observed SBP and the minimum target SBP; and incidence of newly occurring heart rate of at least 100 beats min-1. RESULTS: Although effective blood pressure stabilisation was achieved with both treatments, this effect was faster and more pronounced with C/T (P < 0.0001). The incidence of tachycardia and changes in heart rate were higher with ephedrine (P < 0.01). Fewer additional boluses (P < 0.01) were required with C/T. Although favourable neonatal outcomes were reported in both groups, base deficit and lactate values were greater with ephedrine (P < 0.01). Physician satisfaction was higher with C/T. CONCLUSIONS: After C/T, tachycardia was not a problem, providing an advantage over ephedrine. Fewer additional boluses were required with C/T, suggesting greater effectiveness. An increased base deficit with ephedrine suggests reduced oxygen supply or increased demands in foetal circulation. TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02893241, German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00010740.

[Contra: Is Postoperative Epidural Analgesia the Gold Standard?] / CONTRA: Postoperative Epiduralanalgesie ­ der Goldstandard?

As strategy for postoperative pain therapy, epidural analgesia (EDA) is superior to systemic opiate analgesia after abdominal and thoracic surgery. In addition, EDA may significantly reduce the incidence of complications in some large operations, such as, e.g. cardiac (myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation) and pulmonary complications (pneumonia, atelectasis), and even reduce mortality. Intestinal motility can also be improved. However, these positive effects do not appear in all interventions and not to the same degree. Therefore, for benefit-risk assessment, it is important to know both the operation-specific benefits and disadvantages of EDA. In the meantime, the distinctly different complication rates of epidural bleeding and abscesses after EDA are also known for different surgical interventions. In large open abdominal interventions, open thorax operations, and especially open abdominal aortic surgeries, EDA reduces pain and complications. It should be noted that the positive effects of EDA have so far hardly been directly compared with those of intraoperative lidocaine administration.

Assessing Cognitive and Psychomotor Performance in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) generally present with chronic widespread pain, accompanied by a range of additional and non-specific symptoms, such as fatigue, disturbed sleep, and cognitive dysfunction, which tend to increase with overall severity. Previous studies have shown moderate cognitive impairment in patients with FMS, but there are few valid data explicitly assessing the relevance of these findings to everyday functions, such as driving ability. Therefore, we studied patients with FMS to assess the impact of FMS on tests that predict driving ability. METHODS: Female patients with FMS were prospectively compared to a historical control group of healthy volunteers. The test battery comprised assessments of visual orientation, concentration, attention, vigilance, motor coordination, performance under stress, and reaction time. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients were matched to 129 controls. The results indicated that the patients' psychomotor and cognitive performances were significantly non-inferior when compared to healthy controls (with 0.05% alcohol), with the exception of motor coordination. Patients and healthy controls showed an age-related decline in test performance. Correlations were smaller in patients and reversed for vigilance which was linked to a greater FMS symptom load in younger patients. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study demonstrate that, in general, the driving ability of patients with FMS was not inferior to that of healthy volunteers based on a standardized computer-based test battery. However, variables, such as younger age, depression, anxiety, fatigue, pain, and poor motor coordination, likely contribute to the subjective perception of cognitive dysfunction in FMS.

Effects of hydroxyethyl starch, gelatin and dextran on endothelium-derived relaxation in porcine coronary arteries.

BACKGROUND: In a pilot study we could show that hydroxyethyl starch (HES) induced a significant reduction of endothelium-dependent relaxation (EDR) and the endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF). In this follow-up study we investigated whether this effect of HES was dose-dependent and whether it could be replicated with other colloids like dextran (DX) and gelatin (GL). METHODS: Rings of fresh porcine coronary arteries were consecutively tested with or without HES, DX or GL (5, 10, or 20 mg/ml). Indomethacin was added in all measurements to eliminate prostacyclin effects. Prostaglandin F2α was used for contraction and bradykinin (BK, 10⁻¹° to 10⁻5 M) for inducing EDR. After blocking nitric oxide (NO) by N-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA), the experiments were repeated to assess the EDHF-mediated relaxation response to BK. RESULTS: HES induced a reduction in EDR for the BK concentrations of 10⁻8 and 10⁻7 M (n = 10; p < 0.05). After NO blockage with L-NNA, the relaxation response was reduced especially for the BK concentrations of 10⁻6 and 10⁻5 M (p < 0.05). GL showed a reduction in EDR with or without NO blockage with L-NNA especially for the BK concentrations of 10⁻6 and 10⁻5 M (n = 14; p < 0.05). DX induced a significant reduction in EDR for the BK concentrations of 10⁻7 and 10⁻6 M (n = 12; p < 0.05). After NO blockage with L-NNA, the relaxation response was reduced especially for the BK concentrations of 10⁻6 and 10⁻5 M (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: For clinically relevant concentrations of HES, DX and GL a significant reduction in both NO-induced and NO-/prostacyclin-independent EDR can be found in epicardial coronary arteries of the pig.

Chronic pain and disability after pelvic and acetabular fractures--assessment with the Mainz Pain Staging System.

BACKGROUND: Chronic posttraumatic pelvic pain (PPP) after pelvic ring fractures impacts negatively on quality of life issues. This study aimed to more clearly identify and quantify the problem. METHODS: For this cross-sectional study, patients were examined 52 (median) months after pelvic fractures. The following parameters were measured: pain chronicity (Mainz Pain Staging System [MPSS]), pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, 0-10), pelvic fracture outcome scores (Majeed, Pohlemann, and Bürk), pain severity (Chronic Pain Grading Questionnaire), pain-related interference with activities of daily living (Chronic Pain Grading Questionnaire), low back pain-related disability (Oswestry score), neuropathic pain (painDETECT), physical functioning (Short Form-12), and medical comorbidities (Weighted Illness Check List-20). Psychological distress was evaluated for anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and mental quality of life (Short Form-12). RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients had a total of 49 pelvic and 41 acetabular fractures; 70% underwent osteosynthesis. The prevalence of PPP was 64%. Prevalence weighted with the dysfunctional pain chronicity stages MPSS II and III was 48%. Patients with pelvic fracture types (AO classification) A, B, and C had PPP prevalences of 38%, 67%, and 90%, respectively. Pain chronicity stages (MPSS) were moderately to strongly correlated with pelvic pain intensity (r = 0.57), the three pelvic fracture outcome scores (r = -0.78 to -0.90), pain-related interference (r = 0.72), Oswestry score (r = 0.68), nerve injury and neuropathic pain (r = 0.52), reduced physical (r = -0.72) and mental functioning (r = -0.58), trauma-related comorbidity (r = 0.53), anxiety (r = 0.51), and depression (r = 0.67). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the intensity and prevalence of PPP are high even some 4 years after injury. The validated instruments MPSS (measuring pain chronicity) and Oswestry disability score proved to be appropriate for classifying outcome after pelvic ring fractures.

Pain prevalence and risk distribution among inpatients in a German teaching hospital.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to provide a cross-sectional analysis of pain prevalence, chronicity, and severity as well as the impact of pain on psychological and social variables in inpatients in various departments of a German teaching hospital. METHODS: Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire including sections on sociodemographic and socioeconomic data, pain variables, recent and past health care utilization, and screening questionnaires for depression, anxiety, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 438 patients, 386 (88.1%) had experienced pain in the past 12 months; 367 (83.8%) reported having pain in the previous 3 months. Sixty-four percent of the pain patients stated that pain was the main reason for hospital admission; 48% reported having three or more pain sites. The most common location of pain was the back (26.9%). Pain patients showed significantly higher depression and anxiety scores and markedly reduced physical health when compared to non-pain patients. DISCUSSION: The results of this study indicate that in most medical disciplines pain is more than merely a symptom of disease. In many instances pain should be considered a serious comorbidity that can influence the outcome of medical and surgical treatment. Recent research has shown that prevention of the pain chronification process is the most promising strategy for avoiding the development of intractable pain. Acceptance, recognition, and assessment of pain as a risk factor at an early stage are essential factors. A first step might involve routine screening for pain on admission to any hospital facility, and subsequently evaluating the impact of pain on biopsychosocial functions.