Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Radiol Prot ; 43(4)2023 Oct 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37669663

RESUMO

In September 2022, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) organised a workshop in Estoril, Portugal, on the 'Review and Revision of the System of Radiological Protection: A Focus on Research Priorities'. The workshop, which was a side event of the European Radiation Protection Week, offered an opportunity to comment on a recent paper published by ICRP on areas of research to support the System of Radiological Protection. Altogether, about 150 individuals participated in the workshop. After the workshop, 16 of the 30 organisations in formal relations with ICRP provided written feedback. All participants and organisations followed ICRP's view that further research in various areas will offer additional support in improving the System in the short, medium, and long term. In general, it was emphasised that any research should be outcome-focused in that it should improve protection of people or the environment. Many research topics mentioned by the participants were in line with those already identified by ICRP in the paper noted above. In addition, further ideas were expressed such as, for example, that lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic with regards to the non-radiological social, economic and environment impacts, should be analysed for their usefulness to enhance radiological protection, and that current protection strategies and application of current radiological protection principles may need to be adapted to military scenarios like those observed recently during the military conflict in the Ukraine or the detonation of a nuclear weapon. On a broader perspective, it was discussed how radiation research and radiological protection can contribute towards the Sustainable Development Goals announced by the United Nations in 2015. This paper summarises the views expressed during the workshop and the major take home messages identified by ICRP.

2.
J Radiol Prot ; 41(3)2021 Aug 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33910181

RESUMO

An essential part of a protection strategy for radiological emergencies is the development of national dose criteria and of operational intervention levels (OILs) to decide about protective measures for all ten scenarios Germany is preparing. For the process of planning and implementing such protection strategies as required by the German Radiation Protection Law the Federal Ministry BMU has commissioned the German Radiation Protection Commission (SSK) to recommend dose criteria and OILs for emergency response measures. OILs link a chosen dose criterion for a protective action with a suitable measurement of the contamination situation such as ambient dose rate (µSv h-1), contamination level on surfaces (Bq cm-2) or activity content (Bq g-1, Bq cm-3). This link should adequately model the exposure of persons during a defined exposure period (e.g. seven days, one year) caused by the measured contamination. Dose calculations to quantify OILs should apply assumptions and parameter values that are in tendency realistic and not unduly conservative. OILs have been developed for the following emergency response actions based on radiation measurements:Sheltering on the basis of dose rate (µSv h-1) and contamination level(Bq cm-2).Evacuation on the basis of dose rate (µSv h-1) and contamination level(Bq cm-2).Establishing a radiological hazard area to implement access andcontamination control on the basis of dose rate (µSv h-1) and contaminationlevel (Bq cm-2).Contamination control and possibly decontamination of persons and objects(items, goods, vehicles, etc) based on contamination level (Bq cm-2).A set of precautionary early actions: warning the population not toconsume freshly contaminated food and agricultural measures to reducefood contamination based on dose rate (µSv h-1).Application of maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination offood and feed (Bq kg-1) according to Euratom Regulation.


Assuntos
Monitoramento de Radiação , Proteção Radiológica , Alemanha , Doses de Radiação , Radioisótopos
3.
Health Phys ; 119(1): 2-11, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32205714

RESUMO

Following large-scale nuclear power plant accidents such as those that occurred at Chernobyl (Ukraine) in 1986 and Fukushima Daiichi (Japan) in 2011, large populations are living in areas containing residual amounts of radioactivity. As a key session of the ConRad conference, experts were invited from different disciplines to provide state-of-the-art information on the topic of "living in contaminated areas." These experts provided their different perspectives on a range of topics including radiation protection principles and dose criteria, environmental measurements and dose estimation, maintaining decent living and working conditions, evidence of health risks, and social impact and risk communication. A short summary of these different perspectives is provided in this paper.


Assuntos
Poluentes Radioativos/química , Acidente Nuclear de Chernobyl , Acidente Nuclear de Fukushima , Humanos , Japão , Centrais Nucleares , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação , Monitoramento de Radiação , Proteção Radiológica , República de Belarus , Gestão de Riscos , Ucrânia
4.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 173(1-3): 151-156, 2017 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27885092

RESUMO

The PREPARE project aimed closing gaps identified in nuclear and radiological preparedness in Europe following the first evaluation of the Fukushima disaster. With 46 partners from Europe and Japan, it collected the key players in the area of emergency management and rehabilitation preparedness. Starting from February 2013, the project ended in January 2016. Among others, the project reviewed existing operational procedures for long-lasting releases, cross-border problems in radiation monitoring and food safety and further developed missing functionalities in decision support systems ranging from improved source term estimation and dispersion modelling to the inclusion of hydrological pathways for European water bodies. In addition, a so-called Analytical Platform has been developed to explore the scientific and operational means to improve information collection, information exchange and the evaluation of such types of disasters. The tools developed within the project will be partly integrated into the decision support systems ARGOS and JRODOS.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Desastres , Desastres , Monitoramento de Radiação , Europa (Continente) , Acidente Nuclear de Fukushima , Humanos , Japão , Radiografia
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 164(1-2): 170-4, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25227442

RESUMO

The PREPARE project that started in February 2013 and will end at the beginning of 2016 aims to close gaps that have been identified in nuclear and radiological preparedness in Europe following the first evaluation of the Fukushima disaster. Among others, the project will address the review of existing operational procedures for dealing with long-lasting releases and cross-border problems in radiation monitoring and food safety and further develop missing functionalities in decision support systems (DSS) ranging from improved source-term estimation and dispersion modelling to the inclusion of hydrological pathways for European water bodies. In addition, a so-called Analytical Platform will be developed exploring the scientific and operational means to improve information collection, information exchange and the evaluation of such types of disasters. The tools developed within the project will be partly integrated into the two DSS ARGOS and RODOS.


Assuntos
Defesa Civil/organização & administração , Disseminação de Informação/métodos , Monitoramento de Radiação/métodos , Proteção Radiológica/métodos , Liberação Nociva de Radioativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Software , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Vigilância da População/métodos
6.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 109(1-2): 25-9, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15238651

RESUMO

An overview of existing approaches on assessing and evaluating the radiological situation in the late phase of a nuclear accident is given in this paper. Special attention is paid to the weak points of existing approaches and to problems to be solved in the future. Assessment of the radiological situation can be based on both monitoring data and model predictions. Approaches have been developed for many years in both categories and have meanwhile reached some kind of maturity and also operational applicability. Nevertheless, some areas exist where significant improvements could be achieved in the near future, e.g. by combining monitoring data and model predictions, by improving the modelling of urban areas or by improving existing radioecological models.


Assuntos
Planejamento em Desastres/métodos , Centrais Elétricas , Proteção Radiológica/métodos , Liberação Nociva de Radioativos , Radiometria/métodos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Administrativas/organização & administração , Planejamento em Desastres/organização & administração , Emergências , Modelos Biológicos , Doses de Radiação , Fatores de Risco , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...