Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
J Postgrad Med ; 60(4): 366-71, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25370543

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent review of older (≥45-years-old) patients admitted to our trauma center showed that more than one-third were using neuro-psychiatric medications (NPMs) prior to their injury-related admission. Previously published data suggests that use of NPMs may increase patients' risk and severity of injury. We sought to examine the impact of pre-injury NPM use on older trauma patients' morbidity and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective record review included medication regimen characteristics and NPM use (antidepressants-AD, antipsychotics-AP, anxiolytics-AA). Hospital morbidity, mortality, and 90-day survival were examined. Comparisons included regimens involving NPMs, further focusing on their interactions with various cardiac medications (beta blocker - BB; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker - ACE/ARB; calcium channel blocker - CCB). RESULTS: 712 patient records were reviewed (399 males, mean age 63.5 years, median ISS 8). 245 patients were taking at least 1 NPM: AD (158), AP (35), or AA (108) before injury. There was no effect of NPM monotherapy on hospital mortality. Patients taking ≥3 NPMs had significantly lower 90-day survival compared to patients taking ≤2 NPMs (81% for 3 or more NPMs, 95% for no NPMs, and 89% 1-2 NPMs, P < 0.01). Several AD-cardiac medication (CM) combinations were associated with increased mortality compared to monotherapy with either agent (BB-AD 14.7% mortality versus 7.0% for AD monotherapy or 4.8% BB monotherapy, P < 0.05). Combinations of ACE/ARB-AA were associated with increased mortality compared to ACE/ARB monotherapy (11.5% vs 4.9, P = 0.04). Finally, ACE/ARB-AD co-administration had higher mortality than ACE/ARB monotherapy (13.5% vs 4.9%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Large proportion of older trauma patients was using pre-injury NPMs. Several regimens involving NPMs and CMs were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Additionally, use of ≥3 NPMs was associated with lower 90-day survival.


Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Polimedicação , Ferimentos e Lesões/complicações , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/mortalidade , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia
4.
Scand J Surg ; 101(3): 147-55, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22968236

RESUMO

The use of nasoenteric tubes (NETs) is ubiquitous, and clinicians often take their placement, function, and maintenance for granted. NETs are used for gastrointestinal decompression, enteral feeding, medication administration, naso-biliary drainage, and specialized indications such as upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Morbidity associated with NETs is common, but frequently subtle, mandating high index of suspicion, clinical vigilance, and patient safety protocols. Common complications include sinusitis, sore throat and epistaxis. More serious complications include luminal perforation, pulmonary injury, aspiration, and intracranial placement. Frequent monitoring and continual re-review of the indications for continued use of any NET is prudent, including consideration of changing goals of care. This manuscript reviews NET-related complications and associated topics.


Assuntos
Intubação Gastrointestinal/efeitos adversos , Contraindicações , Falha de Equipamento , Doenças do Esôfago/etiologia , Humanos , Intubação Gastrointestinal/instrumentação , Intubação Gastrointestinal/métodos , Segurança do Paciente , Doenças Respiratórias/etiologia
5.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci ; 1(1): 5-12, 2011 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22096767

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Glycemic control is an important aspect of patient care in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). This is a pilot study of a novel glycemic analysis tool - the glucogram. We hypothesize that the glucogram may be helpful in quantifying the clinical significance of acute hyperglycemic states (AHS) and in describing glycemic variability (GV) in critically ill patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serial glucose measurements were analyzed in SICU patients with lengths of stay (LOS) >30 days. Glucose data were formatted into 12-hour epochs and graphically analyzed using stochastic and momentum indicators. Recorded clinical events were classified as major or minor (control). Examples of major events include cardiogenic shock, acute respiratory failure, major hemorrhage, infection/sepsis, etc. Examples of minor (control) events include non-emergent bedside procedures, blood transfusion given to a hemodynamically stable patient, etc. Positive/negative indicator status was then correlated with AHS and associated clinical events. The conjunction of positive indicator/major clinical event or negative indicator/minor clinical event was defined as clinical "match". GV was determined by averaging glucose fluctuations (maximal - minimal value within each 12-hour epoch) over time. In addition, event-specific glucose excursion (ESGE) associated with each positive indicator/AHS match (final minus initial value for each occurrence) was calculated. Descriptive statistics, sensitivity/specificity determination, and student's t-test were used in data analysis. RESULTS: Glycemic and clinical data were reviewed for 11 patients (mean SICU LOS 74.5 days; 7 men/4 women; mean age 54.9 years; APACHE II of 17.7 ± 6.44; mortality 36%). A total of 4354 glucose data points (1254 epochs) were analyzed. There were 354 major clinical events and 93 minor (control) events. The glucogram identified AHS/indicator/clinical event "matches" with overall sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 65%. We noted that while the mean GV was greater for non-survivors than for survivors (19.3 mg/dL vs. 10.3 mg/dL, P = 0.02), there was no difference in mean ESGE between survivors (154.7) and non-survivors (160.8, P = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: The glucogram was able to quantify the correlation between AHS and major clinical events with a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 65%. In addition, mean GV was nearly two times higher for non-survivors. The glucogram may be useful both clinically (i.e., in the electronic ICU or other "early warning" systems) and as a research tool (i.e., in model development and standardization). Results of this study provide a foundation for further, larger-scale, multi-parametric, prospective evaluations of the glucogram.

6.
Pharmacotherapy ; 20(7): 771-5, 2000 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10907967

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of bleeding complications from enoxaparin in patients with normal renal function versus patients with renal insufficiency. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: University-based tertiary care center. PATIENTS: One hundred six patients who received two or more doses of enoxaparin. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Total bleeding complications occurred in 22% of patients with normal renal function and 51% with renal insufficiency (p<0.01). Major bleeds were also significantly different, 2% and 30%, respectively (p<0.001). No patients with normal renal function were given fresh-frozen plasma or packed red blood cells, whereas in those with renal insufficiency, 13% and 32%, respectively, received these products (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Enoxaparin may have resulted in increased bleeding complications and use of blood products in patients with renal insufficiency. Prospective studies need to be conducted to define the drug's role and dosage adjustments in these patients.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Enoxaparina/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Insuficiência Renal/complicações , Idoso , Feminino , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diálise Renal , Insuficiência Renal/sangue , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
Pharmacotherapy ; 20(5): 540-8, 2000 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10809340

RESUMO

Contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity (CMN) is a common form of iatrogenic acute renal failure. Typically, patients experience changes in serum creatinine or creatinine clearance between 1 and 5 days after exposure to a contrast medium, but they rarely require dialysis. The mechanism for CMN is not understood, but renal insufficiency, dehydration, and congestive heart failure are risk factors. The frequency of CMN with high-osmolality versus low-osmolality media is controversial. Prophylaxis can reduce CMN. Of many different strategies, hydration with normal saline before and after exposure offers the best protection with the fewest adverse effects.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/induzido quimicamente , Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Injúria Renal Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Injúria Renal Aguda/fisiopatologia , Cardiotônicos/uso terapêutico , Desidratação/tratamento farmacológico , Diuréticos Osmóticos/uso terapêutico , Dopamina/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Manitol/uso terapêutico , Concentração Osmolar , Insuficiência Renal/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco , Cloreto de Sódio/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...