Endogenous thrombin potential and examination of a further 31 analytes in liver transplant candidates.

BACKGROUND: To predict the change in patient status and differentation of the basic diseases, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), clinical chemistry, and coagulation variables were measured in liver transplant-listed patients with different etiologies. METHODS: Differences in values of ETP and analytes of 30 control persons and 164 cirrhotic patients were examined by means of binary logistic regression. The relationship between the analytes and ETP parameters were analyzed by means of Spearman correlation. The different etiologies of cirrhosises were studied by factor and discriminant analyses. Binary logistic regression was applied to forecast changes in clinical status. Survival analysis was carried out with the appropriate variable. RESULTS: International Normalized Ratio and activated partial thromboplastin time values were higher, whereas the area-under-the-curve values were lower in cirrhosis than in healthy subjects. A strong relationship was found only between the peak height and the anti-thrombin III (ATIII) values. In the factor analysis, 3 factors were found, which explained 81.6% of the total variance. Combination of aspartate aminotransferase and ATIII mostly separated the basic disease groups from each other in the discriminant analysis. From 35 variables, the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and ATIII have been suited for predicting the change in patient status. Eighty percent of patients with low ATIII and high LDH levels had deterioration of their clinical status. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that the ETP parameters did not provide additional information compared with "conventional" coagulation tests in cirrhosis. On the basis of our study, LDH and ATIII appear to be promising analytes to assess the clinical status of patients with cirrhosis. In our opinion, the classification system of liver transplant-listed patients can be improved with their use.

Significance of mycophenolate monitoring in liver transplant recipients: toward the cut-off level.

Mycophenolate mofetil blocks the "de novo" -purine synthesis to reduce the incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes. There has been an increased interest in utility of monitoring mycophenolic acid (MPA) levels, however currently the MPA monitoring is not part of the protocol following liver transplantation. We assessed whether trough MPA monitoring could be advisable in liver transplant patients or not. For this reason MPA levels of 56 liver transplants were measured on 3, 5, 10, 14, 21, 30, 60, and 180 posttransplant days. The optimal cut-off of MPA level (≥1.73 mg/L) for all (56) and ≥1.34 mg/L for ciclosporin-treated- and ≥1.98 mg/L for the tacrolimus-treated transplants were calculated by statistical analysis to reduce the incidence of acute rejection. MPA concentrations of 3 days period before the day of clinical diagnosis acute rejection were well below the cut-off value. Only 3 (16%) out 19 patients with acute rejection had higher MPA levels than the cut-off value on the day of diagnosis of acute rejection. In conclusion, our data suggests that MPA predose level monitoring, especially in the early "filling phase" after transplantation, is applicable in liver allograft recipients given adjunctive MMF, protecting them from the ineffective immunosuppression.

Small difference in international normalized ratio may yield a significant impact on prioritizing patients listed for liver transplantation.

Priority for liver transplantation is currently based on the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. The aim of our study was to assess in detail the contribution of international normalized ratio (INR) differences for MELD scores because of interlaboratory variability. The samples from 92 cirrhotic patients were measured on different systems combining three coagulometers and three thromboplastin products to determine variations in INR and MELD score. The INR differences among the first four systems varied between 0 and 0.2, resulting in MELD differences of 0 to 2. The MELD scores of 92 patients changed only among 10 possible integers so that normally 2 to 10 patients shared the same MELD value. In some cases, one MELD score difference resulted in a 10 superpositioning on the waiting list. Including one more system (mechanical vs optical) into our investigations achieved a five MELD difference. Supposing an extreme situation where one patient competes with his or her lowest, all the other with their highest possible score (and visa versa), the difference may be even 20 positions, overturning the complete waiting list. In conclusion substantial interlaboratory differences in MELD score have profound clinical consequences.