RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Acute cholecystitis occurs frequently in the elderly. According to the current recommendations specific to the characteristics of each case, these patients are most often treated by delayed cholecystectomy after medical treatment. Our study aimed to compare the success rate of this strategy in patients over and under 75years of age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center analytic observational study that included patients who were hospitalized for acute cholecystitis in a geriatric postoperative unit (unité postopératoire gériatrique [UPOG]) and gastrointestinal surgery unit between 2021 and 2022. The main endpoint was the failure rate of deferred cholecystectomy. Secondary endpoints included: respect for the recommended operative delay, loss of the patient's functional independence during hospitalization, and the reason for surgical abstention. RESULTS: In total, 290 patients were included. The strategy of delayed elective cholecystectomy was not achieved in 31 (44%) patients 75years old or older vs. eight (18%) patients younger than 75years old (P=0.005). The main reason was the decision not to operate after medical treatment. In both groups, the recommended operative interval was equitably respected and the loss of autonomy during hospitalization was minor. More than one-third of the elderly patients scheduled for elective surgery finally refused to undergo surgery. CONCLUSION: The strategy of routine elective cholecystectomy should not be strict in the elderly with acute cholecystitis; the indication for this procedure should take into account the wishes as well as the physiological status of the patient.
RESUMO
Polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate prescriptions and inadequate coordination between prescribers are among main factors explaining the occurrence of adverse drug events in elderly patients. Prospective and descriptive study of medication prescriptions for elderly patients during a continuous period of health-care: entry in an acute geriatric unit (T1), at discharge (T2) and two months after hospitalization (T3). A global iatrogenic risk was defined: presence of poly-pharmacy and/or PPI (Laroche criteria) and/or absence of quality indicators for prescription according to the French health authority. For the 79 patients (mean age 87), mean number of medication decreased from 7.33 (T1) to 6 (T2) (p=0.0018) and 6 (T3). Number of quality indicators for prescription improved from 6.67 (T1) to 6.92 (T2) (p=0.001) then decreased to 6.84 (T3). Number of PPI decreased from 1.16 to 0.42 between T1 and T2 (p=0.001) then increased to 0.59 at T3. The global iatrogenic risk indicator fluctuated from 80% (T1) to 64% (T2) and 75% (T3). Selected interventions were developed to prevent adverse drug events during hospitalization and ambulatory follow-up. If geriatric intervention can enhance quality of prescription, iatrogenic risk remains frequent all along health-care follow-up. A local study of prescriptions can be a first step to develop an adequate program for adverse drug events prevention.