Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 67
Filtrar
2.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 27(4): 328-33, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26045514

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To develop a consensus opinion regarding capturing diagnosis-timing in coded hospital data. METHODS: As part of the World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases-11th Revision initiative, the Quality and Safety Topic Advisory Group is charged with enhancing the capture of quality and patient safety information in morbidity data sets. One such feature is a diagnosis-timing flag. The Group has undertaken a narrative literature review, scanned national experiences focusing on countries currently using timing flags, and held a series of meetings to derive formal recommendations regarding diagnosis-timing reporting. RESULTS: The completeness of diagnosis-timing reporting continues to improve with experience and use; studies indicate that it enhances risk-adjustment and may have a substantial impact on hospital performance estimates, especially for conditions/procedures that involve acutely ill patients. However, studies suggest that its reliability varies, is better for surgical than medical patients (kappa in hip fracture patients of 0.7-1.0 versus kappa in pneumonia of 0.2-0.6) and is dependent on coder training and setting. It may allow simpler and more precise specification of quality indicators. CONCLUSIONS: As the evidence indicates that a diagnosis-timing flag improves the ability of routinely collected, coded hospital data to support outcomes research and the development of quality and safety indicators, the Group recommends that a classification of 'arising after admission' (yes/no), with permitted designations of 'unknown or clinically undetermined', will facilitate coding while providing flexibility when there is uncertainty. Clear coding standards and guidelines with ongoing coder education will be necessary to ensure reliability of the diagnosis-timing flag.


Assuntos
Diagnóstico , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças/normas , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Comitês Consultivos , Coleta de Dados/métodos , Coleta de Dados/normas , Coleta de Dados/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais/normas , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 26(5): 511-5, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24990594

RESUMO

Hospital-based medical records are abstracted to create International Classification of Disease (ICD) coded discharge health data in many countries. The 'main condition' is not defined in a consistent manner internationally. Some countries employ a 'reason for admission' rule as the basis for the main condition, while other countries employ a 'resource use' rule. A few countries have recently transitioned from one of these approaches to the other. The definition of 'main condition' in such ICD data matters when it is used to define a disease cohort to assign diagnosis-related groups and to perform risk adjustment. We propose a method of harmonizing the international definition to enable researchers and international organizations using ICD-coded health data to aggregate or compare hospital care and outcomes across countries in a consistent manner. Inter-observer reliability of alternative harmonization approaches should be evaluated before finalizing the definition and adopting it worldwide.


Assuntos
Codificação Clínica/normas , Administração Hospitalar/normas , Classificação Internacional de Doenças/normas , Internacionalidade , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
4.
Diabet Med ; 30(5): 567-73, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23323955

RESUMO

AIM: To identify the clinical and socio-demographic factors associated with hospitalization for diabetic ketoacidosis in adults with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: We combined clinical and administrative health data from a large urban diabetes clinic to perform a data linkage study. We identified adults (aged ≥ 18 years old) with Type 1 diabetes and linked to hospital discharge abstracts to assess for diabetic ketoacidosis hospitalization. The study period was between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2009, with all individuals living in the same geographic area. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify potential predictors of diabetic ketoacidosis hospitalization. RESULTS: We identified 255 individuals with a diabetic ketoacidosis hospitalization and 1739 without a diabetic ketoacidosis hospitalization. Mean (standard deviation) age was 40.0 (15.8) years, 51.7% were men and mean duration of diabetes was 17.8 (12.9) years. Diabetic ketoacidosis hospitalization was associated with shorter duration of diabetes (odds ratio 0.96 per year; 95% confidence interval 0.95-0.98), gastroparesis (odds ratio 4.13; 95% confidence interval 1.82-9.35), psychiatric diagnosis (odds ratio 1.98; 95% confidence interval 1.22-3.19), and higher HbA1c (odds ratio 1.25 per 1% increase; 95% confidence interval 1.16-1.35). CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies specific clinical factors associated with diabetic ketoacidosis hospitalization in adults with Type 1 diabetes. This information can help to inform the detection of high-risk patients, for whom special attention and interventions may be warranted to prevent diabetic ketoacidosis.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Cetoacidose Diabética/etiologia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiologia , Coleta de Dados , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiologia , Cetoacidose Diabética/sangue , Cetoacidose Diabética/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , População Urbana
5.
Int J Nurs Stud ; 49(9): 1074-83, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22534492

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A considerable number of patients receive chelation therapy to treat their coronary artery disease. However, there is no current empirical evidence to support its use. AIM: To better understand patient's decision-making processes regarding the use of chelation therapy as a treatment for coronary artery disease. METHODS: Based on qualitative interviews with 32 coronary artery disease patients, a taxonomy of decision-related issues, hierarchical decision-model, and survey based on the model were developed. The model was then pilot tested with another group of 30 patients and revised accordingly. The final model was tested with another group of 167 patients (27 current users, 72 previous users, and 68 never users of chelation therapy). The primary examination of the model was to determine the degree to which it successfully identified people who fell within each behavioral group. This was done by dividing the total number of successes by the total number of cases on all paths (or questions in the questionnaire). RESULTS: The most important elements in the decision to use or not use chelation therapy were: previous experience with or learning about chelation therapy, openness to alternative treatments, satisfaction with current level of (traditional) care, physician opinion regarding chelation therapy, costs associated with chelation therapy, perceived access to chelation therapy provider, current state of health (good or bad), and wanting to do 'all one can' for heart health. When tested, the ability of the model to predict the appropriate outcome was nearly 93%. The most salient junctures in the model that led participants to different behavioral outcomes were: considering using non-traditional treatments; perceptions regarding potential risks and benefits; cost; and believing that using chelation therapy was 'doing all that they can' to help their heart health. CONCLUSIONS: Descriptive decision-modeling is a useful method to depict cardiac patients' decision-making concerning the use of chelation therapy. It can also assist healthcare providers and policy makers in directing interventions and policy aimed at enhancing the use of evidence-based therapies for cardiac patients.


Assuntos
Quelantes/uso terapêutico , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/tratamento farmacológico , Tomada de Decisões , Ácido Edético/uso terapêutico , Participação do Paciente , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
6.
J Wound Care ; 21(11): 517-8, 520, 522 passim, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23413490

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of continuous pressure imaging technology on strategic turning of patients by health professionals. METHOD: This pilot study of a newly-developed continuous pressure imaging technology (XSENSOR ForeSite PatientTurn System) involved two phases of videotaped observation of medical inpatients, with each patient serving as his/her own control: a control phase in which continuous pressure imaging was not available to health-care providers and an intervention phase where it was. The primary outcome was to determine whether access to the technology influenced the rate of patient turns/shifts by nursing staff. Secondary outcomes included a comparison of the rates of other care provider shifts, patient self-shifts, and family assisted shifts. Qualitative data regarding nurse and patient/family perspectives were also obtained. RESULTS: Complete control/intervention data were available for nine patients.The mean rate of two-person assisted turns was 0.274 +/- 0.087 turns per hour in the control phase versus 0.413 +/- 0.091 turns per hour in the intervention phase (p = 0.08). For the combined endpoint of two-person assisted turns or patient transfers off the bed into a wheelchair/chair, there was a statistically significant difference in the mean number of turns per hour: mean of 0.491 +/- 0.271 turns per hour for the intervention group versus 0.327 +/- 0.235 turns per hour for the control group (p = 0.04). Provider interviews confirmed that nurses used information from the technology to inform their patient shifting strategies and behaviours. CONCLUSION: This pilot study provides some initial data supporting the hypothesis that continuous pressure imaging technology could positively impact the frequency of patient turns by care providers, as well as provide impetus to inspect specific skin locations,thereby providing a potential targeted risk mitigation strategy for the development of pressure ulcers. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: Funding for the study was obtained from PreCarn Inc., an independent, nonprofit company supporting the pre-commercial development of new technologies, and from the Alberta Enterprise and Advanced Education (formally Alberta Advanced Education and Technology). The industry partner, XSENSOR, was involved in setup and maintenance of the technology, but was not involved in the evaluative research protocol. Specifically, XSENSOR personnel were not involved in the collection, coding, or analysis of outcome data, nor in the compilation and writing of this paper. None of the listed authors have any conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, relating to the technology tested.


Assuntos
Monitorização Fisiológica/instrumentação , Posicionamento do Paciente , Úlcera por Pressão/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Movimentação e Reposicionamento de Pacientes/enfermagem , Posicionamento do Paciente/enfermagem , Projetos Piloto , Úlcera por Pressão/enfermagem
7.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 59(5): 341-50, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21899967

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the United States, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has developed 20 Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) to measure the occurrence of hospital adverse events from medico-administrative data coded according to the ninth revision of the international classification of disease (ICD-9-CM). The adaptation of these PSIs to the WHO version of ICD-10 was carried out by an international consortium. METHODS: Two independent teams transcoded ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes proposed by the AHRQ into ICD-10-WHO. Using a Delphi process, experts from six countries evaluated each code independently, stating whether it was "included", "excluded" or "uncertain". During a two-day meeting, the experts then discussed the codes that had not obtained a consensus, and the additional codes proposed. RESULTS: Fifteen PSIs were adapted. Among the 2569 proposed diagnosis codes, 1775 were unanimously adopted straightaway. The 794 remaining codes and 2541 additional codes were discussed. Three documents were prepared: (1) a list of ICD-10-WHO codes for the 15 adapted PSIs; (2) recommendations to the AHRQ for the improvement of the nosological frame and the coding of PSI with ICD-9-CM; (3) recommendations to the WHO to improve ICD-10. CONCLUSIONS: This work allows international comparisons of PSIs among the countries using ICD-10. Nevertheless, these PSIs must still be evaluated further before being broadly used.


Assuntos
Codificação Clínica/métodos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Segurança do Paciente , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , Algoritmos , Codificação Clínica/organização & administração , Codificação Clínica/normas , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/classificação , França , Órgãos dos Sistemas de Saúde/organização & administração , Órgãos dos Sistemas de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Classificação Internacional de Doenças/normas , Cooperação Internacional , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/classificação , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Terminologia como Assunto , Estados Unidos
9.
Neurology ; 73(2): 89-97, 2009 Jul 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19439720

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Among patients with a patent foramen ovale (PFO) and a prior cryptogenic ischemic stroke or TIA, the absolute and relative risk of recurrent events is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in any language published up to February 2008. We included studies reporting original data on recurrent cerebrovascular events in patients with prior cryptogenic stroke or TIA and PFO. Two authors independently extracted data and evaluated study quality. RESULTS: We identified 15 eligible studies, four with a non-PFO comparison group. In these four studies, the pooled relative risk (RR) for recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA in patients with vs without a PFO was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8 to 1.5). For ischemic stroke, the pooled RR was 0.8 (95% CI 0.5 to 1.3). We tabulated the absolute rate of recurrent events in all 15 studies. The pooled absolute rate of recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA in patients with PFO was 4.0 events per 100 person-years (95% CI 3.0 to 5.1) while the rate of recurrent ischemic stroke was 1.6 events per 100 person-years (95% CI 1.1 to 2.1). CONCLUSIONS: In medically treated patients with prior cryptogenic stroke, while the absolute rate of recurrent events is variable, available evidence does not support an increased relative risk of recurrent ischemic events in those with vs without a patent foramen ovale. Patent foramen ovale closure in these patients cannot be recommended until the results of ongoing clinical trials are reported.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiologia , Isquemia Encefálica/etiologia , Forame Oval Patente/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Fatores Etários , Isquemia Encefálica/mortalidade , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Forame Oval Patente/epidemiologia , Forame Oval Patente/mortalidade , Forame Oval Patente/terapia , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/epidemiologia , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/etiologia , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/mortalidade , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/terapia , Recidiva , Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Qual Saf Health Care ; 18(1): 59-62, 2009 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19204134

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of consultations requested by general internal medicine services that communicate key components of the consultation process to medical subspecialists. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review by two researchers, using a standardised chart abstraction instrument (93.1% agreement, kappa 0.85). SETTING: Calgary, Alberta, Canada. SAMPLE: A random sample of medical consultations was selected from those generated on two medical teaching units (MTUs) from 2003 to 2004. MEASUREMENTS: The primary measure of interest was whether a "clear clinical question" was posed to the subspecialist, a binary variable. RESULTS: Two hundred consultations were sampled from the 2885 subspecialty consultations. Of the selected consultations, 94.0% (188/200) were available for review. A clear clinical question was posed in 69.7% (131/188) of consultations (CI 0.63 to 0.74). In a secondary analysis involving a larger sample permitting comparison across subspecialties, 95.1% (368/387) of the consultations, representative of the subspecialties, were available for review. An MTU member contacted the subspecialist for 74.2% of consultations. If a consultation was urgent, a member of the MTU contacted the subspecialist in 81.0% of consultations. Of these urgent consultations, 63.3% had a clear clinical question. CONCLUSION: More than one in four consultations does not contain a clear clinical question, illustrating suboptimal communication between physicians. Innovative strategies that provide a sustainable solution for overcoming barriers to communication could have a significant impact on quality of care.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Medicina Interna , Medicina , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Especialização , Adulto , Idoso , Alberta , Feminino , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
11.
Qual Saf Health Care ; 17(5): 346-50, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18842973

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The prediction of patient complaints is not clearly understood. This is important in so far as patient complaints have been shown to correlate with other adverse outcomes of interest in acute care facilities. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the complexity of the patient case and patient safety culture as predictors of patient complaints. DESIGN: A matched case-control analysis of data from patients filing complaints (cases) and matched patients who did not file complaints (controls) in 2005. Staff surveys were used to measure the Patient Safety Culture on individual units. SETTING: 45 inpatient acute care units from four general hospitals in a large metropolitan centre in western Canada. SAMPLE: 586 patients registering complaints in 2005. METHOD: The primary outcome was patient complaints (number and type). Predictors included unit-level measures of patient safety culture based on a survey and patient admission characteristics (including age, gender, treatment unit, primary diagnosis, case resource intensity). RESULTS: The probability of a patient complaint was positively associated with cases of higher complexity (beta = 0.145, p = 0.032; odds ratio = 1.16; CI 0.994 to 1.344). The culture of patient safety within hospital units was not related to the probability of complaints within a given unit. CONCLUSIONS: Patient complaints are associated with higher clinical complexity. However, the confidence interval around the odds ratio for this association just crosses 1.0 and is thus not "significant" in a traditional framework of dichotomously judging statistical significance at the 95% confidence level. The lack of association with a unit's safety culture, meanwhile, implies that the non-modifiable clinical complexity factor is a more important determinant of patient complaints.


Assuntos
Relações Hospital-Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Canadá , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Previsões , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Unidades Hospitalares/organização & administração , Hospitais Gerais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Urbanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cultura Organizacional , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Análise de Regressão , Inquéritos e Questionários
12.
QJM ; 100(2): 87-92, 2007 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17277316

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease is common among the elderly, and these patients are at risk of progressive kidney dysfunction. AIM: To develop an index to predict rapid progression of kidney dysfunction. DESIGN: Community-based cohort divided into derivation (n = 6789) and validation (n = 3395) subsets. METHODS: We identified 10 184 subjects aged >/=66 years from computerized laboratory data. Prescription drug data was used to define disease categories and medication exposure, and an index for predicting rapid progression of kidney dysfunction (> or =25% decline in glomerular filtration rate over a 2-year period) was obtained from a logistic regression model in the derivation cohort. The risk score for each subject was calculated by summing the component variables together, which were subsequently categorized into five risk classes. RESULTS: Five predictors of rapid progression were identified: age >75 years, cardiac disease, diabetes mellitus, gout, and use of anti-emetic medications. Rates of rapid progression for risk classes I through V were 8.6%, 10.9%, 13.9%, 15.6%, and 24.1%, respectively, for the derivation cohort, and 8.4%, 11.6%, 15.5%, 17.3%, 21.9%, respectively, for the validation cohort. The risk index distinguished between low and high risk of rapid progression, with a 2.5-fold greater risk for the highest, compared to the lowest, risk decile. DISCUSSION: Readily available clinical data can be used to identify most elderly at risk of rapid progression of kidney dysfunction. This simple index could help clinicians to identify patients at risk, and implement strategies to slow the progression of kidney dysfunction.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Renal/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Medição de Risco/normas , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
14.
Kidney Int ; 69(12): 2155-61, 2006 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16531986

RESUMO

Despite the high prevalence of chronic kidney disease among the elderly, few studies have described their loss of kidney function. We sought to determine the progression of kidney dysfunction among a community-based cohort of elderly subjects. The cohort included 10 184 subjects 66 years of age or older, who had one or more outpatient serum creatinine measurements during each of two time periods: 1 July to 31 December 2001 and 1 July to 31 December 2003. A mixed effects model, including covariates for age, gender, diabetes mellitus, and comorbidity, was used to determine the rate of decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, in ml/min/1.73 m2) per year over a median follow-up of 2.0 years. Subjects with diabetes mellitus had the greatest decline in eGFR of 2.1 (95% CI 1.8-2.5) and 2.7 (95% CI 2.3-3.1) ml/min/1.73 m2 per year in women and men, respectively. The rate of decline for women and men without diabetes mellitus was 0.8 (95% CI 0.6-1.0) and 1.4 (95% CI 1.2-1.6) ml/min/1.73 m2 per year. Subjects with a study mean eGFR<30 ml/min/1.73 m2, both those with and without diabetes mellitus, experienced the greatest decline in eGFR. In conclusion, we found that the majority of elderly subjects have no or minimal progression of kidney disease over 2 years. Strategies aimed at slowing progression of kidney disease should consider underlying risk factors for progression and the negligible loss of kidney function that occurs in the majority of older adults.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular/fisiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Rim/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Envelhecimento/patologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/fisiopatologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Creatinina/sangue , Complicações do Diabetes , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Rim/patologia , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo
16.
Neurology ; 64(8): 1435-7, 2005 Apr 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15851737

RESUMO

Stroke neurologists are commonly asked to review patients who require coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) but who also have comorbid severe carotid stenosis; such patients may be offered simultaneous carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In Canada, 0.51% of CABG procedures were combined CEA-CABG. The adjusted stroke and death rate was 2.67-fold greater in the combined CEA-CABG group compared to CABG alone. Randomized trials of the combined procedure are needed.


Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica/cirurgia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/cirurgia , Isquemia Encefálica/prevenção & controle , Canadá , Estenose das Carótidas/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/métodos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/métodos , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica/epidemiologia , Mortalidade , Seleção de Pacientes , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Clin Nephrol ; 60(5): 341-51, 2003 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14640240

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have significant impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In part, this is due to the intrusiveness of the treatment (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) that is required. It is unclear whether hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis is associated with a higher HRQOL. METHODS: 192 prevalent patients who self-selected treatment with hemodialysis (either in-center, satellite or home/self-care hemodialysis) or peritoneal dialysis were studied to determine whether treatment with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis is associated with a higher HRQOL. Demographic, laboratory and clinical information (including the presence of comorbid conditions using the Charlson comorbidity index) was assessed at baseline. The outcome of interest was HRQOL, which was measured using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form (KDQOL-SF), the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and the EuroQol EQ-5D at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in HRQOL scores for the SF-36, the EQ-5D and for 9 of 11 KDQOL dimensions for patients treated with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis at baseline. As expected, HRQOL was significantly lower for patients who had more comorbid disease, required assistance with their daily care, and for patients with less than a grade 12 education. After controlling for the effect of other important variables, HRQOL (as measured by the EQ-5D visual analog or index scores) did not differ between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. HRQOL was stable over time, both for patients who started on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in HRQOL for prevalent ESRD patients treated with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. It will be important to determine if this finding holds true for incident patients treated with hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.


Assuntos
Qualidade de Vida , Diálise Renal , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Diálise Peritoneal , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Regressão
18.
Am J Med ; 111(9): 686-91, 2001 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11747847

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Among patients who had undergone coronary angiography, we sought to determine the proportion of chelation therapy users, their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and the association of chelation therapy with subsequent revascularization. METHODS: We studied all patients who underwent coronary angiography in the province of Alberta, Canada, during 1995 and 1996. The cohort was followed for up to 6 years to determine subsequent revascularization status. Use of chelation therapy was determined by a mailed survey 1 year after angiography. RESULTS: Among the 5854 patients who responded to the mail survey (70% response rate), 210 (3.6%) reported current use of chelation therapy and 252 (4.3%) reported past use. Current use of chelation therapy was associated with extensive coronary artery disease (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9 to 5.7 for 3-vessel disease; and OR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.2 to 6.0 for left main disease, as compared with those with normal anatomy) and the absence of diabetes (OR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4 to 0.9). Current users were less likely to have undergone percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (OR = 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5 to 0.9) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery (OR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.5) in the first year after angiography, but were as likely as nonusers of chelation therapy to have undergone CABG surgery in the subsequent 3- to 5-year period (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.1; 95% CI: 0.7 to 1.9). Past use of chelation therapy was associated with a history of CABG surgery before coronary angiography (OR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.3) and extensive coronary artery disease. Past users were also more likely to have undergone CABG surgery in the follow-up period (HR = 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.6). CONCLUSIONS: About 8% of patients who underwent cardiac catheterization for coronary artery disease were using or had previously tried chelation therapy. Users may have foregone revascularization in favor of this less invasive yet unproven treatment, with some users subsequently undergoing conventional treatment after chelation. Alternatively, some patients may have turned to chelation as a "last resort" after having been judged unsuitable for revascularization.


Assuntos
Terapia por Quelação/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença das Coronárias/terapia , Idoso , Alberta , Análise de Variância , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Angiografia Coronária , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais
19.
Ann Intern Med ; 135(10): 858-69, 2001 Nov 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11712876

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Evidence-based medicine guidelines based on venographic end points recommend in-hospital prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in patients having elective hip surgery. Emerging data suggest that out-of-hospital use may offer additional protection; however, uncertainty remains about the risk-benefit ratio. To provide clinicians with a practical pathway for translating clinical research into practice, we systematically reviewed trials comparing extended out-of-hospital LMWH prophylaxis versus placebo. DATA SOURCES: Studies were identified by 1) searching PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library Database for reports published from January 1976 to May 2001; 2) reviewing references from retrieved articles; 3) scanning abstracts from conference proceedings; and 4) contacting pharmaceutical companies and investigators of the original reports. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials comparing extended out-of-hospital prophylaxis with LMWH versus placebo in patients having elective hip arthroplasty. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers extracted data independently. Reviewers evaluated study quality by using a validated four-item instrument. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six of seven original articles met the defined inclusion criteria. The included studies were double-blind trials that used proper randomization procedures. Compared with placebo, extended out-of-hospital prophylaxis decreased the frequency of all episodes of deep venous thrombosis (placebo rate, 150 of 666 patients [22.5%]; relative risk, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.54; P < 0.001]), proximal venous thrombosis (placebo rate, 76 of 678 patients [11.2%]; relative risk, 0.31 [CI, 0.20 to 0.47; P < 0.001]), and symptomatic venous thromboembolism (placebo rate, 36 of 862 patients [4.2%]; relative risk, 0.36 [CI, 0.20 to 0.67; P = 0.001]). Major bleeding was rare, occurring in only one patient in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Extended LMWH prophylaxis showed consistent effectiveness and safety in the trials (regardless of study variations in clinical practice and length of hospital stay) for venographic deep venous thrombosis and symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The aggregate findings support the need for extended out-of-hospital prophylaxis in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty surgery.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/uso terapêutico , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fatores de Tempo
20.
Curr Opin Pulm Med ; 7(5): 349-53, 2001 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11584188

RESUMO

The clinical assessment of the probability of pulmonary embolism is a key step in proposed diagnostic strategies for pulmonary embolism, because the interpretation of noninvasive test results is conditional on the pretest probability derived from the presence or absence of clinical factors. The past year has brought important progress in the general area of clinical prediction of pulmonary embolism with the publication of two new simple clinical prediction rules. Each of the prediction rules includes a total of seven clinical variables that, when combined, allow for the categorization of patients into categories of low, intermediate, or high pretest probability of pulmonary embolism. Although these clinical prediction rules are perhaps only slightly better than the estimates of experienced clinicians, they provide an explicit method for estimating the probability of PE as an adjunct to diagnostic testing. Further validation work is now needed to assess how well these new prediction rules perform in settings other than the derivation sites.


Assuntos
Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Medição de Risco/métodos , Algoritmos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Valor Preditivo dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...