Immediate Implant Placement in Intact Fresh Extraction Sockets Using Vestibular Socket Therapy Versus Partial Extraction Therapy in the Esthetic Zone: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial aimed to assess esthetic and soft and hard tissue outcomes 6 months after immediate implant placement using vestibular socket therapy (VST) (test) versus partial extraction therapy (comparator) in intact thin-walled fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with hopeless maxillary anterior teeth requiring immediate implant placement were randomly assigned to two equal groups to receive either VST or partial extraction therapy. Definitive restorations were delivered after 3 months. Pink esthetic scores (PESs) and vertical soft tissue alterations in millimeters were measured 6 months after restoration using intraoral digital scans of the distal papilla, midfacial gingival margin, and mesial papilla. Facial bone thickness was measured using CBCT scans at baseline and after 6 months. Implant survival and peri-implant pocket depth were assessed. RESULTS: Both groups showed 100% implant survival after 6 months. The overall PESs after 6 months were 12.67 (± 1.3) in the VST group, while the partial extraction therapy group score was 13.17 (± 1.19), with no significant difference between them (P = .02). The mean (± SD) vertical soft tissue measurements for the VST group were 0.08 (± 0.55), 0.01 (± 0.73), and -0.03 (± 0.52) mm, and for the partial extraction therapy group, they were -0.24 (± 0.25) mm, -0.20 (± 0.10) mm, and -0.34 (± 0.13) mm for the mesial papilla, midfacial gingival margin, and distal papilla, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the groups at any of the reference points (P ± .05). Both techniques demonstrated a significant gain in millimeters of labial bone thickness after 6 months compared to baseline (P ± .05). Regarding VST, the apical, middle, and crestal mean bone gain was 1.68 (±± 2.73), 1.62 (±± 1.35), and 1.33 (±± 1.22) mm, respectively, while partial extraction therapy showed 0.58 (± 0.62), 1.27 (± 1.22), and 1.53 (± 1.24) mm, respectively, with no significant difference detected between them (P ≥ .05). Additionally, the mean (± SD) peri-implant pocket depth after 6 months for VST was 2.16 (± 0.44) and 2.08 (± 1.02) mm for partial extraction therapy with no significant difference between them (P = .79). CONCLUSION: This investigation suggests that both VST and partial extraction therapy preserved alveolar bone structure and peri-implant tissues following immediate implants. The novel VST might be considered a predictable alternative treatment approach for immediate implant placement in intact thin-walled fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2023;38:468-478. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9973.

A novel atraumatic extraction technique using vestibular socket therapy for immediate implant placement: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

PURPOSE: This randomized controlled clinical trial compared soft tissue changes following a novel vestibular atraumatic extraction technique (test group) versus the conventional incisal atraumatic extraction approach (control group) while implementing the vestibular socket therapy for immediate implant placement. METHODS: Thirty patients with hopeless maxillary anterior teeth requiring atraumatic extraction were randomly assigned into two equal groups to receive either test or control. Vertical soft tissue alterations in mm were measured at baseline and 12 months post-restoration using intraoral digital scans at three reference points, distal papilla, mid-facial gingival margin, and mesial papilla, as well as pink esthetic scores (PESs) after 12 months. RESULTS: Vestibular extraction technique showed significant soft tissue improvement and creeping when compared to incisal extraction (P < 0.05). The test group showed soft tissue measurements with a mean (± SD) of 0.26 (± 0.58), 0.39 (± 0.64), and 0.05 (± 0.37) mm for the mesial papilla, mid-facial gingival margin, and distal papilla respectively. While the incisal extraction technique demonstrated gingival recession at the distal papilla, mid-facial gingival margin, and mesial papilla of - 0.37 (± 0.54) mm, - 0.32 (± 0.68) mm, and - 0.39 (± 0.59) mm respectively. The overall PESs after 12 months were 12.67 (± 1.59) in vestibular extraction group, while incisal extraction group was 11.40 (± 1.40), with significant difference between them (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: This investigation suggests that both studied techniques were successful in the atraumatic extraction of hopeless severely damaged teeth. The novel vestibular extraction technique might be considered an alternative reliable atraumatic extraction approach compared to the conventional incisal extraction when performing the vestibular socket protocol for immediate implant placement with soft tissue enhancement.

Diagnostic potential and future directions of biomarkers in gingival crevicular fluid and saliva of periodontal diseases: Review of the current evidence.

OBJECTIVES: The holy grail of biomarker research in periodontology is to develop a high impact diagnostics which have a significant impact on clinical decision-making, patient outcomes and healthcare providers. In the field of periodontal diagnostics, oral fluid-based biomarkers have been studied mainly in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and saliva. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the Cochrane library and PubMed databases from 2000 to January 2017. RESULTS: Currently, there are more than 90 different components in the GCF that have been investigated as diagnostic and prognostic markers of periodontal disease progression involving; inflammatory mediators, markers of oxidative stress, host-derived enzymes, tissue-breakdown products and mediators of bone homeostasis. Furthermore, various biomarkers in saliva have been proposed which reveal a promising outlook for saliva as a key diagnostic medium for periodontal disease. Recent systematic reviews with high value of evidence have shown that potential salivary biomarkers can provide important complimentary diagnostic information and can be used as tests for screening diagnosis, prognosis and predicting periodontal disease progression. CONCLUSION: Future developments in proteomic analysis and personalized medicine will pave the way allowing novel diagnostic tools. Still, the application into the field of dentistry will depend on how practitioners will apply this into their daily clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Still, the application into the field of dentistry will depend on how practitioners will apply this into their daily clinical practice.

Racemization of aspartic acid in root dentin as a tool for age estimation in a Kuwaiti population.

Estimation of age is one of the most significant tasks in forensic practice. Amino acid racemization is considered one of the most reliable and accurate methods of age estimation and aspartic acid shows a high racemization reaction rate. The present study has investigated the application of aspartic acid racemization in age estimation in a Kuwaiti population using root dentin from a total of 89 upper first premolar teeth. The D/L ratio of aspartic acid was obtained by HPLC technique in a test group of 50 subjects and a linear regression line was established between aspartic acid racemization and age. The correlation coefficient (r) was 0.97, and the standard error of estimation was ±1.26 years. The racemization age "t" of each subject was calculated by applying the following formula: ln [(1 + D/L)/(1 - D/L)] = 0.003181 t + (-0.01591). When the proposed formula "estimated age t = ln [(1 + D/L)/(1 - D/L)] + 0.01591/0.003181" was applied to a validation group of 39 subjects, the range of error was less than one year in 82.1% of the cases and the standard error of estimation was ±1.12. The current work has established a reasonably significant correlation of the D-/L-aspartic acid ratio with age, and proposed an apparently reliable formula for calculating the age in Kuwaiti populations through aspartic acid racemization. Further research is required to find out whether similar findings are applicable to other ethnic populations.