Multidisciplinary Difficult Airway Team Characteristics, Airway Securement Success, and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether implementation of a multidisciplinary airway team was associated with improvement in (1) rate of successful airway securement at first attempt; (2) time to secure airway; and (3) overall complication rate in patients with a difficult airway, as compared with usual care. DATA SOURCES: Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central, and CINAHL databases. REVIEW METHODS: Systematic review of literature on inpatient multidisciplinary team management of difficult airways, including all studies performed in inpatient settings, excluding studies of ventilator weaning, flight/military medicine, EXIT procedures, and simulation or educational studies. DistillerSR was used for article screening and risk of a bias assessment to evaluate article quality. Data was extracted on study design, airway team composition, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes including airway securement, complications, and mortality. RESULTS: From 5323 studies screened, 19 studies met inclusion criteria with 4675 patients. Study designs included 12 quality improvement projects, 6 cohort studies, and 1 randomized controlled trial. Four studies evaluated effect of multidisciplinary difficult airway teams on airway securement; all reported higher first attempt success rate with team approach. Three studies reported time to secure the difficult airways, all reporting swifter airway securement with team approach. The most common difficult airway complications were hypoxia, esophageal intubation, hemodynamic instability, and aspiration. Team composition varied, including otolaryngologists, anesthesiologists, intensivists, nurses, and respiratory care practitioners. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary difficult airway teams are associated with improved clinical outcomes compared to unstructured emergency airway management; however, studies have significant heterogeneity in team composition, algorithms for airway securement, and outcomes reported. Further evidence is necessary to define the clinical efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and best practices relating to implementing difficult airway teams in inpatient settings.

Post-stapedotomy reparative granuloma following use of acellular porcine small intestinal submucosa.

PURPOSE: There have been multiple proposed etiologies of reparative granuloma following stapes surgery. In this report, we present the first case of post-stapedectomy reparative granuloma following the use of Biodesign (Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN) otologic graft material, an acellular matrix derived from porcine small intestinal submucosa, and review the literature of post-stapes surgery reparative granuloma. PATIENT: 50-year-old woman who developed a reparative granuloma following stapedotomy with acellular porcine intestinal submucosa presenting with profound hearing loss and vertigo. INTERVENTION: Middle ear exploration with excision of granuloma and revision stapedotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Audiologic outcomes as measured by pure-tone air and bone conduction thresholds and word recognition scores. Improvement in vertigo. MAIN FINDINGS: Surgical excision of the reparative granuloma with revision stapedotomy resolved vertigo. Hearing has improved progressively postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: We report the first case of post-stapedotomy reparative granuloma following the use of acellular porcine intestinal submucosa. Although exact etiology cannot be determined from a single case report, this illustrates the need for careful use of novel foreign graft material. This case additionally confirms that removal of granuloma and inciting materials can salvage serviceable hearing.