Imagistic Findings Using Artificial Intelligence in Vaccinated versus Unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2-Positive Patients Receiving In-Care Treatment at a Tertiary Lung Hospital.

BACKGROUND: In December 2019 the World Health Organization announced that the widespread severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection had become a global pandemic. The most affected organ by the novel virus is the lung, and imaging exploration of the thorax using computer tomography (CT) scanning and X-ray has had an important impact. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed the prevalence of lung lesions in vaccinated versus unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2 patients using an artificial intelligence (AI) platform provided by Medicai. The software analyzes the CT scans, performing the lung and lesion segmentation using a variant of the U-net convolutional network. RESULTS: We conducted a cohort study at a tertiary lung hospital in which we included 186 patients: 107 (57.52%) male and 59 (42.47%) females, of which 157 (84.40%) were not vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2. Over five times more unvaccinated patients than vaccinated ones are admitted to the hospital and require imaging investigations. More than twice as many unvaccinated patients have more than 75% of the lungs affected. Patients in the age group 30-39 have had the most lung lesions at almost 69% of both lungs affected. Compared to vaccinated patients with comorbidities, unvaccinated patients with comorbidities had developed increased lung lesions by 5%. CONCLUSION: The study revealed a higher percentage of lung lesions among unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2-positive patients admitted to The National Institute of Pulmonology "Marius Nasta" in Bucharest, Romania, underlining the importance of vaccination and also the usefulness of artificial intelligence in CT interpretation.

Risk of Death in Comorbidity Subgroups of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Inferred by Routine Laboratory Markers of Systemic Inflammation on Admission: A Retrospective Study.

Our study objective was to construct models using 20 routine laboratory parameters on admission to predict disease severity and mortality risk in a group of 254 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Considering the influence of confounding factors in this single-center study, we also retrospectively assessed the correlations between the risk of death and the routine laboratory parameters within individual comorbidity subgroups. In multivariate regression models and by ROC curve analysis, a model of three routine laboratory parameters (AUC 0.85; 95% CI: 0.79-0.91) and a model of six laboratory factors (AUC 0.86; 95% CI: 0.81-0.91) were able to predict severity and mortality of COVID-19, respectively, compared with any other individual parameter. Hierarchical cluster analysis showed that inflammatory laboratory markers grouped together in three distinct clusters including positive correlations: WBC with NEU, NEU with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), NEU with systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), NLR with SII and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) with SII. When analyzing the routine laboratory parameters in the subgroups of comorbidities, the risk of death was associated with a common set of laboratory markers of systemic inflammation. Our results have shown that a panel of several routine laboratory parameters recorded on admission could be helpful for early evaluation of the risk of disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Inflammatory markers for mortality risk were similar in the subgroups of comorbidities, suggesting the limited effect of confounding factors in predicting COVID-19 mortality at admission.