Evaluating the Persian versions of two psoriatic arthritis screening questionnaires early arthritis for psoriatic patients questionnaire (EARP) and psoriasis epidemiology screening tool (PEST) in Iranian psoriatic patients

Background/aim: The majority of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients present at dermatology clinics with cutaneous psoriasis up to 10 years prior to arthritis onset; therefore, applying a suitable screening tool to detect PsA early is essential for dermatologists. This study aimed to validate and evaluate the Persian version of two PsA screening questionnaires, the early arthritis for psoriatic patients questionnaire (EARP) and the psoriasis epidemiology screening tool (PEST) in Iranian psoriatic patients. Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, psoriatic patients who presented to the dermatology clinic without a previously established PsA were asked to fill out the Persian version of EARP and PEST. PsA was diagnosed by a rheumatologist based on the fulfillment of the classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for both questionnaires. Results: A total of 75 patients (33 [44%] female, 42 [56%] male, with a mean age of 43.2 ± 14.6) were enrolled in the study. The prevalence of PsA based on rheumatologist diagnosis was 25.3% (19 patients had PsA). The ROC curve analysis of EARP and PEST were 0.949 (95% CI: 0.897­1) and 0.922 (95% CI: 0.834­1). The sensitivity of EARP and PEST questionnaires was 94.7% and 58%, respectively, while the specificity was 78.6% and 96.4%, respectively, with a cut-off of 3. Conclusion: The Persian version of both questionnaires showed good performance. We suggest EARP as a screening tool for PsA in the dermatology clinics due to much higher sensitivity with acceptable specificity compared to PEST.

Diffuse pigmentation of back and arms: macular amyloidosis or other?

The study was undertaken to answer the question that how many patients with pigmentation of back and arms actually have amyloid deposits in pathology. 44 patients presenting with diffuse pigmentation of back and arms (DPOBA) were selected. Skin biopsies were performed in all cases from the affected sites. On all formalin fixed and paraffin embedded specimens, the following histochemical stains were performed: Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Congo red and immunohistochemical staining using anti-cytokeratin monoclonal antibody. In 9 of 44 cases (20%), amyloid deposits were found. In the remaining 35 cases (80%), H&E, Congo red and immunohistochemical staining failed to show any amyloid deposition. We were unable to find amyloid deposition in most of the patients presented with DPOBA. It seems that the signs may be attributable other disorders with similar clinical but different pathophysiologic aspects.