Differential landscape of immune evasion in oncogenic RAS-driven primary and metastatic colorectal cancers.

Oncogenic drivers such as KRAS extensively modulate the tumor inflammatory microenvironment (TIME) of colorectal cancer (CRC). The influence of KRAS on modulating immune cell composition remains unclear. The objective of this study was to identify signatures of infiltrative immune cells and distinctive patterns that differ between RAS wild-type (WT) and oncogenic mutant (MT) CRC that explain immune evasion in MT tumors. A total of 7,801 CRC specimens were analyzed using next-generation DNA sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, and/or whole transcriptome sequencing. Deficiency of mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutation burden (TMB) were also assessed. KRAS mutations were present in 48% of CRC, similarly distributed in patients younger than vs. 50 years and older. In microsatellite stable (MSS) KRAS MT tumors, composition of the TIME included higher neutrophil infiltration and lower infiltration of B cells. MSI-H/dMMR was significantly more prevalent in RAS WT (9.1%) than in KRAS MT (2.9%) CRC. In MSS CRC, TMB-high cases were significantly higher in RAS MT (3.1%) than in RAS WT (2.1%) tumors. KRAS and NRAS mutations are associated with increased neutrophil infiltration, with codon-specific differences. These results demonstrate significant differences in the TIME of RAS mutant CRC that match previous reports of immunoevasive characteristics of such tumors.

Alliance for clinical trials in Oncology (Alliance) trial A022101/NRG-GI009: a pragmatic randomized phase III trial evaluating total ablative therapy for patients with limited metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluating radiation, ablation, and surgery (ERASur).

BACKGROUND: For patients with liver-confined metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), local therapy of isolated metastases has been associated with long-term progression-free and overall survival (OS). However, for patients with more advanced mCRC, including those with extrahepatic disease, the efficacy of local therapy is less clear although increasingly being used in clinical practice. Prospective studies to clarify the role of metastatic-directed therapies in patients with mCRC are needed. METHODS: The Evaluating Radiation, Ablation, and Surgery (ERASur) A022101/NRG-GI009 trial is a randomized, National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase III study evaluating if the addition of metastatic-directed therapy to standard of care systemic therapy improves OS in patients with newly diagnosed limited mCRC. Eligible patients require a pathologic diagnosis of CRC, have BRAF wild-type and microsatellite stable disease, and have 4 or fewer sites of metastatic disease identified on baseline imaging. Liver-only metastatic disease is not permitted. All metastatic lesions must be amenable to total ablative therapy (TAT), which includes surgical resection, microwave ablation, and/or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) with SABR required for at least one lesion. Patients without overt disease progression after 16-26 weeks of first-line systemic therapy will be randomized 1:1 to continuation of systemic therapy with or without TAT. The trial activated through the Cancer Trials Support Unit on January 10, 2023. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, adverse events profile, and time to local recurrence with exploratory biomarker analyses. This study requires a total of 346 evaluable patients to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 to detect an improvement in OS from a median of 26 months in the control arm to 37 months in the experimental arm with a hazard ratio of 0.7. The trial uses a group sequential design with two interim analyses for futility. DISCUSSION: The ERASur trial employs a pragmatic interventional design to test the efficacy and safety of adding multimodality TAT to standard of care systemic therapy in patients with limited mCRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05673148, registered December 21, 2022.

Consideration of Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Expert Survey and Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: A survey of medical oncologists (MOs), radiation oncologists (ROs), and surgical oncologists (SOs) who are experts in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was conducted to identify factors used to consider metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey to assess clinical factors when weighing MDT in patients with mCRC was developed based on systematic review of the literature and integrated with clinical vignettes. Supporting evidence from the systematic review was included to aid in answering questions. RESULTS: Among 75 experts on mCRC invited, 47 (response rate 62.7%) chose to participate including 16 MOs, 16 ROs, and 15 SOs. Most experts would not consider MDT in patients with 3 lesions in both the liver and lung regardless of distribution or timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (6 vs. 36 months after definitive treatment). Similarly, for patients with retroperitoneal lymph node and lung and liver involvement, most experts would not offer MDT regardless of timing of metastatic disease diagnosis. In general, SOs were willing to consider MDT in patients with more advanced disease, ROs were more willing to offer treatment regardless of metastatic site location, and MOs were the least likely to consider MDT. CONCLUSIONS: Among experts caring for patients with mCRC, significant variation was noted among MOs, ROs, and SOs in the distribution and volume of metastatic disease for which MDT would be considered. This variability highlights differing opinions on management of these patients and underscores the need for well-designed prospective randomized trials to characterize the risks and potential benefits of MDT.

The role of specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs) in inflammatory arthritis: A therapeutic strategy.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is classified as a persistent inflammatory autoimmune disorder leading to the subsequent erosion of articular cartilage and bone tissue originating from the synovium. The fundamental objective of therapeutic interventions in RA has been the suppression of inflammation. Nevertheless, conventional medicines that lack target specificity may exhibit unpredictable effects on cell metabolism. In recent times, there has been evidence suggesting that specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs), which are lipid metabolites, have a role in facilitating the resolution of inflammation and the reestablishment of tissue homeostasis. SPMs are synthesized by immune cells through the enzymatic conversion of omega-3 fatty acids. In the context of RA, there is a possibility of dysregulation in the production of these SPMs. In this review, we delve into the present comprehension of the endogenous functions of SPMs in RA as lipids that exhibit pro-resolutive, protective, and immunoresolvent properties.

A Comparison between Pre-Incisional and Intraoperative Lidocaine Infiltration on Post-Incisional Surgical Pain in Microdiscectomy Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study.

Objectives: Effective postoperative pain control in microdiscectomy surgery is crucial to managing the disease and improving the patient's quality of life. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the potential effectiveness of 2% lidocaine in reducing pain immediately after discectomy surgery. Methods: A total of 60 patients who underwent microdiscectomy surgery were enrolled in this randomized clinical trial study. They were randomly assigned to three groups: one group received lidocaine just before the incision, another group received lidocaine just before closing the incision, and the third group served as the control. Pain scores were measured at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, and 12 h after the surgery using a Visual Analogue Scale. Results: The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population, including age, weight, length of surgery, gender, and history of diabetes, hypertension, and previous surgery, were comparable across all three groups (P>0.05). There was a significant reduction in pain scores over time in the groups that received lidocaine before (P<0.001) and during surgery (P=0.002). Moreover, there were significant differences in pain scores at all time points among the three groups. Both groups receiving lidocaine showed significantly lower pain scores than the control group (Pbefore surgery=0.005 and Pduring surgery<0.001). However, no significant difference was observed between the groups receiving lidocaine (P=0.080). Conclusion: These findings highlight the effectiveness of a local injection of 2% lidocaine either before or during the surgery in managing post-incisional surgical pain after discectomy.

A Meta-Analysis to Assess the Efficacy of HER2-Targeted Treatment Regimens in HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC).

Recent trials provide evidence that HER2 is a potential new target for patients with colorectal cancer. While HER2-positive tumors do not show a very encouraging response to anti-HER2-positive agents like trastuzumab alone, promising results have been observed when combined with other synergistically acting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Our meta-analysis was conducted following the Cochrane Handbook and written following the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO with the registration number CRD42022338935. After a comprehensive search for relevant articles, 14 CTs were identified and uploaded to Rayyan, and six trials were ultimately selected for inclusion. The meta-analysis revealed that a median of three prior lines of therapy was used before enrolling in the six trials comprising 238 patients with HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 31.33% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.27-38.39) and 74.37% (95% CI 64.57-84.17), respectively. The pooled weighted progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.2 months. The pooled ORR and DCR meta-analysis indicate a significant response to HER2-targeted therapy in this patient in HER2-positive mCRC. Additionally, a pooled PFS of 6.2 months suggests that HER2-targeted treatment regimens are associated with a meaningful improvement in survival outcomes in this population.

Current Practices in Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) Chemotherapy: An International Survey of the HAI Consortium Research Network.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of hepatic artery infusion (HAI) programs have been established worldwide. Practice patterns for this complex therapy across these programs have not been reported. This survey aimed to identify current practice patterns in HAI therapy with the long-term goal of defining best practices and performing prospective studies. METHODS: Using SurveyMonkeyTM, a 28-question survey assessing current practices in HAI was developed by 12 HAI Consortium Research Network (HCRN) surgical oncologists. Content analysis was used to code textual responses, and the frequency of categories was calculated. Scores for rank-order questions were generated by calculating average ranking for each answer choice. RESULTS: Thirty-six (72%) HCRN members responded to the survey. The most common intended initial indications for HAI at new programs were unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM; 100%) and unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uIHC; 56%). Practice patterns evolved such that uCRLM (94%) and adjuvant therapy for CRLM (adjCRLM; 72%) have become the most common current indications for HAI at established centers. Referral patterns for pump placement differed between uCRLM and uIHC, with most patients referred while receiving second- and first-line therapy, respectively, with physicians preferring to evaluate patients for HAI while receiving first-line therapy for CRLM. Concern for extrahepatic disease was ranked as the most important factor when considering a patient for HAI. CONCLUSIONS: Indication and patient selection factors for HAI therapy are relatively uniform across most HCRN centers. The increasing use of adjuvant HAI therapy and overall consistency of practice patterns among HCRN centers provides a robust environment for prospective data collection and randomized clinical trials.

Disparities in treatment and survival in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in California.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Curative intent therapy is the standard of care for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, these therapies are under-utilized, with several treatment and survival disparities. We sought to demonstrate whether the type of facility and distance from treatment center (with transplant capabilities) contributed to disparities in curative-intent treatment and survival for early-stage HCC in California. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the California Cancer Registry for patients diagnosed with stage I or II primary HCC between 2005 and 2017. Primary and secondary outcomes were receipt of treatment and overall survival, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression and Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate associations. RESULTS: Of 19 059 patients with early-stage HCC, only 36% (6778) received curative-intent treatment. Compared to Non-Hispanic White patients, Hispanic patients were less likely, and Asian/Pacific Islander patients were more likely to receive curative-intent treatment. Our results showed that rural residence, public insurance, lower neighborhood SES, and care at non-National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center were associated with not receiving treatment and decreased survival. CONCLUSIONS: Although multiple factors influence receipt of treatment for early-HCC, our findings suggest that early intervention programs should target travel barriers and access to specialist care to help improve oncologic outcomes.

Adjuvant hepatic artery infusion pump chemotherapy for resected colorectal cancer liver metastases.

First introduced in the late 1980s in the setting of unresectable liver metastasis, the use of the hepatic artery infusion pump was expanded to deliver chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting after hepatic resection about 1 decade later. Though the initial randomized clinical trial comparing the hepatic artery infusion pump to resection alone failed to show an improvement in overall survival, 2 large randomized clinical trials, namely the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (1999) and European Cooperative Group (2002) trials, did report improved hepatic disease-free survival with the use of a hepatic artery infusion pump. There remained limited evidence of a replicable improvement in overall survival, and the expansion of hepatic artery infusion pump into the adjuvant space was cautioned by a Cochrane review in 2006, highlighting the need for further studies to establish a consistent benefit. Those data were forthcoming over the 2000s and 2010s in large-scale retrospective analyses for the most part, but the recommendations from international guidelines remain equivocal to this day. With widespread retrospective data and high-quality randomized clinical trial evidence that a hepatic artery infusion pump in the setting of resected hepatic metastasis from colorectal liver metastasis decreases hepatic recurrence and indications that it may improve overall survival, it is clear that there is a subset of patients that greatly benefit from this treatment modality. New randomized clinical trials, specifically in the adjuvant setting, are currently enrolling and should continue to elucidate the benefit that hepatic artery infusion pumps may confer. That being said, it remains a challenge to reliably identify these patients, and the procedure is limited by complexity and resources to high-volume academic centers, leaving accessibility as a further potential barrier for patients. It remains to be seen what volume of literature may shift the hepatic artery infusion pump into the standard of care, but adjuvant hepatic artery infusion pump in the setting of colorectal liver metastasis should certainly be explored further as a validated treatment for patients.

Starting a successful hepatic artery infusion pump program: A practical guide.

Implementation of a successful hepatic artery infusion pump program requires numerous factors to be in place, and the lack of any of these may lead to program failure. First and foremost, hepatic artery infusion pump programs must have adequate surgical expertise in the complex technical aspects of hepatic artery infusion pump implantation and postoperative management. Most new hepatic artery infusion pump programs are initiated by a surgeon and led in conjunction with a medical oncologist. Medical oncology experience in floxuridine dosing is critical in maximizing the treatment doses and the number of cycles administered while avoiding biliary toxicity. This is facilitated by collaboration with an engaged pharmacy team. To have adequate patient volume for a successful program, internal and external stakeholders must have buy-in, including surgical and medical oncology colleagues unfamiliar with hepatic artery infusion pumps, colorectal surgery, and other referring providers. Programmatic support must be obtained from the hospital, cancer center, and department administration. Day-to-day pump access for chemotherapy and maintenance saline fills must be performed by appropriately trained infusion nurses to avoid complications. Nuclear and diagnostic radiology experience is key to identifying extrahepatic perfusion and hepatic artery infusion pump-specific complications. Additionally, skilled interventional radiologists and gastroenterologists are necessary to identify and treat rare complications rapidly. Finally, given the current rapid expansion of hepatic artery infusion pump programs, new programs must identify engaged mentors to help guide patient selection, navigate the nuanced issues that may arise, and provide advice in the case of complications. Although hepatic artery infusion pump dissemination outside of several major tertiary centers previously had stalled, establishing a successful and active hepatic artery infusion pump is feasible with appropriate training, mentorship, and thoughtful assembly of a dedicated multidisciplinary team.

Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared With Cefoxitin as Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Despite improvements in perioperative mortality, the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) remains high after pancreatoduodenectomy. The effect of broad-spectrum antimicrobial surgical prophylaxis in reducing SSI is poorly understood. Objective: To define the effect of broad-spectrum perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis on postoperative SSI incidence compared with standard care antibiotics. Design, Setting, and Participants: Pragmatic, open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 clinical trial at 26 hospitals across the US and Canada. Participants were enrolled between November 2017 and August 2021, with follow-up through December 2021. Adults undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy for any indication were eligible. Individuals were excluded if they had allergies to study medications, active infections, chronic steroid use, significant kidney dysfunction, or were pregnant or breastfeeding. Participants were block randomized in a 1:1 ratio and stratified by the presence of a preoperative biliary stent. Participants, investigators, and statisticians analyzing trial data were unblinded to treatment assignment. Intervention: The intervention group received piperacillin-tazobactam (3.375 or 4 g intravenously) as perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, while the control group received cefoxitin (2 g intravenously; standard care). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was development of postoperative SSI within 30 days. Secondary end points included 30-day mortality, development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, and sepsis. All data were collected as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Results: The trial was terminated at an interim analysis on the basis of a predefined stopping rule. Of 778 participants (378 in the piperacillin-tazobactam group [median age, 66.8 y; 233 {61.6%} men] and 400 in the cefoxitin group [median age, 68.0 y; 223 {55.8%} men]), the percentage with SSI at 30 days was lower in the perioperative piperacillin-tazobactam vs cefoxitin group (19.8% vs 32.8%; absolute difference, -13.0% [95% CI, -19.1% to -6.9%]; P < .001). Participants treated with piperacillin-tazobactam, vs cefoxitin, had lower rates of postoperative sepsis (4.2% vs 7.5%; difference, -3.3% [95% CI, -6.6% to 0.0%]; P = .02) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (12.7% vs 19.0%; difference, -6.3% [95% CI, -11.4% to -1.2%]; P = .03). Mortality rates at 30 days were 1.3% (5/378) among participants treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and 2.5% (10/400) among those receiving cefoxitin (difference, -1.2% [95% CI, -3.1% to 0.7%]; P = .32). Conclusions and Relevance: In participants undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy, use of piperacillin-tazobactam as perioperative prophylaxis reduced postoperative SSI, pancreatic fistula, and multiple downstream sequelae of SSI. The findings support the use of piperacillin-tazobactam as standard care for open pancreatoduodenectomy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03269994.

Adjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Lymph Node-Positive Biliary Tract Cancers: Secondary Analysis of a Single-Arm Clinical Trial (SWOG 0809).

BACKGROUND: SWOG 0809 is the only prospective study of adjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation focusing on margin status in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) and gallbladder cancer (GBCA); however, the effects of adjuvant therapy by nodal status have never been reported in this population. METHODS: Patients with resected EHCC and GBCA, stage pT2-4, node-positive (N+) or margin-positive (R1) who completed four cycles of chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy were included. Cox regression was used to compare overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence, and distant metastasis by nodal status. DFS rates were compared with historical data via a one-sample t-test. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients [EHCC, n = 46 (66%); GBCA, n = 23 (33%)] were evaluated, with a median age of 61.7 years and an R0 rate of 66.7% and R1 rate of 33.3%. EHCC versus GBCA was more likely to be N+ (73.9% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.03). Nodal status did not significantly impact OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-4.54, p = 0.11) or DFS (HR 1.63, 95% CI 0.77-3.44, p = 0.20). Two-year OS was 70.6% for node-negative (N0) disease and 60.9% for N+ disease, while 2-year DFS was 62.5% for N0 tumors and 49.8% for N+ tumors. N+ versus N0 tumors showed higher rates of distant failure (42.2% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.04). The 2-year DFS rate in N+ tumors was significantly higher than in historical controls (49.8% vs. 29.7%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy is associated with favorable outcome independent of nodal status and may impact local control in N+ patients. These data could serve as a benchmark for future adjuvant trials, including molecular-targeted agents.

Utility of combined gadoxetic acid and ferumoxytol-enhanced liver MRI for preoperative detection of colorectal cancer liver metastases: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide and resection of CRC metastases confined to the liver is the treatment of choice when feasible. Ferumoxytol is an off-label contrast agent that opacifies vasculature and may be helpful in distinguishing metastases from small hemangiomas and blood vessels on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI using a standard gadoxetic acid protocol and a combined gadoxetic acid/ferumoxytol protocol in patients with suspected colorectal hepatic metastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved, single-institution, retrospective study, eight patients underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI, supplemented with additional T1-weighted ferumoxytol enhanced sequences. Two radiologists in consensus identified all metastases using all available sequences, which served as the reference standard. Two different radiologists reviewed each exam twice, once using the standard protocol and once with additional ferumoxytol sequences. The detection rate was estimated as the predicted probability of a metastasis along with the 95% confidence interval (CI) using hierarchical logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 49 metastases were identified. The mean diameter was 10 mm, measured in greatest axial dimension (median=7 mm; range=2-70 mm). Readers 1 and 2 had detection rates of 69.6% (95% CI = 48.2-85.0) and 53.1% (95% CI = 35.2-70.3) for gadoxetic acid alone and 98.0% (95% CI = 86.3-99.7) and 83.5% (95% CI = 59.3-94.7) for combined protocol. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary investigation, adding ferumoxytol-enhanced sequences to gadoxetic acid liver MRI protocol increased the detection rate of CRC hepatic metastases and may aid in preoperative decision making.

Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: ASCO Guideline.

PURPOSE: To develop recommendations for treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice. RESULTS: Five systematic reviews and 10 randomized controlled trials met the systematic review inclusion criteria. RECOMMENDATIONS: Doublet chemotherapy should be offered, or triplet therapy may be offered to patients with previously untreated, initially unresectable mCRC, on the basis of included studies of chemotherapy in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies. In the first-line setting, pembrolizumab is recommended for patients with mCRC and microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair tumors; chemotherapy and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy is recommended for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair left-sided treatment-naive RAS wild-type mCRC; chemotherapy and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy is recommended for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair RAS wild-type right-sided mCRC. Encorafenib plus cetuximab is recommended for patients with previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC that has progressed after at least one previous line of therapy. Cytoreductive surgery plus systemic chemotherapy may be recommended for selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases; however, the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is not recommended. Stereotactic body radiation therapy may be recommended following systemic therapy for patients with oligometastases of the liver who are not considered candidates for resection. Selective internal radiation therapy is not routinely recommended for patients with unilobar or bilobar metastases of the liver. Perioperative chemotherapy or surgery alone should be offered to patients with mCRC who are candidates for potentially curative resection of liver metastases. Multidisciplinary team management and shared decision making are recommended. Qualifying statements with further details related to implementation of guideline recommendations are also included.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Current Progress and Advances in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Highlights from the 2022 Annual American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Gastrointestinal Meeting.

PURPOSE: To provide an overview of the key findings from studies in upper gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, pancreas, and colorectal malignancies presented at ASCO GI 2022. METHODS: We reviewed the abstracts presented at ASCO GI 2022. The studies highlighted were selected by the authors based on their significant discoveries and potential impact on clinical practice. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: This year's hybrid ASCO-GI symposium (2022) introduced many promising new treatment strategies in GI oncology, with several changes in clinical practice for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).

Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance) trial A022101/NRG-GI009: A pragmatic randomized phase III trial evaluating total ablative therapy for patients with limited metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluating radiation, ablation, and surgery (ERASur).

Background: For patients with liver-confined metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), local therapy of isolated metastases has been associated with long-term progression-free and overall survival (OS). However, for patients with more advanced mCRC, including those with extrahepatic disease, the efficacy of local therapy is less clear although increasingly being used in clinical practice. Prospective studies to clarify the role of metastatic-directed therapies in patients with mCRC are needed. Methods: The Evaluating Radiation, Ablation, and Surgery (ERASur) A022101/NRG-GI009 trial is a randomized, National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase III study evaluating if the addition of metastatic-directed therapy to standard of care systemic therapy improves OS in patients with newly diagnosed limited mCRC. Eligible patients require a pathologic diagnosis of CRC, have BRAF wild-type and microsatellite stable disease, and have 4 or fewer sites of metastatic disease identified on baseline imaging. Liver-only metastatic disease is not permitted. All metastatic lesions must be amenable to total ablative therapy (TAT), which includes surgical resection, microwave ablation, and/or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) with SABR required for at least one lesion. Patients without overt disease progression after 16-26 weeks of first-line systemic therapy will be randomized 1:1 to continuation of systemic therapy with or without TAT. The trial activated through the Cancer Trials Support Unit on January 10, 2023. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, adverse events profile, and time to local recurrence with exploratory biomarker analyses. This study requires a total of 346 evaluable patients to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 0.05 to detect an improvement in OS from a median of 26 months in the control arm to 37 months in the experimental arm with a hazard ratio of 0.7. The trial uses a group sequential design with two interim analyses for futility. Discussion: The ERASur trial employs a pragmatic interventional design to test the efficacy and safety of adding multimodality TAT to standard of care systemic therapy in patients with limited mCRC.