RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic musculoskeletal pain is prevalent and disabling among older adults in underserved communities. Psychosocial pain management is more effective than pharmacological treatment in older adults. However, underserved community clinics often lack psychosocial treatments, in part because of a lack of trained providers. Shared medical appointments, in which patients undergo brief medical evaluation, monitoring, counseling, and group support, are an efficacious and cost-effective method for chronic disease management in underserved clinics, reducing the need for specialized providers. However, shared medical visits are often ineffective for chronic pain, possibly owing to lack of inclusion of skills most relevant for older adults (eg, pacing to increase engagement in daily activities). OBJECTIVE: We have described the protocol for the development and initial pilot effectiveness testing of the GetActive+ mind-body activity intervention for older adults with chronic pain. GetActive+ was adapted from GetActive, an evidence-based intervention that improved pain outcomes among mostly affluent White adults. We aim to establish the initial feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and effectiveness of GetActive+ when delivered as part of shared medical appointments in a community clinic. METHODS: We conducted qualitative focus groups and individual interviews with providers (n=25) and English-speaking older adults (aged ≥55 y; n=18) with chronic pain to understand the pain experience in this population, perceptions about intervention content, and barriers to and facilitators of intervention participation and implementation in this setting. Qualitative interviews with Spanish-speaking older adults are in progress and will inform a future open pilot of the intervention in Spanish. We are currently conducting an open pilot study with exit interviews in English (n=30 individuals in total). Primary outcomes are feasibility (≥75% of patients who are approached agree to participate), acceptability (≥75% of patients who enrolled complete 8 out of 10 sessions; qualitative), and fidelity (≥75% of session components are delivered as intended). Secondary outcomes include physical function-self-reported, performance based (6-minute walk test), and objective (step count)-and emotional function (depression and anxiety). Other assessments include putative mechanisms (eg, mindfulness and pain catastrophizing). RESULTS: We began enrolling participants for the qualitative phase in November 2022 and the open pilot phase in May 2023. We completed the qualitative phase with providers and English-speaking patients, and the results are being analyzed using a hybrid, inductive-deductive approach. We conducted rapid analysis of these data to develop GetActive+ before the open pilot in English, including increasing readability and clarity of language, reducing the number of skills taught to increase time for individual check-ins and group participation, and increasing experiential exercises for skill uptake. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a blueprint for the refinement of a mind-body activity intervention for older adults with chronic pain in underserved community clinics and for incorporation within shared medical visits. It will inform a future, fully powered, effectiveness-implementation trial of GetActive+ to help address the chronic pain epidemic among older adults. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05782231; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05782231. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/52117.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We analyzed individuals with epilepsy due to Sturge-Weber syndrome to determine which anticonvulsants provided optimal seizure control and which resulted in the fewest side effects. METHODS: One-hundred-eight records from a single center were retrospectively analyzed for Sturge-Weber syndrome brain involvement, epilepsy, Sturge-Weber syndrome neuroscores, and currently used anticonvulsants. RESULTS: Of the fourteen anticonvulsants that had been employed, the most often used agents were oxcarbazepine or carbamazepine, and levetiracetam. Individuals whose seizures at the most recent visit were fully controlled (seizure-free) for 6 months or longer were more likely to have ever tried, or currently used, oxcarbazepine or carbamazepine than those with uncontrolled seizures. Thirty-nine of 69 individuals (56.5%) were seizure-free with oxcarbazepine or carbamazepine history versus 11 of 35 individuals (31.4%) who had not taken these agents (P < 0.05); 38 of 62 patients (61.3%) were seizure-free while currently taking these anticonvulsants versus 12 of 42 (28.6%) not taking them (P < 0.01). Patients with seizure control for 6 months or longer were less likely to have ever tried, or to currently be taking, levetiracetam than those without control. Sixteen of 56 individuals (28.6%) were seizure-free with levetiracetam history versus 34 of 48 (70.8%) without it (P < 0.001); 14 of 43 individuals (32.6%) were seizure-free and currently taking levetiracetam versus 36 of 61 (59.0%) not taking it (P < 0.01). When topiramate was added as second-line medication, five of nine patients (55.6%) experienced decreased seizure severity, and worsening of glaucoma was not reported. CONCLUSIONS: Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine were associated with better seizure control than levetiracetam in this Sturge-Weber syndrome cohort and so may be preferred as the initial therapy. When used as adjunctive therapy, topiramate was effective in this limited analysis without a clear increased incidence of glaucoma.