Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Contraception ; 82(4): 354-7, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20851229

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is limited information about the number of intrauterine device (IUD) users requiring operative intervention for device-related complications. This is an evaluation of cases requiring in-hospital operative intervention for IUD perforations, removals and pregnancy-related complications. STUDY DESIGN: Large retrospective case series of patients who received operative management of IUD complications. RESULTS: Charts of patients from 15 hospitals in two health care systems from 2000 to 2007 were reviewed and outcomes of 276 women are reported. There were 95 operative IUD removals for perforations (including 60 levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems), 157 operative procedures for inability to remove an IUD in the office, and 42 pregnancy-related complications that were managed in the operating room. Ectopic pregnancy was the most common diagnosis among pregnant women (23 of 42 pregnant women, 54.8%). CONCLUSION: The majority of operative procedures were performed for intrauterine IUDs, most of which were appropriately positioned IUDs with missing or short strings. In-office techniques for obtaining analgesia and dilation as well as appropriate devices for removal of T-shaped IUDs should make this practice rare.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Remoção de Dispositivo , Feminino , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/etiologia , Doenças dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Humanos , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/etiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Perfuração Uterina/etiologia , Perfuração Uterina/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...