RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The introduction of the classification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) by NKF KDOQI guidelines in 2002, including the staging and risk assessment of this disease, was a landmark event. The division of CKD into stages 1-5 turned out to be very useful and sensitive tool in the hands of both scientists and clinical practitioners; it established common nomenclature pertaining to CKD all over the world. This stratification profoundly changed the approach to CKD, transforming it from a somewhat neglected clinical problem to the phenomenon named "the epidemic of CKD". However, after a short period if clinical experience a heated debate was initiated in the literature, indicating the shortcomings of the adopted classification. The most questionable areas included methodological issues as well as dissimilar prognoses for patients depending on the cause of kidney dysfunction, the presence of proteinuria and comorbidities. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of CKD and the risk factors based on NKF KDOQI classification of 2002 in the population of Ostróda administrative district. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In total 437 individuals (F 277, M 160) aged 52.7±18.0 were examined. The study was conducted in Ostróda among randomly selected inhabitants of Ostróda adminstrative district. Serum creatinine was determined by a modified Jaffe method and eGFR was calculated (MDRD formula) for each individual. The correlations between serum creatinine and eGFR, gender and age were studied. Additionally, 326 of the examined participants were interviewed to establish CKD risk factors: kidney disease in the family, being overweight and/or obese, arterial hypertension, diabetes, smoking, heart attack, stroke. RESULTS: 58.6% of the examined individuals demonstrated abnormal eGFR values (<90 ml/min/l.73 m2), whereas serum creatinine above the laboratory norm was found in 1.3% of patients. Significant CKD risk factors included an increased prevalence of obesity (78.3%), arterial hypertension (38.6%), and smoking (26.8%); 23.9% reported kidney disease in the family. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our study, it can be concluded that CKD prevalence evaluated according to the classification of 2002 seems to be overestimated, and the main factor contributing to a false CKD diagnosis is a physiological decline in eGFR values with aging. The modification of CKD classification carried out by NKF in 2012 requires further observation and evaluation of its usefulness in daily clinical practice.
