Sex affects transcriptional associations with schizophrenia across the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and caudate nucleus.

Schizophrenia is a complex neuropsychiatric disorder with sexually dimorphic features, including differential symptomatology, drug responsiveness, and male incidence rate. Prior large-scale transcriptome analyses for sex differences in schizophrenia have focused on the prefrontal cortex. Analyzing BrainSeq Consortium data (caudate nucleus: n = 399, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: n = 377, and hippocampus: n = 394), we identified 831 unique genes that exhibit sex differences across brain regions, enriched for immune-related pathways. We observed X-chromosome dosage reduction in the hippocampus of male individuals with schizophrenia. Our sex interaction model revealed 148 junctions dysregulated in a sex-specific manner in schizophrenia. Sex-specific schizophrenia analysis identified dozens of differentially expressed genes, notably enriched in immune-related pathways. Finally, our sex-interacting expression quantitative trait loci analysis revealed 704 unique genes, nine associated with schizophrenia risk. These findings emphasize the importance of sex-informed analysis of sexually dimorphic traits, inform personalized therapeutic strategies in schizophrenia, and highlight the need for increased female samples for schizophrenia analyses.

Patterns of Unwanted Biological and Technical Expression Variation Among 49 Human Tissues.

Tissue gene expression studies are impacted by biological and technical sources of variation, which can be broadly classified into wanted and unwanted variation. The latter, if not addressed, results in misleading biological conclusions. Methods have been proposed to reduce unwanted variation, such as normalization and batch correction. A more accurate understanding of all causes of variation could significantly improve the ability of these methods to remove unwanted variation while retaining variation corresponding to the biological question of interest. We used 17,282 samples from 49 human tissues in the Genotype-Tissue Expression data set (v8) to investigate patterns and causes of expression variation. Transcript expression was transformed to z-scores, and only the most variable 2% of transcripts were evaluated and clustered based on coexpression patterns. Clustered gene sets were assigned to different biological or technical causes based on histologic appearances and metadata elements. We identified 522 variable transcript clusters (median: 11 per tissue) among the samples. Of these, 63% were confidently explained, 16% were likely explained, 7% were low confidence explanations, and 14% had no clear cause. Histologic analysis annotated 46 clusters. Other common causes of variability included sex, sequencing contamination, immunoglobulin diversity, and compositional tissue differences. Less common biological causes included death interval (Hardy score), disease status, and age. Technical causes included blood draw timing and harvesting differences. Many of the causes of variation in bulk tissue expression were identifiable in the Tabula Sapiens data set of single-cell expression. This is among the largest explorations of the underlying sources of tissue expression variation. It uncovered expected and unexpected causes of variable gene expression and demonstrated the utility of matched histologic specimens. It further demonstrated the value of acquiring meaningful tissue harvesting metadata elements to use for improved normalization, batch correction, and analysis of both bulk and single-cell RNA-seq data.

Patterns of unwanted biological and technical expression variation across 49 human tissues.

All tissue-based gene expression studies are impacted by biological and technical sources of variation. Numerous methods are used to normalize and batch correct these datasets. A more accurate understanding of all causes of variation could further optimize these approaches. We used 17,282 samples from 49 tissues in the Genotype Tissue Expression (GTEx) dataset (v8) to investigate patterns and causes of expression variation. Transcript expression was normalized to Z-scores and only the most variable 2% of transcripts were evaluated and clustered based on co-expression patterns. Clustered gene sets were solved to different biological or technical causes related to metadata elements and histologic images. We identified 522 variable transcript clusters (median 11 per tissue) across the samples. Of these, 64% were confidently explained, 15% were likely explained, 7% were low confidence explanations and 14% had no clear cause. Common causes included sex, sequencing contamination, immunoglobulin diversity, and compositional tissue differences. Less common biological causes included death interval (Hardy score), muscle atrophy, diabetes status, and menopause. Technical causes included brain pH and harvesting differences. Many of the causes of variation in bulk tissue expression were identifiable in the Tabula Sapiens dataset of single cell expression. This is the largest exploration of the underlying sources of tissue expression variation. It uncovered expected and unexpected causes of variable gene expression. These identified sources of variation will inform which metadata to acquire with tissue harvesting and can be used to improve normalization, batch correction, and analysis of both bulk and single cell RNA-seq data.

Genome Sequence of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum DmPark25_157, a Bacterial Strain Isolated from Drosophila melanogaster.

We present the genome sequence of a bacterial strain isolated from park25 mutants of Drosophila melanogaster as part of efforts to better understand the microbial communities in D. melanogaster We isolated and sequenced a Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strain. We present a preliminary comparative analysis with a closely related strain.

The Science and Art of Clinical Genetic Variant Classification and Its Impact on Test Accuracy.

Clinical genetic variant classification science is a growing subspecialty of clinical genetics and genomics. The field's continued improvement is essential for the success of precision medicine in both germline (hereditary) and somatic (oncology) contexts. This review focuses on variant classification for DNA next-generation sequencing tests. We first summarize current limitations in variant discovery and definition, and then describe the current five- and four-tier classification systems outlined in dominant standards and guideline publications for germline and somatic tests, respectively. We then discuss measures of variant classification discordance and the field's bias for positive results, as well as considerations for panel size and population screening in the context of estimates of positive predictive value thatincorporate estimated variant classification imperfections. Finally, we share opinions on the current state of variant classification from some of the authors of the most widely used standards and guideline publications and from other domain experts.