The Müller-Lyer illusion: investigation of a center of gravity effect on the amplitudes of saccades.

Previous research has compared the effects of visual illusions on perception with their effects on action to investigate if the action system and the perceptual system use different or common codes. Appropriate conclusions based on this comparison rely on effects that reflect the internal parameter estimates of the action and of the perceptual system. We investigated an additional factor that can possibly change the amplitudes of saccades along the Müller-Lyer illusion, the center of gravity effect. It refers to the finding that the endpoints of saccades can be diverted from the target point in the direction of the center of gravity of a stimulus configuration. We measured the perceptual (adjustment method) and the action effects (amplitudes of saccades) of the illusion. In addition, we let subjects carry out saccades along Müller-Lyer figures and a neutral figure that appeared to have the same size (but differed in actual sizes). The amplitudes of saccades differed for these figures. This was interpreted as evidence for a center of gravity effect. Its quantification allowed a correction of the action effect, which was then remarkably similar to the perceptual effect. Our results are in agreement with the notion of a common internal representation for perception and action.

Control of bladder sensations: an fMRI study of brain activity and effective connectivity.

When the bladder is fairly full, the desire to void can be suppressed, but it can also be called forth deliberately. We studied brain activity during such intentional modulations of bladder sensation in 33 healthy volunteers (17 women, 16 men). The supplementary motor area, midcingulate cortex, insula, frontal operculum, and right prefrontal cortex were consistently more active when the desire to void was enhanced without allowing urine to pass ("attempted micturition") than during a baseline task when bladder sensations were suppressed. The right anterior insula and midbrain periaquaeductal grey (PAG) were more active at higher than at lower bladder volumes. Responses of the right thalamus and several other right-hemispherical regions were stronger in women than in men. Using the psychophysiological interaction (PPI) method, we found that the midcingulate cortex had stronger connectivity (indicated by parallel co-variations of the activation time series) with the PAG and medial motor areas during "attempted micturition" than during the baseline task, possibly reflecting monitoring of urethral sphincter contractions. Conversely, the left and right insula showed decreased connectivity with many other brain regions during "attempted micturition", possibly due to predominant processing of bladder-afferent input. Intentional modulations of the desire to void change the effective connectivity of supraspinal regions involved in bladder control.

Brain activity is similar during precision and power gripping with light force: an fMRI study.

Handgrips can be broadly classified into precision and power grips. To compare central neuronal control of these tasks, functional magnetic resonance imaging was used in 14 healthy right-handed volunteers, who repetitively squeezed non-flexible force transducers with a precision grip and a power grip of the dominant hand. The relative grip force levels and movement rates (0.45 Hertz) of both tasks were comparable. Peak isometric grip forces ranged between 1% and 10% of the maximum voluntary force. Reflecting the additional recruitment of extrinsic hand muscles and the higher absolute force, activation of the contralateral primary sensorimotor cortex (M1/S1) and ipsilateral cerebellum was significantly stronger during power than during precision grip. No brain areas exhibited stronger activity during the precision grip than during the power grip. The left M1/S1 and right cerebellum showed a positive linear relationship with the grip force, while the right angular gyrus and left superior frontal gyrus showed a gradual increase in activity when less force was applied. However, these force-dependent modulations of brain activity were similar for the precision and power grip tasks. No brain region was specifically activated during one task but not during the other. Activity during precision gripping did not exceed the activity associated with power gripping possibly because the precision grip task was not challenging enough to call on dexterous fine motor control.

Asymmetry of arm-swing not related to handedness.

This study systematically investigated the symmetry of arm-swing kinematics in 16 normal subjects (8 right-handed, 8 left-handed) during treadmill locomotion, including forward walking (2-6 km/h), running (8 km/h), and backward walking (4 km/h). Kinematic data of both sides were compared. Significant differences between the left and right amplitudes of arm-swing (p<0.05) were detected in 47 of the 96 gait trials (16 subjects x 6 conditions). The mean magnitude of the side differences was 8.6 cm during forward walking (averaged across all subjects). The mean index of asymmetry of 12.5+/-24.0 (+/-S.D.) indicated a trend towards left arm-swing preference. In 10 of the 16 subjects, the individual direction of the arm-swing asymmetry could be reproduced across different velocities and locomotor modes. The asymmetry was not related to handedness, nor was it related to asymmetrical leg movements. The first comprehensive normative data of arm-swing asymmetry during treadmill walking are provided. A certain degree of asymmetry is physiological.

Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.

The assumption that the Ebbinghaus/Titchener illusion deceives perception but not grasping, which would confirm the two-visual-systems hypothesis (TVSH) as proposed by Milner and Goodale (The visual brain in action, 1995), has recently been challenged. Franz et al. (Exp Brain Res 149:470-477, 2003) found that the illusion affects both perception and grasping, and showed that the effect of the illusion on the peak grip aperture (PGA) cannot be accounted for by different sizes of the gap that separates the central target disk from the surrounding flankers. However, it is not yet clear if the presence of flankers per se influences grasping. We therefore compared kinematic parameters of prehension, using the Ebbinghaus illusion, and a neutral control condition where normal subjects grasped a disk without any flankers. In accordance with the well-known effects of the illusion on perceived size, the PGA was smaller when the target disk was surrounded by large flankers, and larger when it was encircled by small flankers. However, the largest PGA values were reached in the neutral control condition. Hence the presence of flankers leads to a general reduction of the PGA, possibly because the flankers are regarded as obstacles. This 'reduction effect' casts doubts on how appropriate it is to directly compare perceptual measures and PGA values when using the Ebbinghaus illusion. Even smaller effects of the illusion on the PGA compared to larger perceptual effects cannot be unequivocally interpreted.