Failure to Detect Leishmania in the Blood of Patients with Old-World Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Implications for Blood Donation.

Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is endemic in Israel, caused mainly by Leishmania major (L. major) and L. tropica. In addition, returning travelers import another leishmanial species such as L. braziliensis. Although we are dealing with a skin disease, the blood bank in Israel does not accept blood donations from people infected with CL in cases of multiple lesions due to the possibility of transfusion. Our purpose was to investigate the prevalence of Leishmania in the blood of patients with active or previous CL. This pilot study screened patients with active or previous CL for parasites in their blood. All patients were infected in Israel or were returning travelers with leishmaniasis acquired in Latin America. Patients were seen at the Sheba Medical Center. In addition, patients were seen at their homes in L. tropica and L. major endemic regions in Israel. Blood samples were taken from each patient for culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Altogether 62 blood samples were examined (L. tropica = 26, L. major = 33, and L. braziliensis = 3). Twenty-seven patients had an active disease and 35 were recovered. All blood cultures and PCR were negative for parasites except one blood sample that was PCR positive for L. braziliensis. The findings of our study, although a small sample, suggest that people with active or recent CL caused by L. major and L. tropica, do not harbor parasites in their blood. Thus, their exclusion from blood donation should be revisited. Further studies are needed with larger sample size and highly sensitive tests.

Obstetrical outcomes following laparoscopy during pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate pregnancy outcome of patients who undergo laparoscopy during pregnancy. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study, conducted in a single university-affiliated tertiary care medical center, comparing pregnancy outcomes of women who underwent laparoscopy during pregnancy to women without operations during pregnancy. The study group (n = 232) included all pregnant women who underwent a single laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy (4-28 weeks of gestation) which culminated in delivery between 2006 and 2017; this study group was matched to a control group (n = 463) without surgical intervention during pregnancy, in a 2:1 ratio by maternal age, parity, and multiple gestation. RESULTS: The main pregnancy outcomes included preterm birth, cesarean section, small for gestational age (≤ 10 percentile), and Apgar score of less than 7 in 5 min. Laparoscopy during pregnancy was associated with an increased risk for cesarean section (32.3% vs. 24.6%, adjusted OR = 1.9, CI 1.2-3.1, p = 0.011). We found no difference between the groups with regard to other outcomes, including rates of preterm birth (12.1% vs. 10.4%, adjusted OR = 1.3, CI 0.64-2.72, p = 0.451). In a subgroup analysis of the study group, various perioperative parameters such as operation duration, hospitalization length, and others, did not correlate with adverse pregnancy outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy during pregnancy may be associated with an increased rate of cesarean section. We did not find an increase in any other pregnancy or neonatal complication. Different perioperative parameters did not appear to predict adverse pregnancy outcome.