Effectiveness of daily versus non-daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in patients with solid tumours undergoing chemotherapy: a multivariate analysis of data from current practice.

We conducted a multicentre, retrospective, observational study including patients with solid tumours (excluding breast cancer) that received granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) and chemotherapy. We investigated the effectiveness of daily vs. non-daily G-CSFs (pegfilgrastim) adjusting by potential confounders. The study included 391 patients (211 daily G-CSF; 180 pegfilgrastim), from whom 47.3% received primary prophylaxis (PP) (57.8% pegfilgrastim), 26.3% secondary prophylaxis (SP: initiation after cycle 1 and no reactive treatment in any cycle) (51.5% pegfilgrastim) and 26.3% reactive treatment (19.4% pegfilgrastim). Only 42.2% of patients with daily G-CSF and 46.2% with pegfilgrastim initiated prophylaxis within 72 h after chemotherapy, and only 10.5% of patients with daily G-CSF received it for ≥ 7 days. In the multivariate models, daily G-CSF was associated with higher risk of grade 3-4 neutropenia (G3-4N) vs. pegfilgrastim [odds ratio (OR): 1.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.004-2.97]. Relative to SP, PP protected against G3-4N (OR for SP vs. PP: 6.0, 95%CI: 3.2-11.4) and febrile neutropenia (OR: 3.1, 95%CI: 1.1-8.8), and was associated to less chemotherapy dose delays and reductions (OR for relative dose intensity <85% for SP vs. PP: 3.1, 95%CI: 1.7-5.4) and higher response rate (OR: 2.1, 95%CI: 1.2-3.7). Data suggest that pegfilgrastim, compared with a daily G-CSF, and PP, compared with SP, could be more effective in preventing neutropenia and its related events in the clinical practice.

Successful desensitization protocol for hypersensitivity reactions caused by oxaliplatin.

OBJECTIVE: To report the successful desensitization of a patient with a hypersensitivity reaction to oxaliplatin. CASE SUMMARY: A 57-year-old woman with metastatic colon cancer was receiving oxaliplatin, fluorouracil and leucovorin every 2 weeks and showed a partial response to therapy. During the fourth cycle, an anaphylactic reaction with palpitations and rash occurred. The patient was hypotensive with mild pulmonary wheezing. Since oxaliplatin was the probable cause of the hypersensitivity reaction, therapy with this drug was discontinued. Therapy in the patient was continued using cetuximab and irinotecan but this resulted in progression of the cancer. In view of the initial satisfactory response to the oxaliplatin-based regimen, it was decided to attempt desensitization to oxaliplatin using a protocol adapted from carboplatin regimens. The desensitization procedure was successful and the patient subsequently tolerated an additional three cycles using this regimen without further symptoms of hypersensitivity. DISCUSSION: In cases with moderate-to-severe reactions to oxaliplatin, reexposure is not usually considered. However, a need to use first-line therapy when there is recurrence of the cancer has encouraged the development of rapid desensitization procedures which allow patients to be treated with medications to which they have previously shown hypersensitivity reactions. A combination of premedication using intravenous dexamethasone and a desensitization regimen was designed which was used successfully to increase concentrations and flow rates of oxaliplatin. CONCLUSIONS: Hypersensitivity reactions to oxaliplatin are not rare and physicians need to be aware of these. When substitution of another antineoplastic drug is not feasible, oxaliplatin desensitization should be considered even when hypersensitivity reactions to oxaliplatin are severe.

Possible delayed onset of osteonecrosis of the jaw in association with zoledronic acid.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of possible delayed-onset osteonecrosis of the jaw after treatment with zoledronic acid. CASE SUMMARY: A 53-year-old white man with no history of allergic drug reactions had been diagnosed as having bronchial epidermoid carcinoma. He received therapy with docetaxel and zoledronate. Because of metastatic progression of the disease, he started treatment with irinotecan and zoledronate. The patient received 18 monthly cycles of zoledronate. One year after the last cycle of bisphosphonate therapy, the patient had one tooth extracted. Three weeks later, he complained of continuous mandibular pain and swallowing difficulties. A diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the jaw was made. Surgical treatment was chosen, with debridement and a mucosal flap, complemented with antibiotic therapy. Other potential aetiologic risk factors for osteonecrosis were investigated and could not be identified. Accordingly, a diagnosis of possible delayed onset jaw osteonecrosis associated with zoledronate was made. DISCUSSION: Osteonecrosis of the jaws has recently emerged as a potential complication of bisphosphonate therapy in patients with metastatic cancer undergoing dental surgery. This is the first report of possible delayed-onset osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with zoledronate. Patients appear to remain at low risk of developing osteonecrosis even in the absence of zoledronate, especially after a dental extraction or oral surgery. Based on the Naranjo algorithm the adverse reaction was classed as possible.

Possible macular exanthema associated with linezolid therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of macular exanthema associated with linezolid therapy. CASE SUMMARY: A 54-year-old white man diagnosed as having laryngeal epidermoid carcinoma attended our emergency department because of fatigue, fever, neck pain and a fistulized fixed mass in the right side of the neck with purulent exudation. Treatment with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 875 mg/125 mg p.o. every 8 hours as empirical therapy was started. Cultures of the exudates from the fistula confirmed the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was discontinued and therapy was started with linezolid 600 mg p.o. every 12 hours but 5 days after commencing linezolid the patient came to our emergency room because of generalized erythematous macular eruptions. A diagnosis of severe and generalized macular exanthema induced by linezolid was made. Administration of linezolid was suspended and there was an improvement in the skin lesions and general state of health. The patient was discharged without further symptoms. DISCUSSION: In this case, there was a close temporal correlation between drug exposure and the onset of symptoms. When linezolid was discontinued, the skin lesions resolved quickly and the general condition of the patient improved. Furthermore, linezolid was the only drug added before the cutaneous lesions appeared. It is possible that the adverse reaction was associated with administration of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. However, the patient had been treated with this antibiotic previously without appearance of any cutaneous reaction. An objective causality assessment revealed that an adverse effect was possible. CONCLUSION: Based on our observations, we conclude that linezolid was the most likely cause of the adverse reaction. Clinicians should be aware of this infrequent but severe reaction.

Osteonecrosis maxilar asociada a zoledronato / No disponible

No disponible

Metástasis infrecuentes de carcinoma epidermoide de laringe. A Propósito de dos casos / Infrequent metastases from larynx epidermoid carcinoma. Report of two cases

Propósito: El carcinoma epidermoide de laringe metastatiza con frecuencia en pulmón, esqueleto y esófago. Recientemente hemos tratado dos pacientes con carcinoma de laringe que recidivaron en sitios poco habituales, en piel de los dedos y en médula ósea. Material y métodos: Presentamos un paciente que además de la progresión local de su enfermedad tras cirugía, quimioterapia (QT) y radioterapia (RT), presentó afectación secundaria de la piel de los dedos de las manos. El segundo caso es el de un varón, que tras el diagnóstico y tratamiento de carcinoma de laringe presentó como único signo de recidiva, infiltración de médula ósea. Conclusiones: La afectación secundaria de la médula ósea y de la piel por un carcinoma epidermoide de laringe es rara. El interés de estos casos radica en lo poco común de estas localizaciones y en su mal pronóstico (AU)