Lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex enhance the early phase of psychogenic fever to unexpected sucrose concentration reductions, promote recovery from negative contrast and enhance spontaneous recovery of sucrose-entrained anticipatory activity.

Two groups of rats, one bearing bilateral excitotoxic lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and one sham-lesioned group, were run in a successive negative contrast paradigm. Both groups had telemeters implanted to monitor core temperature and activity. After ad libitum baseline and food restriction to 85% body weights, rats received a sucrose solution once daily for 5 min and 30 s at 10:30 h. They received their preshift 32% sucrose solution for 14 days followed by a sucrose concentration reduction (downshift) to 4% sucrose for 12 days. Rats were then upshifted to 32% for six additional days before being downshifted to 4% for the next 6 days. There were no differences in intake of the 32% sucrose during the preshift. All rats showed profound suppression of intake upon the shift to 4% sucrose. On the first day of the unexpected 4% sucrose, lesioned rats showed an enhanced psychogenic fever compared with Shams, whereas on the second day of 4% sucrose they showed an impaired ability to blunt that fever compared with Shams. In addition, lesioned rats showed greater rates of recovery and asymptotic drinking of the subsequent 4% sucrose solution than Shams, indicating impairments in the encoding or retrieval of the shift. In addition, lesioned rats showed enhanced entrainment to the 32% sucrose meals, normal damping of anticipation, and enhanced spontaneous recovery of anticipatory thermal responses to the calorically impoverished 4% solutions. These failures to inhibit responding point to a failure in interference learning in rats bearing lesions of the mPFC.

Mapping brain c-Fos immunoreactivity after insulin-induced voluntary lard intake: insulin- and lard-associated patterns.

In addition to the inhibitory role of central insulin on food intake, insulin also acts to promote lard intake. We investigated the neural pathways involved in this facet of insulin action. Insulin or saline was infused into either the superior mesenteric or right external jugular veins of streptozotocin-diabetic rodents with elevated steady-state circulating corticosterone concentrations. After postsurgical recovery, rats were offered the choice of chow or lard to eat. Irrespective of the site of venous infusion, insulin increased lard and decreased chow intake. After 4 days, lard was removed for 8 h. On return for 1 h, only insulin infused into the superior mesenteric vein resulted in lard intake. This facilitated distinction between the effects of circulating insulin concentrations (similar in the two insulin-infused groups) and lard ingestion on the patterns of c-Fos(+) cells in the brain, termed insulin- and lard-associated patterns, respectively. Insulin-associated changes in c-Fos(+) cell numbers were evident in the arcuate nucleus, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and substantia nigra pars compacta, concomitant with elevated leptin levels and reduced chow intake. Lard-associated changes in c-Fos(+) cell numbers were observed in the nucleus of the tractus solitarius, lateral parabrachial nucleus, central nucleus of the amygdala, ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens shell and the prefrontal cortex, and were associated with lower levels of triglycerides and free fatty acids. The anterior paraventricular thalamic nucleus exhibited both patterns. These data collectively fit into a framework for food intake and reward and provide targets for pharmacological manipulation to influence the choice of food intake.

Limited brain diffusion of the glucocorticoid receptor agonist RU28362 following i.c.v. administration: implications for i.c.v. drug delivery and glucocorticoid negative feedback in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

The experiments described herein present a method for tracking diffusion of the glucocorticoid receptor agonist RU28362 in brain following i.c.v. drug administration. A useful property of glucocorticoid receptor is that it is primarily cytoplasmic when unbound and rapidly translocates to the nucleus when bound by ligand. Thus, removal of endogenous glucocorticoids by adrenalectomy allows us to identify brain regions with activated glucocorticoid receptor after i.c.v. glucocorticoid receptor agonist treatment by examining the presence or absence of nuclear glucocorticoid receptor immunostaining. We have previously demonstrated that an i.p. injection of 150 microg/kg RU28362 1 h prior to restraint stress is sufficient to suppress stress-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hormone secretion [Ginsberg AB, Campeau S, Day HE, Spencer RL (2003) Acute glucocorticoid pretreatment suppresses stress-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hormone secretion and expression of corticotropin-releasing hormone hnRNA but does not affect c-fos mRNA or fos protein expression in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. J Neuroendocrinol 15:1075-1083]. We report here, however, that in rats i.c.v. treatment with a high-dose of RU28362 (1 microg) 1 h prior to stressor onset does not suppress stress-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity. We then performed a series of experiments to examine the possible differences in glucocorticoid receptor activation patterns in brain and pituitary after i.c.v. or i.p. treatment with RU28362. In a dose-response study we found that 1 h after i.c.v. injection of RU28362 (0.001, 0.1 and 1.0 microg) glucocorticoid receptor nuclear immunoreactivity was only evident in brain tissue immediately adjacent to the lateral or third ventricle, including the medial but not more lateral portion of the medial parvocellular paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus. In contrast, i.p. injection of RU28362 produced a uniform predominantly nuclear glucocorticoid receptor immunostaining pattern throughout all brain tissue. I.c.v. injection of the endogenous glucocorticoid receptor agonist, corticosterone (1 microg) also had limited diffusion into brain tissue. Time-course studies indicated that there was not a greater extent of nuclear glucocorticoid receptor immunostaining present in brain after shorter (10 or 30 min) or longer (2 or 3 h) intervals of time after i.c.v. RU28362 injection. Importantly, time-course studies found that i.c.v. RU28362 produced significant increases in nuclear glucocorticoid receptor immunostaining in the anterior pituitary that were evident within 10 min after injection and maximal after 1 h. These studies support an extensive literature indicating that drugs have very limited ability to diffuse out of the ventricles into brain tissue after i.c.v. injection, while at the same time reaching peripheral tissue sites. In addition, these studies indicate that significant occupancy of some glucocorticoid receptor within the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and pituitary is not necessarily sufficient to suppress stress-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity.

Specific and time-dependent effects of glucocorticoid receptor agonist RU28362 on stress-induced pro-opiomelanocortin hnRNA, c-fos mRNA and zif268 mRNA in the pituitary.

This study examined the effects of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) agonist RU28362 on stress-induced gene expression in the pituitary of rats to investigate mechanisms of glucocorticoid negative feedback in vivo. In an initial experiment, acute restraint stress produced rapid (within 15 min) induction of c-fos mRNA, zif268 mRNA and pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) hnRNA within the anterior and intermediate/posterior pituitary as determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Treatment with RU28362 (150 microg/kg, i.p.) 60 min before restraint inhibited adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) and corticosterone secretion and selectively suppressed the stress-induced increase in POMC hnRNA in the anterior pituitary gland. The failure of RU28362 to surpress the stress-induced rise in c-fos and expression of zif268 mRNA suggests that the central release of ACTH secretagogues was not affected at this time point by treatment with the GR agonist. Rather, the inhibition of ACTH release appeared to be due to a direct effect of RU28362 within the pituitary. A follow-up time-course study varied the interval (10, 60 or 180 min) between RU28362 pretreatment and the onset of restraint. The stress-induced increase in POMC hnRNA was completely blunted by RU28362 treatment within 10 min of treatment, although the stress induced hormone secretion, c-fos mRNA and zif268 mRNA were unaffected. The rapid inhibition of the stress-induced rise in POMC hnRNA in the anterior pituitary appears to reflect direct, GR-mediated suppression of POMC gene expression. RU28362 pretreatment 180 min before restraint onset was sufficient to suppress the stress-induced expression in the anterior pituitary gland of all three genes examined. Thus, the delayed negative feedback effects on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity that emerged after 180 min after glucocorticoid treatment were not evident at 60 min. Taken together, the data suggest that the inhibition of the stress-induced release of ACTH apparent within the first hour of glucocorticoid exposure is effected at the level of the pituitary gland. The delayed glucocorticoid effects evident 180 min after RU28362 treatment may include glucocorticoid actions in the brain and additional actions within the pituitary.

Acute glucocorticoid pretreatment suppresses stress-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis hormone secretion and expression of corticotropin-releasing hormone hnRNA but does not affect c-fos mRNA or fos protein expression in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus.

Corticosterone regulates both basal and stress-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity in a negative-feedback fashion. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms of this negative feedback have yet to be explicitly characterized. By comparing stress-induced c-fos and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) expression in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN), we may be able to determine whether acute glucocorticoid treatment affects the net neural excitatory input to the PVN (represented primarily by c-fos mRNA expression) or directly affects the ability of cells in the PVN to respond to that input (represented primarily by CRH hnRNA expression). In the following studies, we observed the effect of acute glucocorticoid (RU28362) treatment on subsequent HPA axis reactivity by measuring stress-induced plasma hormone concentration [corticosterone and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)] and gene expression (c-fos and CRH) in the PVN. First, we examined the dose-response relationship between systemically administered RU28362 (1-150 microg/kg, i.p) and suppression of the stress-induced corticosterone response. We then confirmed central nervous system access of the maximally suppressive dose of RU28362 (150 microg/kg) by an ex vivo radioligand binding assay. RU28362 selectively occupied the majority of glucocorticoid receptors in the hippocampus and hypothalamus while having no effect on mineralocorticoid receptors. In separate studies, RU28362 (150 microg/kg) and corticosterone (5 mg/kg) were injected i.p. 1 h before restraint stress. Compared to vehicle-treated controls, rats treated with RU28362 and corticosterone had substantially blunted stress-induced corticosterone and ACTH production, respectively. Furthermore, treatment with RU28362 significantly blunted stress-induced CRH hnRNA expression in the PVN. By contrast, neither RU28362 nor corticosterone treatment had an effect on stress-induced neuronal activation as measured by c-fos mRNA and its protein product in the PVN. This dissociation between c-fos and CRH gene expression suggests that glucocorticoid suppression of HPA activity within this time-frame is not a result of decreased excitatory neural input to the PVN, but instead depends on some direct effect of RU28362 on cells intrinsic to the HPA axis.

Brainstem application of melanocortin receptor ligands produces long-lasting effects on feeding and body weight.

Recent evidence suggests that the central melanocortin (MC) system is a prominent contributor to food intake and body weight control. MC receptor (MC-R) populations in the arcuate and paraventricular nuclei are considered probable sites of action mediating the orexigenic effects of systemically or intracerebroventricularly administered ligands. Yet, the highest MC4-R density in the brain is found in the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve, situated subjacent to the commissural nucleus of the solitary tract, a site of pro-opiomelanocortin mRNA expression. We evaluated the contribution of the caudal brainstem MC system by (1) performing respective dose-response analyses for an MC-R agonist (MTII) and antagonist (SHU9119) delivered to the fourth ventricle, (2) comparing, in the same rats, the fourth intracerebroventricular dose-response profiles to those obtained with lateral intracerebroventricular delivery, and (3) delivering an effective dose of MTII or SHU9119 to rats before a 24 hr period of food deprivation. Fourth intracerebroventricular agonist treatment yielded a dose-dependent reduction of short-term (2 and 4 hr) and longer-term (24 hr) food intake and body weight. Fourth intracerebroventricular antagonist treatment produced the opposite pattern of results: dose-related increases in food intake and corresponding increases in body weight change for the 24-96 hr observation period. Comparable dose-response functions for food intake and body weight were observed when these compounds were delivered to the lateral ventricle. Results from deprived rats (no effect of MTII or SHU9119 on weight loss) support the impression derived from the dose-response analyses that the body weight change that follows MC treatments is secondary to their respective effects on food intake. Results support the relevance of the brainstem MC-R complement to the control of feeding.