Assisted reproductive technology use and outcomes in childhood cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: Treatment exposures for childhood cancer reduce ovarian reserve. However, the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART) among female survivors is not well established. METHODS: Five-year survivors of childhood cancer in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study were linked to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, which captures national ART outcomes. The authors assessed the live birth rate, the relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), and associations with treatment exposure using generalized estimating equations to account for multiple ovarian stimulations per individual. Siblings from a random sample of survivors were recruited to serve as a comparison group. RESULTS: Among 9885 female survivors, 137 (1.4%; median age at diagnosis, 10 years [range, 0-20 years]; median years of follow-up after age 18 years, 11 years [range, 2-11 years]) underwent 224 ovarian stimulations using autologous or donor eggs and/or gestational carriers (157 autologous ovarian stimulation cycles, 67 donor ovarian stimulation cycles). In siblings, 33 (1.4%) underwent 51 autologous or donor ovarian stimulations. Of those who used embryos from autologous eggs without using gestational carriers, 97 survivors underwent 155 stimulations, resulting in 49 live births, for a 31.6% chance of live birth per ovarian stimulation (vs. 38.3% for siblings; p = .39) and a 43.9% chance of live birth per transfer (vs. 50.0%; p = .33). Prior treatment with cranial radiation therapy (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.97) and pelvic radiation therapy (RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15-0.73) resulted in a reduced chance of live birth compared with siblings. The likelihood of live birth after ART treatment in survivors was not affected by alkylator exposure (cyclophosphamide-equivalent dose, ≥8000 mg/m2 vs. none; RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.52-2.05). CONCLUSIONS: Childhood cancer survivors are as likely to undergo treatment using ART as sibling controls. The success of ART treatment was not reduced after alkylator exposure. The results from the current study provide needed guidance on the use of ART in this population.

The impact of increasing body mass index on in vitro fertilization treatment, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Citing the risks of administering anesthesia to patients with obesity, few fertility centers offer in vitro fertilization as a treatment modality for patients with body mass indexes ≥40 kg/m2. Although previous studies have assessed clinical pregnancy and cumulative live birth rates in patients who spontaneously conceive with body mass indexes ≥50 kg/m2, there is a paucity of in vitro fertilization, obstetrical, and neonatal outcome data in patients with severe obesity who conceive after in vitro fertilization. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of increasing body mass index on in vitro fertilization, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes in patients with obesity undergoing in vitro fertilization. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study within an academic fertility center including 2069 fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and frozen embryo transfer cycles from January 1, 2012 to April 30, 2020; this cohort was used to determine in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes. A second embedded cohort of 867 fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and frozen embryo transfer cycles that resulted in ongoing clinical pregnancies and deliveries within a single tertiary hospital system was used to determine pregnancy, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. All patients with a body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 underwent consultation with a maternal-fetal medicine specialist before starting treatment and a preoperative evaluation with an anesthesiologist before oocyte retrieval. Cycles were grouped by body mass index at cycle start (30-34.9, 35-39.9, 40-44.9, 45-49.9, and ≥50 kg/m2). Log-binomial regression and Poisson regression with an offset were fitted with body mass index of 30 to 34.9 kg/m2 as the reference group, adjusting for potential confounders including oocyte age, patient age, embryo quality, transfer type, and coexisting comorbidities. The primary outcome was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, blastulation rate, miscarriage rate, incidence of preeclampsia with severe features, gestational diabetes, labor induction, cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, and birthweight. RESULTS: There were 2069 fresh in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and frozen embryo transfer cycle starts from January 1, 2012 to April 30, 2020. Of these, 1008 cycles were in the 30 to 34.9 kg/m2 group, 547 in the 35 to 39.9 kg/m2 group, 277 in the 40 to 44.9 kg/m2 group, 161 in the 45 to 49.9 kg/m2 group, and 76 in the ≥50 kg/m2 body mass index group. Live birth rate was not significantly different between groups. The body mass index ≥50 kg/m2 group was significantly more likely to experience preeclampsia with severe features when compared with the 30 to 34.9 kg/m2 body mass index group (absolute risk reduction, 2.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-6.67). Fertilization rate, blastulation rate, miscarriage rate, incidence of gestational diabetes, labor induction, cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, and neonatal birthweights were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Among patients with body mass indexes from 30 to 60 kg/m2 who conceived via in vitro fertilization and received comprehensive prenatal care at a tertiary care hospital, in vitro fertilization, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes were largely comparable. These data support a collaborative care approach with maternal-fetal medicine specialists and skilled anesthesiologists, reinforcing the notion that in vitro fertilization should not be withheld as a treatment modality from patients with obesity.

Utility of Office Hysteroscopy in Diagnosing Retained Products of Conception Following Early Pregnancy Loss After In Vitro Fertilization.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of office hysteroscopy in diagnosing and treating retained products of conception in patients with infertility who experience early pregnancy loss (EPL) after in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: We evaluated a retrospective cohort of 597 pregnancies that ended in EPL in patients aged 18-45 years who conceived through fresh or frozen embryo transfer at an academic fertility practice between January 2016 and December 2021. All patients underwent office hysteroscopy after expectant, medical, or surgical management of the EPL. The primary outcome was presence of retained products of conception at the time of office hysteroscopy. Secondary outcomes included incidence of vaginal bleeding, presence of intrauterine adhesions, treatment for retained products of conception, and duration of time from EPL diagnosis to resolution. Log-binomial regression and Poisson regression were performed, adjusting for potential confounders including oocyte age, patient age, body mass index, prior EPL count, number of prior dilation and curettage procedures, leiomyomas, uterine anomalies, and vaginal bleeding. RESULTS: Of the 597 EPLs included, 129 patients (21.6%) had retained products of conception diagnosed at the time of office hysteroscopy. The majority of individuals with EPL were managed surgically (n=427, 71.5%), in lieu of expectant management (n=140, 23.5%) or medical management (n=30, 5.0%). The presence of retained products of conception was significantly associated with vaginal bleeding (relative risk [RR] 1.72, 95% CI 1.34-2.21). Of the 41 patients with normal pelvic ultrasonogram results before office hysteroscopy, 10 (24.4%) had retained products of conception detected at the time of office hysteroscopy. When stratified by EPL management method, retained products of conception were significantly more likely to be present in individuals with EPL who were managed medically (adjusted RR 2.66, 95% CI 1.90-3.73) when compared with those managed surgically. Intrauterine adhesions were significantly less likely to be detected in individuals with EPL who underwent expectant management when compared with those managed surgically (RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.44). Of the 127 individuals with EPL who were diagnosed with retained products of conception at the time of office hysteroscopy, 30 (23.6%) had retained products of conception dislodged during the office hysteroscopy, 34 (26.8%) chose expectant or medical management, and 63 (49.6%) chose surgical management. The mean number of days from EPL diagnosis to resolution of pregnancy was significantly higher in patients who elected for expectant management (31 days; RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02-1.37) or medical management (41 days; RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.25-1.90) when compared with surgical management (27 days). CONCLUSION: In patients with EPL after IVF, office hysteroscopy detected retained products of conception in 24.4% of those with normal pelvic ultrasonogram results. Due to the efficacy of office hysteroscopy in diagnosing and treating retained products of conception, these data support considering office hysteroscopy as an adjunct to ultrasonography in patients with infertility who experience EPL after IVF.

Fertility restoration in mice with chemotherapy induced ovarian failure using differentiated iPSCs.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) are limited to hormone replacement and donor oocytes. A novel induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) transplant paradigm in a mouse model has potential translational applications for management of POI. METHODS: Mouse ovarian granulosa cell derived-iPSCS were labelled with green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter and differentiated in vitro into oocytes. Differentiated cells were assayed for estradiol and progesterone secretion by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. After Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) for the cell surface marker anti-Mullerian hormone receptor (AMHR2), enriched populations of differentiated cells were surgically transplanted into ovaries of mice that had POI secondary to gonadotoxic pre-treatment with alkylating agents. A total of 100 mice were used in these studies in five separate experiments with 56 animals receiving orthotopic ovarian injections of either FACS sorted or unsorted differentiated iPSCSs and the remaining animals receiving sham injections of PBS diluent. Following transplantation surgery, mice were stimulated with gonadotropins inducing oocyte development and underwent oocyte retrieval. Nine transplanted mice were cross bred with wild-type mice to assess fertility. Lineage tracing of resultant oocytes, F1 (30 pups), and F2 (42 pups) litters was interrogated by GFP expression and validation by short tandem repeat (STR) lineage tracing. FINDINGS: [1] iPSCs differentiate into functional oocytes and steroidogenic ovarian cells which [2] express an ovarian (GJA1) and germ cell (ZP1) markers. [3] Endocrine function and fertility were restored in mice pretreated with gonadotoxic alkylating agents via orthotopic transplantation of differentiated iPSCS, thus generating viable, fertile mouse pups. INTERPRETATION: iPSC-derived ovarian tissue can reverse endocrine and reproductive sequelae of POI. FUNDING: Center for Infertility and Reproductive Surgery Research Award, Siezen Foundation award (RMA). Reproductive Scientist Development Program, Marriott Foundation, Saltonstall Foundation, Brigham Ovarian Cancer Research Fund (K.E).

Ultra-low-dose and very-low-dose Lupron downregulation protocols for poor responders based on POSEIDON group 3 and 4 classifications.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess if very-low-dose Lupron (VLDL) and ultra-low-dose Lupron (ULDL) protocols can have comparable cycle outcomes when compared to other "poor responder" stimulation protocols based on POSEIDON classification groups 3 (PG3) and 4 (PG4). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study at a single, large academic center was performed. Women in PG3 (age < 35, AMH < 1.2 ng/mL) or PG4 (age ≥ 35, AMH < 1.2 ng/mL) undergoing in vitro fertilization using an ULDL (Lupron 0.1 to 0.05 mg daily), VLDL (Lupron 0.2 to 0.1 mg daily), microflare (Lupron 0.05 mg twice a day), estradiol priming/antagonist, antagonist, or minimal stimulation protocols from 2012 to 2021 were included. The primary outcome was the number of mature oocytes (MII) obtained. The secondary outcome was live birth rate (LBR). RESULTS: The cohort included 3601 cycles. The mean age was 38.1 ± 3.8 years. In the PG3 group, ULDL and VLDL protocols produced a comparable number of MIIs (5.8 ± 4.3 and 5.9 ± 5.4, respectively) and live births (33.3% and 33.3%, respectively) when compared to other protocols. In the PG4 group, ULDL and VLDL protocols resulted in a higher percentage of MIIs when compared to microflare or minimal stimulation (Microflare/ULDL: adjusted relative risk (aRR) 0.78 (95% CI 0.65, 0.95); min stim/ULDL: aRR 0.47 (95% CI 0.38, 0.58); microflare/VLDL: aRR 0.77 (95% CI 0.63, 0.95); min stim/VLDL: aRR 0.47 (95% CI 0.38, 0.95)). There were no significant differences in LBR. CONCLUSION: Dilute Lupron downregulation protocols have comparable outcomes to other poor responder protocols and are reasonable to use.

What to do with one good quality blastocyst and where do we place the emphasis?

The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in poor responders undergoing assisted reproductive technology has been a topic of debate with controversial results. It is critical to note the denominators used in data presented. Herein, we comment on the results found in the study by Kahraman et al. on the utility of PGT-A in poor responders with a single, good-quality blastocyst.

Development of a Model to Estimate the Optimal Number of Oocytes to Attempt to Fertilize During Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment.

Importance: Surplus cryopreserved embryos pose a challenge for in vitro fertilization patients and clinics; with Roe v. Wade overturned, some states may deem the discarding of surplus embryos illegal, radically changing in vitro fertilization practice. An evidence-based tool would help limit surplus embryo creation. Objective: To develop a prediction tool for determining how many oocytes should be exposed to sperm to create embryos to conserve the chance of live birth while minimizing surplus embryos. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study used data from member clinics of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinical Outcomes Reporting System between 2014 to 2019. A total of 410 719 oocyte retrievals and 460 577 embryo transfer cycles from 311 237 patients aged 18 to 45 years old who initiated their first oocyte stimulation cycle between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2019, were included. Data were analyzed from February to June 2022. Exposures: Female patient age, anti-mullerian hormone level, diminished ovarian reserve diagnosis, number of oocytes retrieved, and the state where the clinic is located were included in the final models. Main Outcomes and Measures: The algorithm was based on 3 models with outcomes: (1) day of transfer; (2) proportion of retrieved oocytes that become usable blastocysts; and (3) number of blastocysts needed for transfer for 1 live birth to occur. Results: The median (IQR) age at stimulation cycle start was 35 (29-32) years and the median (IQR) number of oocytes retrieved was 10 (6-17). The likelihood of recommending that all oocytes be exposed to sperm increased with age; less than 20.0% of retrievals among patients younger than 32 years and more than 99.0% of retrievals among patients older than 42 years received recommendations that all oocytes be exposed to sperm. Among cycles recommended to expose fewer than all oocytes, the median (IQR) numbers recommended for 1 live birth were 7 oocytes (7-8) for patients aged less than 32 years, 8 (7-8) for patients aged 32 to 34 years, and 9 (9-11) for patients aged 35 to 37 years. Conclusions and Relevance: In this diagnostic study of in vitro fertilization cycles, a prediction tool was developed to aid clinicians in determining the optimal number of oocytes to expose to sperm, reducing the number of unused embryos created and immediately addressing current patient and clinician concerns.

Fertility Preferences and Practices Among Young Women With Breast Cancer: Germline Genetic Carriers Versus Noncarriers.

BACKGROUND: Young women with breast cancer who carry germline genetic pathogenic variants may face distinct fertility concerns, yet limited data exist comparing fertility preferences and practices between carriers and noncarriers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Participants in the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study (NCT01468246), a prospective cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤40 years, who completed a modified Fertility Issues Survey were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Of 1052 eligible participants, 118 (11%) tested positive for a pathogenic variant. Similar proportions (P = .23) of carriers (46%, [54/118]) and noncarriers (37%, [346/934]) desired more biologic children prediagnosis, and desire decreased similarly postdiagnosis (carriers, 30% [35/118] vs. noncarriers, 26% [244/934], P = .35). Among those desiring children postdiagnosis (n = 279), concern about cancer risk heritability was more common among carriers (74% [26/35] vs. noncarriers, 36% [88/244], P < .01). Carriers were more likely to report that concern about cancer risk heritability contributed to a lack of certainty or interest in future pregnancies (20% [16/81] vs. noncarriers, 7% [49/674], P = .001). Similar proportions (P = .65) of carriers (36% [43/118]) and noncarriers (38% [351/934]) were somewhat or very concerned about infertility post-treatment; utilization of fertility preservation strategies was also similar (carriers, 14% [17/118] vs. noncarriers, 12% [113/934], P = .78). CONCLUSION: Carriers were similarly concerned about future fertility and as likely to pursue fertility preservation as noncarriers. Concern about cancer risk heritability was more frequent among carriers and impacted decisions not to pursue future pregnancies for some, underscoring the importance of counseling regarding strategies to prevent transmission to offspring, including preimplantation genetic testing.

Meeting the challenge of unclaimed cryopreserved embryos.

With the rise of efficient and highly effective embryo cryopreservation techniques, the modern in vitro fertilization laboratory has unintentionally become a long-term storage facility for embryos and gametes. One challenge posed by long-term storage is the issue of unclaimed, effectively abandoned, cryopreserved embryos whose owners cannot be identified or are unable to provide a dispositional decision. Given the nuanced nature of dealing with human tissue, no straightforward solutions for managing this novel scenario have prevailed. In this article, we discuss the problem faced by physicians, clinics, and patients alike when faced with unclaimed cryopreserved embryos. We also review strategies for proactive prevention and resolution of conflicts that may arise when making dispositional decisions.

In vitro fertilization cycle and embryo transfer outcomes in oligoanovulatory patients with hypothalamic hypogonadism vs. polycystic ovary syndrome and compared with normo-ovulatory patients.

Objective: To study the difference in the live birth rates between anovulatory women with hypothalamic hypogonadism (HH) and those with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and normo-ovulatory women undergoing fresh embryo transfer or frozen embryo transfer (FET). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patients: Patients with oligoanovulation (HH, n = 47; PCOS, n = 533) and normo-ovulation (tubal factor infertility, n = 399) undergoing in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles from January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2019. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Live birth rate. Results: Patients with HH had longer stimulation durations than both patients with PCOS and tubal factor infertility. Patients with HH had fewer oocytes retrieved than patients with PCOS, but their numbers of blastocysts were similar. Patients with HH and tubal factor infertility had similar numbers of oocytes retrieved and blastocysts. In fresh embryo transfer cycles, the live birth rates were similar among patients with HH, PCOS, and tubal factor infertility (37.5% vs. 37.1% vs. 29.3%, respectively). When evaluating FET cycles, patients with HH had lower live birth rates than patients with PCOS (26.5% vs. 46.7%) and tubal factor infertility (42.6%). Conclusions: Live birth rates are similar among patients with HH, PCOS, and normo-ovulation undergoing fresh embryo transfer but are significantly lower in women with HH undergoing FET.

The impact of insurance mandates on donor oocyte utilization: an analysis of 39,338 donor oocyte cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.

BACKGROUND: A total of 19 states passed legislation mandating insurance coverage of assisted reproductive technology, and out-of-pocket costs associated with in vitro fertilization vary significantly depending on the region. Consequently, it has been observed that assisted reproductive technology utilization differs regionally and is associated with the presence of an insurance mandate. However, it is unknown whether regional differences exist among patients using donor oocytes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the patient and cycle-specific parameters associated with the use of donor oocytes according to the insurance mandate status of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology clinic in which the assisted reproductive technology cycle was performed. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective cohort study using national data collected from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry for 39,338 donor oocyte cycles and 242,555 autologous oocyte cycles performed in the United States from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2016. Cycles were stratified by insurance mandate of the state in which the assisted reproductive technology cycle was performed: comprehensive (coverage for at least 4 cycles of assisted reproductive technology), limited (coverage limited to 1-3 assisted reproductive technology cycles), offer (insurance mandates exist but exclude assisted reproductive technology treatment), and no mandate. The primary outcome was the number of previous autologous assisted reproductive technology cycles of the recipient. The secondary outcomes included age, serum follicle stimulating hormone level, frozen donor oocyte utilization, day of embryo transfer, number of embryos transferred, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate. Analyses were adjusted for day of transfer, number of embryos transferred, and age of the recipient. RESULTS: Patients in no mandate states underwent fewer autologous assisted reproductive technology cycles (mean, 1.1; standard deviation, 1.6) before using donor oocytes than patients in offer (mean, 1.7; standard deviation, 2.5; P<.01), limited (mean, 1.5; standard deviation, 2.5; P<.01), and comprehensive (mean, 1.7; standard deviation, 2.0; P<.01) states. Patients in no mandate states were more likely to use frozen oocytes than patients in offer (relative risk, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.57), limited (relative risk, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.54), and comprehensive (relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.99) states. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were similar among recipients of donor oocytes, regardless of insurance mandate. CONCLUSION: Despite similar ages and ovarian reserve parameters, patients without state-mandated insurance coverage of assisted reproductive technology were more likely to use frozen donor oocytes and undergo fewer autologous in vitro fertilization cycles than their counterparts in partial or comprehensive insurance coverage states. These differences in donor oocyte utilization highlight the financial barriers associated with pursuing assisted reproductive technology in uninsured states.

Use of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders and subsequent prenatal care and diagnostic testing.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic or single gene defects (PGT-M) is to identify inherited pathogenic variants in the embryo prior to embryo transfer, increasing the likelihood of an unaffected child. Prenatal diagnostic testing is recommended to confirm the results of PGT-M. The purpose of this study was to characterize the population undergoing PGT-M over time. METHODS: This retrospective study examined patients who had a positive pregnancy test after PGT-M from 2012 to 2019. A query of the internal assisted reproductive technology database and chart review were used. RESULTS: One hundred and 42 patients completed IVF cycles for PGT-M during this time period and progressed past 10 weeks gestation. There were more PGT-M cycles over time with 46 cycles between 2012 and 2015 and 96 cycles between 2016 and 2019. Patients varied on the decision to pursue prenatal diagnostic testing after PGT-M. For those with known follow-up (130/142), 16 patients underwent diagnostic testing (12%) and 114 did not. CONCLUSION: As PGT-M is increasingly utilized prior to pregnancy, it is important for genetic counselors and OB/GYNs to understand the characteristics and outcomes of the population of patients undergoing PGT-M, including how to counsel about the residual risk of an affected pregnancy after PGT-M.

The impact of fertility preservation on the timing of breast cancer treatment, recurrence, and survival.

BACKGROUND: Many young women with breast cancer undergo fertility preservation (FP) before cancer treatment. This study examined the impact of FP on breast cancer outcomes. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of 272 women aged 20 to 45 years with newly diagnosed stage 0 to III breast cancer who underwent an FP consultation between 2005 and 2017. Among these women, 123 (45.2%) underwent FP (fertility preservation-positive [FP+]). The remaining 149 women did not undergo FP (fertility preservation-negative [FP-]). RESULTS: The characteristics at enrollment were similar with the exception of ethnicity (FP+, 87.8% White; FP-, 67.8% White; P = .002) and BRCA status (FP+, 27.7% BRCA+; FP-, 15.5% BRCA+; P = .021). The median follow-up was approximately 4 years. Women who underwent FP had longer times to first treatment (FP+, 37 days; FP-, 31 days; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.74; confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.99) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (FP+, 36 days; FP-, 26 days; aHR, 0.41; CI, 0.24-0.68) and from surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy (FP+, 41 days; FP-, 33 days; aHR, 0.58; CI, 0.38-0.90). Adjusted 3- and 5-year invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) rates were comparable between the 2 groups (3-year IDFS: FP+, 85.4%; FP-, 79.4%; P = .411; 5-year IDFS: FP+, 73.7%; FP-, 67.1%; P = .288). Similarly, no difference in overall survival (OS) was observed between the 2 groups (3-year OS: FP+, 95.5%; FP-, 93.5%; P = .854; 5-year OS: FP+, 84.2%; FP-, 81.4%; P = .700). CONCLUSIONS: FP after a breast cancer diagnosis delays the time to treatment by a small amount, but this delay does not lead to inferior IDFS or OS.

Safety of Surgical Fertility Preservation Procedures in Children Prior to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant.

Long-term survival following hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in childhood continues to improve, and patients are thus increasingly faced with the late effects of treatment. Infertility is very common for both males and females following HSCT and is one of the most distressing sequelae. Adoption and surrogate egg or sperm donation are possibilities for some patients, but post-HSCT reversal of gonadal failure is not possible. We have recently initiated an oncofertility program with a dedicated practitioner with specific expertise in this area. Our practice is for her to meet with all families and age-appropriate patients during the pre-HSCT evaluation period. This allows patients and families to be accurately informed about the expected treatment-related infertility risk and the available options for fertility preservation. Sperm banking and egg or embryo cryopreservation are established approaches but are not achievable for many children and adolescents. Recently, the harvesting and cryopreservation of ovarian and testicular tissue represents a novel surgical option that allows for the possibility of fertility preservation to be extended to children of all ages. The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the safety of these procedures proximal to conditioning therapy and HSCT. This is a retrospective report on a consecutive cohort of all patients aged 0 to 25 years who, after discussion with our oncofertility specialist, chose to undergo surgical fertility preservation (laparoscopic unilateral oophorectomy or testicular biopsy) at our institution between March 2018 and April 2020. These procedures occurred under general anesthesia at the time of central line placement prior to the initiation of HSCT conditioning. We assess the safety of the procedures in terms of postoperative complications and impact on HSCT course. Twenty-two patients underwent fertility preservation surgical procedures. Thirteen patients (59%) were female, median age 13 years (1 to 22 years), and 9 (41%) were male, median age 8 years (5 to 12 years). Fourteen (63%) were prepubertal and 8 (36%) pubertal. HSCT indications were hematologic malignancies/solid tumor (40%) and nonmalignant diseases (60%). Most received an allogenic graft (68%) and 81% had myeloablative conditioning. All patients became neutropenic at a median of 10 days (0 to 51 days) from the surgical procedure; 1 was neutropenic at the time of testicular tissue cryopreservation (TTC). The mean duration for the procedures performed, including ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) or TTC, was 98 minutes (49 to 260 minutes) and 97 minutes (56 to 178 minutes), respectively. Estimated blood loss was minimal and no postoperative site infections occurred. One postprocedure, blood culture-negative fever was reported without an identifiable source; the patient completed 48 hours of antibiotics with resolution of fever. Sixty-two percent of females and 56% of males started conditioning within 24 hours of OTC/TTC (15 hours to 113 days; median, 1 day). The median time to engraftment was 22 days (9 to 33 days) in females and 17 days (11 to 67 days) in males, consistent with our institutional benchmarks. One patient with aplastic anemia had primary graft failure, attributed to low cell dose. This patient engrafted after a second transplant from an alternative donor but ultimately died of multiorgan failure. He was neutropenic for over 60 days and never experienced surgical site infection. There were no procedure-related delays to start of conditioning or to discharge. Children of all ages can now be offered the possibility of fertility preservation following HSCT for benign and malignant conditions. Our review suggests that these procedure for both females and males can be performed close to the start of conditioning, which allows for coupling with central access placement. These procedures appear to be safe and do not add to transplant-related morbidity.

Self-reported infertility diagnoses and treatment history approximately 20 years after fertility treatment initiation.

BACKGROUND: Infertility history may have important implications for clinical practice and scientific discovery. Previous research on the validity of self-reported infertility measurements has been limited in scope and duration (< 5 years). In this study, we validated self-reported infertility history measures 15-23 years after fertility treatment initiation among women who utilized assisted reproductive technology (ART). METHODS: Women who received ART treatments from three Boston infertility clinics and who enrolled in a prior study (1994-2003) were re-contacted in 2018 for the AfteR Treatment Follow-up Study (ART-FS). Infertility history was collected from clinical records and two self-report questionnaires (at ART initiation and at ART-FS enrollment). Treatment history included specific details (fresh or frozen embryo transfers, number of cycles) and treatment recall prior to ART initiation. Self-reported infertility diagnoses included polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), endometriosis, uterine factor infertility, tubal factor infertility, diminished ovarian reserve/advanced maternal age, male factor infertility, and other/unknown. We compared self-reported measures from 2018 to self-reported and clinical data from prior study initiation, using Cohen's kappa, sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Of 2644 women we attempted to recontact, 808 completed the ART-FS, with an average follow-up of 19.6 years (standard deviation: 2.7). Recall of fertility treatment usage had moderate sensitivity (IVF = 0.85, Clomiphene/Gonadotropin = 0.81) but low specificity across different infertility treatment modalities (IVF = 0.63, Clomiphene/Gonadotropin = 0.55). Specific IVF details had low to moderate validity and reliability with clinical records. Reliability of recalled infertility diagnosis was higher when compared to self-report at ART initiation (PCOS K = 0.66, Endometriosis K = 0.76, Tubal K = 0.73) than when compared to clinical records (PCOS K = 0.31, Endometriosis K = 0.48, Tubal K = 0.62) and varied by diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of women to recall specific IVF treatment details was moderately accurate and recall of self-reported infertility diagnosis varied by diagnosis and measurement method.

Quality of embryos on day 7 after medium refreshment on day 6: a prospective trial.

STUDY QUESTION: Are embryos that fail to meet biopsy or freezing criteria on day 6 (D6) more likely to meet these criteria on day 7 (D7) if cultured in fresh medium from D6 to D7? SUMMARY ANSWER: Refreshment of medium on D6 did not increase the proportion of usable embryos on D7, with an adverse effect for women ≥40 years old. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Embryo development in continuous single-step medium, from fertilization to the blastocyst stage, is equivalent to that using a sequential media protocol. However, there remains a theoretical benefit of refreshing the culture environment by transitioning slowly developing D6 embryos to a fresh medium droplet of the same composition, with a renewed source of nutrients and a milieu free of metabolic toxins. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a prospective trial of culture media exposure in which embryos were randomized on D6 to remain in the same culture medium from D3 to D7 (continuous, n = 620) or be moved to fresh medium (fresh, n = 603) on D6, with re-evaluation on D7. Data were collected from IVF cycles, with or without ICSI, between 29 March 2019 and 17 February 2020. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Embryos from 298 women, aged 18-44 years, from cycles with or without preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) that did not meet criteria for biopsy and/or freeze on D6 were included in the study. Embryos were only included if there was a minimum of two embryos meeting the inclusion criteria in any cohort. Only the first cycle undertaken by each woman in the study period from which embryos were randomized was included. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 1254 embryos were randomized from 312 cycles (209 non-PGT and 103 PGT) including 200 women undergoing IVF without PGT and 98 women who underwent PGT. The proportion of usable blastocysts on D7 did not differ between groups: 10.1% (61/603) in fresh versus 9.7% (60/620) in continuous medium (relative risk (RR) 1.05, 95% CI 0.74-1.47)). Embryos from women ≥40 years old had a significantly decreased likelihood of achieving a usable blastocyst on D7 after culture in fresh versus continuous medium: 3.5% versus 12.2%; RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.08-0.98. In total, 9.9% of embryos otherwise discarded on D6 met the criteria for biopsy and/or freeze on D7. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Future work investigating implantation, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates with D7 embryos is still needed. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Refreshment of medium on D6 did not increase the proportion of usable embryos on D7 overall. Younger women were more likely to develop D7 embryos after refreshment of medium on D6, while an adverse effect was seen in women ≥40 years old. However, by extending the culture of embryos to D7, additional blastocysts become available for clinical use. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Funding was provided through the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Brigham and Women's Hospital. I.G.I. works with Teladoc Health. A.L. has no disclosures. E.S.G. works as a consultant for Teladoc Health, and a writer and editor for UpToDate and BioMed Central. C.R. is a board member of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and works with UpToDate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

The cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in the United States: an analysis of cost and birth outcomes from 158,665 in vitro fertilization cycles.

BACKGROUND: A controversial and unresolved question in reproductive medicine is the utility of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy as an adjunct to in vitro fertilization. Infertility is prevalent, but its treatment is notoriously expensive and typically not covered by insurance. Therefore, cost-effectiveness is critical to consider in this context. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for the treatment of infertility in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: As reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System, a national data registry, in vitro fertilization cycles occurring between 2014 and 2016 in the United States were analyzed. A probabilistic decision tree was developed using empirical outputs to simulate the events and outcomes associated with in vitro fertilization with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. The treatment strategies were (1) in vitro fertilization with intended preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and (2) in vitro fertilization with transfers of untested embryos. Patients progressed through the treatment model until they achieved a live birth or 12 months after ovarian stimulation. Clinical costs related to both treatment strategies were extracted from the literature and considered from both the patient and payer perspectives. Outcome metrics included incremental cost (measured in 2018 US dollars), live birth outcomes, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and incremental cost per live birth between treatment strategies. RESULTS: The study population included 114,157 first fresh in vitro fertilization stimulations and 44,508 linked frozen embryo transfer cycles. Of the fresh stimulations, 16.2% intended preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and 83.8% did not. In patients younger than 35 years old, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher costs. At age 35 years and older, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy led to more cumulative births but was associated with higher costs from both perspectives. From a patient perspective, the incremental cost per live birth favored the no preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy strategy from the <35 years age group to the 38 years age group and beginning at age 39 years favored preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. From a payer perspective, the incremental cost per live birth favored preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy regardless of patient age. CONCLUSION: The cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is dependent on patient age and perspective. From an economic perspective, routine preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy should not be universally adopted; however, it may be cost-effective in certain scenarios.