RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to define the atrial electrical substrate in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) occurring in the absence of overt structural heart disease and to assess if electrophysiological parameters could predict AF recurrence after radiofrequency ablation in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: 45 consecutive patients (39 male, age 59 ± 10 years) with paroxysmal AF and without overt structural heart disease, referred for radiofrequency catheter ablation, were prospectively enrolled. A cohort of 12 age-matched patients without a history of AF, served as a control group. Atrial electrical substrate was assessed by P-wave signal-averaging, intracardiac conduction delays and refractory periods. Total P wave duration during signal-averaging was longer in patients with paroxysmal AF than in controls (140 ± 19 ms vs 123 ± 13 ms, p = 0.004). Patients with paroxysmal AF showed an increase in right intra-atrial (40.2 ± 11.3 ms vs 31.7 ± 11.8 ms, p = 0.02) and inter-atrial conduction delays (87.93 ± 22.0 ms vs 65.3 ± 15.6 ms, p = 0.001) in sinus rhythm. Refractory periods in the right atrium were longer in patients with paroxysmal AF (265 ± 44 ms vs 222 ± 32 ms, p = 0.002). After ablation, 22 patients had AF recurrence but showed no differences in electrophysiological parameters compared to patients without recurrence. CONCLUSION: Electrophysiological abnormalities are present in patients with paroxysmal AF without overt structural heart disease. Neither signal-averaged P-wave duration nor intracardiac atrial electrophysiology could predict arrhythmia recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The circular irrigated decapolar nMARQ ablation catheter designed for treating atrial fibrillation (AF) has recently been recalled following two deaths due to esoatrial fistula. Injury to the esophagus has been previously reported in up to 50% of patients using 20-25 W unipolar radiofrequency (RF) energy. Low power of 15 W has been proposed to prevent this complication, but the efficacy of this strategy to avoid AF recurrence is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with drug-refractory, symptomatic AF were included. Under electroanatomical navigation, the nMARQ catheter was used to isolate all PVs by applying 15 W of unipolar RF simultaneously from up to 10 poles during 40 seconds. Multiple applications were used for each vein, until isolation was achieved. Follow-up was performed after a 2-month blanking period. A total of 50 patients (37 males, age 58 ± 10 years) were included. All PVs were acutely isolated without requiring touch-up by conventional ablation catheters. Pericardial effusion occurred in two patients, of whom one required periocardiocentesis. Right phrenic nerve palsy occurred in another patient, which partially resolved. There were no cases of esophageal fistula or stroke. After a follow-up of 15 ± 4 months, AF recurred in 27/50 (54%) patients. CONCLUSION: The recurrence rate of AF with 15 W unipolar applications is high. Despite use of low power, complications such as pericardial effusion and phrenic nerve palsy may occur.