Hospital networks in Italy: state of the art and future pespectives. Insights from a qualitative research study.

Background Hospitals have undergone important that changes that have led, in recent decades at the international level, to the need for greater integration between hospitals and local healthcare services. The main institutional networks that have been developed in Italy are, as commended by the institutional levels, of 4 main types: the Emergency-Urgency Network, the Time-Dependent Networks, the Oncological Networks, and the Networks with primary care settings. It was important to assess the state of the art and analyze it in relation to possible future developments. Objective The aim of the study was to collect insights from both evidence-based knowledge and personal experience gained by experts in the field regarding the current condition and possible future developments of hospital networks. Material and methods A qualitative research methodology was chosen. Four mini-focus group meetings were organized among participants with proven expertise on the subject. Discussions were guided by four open-ended questions corresponding to the four areas of interest. Directed content analysis was chosen as the methodology for data analysis and final reporting of results. Results Four main categories were explored: "hospital networks and complexity", "hospital networks complexity and the need for integration", "levers for hospital networks governance" and "the COVID-19 challenge and future developments for hospital networks". In particular, the participants found that it is important to understand healthcare systems as complex systems and, therefore, to study the properties of complex systems. In this way it is possible to achieve value-based healthcare in complex contexts. It is also necessary to keep in mind that complexity represents a challenge for coordination/ integration in hospital networks. Mintzberg identified specific mechanisms to achieve it. Of them, mutual adaptation is the key to self-organization. Valentijn showed the organizational levels on which coordination/integration has to be obtained. Hospital network governance should include both hierarchy and self-determination logic to achieve integration in each of the four levels. The participants identified three key levers for governing complex organizations: "education", which consists of multi-professional and multi-level training in governance in complex systems; "information" consisting in considering the data registering as an integral part of the clinical care process to informative value; "leadership", which consists in convincing actors, directed towards personal gains, to achieve valuable goals. Finally, the challenge that COVID-19 served as an incentive for future developments of hospital networks. Discussion Various common points between the definitions of network and complex systems can be found. It is important to study the properties of complex systems in order to achieve value-based healthcare in the hospital networks context. The insights gained should be useful for all professionals from and across all levels of healthcare organizational responsibility, being able to orient roles and actions to achieve coordination/integration inside hospital networks. Conclusions Complexity literature can help understand how to achieve coordination/integration in healthcare settings and find levers for effective governance. It is important to study the current situation to anticipate and, possibly govern, future developments. In conclusion, governance of hospital networks should be interpreted as coordination/integration inside and across multiple organizational levels of co-responsibility.

[From evidence to care sustainability: risk management by contrast agent in cancer patient. Experience in an italian teaching hospital]. / Dalle evidenze alla sostenibilità assistenziale: la gestione del rischio da mezzo di contrasto nel paziente oncologico. Esperienza in un centro universitario italiano.

The use of organo-iodinated contrast media (CM) in diagnostics and intervention has increased in the last 10 years. It is necessary to distinguish between the different types of contrast agent, primarily with respect to osmolarity: with low osmolarity the safety profile for the patient is higher. The risk of acute renal injury caused by contrast agent (PC-AKI) is however determined also by risk factors related to the patient. Particularly in main centers, it is advisable to have a standardized program in order to stratify patients with respect to risk, to define prevention strategies and the roles of the specialists involved. The experience described in this work consists in the application of an organizational model relating to CT, with a feasibility study of applying an evidence-based check-list in the clinical routine, as a tool to support clinical decisions (Clinical Decision Support System, CDSS) in the oncology field. A pilot evaluation was carried out on 54 patients belonging to the case series treated in a Teaching Hospital, in a day service regime with a diagnosis of solid tumor. The results of this evaluation led the working group to believe that the CDSS thus structured determines the possibility of overestimating the clinical risk of PC-AKI, and consequently to redefine the evaluation form. Experience has shown that it is not generally easy to immediately identify an algorithm useful for standardizing the management of clinically complex situations, such as PC-AKI prevention. The conduction of pilot evaluations can be a valid instrument of harmonization between the solidity of the references deriving from evidence based medicine and the tangibility of real world data. It is advisable to broaden the application of the CDSS more in a larger number of cases, as well as conduct a pre-post analysis relating to the clinical impact in terms of incidence from PC-AKI.