Discrepancies and misconceptions of perceived colorectal cancer screening barriers between primary health professionals and unscreened population. A comparative study in Greece.

PURPOSE: Our study aimed to compare the views of healthy eligible unscreened adults, to those of primary care providers in Greece, about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening perceived barriers. METHODS: A sample of 791 unscreened adults (50-75 years) from a recent nationwide health survey in Greece were interviewed about CRC screening barriers, and the main reason for not adhering to colonoscopy and fecal occult blood test (FOBT) was assessed. Results were compared to a concurrent survey of 161 primary care professionals (PCPs) from the same region and the agreement with the general population was assessed with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: General population stated as a primary barrier for colonoscopy, at a significant higher frequency than the PCPs (p<0.001), lack of symptoms (44.5 vs 5.7%), negligence (14.2 vs 3.8%) and lack of PCP recommendation (9.2 vs 2.5%). PCPs were more likely to agree for fear of pain of colonoscopy (OR:19.6, 95%CI 9.3-41.4), fear of cancer diagnosis (OR:17.7, 95%CI 10.8-29.1), and embarrassment (OR:13.8, 95%CI 8.1-23.6). Regarding FOBT, the most frequent barrier for the unscreened population compared to PCPs (p<0.001), was lack of symptoms (38.2 vs 3.9%), followed by unawareness of the test (22.9 vs 55.2%) and lack of PCP recommendation (13% vs 12.3%). The only barrier that PCPs agreed at significantly lower frequency was the lack of physician recommendation (OR:0.3; 95%CI 0.2-0.4). CONCLUSIONS: PCPs do not share the same views as the general population about CRC screening barriers in Greece. PCPs should focus counseling on patient perceived barriers in order to promote adherence.

Cyberbullying Among Greek High School Adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the presence of cyberbullying among Greek students and the efficacy of proposed preventive interventions. METHODS: Three types of high schools (private, experimental and public) with different politics on on-line aggression were enrolled. All students of the aforementioned schools were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire. RESULTS: Around 62 % of the high school students experienced cyberbullying by electronic means, especially by cell phone, mostly the public school students (p 0.008). The bully was a stranger in more than 40 % of the cases. Over 60 % of the victims had not seeked help but dealt with the attack on their own. Only 20 % of the victims manifested sleep or eating disorders, physical/ psychological symptoms or changes in their social life as a consequence of the cyber-attack. CONCLUSIONS: Cyberbullying is a usual phenomenon among high school students. The bully is frequently unacquainted to the victim. Most of the victims are not physically or psychologically affected by the cyber-attack and do not share the event with anyone. There was a slight difference in the response of the students to cyberbullying among the different school politics of on-line aggression.