Variation in Utilization of Physical Therapist and Occupational Therapist Services After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Population-Based Study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the utilization of physical therapist and occupational therapist services after rotator cuff repair (RCR) and examine variation in rehabilitation characteristics by profession. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database. Eligible patients were 18 to 64 years old and had undergone outpatient RCR between 2017 and 2020. Physical therapist and occupational therapist services were identified using evaluation and treatment codes with profession-specific modifiers ("GP" or "GO"). Factors predicting utilization of formal rehabilitation and physical therapist versus occupational therapist services were examined; and univariable and multivariable analyses of days to initiate therapy, number of visits, and episode length by profession were completed. RESULTS: Among 53,497 patients with an RCR, 81.2% initiated formal rehabilitation (93.8% physical therapist, 5.2% occupational therapist, 1.0% both services). Patients in the Northeast and West (vs the South) were less likely to receive rehabilitation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.67 to 0.70) and less likely to receive occupational therapist services (OR = 0.39). Patients living in the Midwest (versus the South) were less likely to receive rehabilitation (OR = 0.79) but more likely to receive occupational therapist services (OR = 1.51). Similarly, those living in a rural (versus urban) area were less likely to utilize rehabilitation (OR = 0.89) but more likely to receive occupational therapist services (OR = 2.21). Additionally, receiving occupational therapist instead of physical therapist services was associated with decreased therapist visits (-16.89%), days to initiate therapy (-13.43%), and episode length (-13.78%). CONCLUSION: Most patients in our commercially insured cohort utilized rehabilitation services, with a small percentage receiving occupational therapist services. We identified profession-specific variation in utilization characteristics that warrants further examination to understand predictors and associated outcomes. IMPACT: Variation in rehabilitation utilization after RCR, including profession-specific and regional differences, may indicate opportunities to improve standardization and quality of care.

Association between timing of initiating supervised physical rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair and incidence of repeat repair and capsulitis: a population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is limited consensus on the optimal time to initiate supervised physical rehabilitation after a rotator cuff repair (RCR). We examined whether timing of initiating supervised physical rehabilitation was associated with repeat RCR or development of adhesive capsulitis within 12 months postoperatively in an observational cohort of commercially insured adults. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. We included adults aged 18-64 who underwent a unilateral outpatient RCR between 2017 and 2020 and initiated supervised physical rehabilitation 1-90 days postoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the adjusted association between time of initiating supervised physical rehabilitation (1-13, 14-27, 28-41, and 42-90 days postoperatively) and each of the primary outcomes: repeat RCR and capsulitis. In a sensitivity analysis, time to rehabilitation was alternatively categorized using a data-driven approach of quartiles (1-7, 8-16, 17-30, and 31-90 days postoperatively). We report adjusted odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: Among 33,841 patients (86.7% arthroscopic index RCR), the median time between index RCR and rehabilitation initiation was 16 days (interquartile range 7-30), with 39.9% initiating rehabilitation at 1-13 days. Additionally, 2.2% underwent repeat RCR within 12 months, and 12-month capsulitis was identified in 1.9% of patients. There were no significant associations between timing of initiating rehabilitation and 12-month repeat RCR (OR 0.85-0.93, P = .18-.49) or 12-month capsulitis (OR 0.83-0.94, P = .22-.63). Lack of associations between timing and outcomes was supported in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Timing of initiating rehabilitation was not significantly associated with adverse outcomes after RCR. The finding of no increased odds of repeat RCR or capsulitis with the earliest timing may support earlier initiation of rehabilitation to accelerate return to daily activities. Findings should be replicated in another dataset of similarly-aged patients.

Fragile Statistical Findings in Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Autograft Versus Allograft Use in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To analyze the statistical stability of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the surgical management of autografts versus allografts in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) literature and calculate the fragility index (FI) and fragility quotient and explore a subgroup analysis by calculating the proportion of outcome events where the FI was less than the number of patients lost to follow-up. METHODS: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a systematic search in the PubMed and Cochrane databases to identify RCTs published between 2000 and 2022 that investigated the use of autografts versus allografts in ACLR literature and reported dichotomous data. The fragility index of each dichotomous variable was calculated through the reversal of a single outcome event until significance was reversed. The fragility quotient was calculated by dividing each fragility index by the study sample size. The interquartile range also was calculated. RESULTS: Of the 4407 articles screened, 23 met the search criteria, with 11 RCTs evaluating ALCR using autografts and allografts included for analysis. Two hundred and 18 outcome events with 32 significant (P < .05) outcomes and 186 nonsignificant (P ≥ .05) outcomes were identified. The overall fragility index and fragility quotient for all 218 outcomes were 6 subjects (interquartile range 5-8) and 0.058 (interquartile range 0.039-0.077). Fragility analysis of statistically significant outcomes and nonsignificant outcomes had a fragility index of 3.5 (interquartile range 1-5.5) and 6 (interquartile range 5-8), respectively. All of the studies reported a loss to follow-up where 45.5% (5) reported a loss to follow-up greater or equal to 6. CONCLUSIONS: The RCTs in the ACLR peer-reviewed literature evaluating autograft versus allograft use are vulnerable to a small number of outcome event reversals and exemplify significant statistical fragility in statistically significant findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, systematic review of Level I studies.

Ambulatory Surgery Centers Significantly Decrease Total Health Care Expenditures in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a commonly performed orthopaedic procedure. The volume and cost of ACLR procedures are increasing annually, but the drivers of these cost increases are not well described. PURPOSE: To analyze the modifiable drivers of total health care utilization (THU), immediate procedure reimbursement, and surgeon reimbursement for patients undergoing ACLR using a large national commercial insurance database from 2013 to 2017. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: For this study, the cohort consisted of patients identified in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database who underwent outpatient arthroscopic ACLR in the United States from 2013 to 2017. Patients with Current Procedural Terminology code 29888 were included. THU was defined as the sum of any payment related to the ACLR procedure from 90 days preoperatively to 180 days postoperatively. A multivariable model was utilized to describe the patient- and procedure-related drivers of THU, immediate procedure reimbursement, and surgeon reimbursement. RESULTS: There were 34,862 patients identified. On multivariable analysis, the main driver of THU and immediate procedure reimbursement was an outpatient hospital as the surgical setting (US$6789 increase in THU). The main driver of surgeon reimbursement was an out-of-network surgeon (US$1337 increase). Health maintenance organization as the insurance plan type decreased THU, immediate procedure reimbursement, and surgeon reimbursement (US$955, US$108, and US$38 decrease, respectively, compared with preferred provider organization; P < .05 for all). CONCLUSION: Performing procedures in more cost-efficient ambulatory surgery centers had the largest effect on decreasing health care expenditures for ACLR. Health maintenance organizations aided in cost-optimization efforts as well, but had a minor effect on surgeon reimbursement. Overall, this study increases transparency into what drives reimbursement and serves as a foundation for how to decrease health care expenditures related to ACLR.

Trends in Health Care Expenditures and Patient Out-of-Pocket Expenses in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures in the United States, and the number of procedures is increasing annually, as is the cost. Patients are expected to shoulder a larger out-of-pocket expenditure. PURPOSE: To answer the following questions: (1) How is reimbursement changing for ACLR, and how is this affecting patients' out-of-pocket expenditures? (2) How are reimbursements from payers and patients' out-of-pocket expenses for ACLR distributed, and how is this changing? (3) Does performing ACLR in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) result in lower costs for payers and patients? STUDY DESIGN: Economic and decision analysis study; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 37,763 patients who underwent outpatient primary arthroscopic ACLR in the United States between 2013 and 2017 were identified using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. Patients with concomitant procedures and revision ACLR were excluded. Recorded outcomes were total patient payments and reimbursed claim totals in US dollars. RESULTS: Day-of-surgery reimbursement decreased 4.3% from $11,536 in 2013 to $11,044 in 2017, while patient out-of-pocket expenses increased 36% from $1085 in 2013 to $1480 in 2017. Day-of-surgery charges were the highest expense for patients, followed by physical therapy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) costs. Total reimbursement for MRI decreased 22.5%, while patient out-of-pocket expenses for MRI increased 166%. ACLR performed in an outpatient hospital resulted in 61% greater day-of-surgery expenditure for payers compared with ACLR performed in an ASC; however, the median total patient out-of-pocket savings for ACLRs performed in an ASC versus outpatient hospital was only $11. CONCLUSION: Out-of-pocket expenses for patients are increasing as they are forced to cover a larger percentage of their health care costs despite overall payer reimbursement decreasing. High-deductible health plans reimbursed the least out of all insurance types while having the highest patient out-of-pocket expenditure.

Preoperative Patient Education May Decrease Postoperative Opioid Use After Meniscectomy.

PURPOSE: To identify the current opioid prescribing and use practices after arthroscopic meniscectomy and to evaluate the role of preoperative patient education in decreasing postoperative opioid consumption. METHODS: Patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy were prospectively identified for inclusion. They were placed into 1 of 2 groups: Group 1 received no education regarding opioid use after surgery, whereas group 2 received a standardized overview on postoperative opioid use. Patients were assigned to the groups consecutively: Patients treated at the beginning of the study were assigned to group 1, and patients treated at the end of the study were assigned to group 2. Data from group 1 were used to identify "normal" opioid prescribing and use practices and to guide patients in group 2 regarding normal postoperative opioid use. Patients were surveyed weekly for 4 weeks after surgery to determine the number of opioids taken. Postoperative opioid consumption was analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients completed the study (32 in group 1 and 30 in group 2). Patients in group 1 were prescribed an average of 42.0 opioid pills (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.0-51.0 pills) and used an average of 15.84 pills (95% CI, 9.26-22.4 pills) after surgery, whereas patients in group 2 used an average of 4.00 pills (95% CI, 2.12-5.88 pills) after surgery. Patients in group 2 used 11.84 fewer opioid pills (P = .001), a 296% decrease in postoperative opioid consumption. The number of patients who continued to take opioid pills 4 weeks after surgery was 7 patients (21.9%) in group 1 and 1 patient (3.3%) in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative patient education regarding opioids may decrease postoperative opioid consumption and the duration for which patients take opioid pills after arthroscopic meniscectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.

No safe zone: The anatomy of the saphenous nerve and its posteromedial branches.

BACKGROUND: Following a case of medial meniscal repair via an inside-out repair, a patient developed acute postoperative electric shock-like paresthesias of the proximal medial calf with any knee flexion beyond 80°. Open saphenous nerve exploration revealed entrapment by suture material of an unnamed branch off the sartorial branch of the saphenous nerve. Symptoms resolved immediately with release. The objective of the study was to perform a cadaveric study to examine the existence and frequency of these previously under-reported branches of the sartorial branch of the saphenous nerve. METHODS: In 16 knees from eight fresh, matched whole cadavers, the medial structures of the knee were exposed, reproducible anatomical structures were identified, and previously under-described posteromedial branches of the sartorial nerve were identified and measured in relation to surrounding structures and the joint line. RESULTS: The saphenous nerve, its sartorial and infrapatellar branches, and its posteromedial branches were identified in all specimens. The sartorial nerve divided from the saphenous nerve an average of 4.8 cm proximal to the medial femoral epicondyle. Between one and four further posteromedial branches off the sartorial nerve were identified. These branches formed at a range of 5.3 cm proximal to 3.0 cm distal to the joint line. CONCLUSIONS: This cadaveric study establishes the consistent presence of a posteromedial branch off the sartorial nerve. It was consistently located near the posteromedial joint line. These branches are at risk for injury during medial meniscus repairs due to entrapment by suture materials, or during other surgical procedures near the posteromedial aspect of the knee.

Use of a Small-Bore Needle Arthroscope to Diagnose Intra-Articular Knee Pathology: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

The use of arthroscopy for purely diagnostic purposes has been largely supplanted by noninvasive technologies, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The mi-eye+TM (Trice Medical) technology is a small-bore needle unit for in-office arthroscopy. We conducted a pilot study comparing the mi-eye⁺™ unit with MRI, using surgical arthroscopy as a gold-standard reference. We hypothesized that the mi-eye⁺™ needle arthroscope, which can be used in an office setting, would be equivalent to MRI for the diagnosis of intra-articular pathology of the knee. This prospective, multicenter, observational study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. There were 106 patients (53 males, 53 females) in the study. MRIs were interpreted by musculoskeletally trained radiologists. The study was conducted in the operating room using the mi-eye⁺™ device. The mi-eye⁺™ device findings were compared with the MRI findings within individual pathologies, and a "per-patient" analysis was performed to compare the arthroscopic findings with those of the mi-eye⁺™ and the MRI. Additionally, we identified all mi-eye⁺™ findings and MRI findings that exactly matched the surgical arthroscopy findings. The mi-eye⁺™ demonstrated complete accuracy of all pathologies for 97 (91.5%) of the 106 patients included in the study, whereas MRI demonstrated complete accuracy for 65 patients (61.3%) (P < .0001). All discrepancies between mi-eye⁺TM and arthroscopy were false-negative mi-eye⁺™ results, as the mi-eye⁺TM did not reveal some aspect of the knee's pathology for 9 patients. The mi-eye⁺™ was more sensitive than MRI in identifying meniscal tears (92.6% vs 77.8%; P = .0035) and more specific in diagnosing these tears (100% vs 41.7%; P < .0001). The mi-eye⁺™ device proved to be more sensitive and specific than MRI for intra-articular findings at time of knee arthroscopy. Certainly there are contraindications to using the mi-eye⁺™, and our results do not obviate the need for MRI, but our study did demonstrate that the mi-eye⁺™ needle arthroscope can safely provide excellent visualization of intra-articular knee pathology.

The Influence of Incision Type on Patient Satisfaction After Plate Fixation of Clavicle Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the clavicle is a common procedure that has been shown to have improved outcomes over nonoperative treatment. Several incisions can be used to approach clavicle fractures, the decision of which is variable among surgeons. PURPOSE: To compare patient satisfaction and subjective outcomes between patients with a longitudinal incision versus those with a necklace incision for the treatment of diaphyseal clavicle fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with a diaphyseal clavicle fracture (Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 15-B) were treated by 1 of 7 orthopaedic surgeons. The intervention was ORIF with anatomic contoured plates. Patients were divided into a necklace incision group and a longitudinal incision group depending on the surgical approach used. Medical records were reviewed, and participants completed an online survey with questions related to pain, numbness, scar appearance, and satisfaction. Function was assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score. Statistical significance was determined with P < .05. RESULTS: There were 16 patients in the necklace incision group and 20 in the longitudinal incision group. Patients in the necklace incision group were significantly more satisfied with the appearance of their scars (P = .01), which correlated with overall satisfaction (P = .05). There were no differences in overall satisfaction, pain, numbness, or reoperation rates for hardware removal between the necklace (6%) and longitudinal groups (15%). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing clavicle ORIF with a necklace incision are more satisfied with their scar appearance than those with a longitudinal incision. The overall satisfaction, rate of numbness, and plate removal were similar in both groups.

The management of meniscal pathology: from partial meniscectomy to transplantation.

The management of meniscal pathology continues to evolve as researchers gain a better understanding of the role of the meniscus in normal knee kinematics. Evidence now supports retention or transplantation of meniscal tissue to maintain homeostatic knee mechanisms because the removal of meniscal tissue changes the contact stresses and leads to structural and biomechanical changes in the articular cartilage and the subchondral plate that predisposes the knee to the development of degenerative arthritis. Advances in repair techniques, biologic adjuvants, and progressive tissue-engineering strategies are rapidly adding to the surgeon's armamentarium when dealing with meniscal injury and insufficiency. Early clinical data support many of these advanced techniques. It is helpful to explore meniscal function, pathology, and current treatment modalities, with a focus on meniscal repair and transplantation as well as adjuvants to biologic healing and future directions in this field.

Where to tenodese the biceps: proximal or distal?

BACKGROUND: The best location for biceps tenodesis is controversial as surgeons have begun to question whether tenodesis location affects the incidence of residual bicipital postoperative pain. An open distal tenodesis technique has been previously proposed to eliminate remaining symptoms at the bicipital groove. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked the following questions: (1) Does a higher tenodesis in the biceps groove result in postoperative pain? And (2) can the tenodesis location be successfully moved more distally ("suprapectoral tenodesis") by an arthroscopic technique? METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 17 patients undergoing arthroscopic biceps tenodesis and evaluated their tenodesis location, either within the upper half of the groove (five) or in the lower half of the groove or shaft (12). Patient outcomes were assessed with visual analog scale scores for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, and Constant-Murley scores. Minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 28 months; range, 12-69 months). RESULTS: Two patients had persistent pain at 12 months; both had a tenodesis in the upper half of the groove. The overall American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant-Murley scores were improved at latest followup. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis represents a new technique for distal tenodesis. Our preliminary observations suggest a more distal tenodesis location may decrease the incidence of persistent postoperative pain at the bicipital groove, although additional research is needed to definitively state whether the proximal location is in fact more painful. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fatty infiltration and atrophy of the rotator cuff do not improve after rotator cuff repair and correlate with poor functional outcome.

BACKGROUND: The role of degenerative changes in rotator cuff musculature with respect to the functional outcomes of rotator cuff repair have only recently been recognized and are still not well understood. In addition, the reversibility of these changes with repair of the tendons is questionable. HYPOTHESIS: Poorer preoperative muscle quality negatively affects outcome, and a successful outcome (in terms of a healed repair) might demonstrate improvements in fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients (mean age, 62 years) were prospectively evaluated with preoperative and 1-year postoperative clinical examination and appropriate magnetic resonance image sequencing to determine grades of muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES), Constant, and pain scores were determined as well as strength measurements. The retear rate and progression of muscle degeneration were also evaluated. Independent predictors of outcome measurements and cuff integrity were determined. RESULTS: The overall clinical outcome, including ASES, Constant, and pain scores, improved significantly (P < .0001). Strength in forward elevation improved significantly (P < .006), while external rotation strength did not. There was a strongly negative correlation between muscle quality and outcome results in most cases. When the results were adjusted for multivariate effect, muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus muscle were the only independent predictors of ASES and Constant scores (P < .03). Tear size and rotator cuff healing did not play an independent role. Tear size, however, was the only independent predictor of ultimate cuff integrity (P = .002). Both atrophy and fatty infiltration progressed significantly over the course of the study. In cases in which the tendon had re-torn, the progression was found to be more significant than when the repair proved successful (P < .003). CONCLUSION: Muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles, particularly of the infraspinatus, play a significant role in determining functional outcome after cuff repair. Tear size appears to have the most influential effect on repair integrity. A successful repair did not lead to improvement or reversal of muscle degeneration and a failed repair resulted in significantly more progression. In general, healed repairs demonstrated minimal progression. These findings suggest that repairs should be performed, if possible, before more significant deterioration in the cuff musculature in order to optimize outcomes, and that understanding the degree of muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration before surgery can help guide patient expectations.

Interscalene regional anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a safe and effective technique.

There has been resistance to the use of interscalene regional block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery because of concerns about potential complications and failed blocks with the subsequent need for general anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to assess whether interscalene regional block is safe and effective and offers many advantages over general anesthesia for outpatient arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Through a retrospective chart review of consecutive arthroscopic shoulder surgeries over a 2.5-year time period, in a tertiary university medical center with an anesthesiology residency, 277 interscalene blocks (96%) were successful; 12 (4%) required general anesthesia because of an inadequate block. There were no seizures, pneumothoraces, cardiac events, or other major complications. There was a 1% rate of minor complications, all of which were transient sensory neuropathies that resolved within 5 weeks on average. We conclude that interscalene block can provide effective anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) has been reported to have good clinical results but high retear rates by ultrasound. We prospectively assessed postoperative cuff integrity and outcome after arthroscopic RCR (40 patients) and compared these results with open RCR (32 patients). Evaluation preoperatively and at 1 year included a physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant scores improved significantly in both groups (P < .0001). Overall, 69% of repairs in the open group and 53% in the arthroscopic group were intact by magnetic resonance imaging. Of tears less than 3 cm in size, 74% in the open group and 84% in the arthroscopic group were intact. Of tears greater than 3 cm in size, 62% in the open group and 24% in the arthroscopic group were intact (P < .036). In the arthroscopic group, patients with an intact cuff had significantly greater strength of elevation (P = .01) and external rotation (P = .02). We conclude that open and arthroscopic RCRs have similar clinical outcomes. Cuff integrity is comparable for small tears, but large tears have twice the retear rate after arthroscopic repair.

Expert panel on anterior cruciate ligament case studies.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions cannot, and should not, be considered "recipe-driven" or "cookie-cutter" operations. There are multiple variables that must be considered both pre- and intraoperatively in order to execute a successful procedure. The following case studies present a number of challenging situations, many of which do not have a straightforward, or only one, solution. The goal is to provide some ral-life clinical situations in which the reader can "observe" an expert panel of ACL surgeons working through the problems--offering solutions based on science, experience, and intuition.

Anatomy of the posterior rotator interval: implications for cuff mobilization.

Release of the posterior rotator interval between the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons may be necessary to obtain appropriate mobilization for an anatomic rotator cuff repair. Ten cadaver shoulders were dissected to expose the region between the infraspinatus and supraspinatus from the spinoglenoid notch to the greater tuberosity. Measurements were made from the spinoglenoid notch to the glenoid rim, the glenoid rim to the confluence of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus musculotendinous junction, and from the confluence of the tendons to the insertion on the humerus. The histologic features of the posterior rotator interval were examined. The posterior rotator interval is a clear structure, consisting of the glenohumeral capsule medially, which fuses with the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons laterally. The average length of the posterior rotator interval was 77.8 mm which includes the distance from the spinoglenoid notch to the glenoid rim (25 mm; standard deviation, 2.89 mm; range, 21-28 mm), from the glenoid to the tendon confluence (25 mm; standard deviation, 1.95 mm; range, 21-28 mm), and from the tendon confluence to insertion (28 mm; standard deviation, 2.36 mm; range, 24-31 mm). Release of the posterior rotator interval can be important to realign the supraspinatus tendon if it is retracted and scarred at its posterior edge.

Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Selecting the appropriate graft for ACL reconstruction depends on numerous factors including surgeon philosophy and experience, tissue availability (affected by anatomical anomalies or prior injury or surgery), and patient activity level and desires. Although the patella tendon autograft has the widest experience in the literature, and is probably the most commonly used graft source, this must be tempered with the higher reported incidences of potential morbidity and pitfalls associated with its use. The hamstring tendons are gaining increasing popularity, mostly due to reduced harvest morbidity and improved soft tissue fixation techniques, and many recent studies in the literature report equal results to BTB ACL reconstruction with respect to functional outcome and patient satisfaction. On the other hand, many of these studies report higher degrees of instrument (KT-100) tested laxity for hamstring reconstruction, and some have reported lower returns to preinjury levels of activity. One question that remains to be addressed is how closely objectively measured laxity tests correlate with subjectively assessed outcomes and ability to return to high levels of competitive sports. Allograft use, which decreased in popularity during the 1990s, appears to be undergoing a resurgence, with better sterilization processes and new graft sources (tibialis tendons), leading to increased availability and improved fixation techniques. The benefits of decreased surgical morbidity and easier rehabilitation must be weighed against the potential for greater failure of biologic incorporation, infection, and possibly slower return to activities. In our practice, for high-demand individuals (those playing cutting, pivoting, or jumping sports and skiing) BTB tends to be the graft of choice. For lower demand or older individuals, hamstring reconstructions will be performed. Allograft tissue will be used in older individuals (generally over 45 years old), those with signs of arthritis (and compelling evidence of instability), or those individuals who understand the pros and cons of allograft use fully and do not want their own tissue used.

Endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patella tendon autograft.

The patella tendon is the most commonly used graft source for ACL reconstruction because of its biomechanical strength and stiffness, the availability of bone-to-bone healing on either end, and the ability to firmly secure the graft within the tunnels. Consistently good results have been reported in the literature, with expectations to return to all activities at pre-injury levels of performance. We outline our technique for endoscopic ACL reconstruction using a patella tendon autograft. The technique is divided into the critical stages of pre-operative assessment, graft harvest, notch preparation, tunnel placement, graft passage, graft fixation, and rehabilitation. Methods for avoiding pitfalls and overcoming mishaps are described.