Normative blood pressure response to exercise stress testing in children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To describe normative values for blood pressure (BP) response to maximal exercise in children/adolescents undergoing a treadmill stress test. METHODS: From a retrospective analysis of medical records, patients who had undergone a Bruce protocol exercise stress test, with (1) normal cardiovascular system and (2) a body mass index percentile rank below 95% were included for analysis. Sex, age, height, weight, resting and peak heart rate, resting and peak systolic blood pressure (SBP), test duration, stage of Bruce protocol at termination, reason for undergoing the test and reason for termination of test were collected. Percentiles for exercise-induced changes in SBP were constructed by age and height for each sex with the use of quantile regression models. RESULTS: 648 patients with a median age of 12.4 years (range 6-18 years) were included. Typical indications for stress testing were investigation of potential rhythm abnormalities, syncope/dizziness and chest pain and were deemed healthy by an overseeing cardiologist. Mean test duration was 12.6±2.2 min. Reference percentiles for change in SBP by sex, age and height are presented. CONCLUSION: The presented reference percentiles for the change in SBP for normal children and adolescents will have utility for detecting abnormally high or low BP responses to exercise in these age groups.

Assessment of diastolic blood pressure with the auscultatory method in children and adolescents under exercise conditions.

Controversy surrounds whether to define resting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as the onset of the fourth or fifth Korotkoff phase (K4, sound muffling, or K5, sound disappearance) in children and adolescents. Although undetectable in some children (due to sounds continuing to zero cuff pressure), K5 is currently recommended for consistency with adult practice and because K4 can be difficult to discern or undetectable. However, to our knowledge, no studies have specifically assessed the reliability of measuring DBP with K4 and K5 in children and adolescents under exercise conditions. We therefore measured DBP before and immediately after a Bruce protocol stress test in 90 children and adolescents aged 12.3 ± 3.5 years (mean ± SD) in a cardiology clinic setting. When detected, K4 and K5 were 63.5 ± 9.2 and 60.2 ± 12.6 mmHg, respectively, at rest and 59.2 ± 14.6 mmHg (p = 0.028 vs rest) and 52.9 ± 18.3 mmHg (p < 0.001), respectively, immediately post-exercise. K4 and K5 were not detected in 41% and 4% of participants at rest or in 29% and 37% post-exercise, respectively, while K5 resulted in unrealistic DBP values (<30 mmHg) in an additional 11%. Better exercise performance was associated with a more frequent absence of K5 post-exercise, and after excluding participants performing at <10th percentile for age, post-exercise K4 was absent in 23%, and plausible K5 values were not obtained in 59% (p < 0.001). Although neither K4 nor K5 alone were reliable measures of DBP immediately post-exercise, a novel hybrid approach using K4, if detected, or K5, if not, produced reasonable DBP measurements in 97% of participants.

Magnitude and significance of interarm blood pressure differences in children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND: An interarm difference (IAD) in blood pressure (BP) of 10 mmHg or more is a potential cardiovascular risk factor in adults, given its association with cardiovascular events/mortality. In children and adolescents, accurate BP assessment is critical for identifying risk of end organ damage. However, IAD has not been systematically studied in paediatric patients; if present and of significant magnitude, measuring BP in only one arm could lead to misclassification of hypertensive status. METHOD: In 95 children/adolescents with a normal aorta (including 15 with a history of tetralogy of Fallot) aged 7-18 years attending the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, we aimed to determine the magnitude of IAD, frequency of IAD of at least 10 mmHg, difference in BP classification between arms, and influence of repeat measures on IAD in a single visit. After 5 min rest, simultaneous bilateral BP was measured in triplicate with an automated device. RESULTS: Absolute systolic IAD was 5.0 mmHg (median, interquartile range 2-8 mmHg) and was 10 mmHg or more in 14%, with no change on repeat measures. In patients with a history of aortic surgery, IAD of 10 mmHg or more occurred in 27% (transposition of the great arteries, n = 15) and 75% (aortic coarctation, n = 8). Differences in BP classification, based on initial left vs. right arm measures, occurred in 25% (normal aorta) and 40%/63% (aortic surgery), or 17% and 33%/50%, respectively if second and third measurements were averaged. CONCLUSION: Substantial interarm BP differences were common, even in apparently healthy children and adolescents: evaluation of IAD may, therefore, be important for BP classification in the paediatric setting.