Differences in invasiveness and recurrence rate among nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors depending on tumor subtype.

PURPOSE: To clarify the invasiveness to surrounding structures and recurrence rate of each subtype of nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (Pit-NETs) according to the WHO 2022 classification. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized data from 292 patients with nonfunctioning Pit-NETs treated with initial transsphenoidal surgery. Recurrence was evaluated on 113 patients who were available for a magnetic resonance imaging follow-up ≥ 60 months. All tumors were assessed by immunohistochemical staining for Pit-1, T-PIT, and GATA3. Invasiveness to surrounding structures was evaluated based on intraoperative findings. RESULTS: Cavernous sinus invasion was found in 47.5% of null cell tumors, 50.0% of Pit-1 lineage tumors, 31.8% of corticotroph tumors, and 18.3% of gonadotroph tumors. Dura mater defects in the floor of sellar turcica, indicating dural invasion, were found in 44.3% of null cell tumors, 36.4% of corticotroph tumors, 16.7% of Pit-1 lineage tumors, and 17.3% of gonadotroph tumors. In logistic regression analysis, Pit-1 (OR 5.90, 95% CI 1.71-20.4, P = 0.0050) and null tumors (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.86-9.23, P = 0.0005) were associated with cavernous sinus invasion. Recurrence was found in 8 (4.9%) patients, but without significant differences between tumor subtypes. The presence of cavernous sinus invasion was correlated with recurrence (HR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.10-3.46, P = 0.0227). CONCLUSION: Among nonfunctioning Pit-NETs, Pit-1 lineage tumors tend to invade the cavernous sinus, corticotroph tumors may produce dura mater defects, and null cell tumors tend to cause both. Pit-NETs with cavernous sinus invasion require a careful attention to recurrence.

Characteristics and therapeutic strategies of brain and cranial radiation-induced sarcoma: analysis of 165 cases from our case experience and comprehensive review.

BACKGROUND: Radiation-induced sarcoma (RIS) is among the neoplasms potentially caused by radiation therapy (RT) for brain tumors. However, the clinical characteristics of and ideal treatment for RIS are unclear. We analysed our case experience and conducted a comprehensive literature review to reveal the characteristics of brain and cranial RIS. METHODS: We analysed 165 cases of RIS from the literature together with the RIS case treated at our institution. In each case, the latency period from irradiation to the development of each RIS and the median overall survival (OS) of the patients was analysed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Spearman's correlation test was used to determine the relationship between the latency period and radiation dose or age at irradiation. RESULTS: The mean age at the development of RIS was 39.63 ± 17.84 years. The mean latency period was 11.79 ± 8.09 years. No factors associated with early development of RIS were detected. The median OS was 11 months, with fibrosarcoma showing significantly shorter OS compared with osteosarcoma and other sarcomas (p = 0.0021), and intracranial RIS showing a worse prognosis than extracranial RIS (p < 0.0001). Patients treated with surgery (p < 0.0001) and postoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.0157) for RIS presented significantly longer OS, whereas RT for RIS was not associated with a survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Although prognosis for RIS is universally poor, pathological characteristics and locations are associated with worse prognosis. Surgery and chemotherapy may be the ideal treatment strategies for RIS.