Peptides From the Variable Domain of Immunoglobulin G as Biomarkers in Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a clinically heterogeneous immune-mediated disease. Diagnostic biomarkers for CIDP are currently lacking. Peptides derived from the variable domain of circulating immunoglobulin G (IgG) have earlier been shown to be shared among patients with the same immunologic disease. Because humoral immune factors are hypothesized to be involved in the pathogenesis of CIDP, we evaluated IgG variable domain-derived peptides as diagnostic biomarkers in CIDP (primary objective) and whether IgG-derived peptides could cluster objective clinical entities in CIDP (secondary objective). METHODS: IgG-derived peptides were determined in prospectively collected sera of patients with CIDP and neurologic controls by means of mass spectrometry. Peptides of interest were selected through statistical analysis in a discovery cohort followed by sequence determination and confirmation. Diagnostic performance was evaluated for individual selected peptides and for a multipeptide model incorporating selected peptides, followed by performance reassessment in a validation cohort. Clustering of patients with CIDP based on IgG-derived peptides was evaluated through unsupervised sparse principal component analysis followed by k-means clustering. RESULTS: Sixteen peptides originating from the IgG variable domain were selected as candidate biomarkers in a discovery cohort of 44 patients with CIDP and 29 neurologic controls. For all 16 peptides, univariate logistic regressions and ROC curve analysis demonstrated increasing peptide abundances to associate with increased odds for CIDP (area under the curves [AUCs] ranging from 64.6% to 79.6%). When including age and sex in the logistic regression models, this remained the case for 13/16 peptides. A model composed of 5/16 selected peptides showed strong discriminating performance between patients with CIDP and controls (AUC 91.5%; 95% CI 84.6%-98.4%; p < 0.001). In the validation cohort containing 45 patients and 43 controls, 2/16 peptides demonstrated increasing abundances to associate with increased odds for CIDP, while the five-peptide model demonstrated an AUC of 61.2% (95% CI 49.3%-73.2%; p = 0.064). Peptide-based patient clusters did not associate with clinical features. DISCUSSION: IgG variable domain-derived peptides showed a valid source for diagnostic biomarkers in CIDP, albeit with challenges toward replication. Our proof-of-concept findings warrant further study of IgG-derived peptides as biomarkers in more homogeneous cohorts of patients with CIDP and controls. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that the pattern of serum IgG-derived peptide clusters may help differentiate between patients with CIDP and those with other peripheral neuropathies.

Prognostic value of neurofilament light chain in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy is a neuroinflammatory disorder with considerable variation in clinical phenotype, disease progression and therapy response among patients. Recently, paranodal antibodies associated with poor response to intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and more aggressive disease course have been described in small subsets of patients, but reliable serum-based prognostic biomarkers are not yet available for the general population. In current retrospective longitudinal study, we utilized logistic regression models to investigate the associations of serum neurofilament light chain levels with 1-year disease progression and therapy response during follow-up in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. One-year disease progression was defined as a decrease of four or more points (the minimal clinically important difference) on an 80-point Medical Research Council sum-score scale 1 year after sampling. Patients who, compared to treatment received at time of sampling, required therapy switch during follow-up due to insufficient effect were classified as non-responders. Serum neurofilament light chain was measured by electrochemiluminescence assay in clinical residual serum samples of 76 patients diagnosed with probable (13 patients) or definite (63 patients) chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy according to European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society diagnostic criteria. Eleven (15%) patients were female, and the mean (standard deviation) cohort age was 61.5 (11.7) years. In both univariate and multivariable (including demographics) models, elevated serum neurofilament light chain harboured increased odds for 1-year disease progression (respectively odds ratio, 1.049; 95% confidence interval, 1.022-1.084 and odds ratio, 1.097; 95% confidence interval, 1.045-1.169; both P = 0.001). Patients with levels above the median cohort neurofilament light chain level (28.3 pg/ml) had largely increased odds of 1-year disease progression (univariate: odds ratio, 5.597; 95% confidence interval, 1.590-26.457; P = 0.01; multivariable: odds ratio, 6.572; 95% confidence interval, 1.495-39.702; P = 0.02) and of insufficient treatment response (univariate: odds ratio, 4.800; 95% confidence interval, 1.622-16.442; P = 0.007; multivariable: odds ratio, 6.441; 95% confidence interval, 1.749-29.357; P = 0.009). In a combined approach analysis, patients with levels above median cohort serum neurofilament light chain level reported strongly increased odds of demonstrating 1-year disease progression and/or therapy non-response during follow-up (univariate: odds ratio, 6.337; 95% confidence interval, 2.276-19.469; P < 0.001; multivariable: odds ratio, 10.138; 95% confidence interval, 2.801-46.404; P = 0.001). These results show that in various logistic regression models, serum neurofilament light chain was associated with both 1-year disease progression and therapy response during follow-up in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Hence, our findings warrant further prospective research regarding the value of neurofilament light chain as potential prognostic biomarker in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

The clinical significance of atypical indirect immunofluorescence patterns on primate cerebellum in paraneoplastic antibody screening.

PURPOSE: Screening for paraneoplastic antibodies is often performed by means of indirect immunofluorescence on primate cerebellar slices. However, atypical immunofluorescence patterns, i.e. patterns that are not specifically related to paraneoplastic antibodies, are often reported. The clinical significance of these patterns is not clear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the significance and diagnostic value-in terms of a paraneoplastic neurological syndrome or other neurological disease being diagnosed in the patient-of such atypical immunofluorescence screening patterns on primate cerebellum. METHODS: This study is a retrospective single center study including atypical indirect immunofluorescence screening patterns of patients with a negative or absent typing assay for intraneuronal and anti-amphiphysin paraneoplastic antibodies. Patients with a positive typing assay or without final diagnosis were excluded. Included patients were grouped according to (i) reported immunofluorescence pattern and (ii) established diagnosis, after which contingency table analyses were performed to investigate an interrelation between reported pattern and diagnostic group. RESULTS: In 3.7% of cases, patients with an atypical pattern obtained a final diagnosis of a paraneoplastic neurological syndrome. The presence of atypical patterns was more prominent in patients with epilepsy or peripheral neuropathies (p Monte Carlo simulation = 0.026), without, however, adding any diagnostic information. CONCLUSIONS: An atypical indirect immunofluorescence pattern on primate cerebellum in the screening for paraneoplastic antibodies has only very minor relevance with respect to paraneoplastic neurological syndromes or any other neurological disease, recommending clinicians to interpret the results of positive screening assays for such antibodies with care.