Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction Using a Handheld Fluorescence Imaging Device.

Background: Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) has traditionally required a fluorescent-capable microscope to identify lymphatic channels used to create a lymphaticovenous bypass (LVB). Herein, a new alternative method is described, identifying lymphatic channels using a commercially available handheld fluorescence imaging device. Methods: This was a single-center study of consecutive patients who underwent ILR over a 1-year period at a tertiary medical center. Intradermal injection of fluorescent indocyanine green dye was performed intraoperatively after axillary or inguinal lymphadenectomy. A handheld fluorescent imaging device (SPY-PHI, Stryker) rather than a fluorescent-capable microscope was used to identify transected lymphatic channels. Data regarding preoperative, intraoperative, and outcome variables were collected and analyzed. Results: The handheld fluorescent imaging device was successfully able to identify transected lymphatic channels in all cases (n = 15). A nonfluorescent-capable microscope was used to construct the LVB in 14 cases. Loupes were used in one case. In 13 cases, ILR was unilateral. In two cases, bilateral ILR was performed in the lower extremities. All upper extremity cases were secondary to breast cancer (n = 7). Lower extremity cases (n = 8) included extramammary Paget disease of the penis, ovarian cancer, vulvar squamous cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of unknown origin, soft tissue sarcomas, cutaneous melanoma, and porocarcinoma. Conclusions: ILR, using indocyanine green injection with a handheld fluorescent imaging device, is both safe and effective. This method for intraoperative identification of lymphatic channels was successful, and LVB creation was completed in all cases. This approach makes ILR feasible when a fluorescent-capable microscope is unavailable, broadening access to more patients.

The New Era of Marketing in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Algorithm of Social Media and Digital Marketing.

Social media has been demonstrated to serve as a critical tool for plastic surgeons, facilitating patient engagement, peer-to-peer education and learning, and outreach to the broader public community. This study aims to perform a meta-analysis of data to determine the most valuable and useful social media platforms for practicing plastic surgeons developing their practice by assessing the perceived value to the practice and quantifying return on investment. A systematic review was performed using PubMed (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). The initial search yielded 3592 articles. Sixteen articles met inclusion and exclusion criteria. It was found that patients are more likely to engage with aesthetic content rather than scientific content. Younger generations are more likely to utilize Instagram (Meta, Menlo Park, CA), Snapchat (Santa Monica, CA), and TikTok (Culver City, CA), while older generations may be more likely to utilize Facebook (Meta, Menlo Park, CA) and YouTube (San Bruno, CA). Age-specific recommendations include utilizing Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok with emphasis on breast augmentation for patients aged 17 and 35 given this is the most common procedure performed for this age group. Patients between the ages of 36 and 70 are most likely to be engaged on Facebook, Instagram, and Facebook with liposuction being the most common procedure in this age group. For ages 70+, patients are most likely to utilize Facebook with the most common procedure performed as blepharoplasty. Effective social media marketing for the plastic surgeon considers delivering the right content and choosing the right platform. The right content and platform are critically dependent on the specific age of the audience.

The Utility of Lymphatic Massage in Cosmetic Procedures.

Lymphedema is a severe debilitating disease characterized by the accumulation of excessive protein-rich fluid in the interstitial space. Given the severe morbidity associated with this disease process, various surgical and nonsurgical treatment modalities have been developed to attempt to reduce the incidence and symptoms associated with lymphedema. Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) is a component of complete decongestive therapy on-surgical treatment which has demonstrated benefit in reducing the development of lymphedema following surgery. Here we provide a review of literature on MLD and its potential mechanism of action. This paper aims to educate patients, physicians, and surgeons about MLD regarding its efficacy and utility in the treatment paradigm for lymphedema and to translate concepts from the treatment of lymphedema to cosmetic procedures.

Mucormycosis following burn injuries: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Mucormycosis is an opportunistic fungal infection with a high mortality rate. Though typically associated with diabetes and other conditions that affect innate immune function, infections can also be precipitated by conditions such as trauma and burns. Burn patients are particularly susceptible to fungal infections due to the immune dysfunction that often accompany their wounds. Indeed case series have described mucormycosis to occur in patients with burn injuries, however the factors contributing to mortality have not been well described. Thus, the purpose of our review was to identify factors contributing to morbidity and mortality in burn patients with Mucormycosis. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature of mucormycosis infection in burn injury patients was performed on Pubmed and Google Scholar using the keywords: Mucor, Mucorales, Mucormycosis, Mucormycotina, Zygomycosis and burn or thermal injury. Clinical trials, observational studies, case reports, and case reviews were included if they provided information regarding mortality in adult and pediatric burn patients diagnosed with mucormycosis, review articles, non-English articles, and articles without patient information were excluded. No time limit was placed on our review. Individual patient data was stratified based on mortality. Statistical analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between patient risk factors and mortality, and the Oxford Level of Evidence was used to evaluate study quality. RESULTS: 46 articles were included in our final review, encompassing 114 patients. On average, survivors had a total body surface area (TBSA)% of 46 (SD 19.8) while non-survivors had a TBSA of 65% (SD 16.4), and this difference was significant (p < .001). Patients with disseminated mucormycosis experienced an 80% mortality rate compared to 36% mortality rate in patients with localized disease (p < .001). We found no statistically significant difference in mean age (p > .05), diabetes (p > .05), mean delay in diagnosis (p > .05), time to antifungal therapy (p > .05), or type of therapy used (p > .05) between survivors and non-survivors. Our review was limited by the lack of prospective, controlled trials; thus, our review primarily consists of case reports. CONCLUSION: Disseminated infections and higher TBSA both increased the risk of mortality in burn patients with mucormycosis, while diabetes did not increase mortality risk. The severity of the initial injury and infection locations must be taken into consideration to inform patient prognosis.

Early Cleft Lip Repair: Demonstrating Efficacy in the First 100 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Cleft lip and/or palate affects approximately one in 700 live births. Optimal timing for repair of cleft lip has yet to be objectively validated. Earlier repair takes advantage of a high degree of plasticity within the nasal cartilage and maxilla. The authors present patients enrolled in an early cleft lip repair protocol facilitating effective repair of the cleft lip and nostril. METHODS: American Society of Anesthesiologists class I to II patients with unilateral cleft lip and/or palate undergoing repair before 3 months of age were enrolled over 5 years. Perioperative data, surgical and anesthetic complications, preoperative and postoperative nostril breadth, nostril width, nasal angle, lip length, frontal nasal breadth, and commissure length measured as ratios between the cleft and noncleft sides were abstracted. Early cleft lip repair and nasoalveolar molding patients were matched for cleft lip severity using the cleft width ratios and compared. RESULTS: The surgical and anesthetic complication rate for 100 early cleft lip repair patients was 2 percent. Operative and anesthetic times were 123 ± 37 minutes and 177 ± 34 minutes, respectively. Hospital length of stay was 1 ± 0 day. Age at repair between early cleft lip repair and nasoalveolar molding was 33 ± 15 days and 118 ± 33 days, respectively. After early cleft lip repair, preoperative to postoperative distance from symmetry for all anthropomorphic measurements improved ( p < 0.001). Comparing severity-matched early cleft lip repair to nasoalveolar molding patients, similar improvements were observed, suggesting equivalent results ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Early cleft lip repair provides an efficacious method for correcting the cleft lip and nasal deformity that simulates nasoalveolar molding. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Painless, Drainless Lipoabdominoplasty: A Retrospective Study of Pain Following Lipoabdominoplasty Utilizing Liposomal Bupivacaine and a Modified Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol.

Background: There are many functional and aesthetic benefits to lipoabdominoplasty (combination of liposuction with abdominoplasty), including increase in core strength, reduction in urinary incontinence, and improvement in lower back pain. However, patients are still hesitant to undergo surgery due to the perceived fears of postsurgical drains, and postoperative pain. Objectives: To propose a standardized multimodal pain protocol for patients undergoing lipoabdominoplasty procedures that aims to improve postoperative pain control. Methods: A total of 80 patients operated on between July 2020 and December 2021 were evaluated in this study. Patients all underwent lipoabdominoplasty and were administered a standardized preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pain regimen. Pain scores were measured across all patients in the immediate postoperative period, and postoperative days (PODs) 1, 7, 28, and 90. Results: Mean pain scores in the postanesthesia recovery unit were 0.46/10 (+/- 0.18). Subsequent reassessment in the postop recovery suite yielded mean pain scores of 0.34 (+/- 0.15). Mean pain scores on POD1 were 1.23 (+/- 0.15) and consistent through to POD7 at 1.24 (+/- 0.11) with patients taking an average of 6.65 total Percocet 5 mg (Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Malvern, PA) during the week. After POD7, 95% (76/80) of patients were only taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A total of 75/80 patients (93.75%) reported zero pain at 4 to 6 weeks after surgery (mean pain score 0.10 +/- 0.08). Conclusions: The multimodal analgesia protocol consisting of preoperative or immediate induction intravenous Tylenol (Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ), precut local analgesia with Marcaine (Pfizer Inc., New York, NY) and lidocaine, and intraoperative use of liposomal bupivacaine can improve perioperative pain control in patients undergoing lipoabdominoplasty.

Craniofacial Dysmorphology in Infants With Non-Syndromic Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (UCS) is a congenital disorder resulting from the premature suture fusion, leading to complex primary and compensatory morphologic changes in the shape of not only the calvarium and but also into the skull base. This deformity typically requires surgery to correct the shape of the skull and prevent neurologic sequelae, including increased intracranial pressure, sensory deficits, and cognitive impairment. METHODS: The present multicenter study sought to reverse-engineer the bone dysmorphogenesis seen in non-syndromic UCS using a geometric morphometric approach. Computed tomography scans for 26 non-syndromic UCS patients were converted to three-dimensional mesh models. Two hundred thirty-six unique anatomical landmarks and semi-landmarked curves were then plotted on each model, creating wireframe representations of the Patients' skulls. RESULTS: Generalized Procrustes superimposition, Principal Component Analysis, and heatmaps identified significant superior displacement of the ipsilateral orbit ("harlequin" eye deformity), anterior displacement of the ear ipsilateral to the fused coronal suture, acute deviation of midline skull base structures ipsilateral to the fused coronal suture and flattening of the parietal bone and associated failure to expand superiorly. CONCLUSIONS: The described technique illustrates the impact of premature coronal suture fusion on the development of the entire skull and proposes how bone dysmorphology contributes to the Patients' neurologic sequelae. By bridging novel basic science methodologies with clinical research, the present study quantitatively describes craniofacial development and bone dysmorphogenesis.

Appropriateness of Computed Tomography Scanning in the Diagnosis of Craniosynostosis.

INTRODUCTION: Although physicians from a variety of specialties encounter infants with possible craniosynostosis, judicious use of computed tomography (CT) imaging is important to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure and healthcare expense. The present study seeks to determine whether differences in specialty of ordering physician affects frequency of resulting diagnostic confirmations requiring operative intervention. METHODS: Radiology databases from 2 institutions were queried for CT reports or indications that included "craniosynostosis" or "plagiocephaly." Patient demographics, specialty of ordering physician, confirmed diagnosis, and operative interventions were recorded. Cost analysis was performed using the fixed unit cost for a head CT to calculate the expense before 1 study led to operative intervention. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-two patients were included. 184 (48.2%) CT scans were ordered by craniofacial surgeons, 71 (18.6%) were ordered by neurosurgeons, and 127 (33.3%) were ordered by pediatricians. One hundred four (27.2%) patients received a diagnosis of craniosynostosis requiring operative intervention. Craniofacial surgeons and neurosurgeons were more likely than pediatricians to order CT scans that resulted in a diagnosis of craniosynostosis requiring operative intervention (P < 0.001), with no difference between craniofacial surgeons and neurosurgeons (P = 1.0). The estimated cost of obtaining an impact CT scan when ordered by neurosurgeons or craniofacial surgeons as compared to pediatricians was $2369.69 versus $13,493.75. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians who more frequently encounter craniosynostosis (craniofacial and neurosurgeons) had a higher likelihood of ordering CT images that resulted in a diagnosis of craniosynostosis requiring operative intervention. This study should prompt multi-disciplinary interventions aimed at improving evaluation of pretest probability before CT imaging.

Exceptionally early tympanostomy tube placement in pediatric patients with cleft lip and palate.

OBJECTIVE: At our institution, cleft lip repair is performed at or before 8 weeks of age, and tympanostomy tubes (TT) have been inserted concurrently in some of these patients. Our objective was to determine the feasibility and present the preliminary results of TT placement at this early age. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 22 patients born with cleft lip and/or palate who had TT placement in the first 8 weeks of life. Data collected included complications and audiologic function post TT placement. RESULTS: Subjects had a mean age of 3.9 weeks at the time of TT placement and cleft lip repair. Thirteen patients (59%) reported otorrhea during the follow-up period. Eighteen of 21 (86%) patients who underwent auditory evaluation had normal audiological function following TT placement. One patient had sensorineural hearing loss and 2 patients had mild conductive hearing loss due to bilateral extruded TT and OME at 15.9 and 39.2 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Exceptionally early TT is feasible. Placing TT at or before 8 weeks of age did not result in any major complications but demonstrated a high incidence of otorrhea. A randomized, prospective study with a larger sample size is necessary to determine the benefits of TT placement at this age.

Factors Associated With Delay in Cleft Surgery at a Tertiary Children's Hospital in a Major US Metropolitan City.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with late cleft repair at a US tertiary children's hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective study of children with CL/P using Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) records. SETTING: US tertiary children's hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing primary CL or CP repair at CHLA from 2009 to 2018. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of children who had delayed primary CL repair or CP repair using CHLA and American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) guidelines and factors associated with late surgery. RESULTS: In total, 805 patients-503 (62.5%) who had CL repair, 302 (37.5%) CP repair-were included. Using CHLA protocol, 14.3% of patients seeking CL repair had delayed surgery. Delay was significantly associated with female gender, non-Hispanic ethnicity, Spanish primary language, government insurance, bilateral cleft, cleft lip and palate (CLP), and syndromic diagnosis. Using ACPA guidelines, 5.4% had delayed surgery. Female gender and syndromic diagnosis were significantly associated with delay and remained significant after adjustment for confounders in multivariate models. For CP repair, 60.3% of patients had delayed surgery using CHLA protocol. Cleft lip and palate diagnosis, complete cleft, syndromic diagnosis, and longer travel distance were significantly associated with delay. Using ACPA guidelines, 28.5% had delayed surgery; however, significant association with patient variables was not consistently observed. CONCLUSIONS: Delay in cleft surgery occurs most often for patients seeking CP repair and is associated with female gender, non-Hispanic ethnicity, Spanish language, government insurance, and bilateral CL, CLP, or syndromic diagnoses. Initiatives should aim to optimize cleft surgery delivery for these subpopulations.

Sphenotemporal and Fronto-Orbital Dysmorphology in Unilateral Coronal Synostosis Using Geometric Morphometric Curve-Based Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Geometric morphometric analysis with Procrustes superimposition is a commonly used method to characterize and study complex dysmorphology. The present study employs an advanced Procrustes-based approach to studying craniofacial dysmorphology in unilateral coronal synostosis and quantitatively describe bony patterns in this disorder, in order to better understand the associated fronto-orbital and sphenotemporal deformities. METHODS: Forty-one unilateral coronal synostosis (UCS) patients and 41 age- and sex-matched controls underwent high-resolution computed tomography imaging. Thirty-one anatomical landmarks were labeled on each imaging set. Landmarks were used to calculate angle, lengths, and define fronto-orbital and sphenotemporal anatomical curves. A validated geometric morphometric workflow was used to perform a Procrustes superimposition to register landmarks into a common space and perform a principal components analysis. RESULTS: Supraorbital bar curvature was significantly increased ipsilateral to the fused suture and decreased contralateral, P < 0.0001 for both sides. The sagittal sphenotemporal curve also showed ipsilateral increase in curvature (P < 0.0001) but there was no effect on the contralateral side (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Geometric morphometric analysis revealed significant dysmorphology between UCS patients and controls. These results suggest bilateral changes in fronto-orbital curvature and ipsilateral changes in sagittal sphenotemporal curvature, which may be useful in further characterizing the dynamic craniofacial changes in UCS.

Is Le Fort I Distraction Enough to Treat Severe Midface Hypoplasia?

BACKGROUND: In severe cases of maxillary hypoplasia, Le Fort I distraction may be required for treatment. This study describes our experience with internal distraction devices and assesses our outcomes in patients with a negative overjet on average >15 mm. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with a history of cleft lip and/or palate who underwent Le Fort I distraction at our institution from 11/2007-11/2017 was performed. Data regarding demographics, procedural details and outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty patients, 13 (65.0%) male and 7 (30.0%) female, were included. All (100%) patients had a history of cleft lip and/or palate and 2 (10.0%) of them had associated syndromes. All 20 patients underwent internal distraction. The average age at surgery was 17.8 years (range 15.2-20.7, SD 1.6 years). The average preoperative negative overjet was 19.27 mm (range 10-30, SD 5.63 mm). The mean total distraction length was 15.3 mm (range 0-30, SD 6.72 mm). There were no intraoperative complications, however, there were a total of 4 (20.0%) postoperative complications, 2 of which required reoperation due to device malfunction or displacement. 14 (70.0%) patients had repeat procedures to complete occlusal correction or correct relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary distraction alone was insufficient for correction of maxillary discrepancies averaging >15 mm. Instead, it's utility may be in positioning the maxilla for a more viable final advancement and fixation procedure, rather than being solely responsible for achieving normal occlusion during distraction.

Craniofacial Dysmorphology in Unilateral Coronal Synostosis Using Three-Dimensional Landmark-Based Analysis With Generalized Procrustes Superimposition.

BACKGROUND: Geometric morphometric analysis with Procrustes superimposition is an advanced computational tool that can be used to quantify dynamic changes in complex three-dimensional structures. The present study couples high resolution CT imaging with a Geometric Morphometric approach in order to further understand the complex dysmorphology that occurs in unilateral coronal synostosis (UCS). METHODS: Forty-one UCS patients and 41 age- and sex-matched controls received high-resolution CT imaging. Thirty-one anatomical landmarks were identified on each imaging set. A geometric morphometric workflow was used to perform a Procrustes superimposition to register landmarks into a common space. Procrustes-aligned landmarks were used to derive angle calculations, lengths, and other anatomical measurements. Three-dimensional coordinates were also used to perform a principal components analysis (PCA). RESULTS: Unilateral coronal synostosis patients exhibited significant angular deviation at the levels of the inferior skull base, mid-posterior fossa, and vertex. Both left- and right-sided UCS patients showed increased lengthening in the transverse (left-right) dimension, exhibiting increased length between the left and right EAC (P = 0.047). Conversely, UCS patients revealed shortening in the midline AP dimension as evidenced by the decreased Nasal root-Lambda (P < 0.0001) and Nasal root-superior dorsum sellae (P = 0.01) distances compared with controls. PCA revealed that 25.26% of variation in shape among the patients sampled to be driven by flattening of the skull and that18.93% of variation was driven by right-sided deformity and mediolateral expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Significant dysmorphology between UCS patients and controls was quantified using Geometric Morphometric approach, which may be useful in further characterizing the dynamic craniofacial changes in UCS.

Rotation of the Ipsilateral Supraorbital Rim Around the Horizontal Axis in Unilateral Coronal Synostosis: A Craniometric Analysis of the Emergence Profile.

INTRODUCTION: Unilateral coronal synostosis (UCS) results in well-defined dysmorphic changes including sphenoid malposition yielding posterior displacement of the supraorbital rim. Although variation in the ipsilateral supraorbital rim emergence profile has been suggested, it has not been previously investigated. The authors sought to characterize the emergence profile of the ipsilateral supraorbital rim in UCS through craniometric analysis. METHODS: Thirty-five nonsyndromic UCS patients (0-18 months) with CT images obtained before operative intervention and 16 control patients (0-24 months, 32 orbits) were included. Craniometric measurements were performed to quantify the emergence profile of the ipsilateral supraorbital rim and locate the likely apex of rotation. RESULTS: The ipsilateral supraorbital rim was significantly rotated around the horizontal axis when measured in reference to the 0° vertical in UCS versus control patients by an average difference of 7.3° to 11.3° across age groups (P < 0.05). No significant effect modification was detected between age and UCS on ipsilateral supraorbital rim emergence profile (P > 0.05). Additional angles with vertices around the superior orbital circumference were then measured to locate the likely apex of rotation and revealed a significant decrease in the posterior orbital roof to 0° horizontal in UCS patients by an average of 9.3° to 22.1° in children under 1 year old (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Variation in the emergence profile of the ipsilateral supraorbital rim in UCS is quantified, and the apex of this rotation likely lies at the posterior orbital roof. The novel quantification and characterization of this deformity will better direct the operative approach and enable a more accurate correction.

Vertical Distraction for the Treatment of Congenital Syngnathia.

Congenital syngnathia is a very rare condition that presents with several unique challenges. There is no consensus on the best operative approach to manage this condition. Readhesion of surgically separated tissues is a relatively common occurrence. The authors propose that the use of a vertical distraction technique helps maintain adequate separation to prevent relapse of the bony fusion. Long-term follow-up will be required to follow mandibular growth and implications of this treatment option.

Temporal Fat Grafting in Children With Craniofacial Anomalies.

BACKGROUND: Fat grafting is a common adjunct procedure used to treat temporal fat hollowing in children with craniofacial anomalies. The goal of this study was to assess the surgical and aesthetic outcomes of this procedure. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent temporal fat grafting at a single tertiary pediatric craniofacial center. The surgical outcome was assessed based on intraoperativeand 30-day postoperative complication rates. The aesthetic outcome was assessed by 3 independent investigators using a 3-point grading scale for preoperative temporal hollowing severity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) and a 5-point scale for postoperative improvement (0 = no, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = significant, and 4 = complete improvement). RESULTS: Forty-three patients met inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven (63%) were male, 39 (91%) had a history of craniosynostosis, and 18 (42%) had associated syndromes. The mean age at fat grafting was 9.9 years (2.7-20.4, SD = 5.5) with an average follow-up time of 1.6 years (0-5.8, SD = 1.8). The average volume of fat grafted was 8.6 mL (0-30, SD = 5.9) to the right temporal region and 8.6 mL (0-30, SD = 5.8) to the left. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The mean improvement score was 2.9 (1-4, SD = 0.7), demonstrating that most patients experienced moderate to significant improvement. Multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that syndromic status had a negative impact on the aesthetic outcome (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that fat grafting is an effective method to treat temporal hollowing in children with craniofacial anomalies with no perioperative complications.

Outcomes of Intracranial Versus Subcranial Approaches to the Frontofacial Skeleton.

PURPOSE: An intracranial approach to the craniomaxillofacial skeleton can be effective for correcting complex craniofacial dystoses such as frontofacial hypoplasia, hypertelorism, and orbital dystopia. However, the significant morbidity resulting from the high complication rates has limited intracranial use. Given the need for intracranial approaches for certain clinical indications, the present study reevaluated intracranial frontofacial procedures to determine their safety and outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all frontofacial procedures completed between 2007 and 2017 at a single institution. Patients who had undergone monobloc distraction alone or with facial bipartition, facial bipartition alone, or box osteotomy were included in the intracranial cohort. Those who had undergone Le Fort III distraction, advancement, or a combination with Le Fort I were included in the subcranial cohort. The recorded data included demographics, previous craniofacial surgery, and operative events. The complications rates were compared between the 2 cohorts. RESULTS: The present study included 65 patients-35 subcranial and 30 intracranial. The rates of previous craniomaxillofacial (P = .193) and intracranial (P = .340) surgery were equivalent between the 2 cohorts. Of the 30 intracranial and 35 subcranial patients, 26.7% and 34.3% experienced complications (P = .218). The intracranial patients experienced more dural tears (53.3 vs 5.7%; P < .0001); however, no significant differences were observed in cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Reintubations (n = 3; 4.5%) occurred exclusively in the subcranial group. No significant differences in the major and minor complication rates were observed between the 2 cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial and subcranial frontofacial procedures are associated with an equal risk of major and minor complications. Given the lack of an increase in risk, intracranial frontofacial procedures should be considered for the management of complex craniofacial dystoses.

Simultaneous Midface Advancement and Orthognathic Surgery: A Powerful Technique for Managing Midface Hypoplasia and Malocclusion.

BACKGROUND: Midface hypoplasia dramatically affects the normative facial cascade. Simultaneous Le Fort III and Le Fort I procedures (Le Fort III/I) provide a powerful tool for achieving significant midface advancement. This study presents the authors' approach for addressing midface hypoplasia in the setting of class III malocclusion using Le Fort III/I advancement. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of patients who underwent Le Fort III/I advancement at the authors' institution from 2009 to 2019. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative data were recorded. The authors' operative technique and surgical pearls are described. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria, 15 male patients (60 percent) and 10 female patients (40 percent). Patient age ranged from 14.9 to 21.6 years. Diagnoses included Crouzon syndrome, nonsyndromic developmental skeletal dysplasia, cleft lip/palate, Klippel-Feil syndrome, Apert syndrome, Van den Ende-Gupta syndrome, and Pfeiffer syndrome. Le Fort III advancements averaged 6.18 ± 1.38 mm and Le Fort I advancements averaged 6.70 ± 2.48 mm. Thirteen patients underwent simultaneous bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with average movement of 5.85 ± 1.21 mm. Average follow-up was 1.3 ± 1.0 years. One patient experienced intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak that resolved with expectant management. Three patients experienced major complications (12 percent) postoperatively necessitating repeated orthognathic operations. Ten patients experienced minor complications (40 percent). Average length of stay was 10 days, with all patients achieving improvement of their facial profile. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' experience reaffirms the relative safety of simultaneous Le Fort III/I advancement. This technique should be considered in select patients with global midface retrusion and class III malocclusion. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

The Monobloc Distraction With Facial Bipartition: Outcomes of Simultaneous Multidimensional Facial Movement Compared With Monobloc Distraction or Facial Bipartition Alone.

BACKGROUND: Although combined monobloc facial bipartition with distraction (MFBD) may simultaneously correct multiple facial dimensions in patients with syndromic craniosynostoses, complication risks limit its use. This study reassesses MFBD complications and outcomes to compare safety and efficacy to monobloc distraction (MD) and facial bipartition (FB) alone. METHODS: A retrospective review of MFBD, MD, and FB cases for 10 years at a tertiary children's hospital was performed. Patient demographics and surgical variables were compared between cohorts. Distraction distance was compared between MFBD and MD. Correction of interdacryon distance in MFBD compared with FB was measured on preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic scans. SPSS 17 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-two total patients, 11 MFBD, 4 MD, and 7 FB, met the inclusion criteria. Three MFBD (27.3%) patients experienced complications, including 1 osteomyelitis and 2 hardware displacements. One MD patient (25%) experienced a postoperative complication consisting of a wound infection. Three FB patients (42.9%) experienced either cerebrospinal fluid leak, seroma, mucocele, hardware exposure, and/or orbital dystopia (n = 1 each). Patients with MFBD had significantly longer intensive care unit stay (P ≤ 0.05), but no difference in hospital stay (P = 0.421). Mean distraction length was similar between MFBD and MD (P = 0.612). There was no significant difference in final (P = 0.243) or change (P = 0.189) in interdacryon distance between MFBD and FB patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, MFBD has similar complication rates compared with MD and FB alone. Given equivalent safety and postoperative correction of facial dimensions, MFBD could be more widely considered for select patients.