Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 51(2): 83-91, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23387345

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The increasing abuse of amphetamine-like compounds presents a challenge for clinicians and clinical laboratories. Although these compounds may be identified by mass spectrometry-based assays, most clinical laboratories use amphetamine immunoassays that have unknown cross-reactivity with novel amphetamine-like drugs. To date, there has been a little systematic study of amphetamine immunoassay cross-reactivity with structurally diverse amphetamine-like drugs or of computational tools to predict cross-reactivity. METHODS: Cross-reactivities of 42 amphetamines and amphetamine-like drugs with three amphetamines screening immunoassays (AxSYM(®) Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II, CEDIA(®) amphetamine/Ecstasy, and EMIT(®) II Plus Amphetamines) were determined. Two- and three-dimensional molecular similarity and modeling approaches were evaluated for the ability to predict cross-reactivity using receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 34%-46% of the drugs tested positive on the immunoassay screens using a concentration of 20,000 ng/mL. The three immunoassays showed differential detection of the various classes of amphetamine-like drugs. Only the CEDIA assay detected piperazines well, while only the EMIT assay cross-reacted with the 2C class. All three immunoassays detected 4-substituted amphetamines. For the AxSYM and EMIT assays, two-dimensional molecular similarity methods that combined similarity to amphetamine/methamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethampetamine most accurately predicted cross-reactivity. For the CEDIA assay, three-dimensional pharmacophore methods performed best in predicting cross-reactivity. Using the best performing models, cross-reactivities of an additional 261 amphetamine-like compounds were predicted. CONCLUSIONS: Existing amphetamines immunoassays unevenly detect amphetamine-like drugs, particularly in the 2C, piperazine, and ß-keto classes. Computational similarity methods perform well in predicting cross-reactivity and can help prioritize testing of additional compounds in the future.


Assuntos
Anfetaminas/análise , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/análise , Imunoensaio/métodos , Anfetaminas/imunologia , Especificidade de Anticorpos , Área Sob a Curva , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/imunologia , Reações Cruzadas , Cristalografia por Raios X , Drogas Ilícitas , Modelos Químicos , Modelos Moleculares , Conformação Molecular , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Curva ROC , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias
2.
J Forensic Sci ; 33(4): 1050-1, 1988 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2971779

RESUMO

A murder/suicide case is reported in which a phosphoglucomutase (PGM) 1*W9 variant was detected in a woman, her child, and from blood collected at the scene.


Assuntos
Medicina Legal/métodos , Homicídio , Fosfoglucomutase/genética , Suicídio , Adulto , Criança , Eletroforese em Gel de Poliacrilamida , Feminino , Humanos , Focalização Isoelétrica , Masculino , Fosfoglucomutase/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...