The Role of Intraoperative Urinary Catheters on Postoperative Urinary Retention after Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Multi-Hospital Retrospective Study on 9,580 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Urinary catheters (UC) are used by some surgeons during total joint arthroplasty (TJA). This study investigated the impact of intraoperative urinary catheters on postoperative urinary retention (POUR) following TJA cases. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective comparative study across 11 medical centers on 9,580 TJA patients. Visits to urgent care or the emergency department within 7 and 30 postoperative days were reviewed. Medical records over a 12-month period for all patients older than 18 years old were used to gather demographic and surgical data as well as the incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI). Chi-squared tests (RStudio) were used to determine statistical significance against P-Values (P) < 0.05. RESULTS: 13 (0.14%) patients returned within 7 days for POUR. POUR was more common in males [10 (0.3%) vs. 3 (0.1%) females, (P = 0.01)]. There was no difference in POUR when comparing total hip and knee arthroplasty procedures [0.16% vs. 0.12%, (P = 0.60)]. Of all operations, 25% had intraoperative UC use. There was no difference in POUR between the UC and no UC groups [0.21 vs. 0.11%, (P = 0.26)]. However, there was an increase in UTI in UC vs. no UC use within 7 postoperative days [0.92 vs. 0.43%, (P = 0.005)] and 30 postoperative days [2.60 vs. 1.50 %, (P < 0.001)]. CONCLUSION: In our study, there was no difference in POUR rates between the intraoperative UC vs. no UC groups. Therefore, the use of intraoperative UC may not decrease the rate of POUR following TJA procedures. Additionally, UTI risk was higher in the UC group which may be attributable to other factors, especially when comparing female vs. male patients.

Population Management Approach to Kidney Stone Care Improves Patient Compliance to Preventive Measures and Reduces Resource Utilization in Patients at High Risk for Stone Recurrence.

INTRODUCTION: Nephrolithiasis is a chronic condition with 5 to 10-year recurrence rates as high as 50%. Stone recurrence can be reduced by implementing American Urological Association kidney stone medical management guidelines, which recommend additional metabolic testing for high risk, recurrent and interested first-time stone formers. However, clinician adherence to guidelines is variable, and patient compliance with preventive evaluations is low. We evaluated our kidney stone population management program's role in patient compliance with completing American Urological Association metabolic studies. We assessed the program's impact on office encounters, operating room procedures and emergency department visits for known high risk kidney stone patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of electronic medical records between 2009 and 2017 identified 4,029 kidney stone patients. A total of 873 patients were at high risk for kidney stone recurrence. In 2013, we established a population management program in which high risk patients were referred and followed by a nurse case manager. Patients were contacted by email or telephone if metabolic serum and urine collections were incomplete. Office, operating room and emergency department visits were compared before and after the program's implementation. RESULTS: Metabolic evaluation orders increased from 17% to 35% in our institution's urology department. Patient compliance with recommended studies improved from <10% to 82%, and reductions in office visits by 48%, surgical procedures by 38% and emergency department encounters by 40% were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our program improved patient compliance with American Urological Association recommended studies for high risk kidney stone patients. Reductions in stone events may have been due to our program but require further study in the future.

Impact of robotic training on surgical and pathologic outcomes during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively compare outcomes during robotic prostatectomy between surgeons with formal training in either robotic prostatectomy (RALP) or laparoscopic prostatectomy (LRP). METHODS: A total of 286 robotic prostatectomies were performed by 12 urologists between August 2008 and March 2009 as part of a new robotic surgery program at one of the largest health maintenance organizations in the United States. Four surgeons had formal training in RALP and 8 had formal training in LRP. We prospectively compared surgical and pathologic outcomes between these 2 groups of surgeons. RESULTS: The 4 RALP surgeons performed 121 RALPs and the 8 LRP surgeons performed 165 RALPs. Patient demographics were similar between groups. The robot-naive group had significantly more clinical stage T1c than the robot-trained group (87.9% vs 74.4%, P = .003). Prostatectomy parameters were similar between the 2 groups of surgeons in terms of prostate size, Gleason score, pathologic stage, and estimated blood loss. The robot-trained surgeons had significantly lower overall positive margin rates (24% vs 34.6%, P = .05) and lower margin rates in T3 tumors (38.5% vs 61.8%, P = .07), which were approximately statistically significant. There was no difference in margin rates in T2 tumors. The robot-trained surgeons had significantly lower apical margin rates (8.3% vs 21.2%, P = .003) and lateral margin rates (1.7% vs 7.3%, P = .05). The robot-trained surgeons had 10%-15% shorter procedure times. There was no difference in complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Formal RALP training may be beneficial for surgical and pathologic outcomes of RALP compared with formal LRP training during the initial implementation of a new robotics program.

Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with intraoperative frozen section (IFS) analysis in patients who are potential candidates for nerve-sparing surgery. Potency can be maintained in select patients who undergo radical prostatectomy using a nerve-sparing approach. However, extracapsular disease extension in the area of the neurovascular bundles may compromise adequate surgical margins in some patients undergoing such surgery. METHODS: We reviewed the pathologic results from 101 patients who underwent either unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy in whom IFS analysis was performed. The clinical disease stage was T1 in 20 patients and T2 in 81 patients. The mean serum prostate-specific antigen level before surgery was 7.2 ng/mL. Of the 101 patients, 62, 28, and 11 had a biopsy Gleason score of 2 to 6, 7, and 8 to 10, respectively. IFS analysis was performed on the surgical margin thought to be at risk of tumor involvement as determined by the results of systematic prostate biopsy, transrectal ultrasonography, or intraoperative inspection. If the frozen section was positive, additional tissue, including the neurovascular bundle, was subsequently removed to establish clear surgical margins. IFS results were compared with those on the final, permanent tissue section, as well as with the status of the additionally resected tissue. RESULTS: The IFS results were identical to those obtained on the final, permanent section in 92 (91%) of the 101 cases. The IFS results showed positive margins in 15 (15%) of 101 patients. Of these cases, 11 demonstrated positive margins on the final permanent sections. Of the 86 patients with negative frozen section diagnosis, 5 had positive surgical margins on permanent sections at the site of the IFS. The positive and negative predictive value for the IFS technique was 73% and 94%, respectively. Of the 15 patients with positive IFS, 12 (80%) had no evidence of tumor in the additionally resected tissue. Prostate-specific antigen recurrence was noted in 7% of the study population. The risk of recurrence in patients with either positive or negative IFS findings was similar. CONCLUSIONS: IFS at the time of radical prostatectomy can reliably predict the final surgical margin status in most carefully selected high-risk patients when there are concerns about the margin status.