Exploring rehabilitation potential in older people living with frailty: a qualitative focus group study.

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation interventions are frequently cited as key in supporting frail older people's recovery following periods of decompensation and acute ill-health. Clinicians are required to make decisions about a patient's potential to respond to rehabilitation. 'Rehabilitation potential' decisions can determine access to services. In acute settings clinicians have limited time to assess and work with patients, families and carers. The complexities of ageing, recovery, rehabilitation and frailty may not be fully appreciated. This study aimed to explore multiple perspectives of the concept of rehabilitation potential and how it is assessed in older people living with frailty in the acute healthcare setting. METHODS: Five focus groups with a purposive sample of 28 participants which included clinicians and members of the public were conducted. Analysis comprised a thematic approach using the Framework method. RESULTS: Rehabilitation potential was found to encapsulate a complex decision-making process where clinicians judged an individual's ability to benefit from and participate in targeted rehabilitation. They asked, "Will it work?", "Is it wanted?" and "Is it available?" In order to predict who would benefit from rehabilitation interventions, clinicians assessed a range of holistic clinical and non-clinical factors. An iterative approach to assessment delivered by a multi-disciplinary team, centred around patient and carer needs and wants was needed to accommodate complexity. Participants believed that everyone had some form of potential but this was dependent on availability of rehabilitation resources and conceptualisations of frailty and rehabilitation. Tensions between iterative approaches to rehabilitation potential assessment and the realities of rapid decision making in the acute hospital setting were found. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation potential decisions involve a complex process of multidisciplinary decision-making and prognostication on the likely outcome and benefit from rehabilitation programmes. These findings lay the foundation for developing structured approaches to rehabilitation potential decision making tools and guidance.

'Socialised care futility' in the care of older people in hospital who call out repetitively: An ethnographic study.

BACKGROUND: People living with dementia may call out repetitively, sometimes called disruptive vocalisation, or verbal agitation. In literature and policy, patients who call out repetitively are assumed to be expressing an unmet need, which should be met. Yet there has been little systematic study of this patient group in an acute hospital setting. OBJECTIVES: To better understand patients who call out repetitively and to identify what care looks like in an acute hospital setting. DESIGN: Ethnography. SETTINGS: Ten acute geriatric medical wards in two hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 30 cognitively impaired patients who were calling out repetitively, and 15 members of hospital staff. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with hospital staff, 150 h of ward observations and informal conversations with staff, scrutiny of medical and nursing documentation, and measures of patient health status. RESULTS: Patients who called out were moderately or severely cognitively impaired, often had delirium, were very physically disabled, and many were approaching the end of life. Most hospital staff were found to hold contradictory views: that calling out represents distress or unmet need, but that nothing can be done to alleviate the calling out. During informal conversations, most staff also tended to say that they intuitively recognised when intervening was likely to alleviate calling out. During observations, many staff appeared to and spoke of the ability to 'block' calling out. As a result we argue that social, emotional and physical needs may get overlooked. We argue that some calling out is due to a need that is unmeetable. We also found that while staff would talk about strategies for identifying need, observations and hospital documentation did not support evidence of systematic attempts to identify potential need. CONCLUSION: Calling out repetitively within a hospital setting is difficult for staff to understand and to respond to. This is because many of these patients are severely cognitively impaired, often immobile and dependent on their professional carers. We argue that a form of socialised care futility is communicated between staff and is used to rationalise becoming unresponsive to calling-out. We explain this phenomenon as resulting from two protective mechanisms: defence of staff's professional identity as competent practitioners; and defence of staff as having personal morality. Socialised care futility risks good quality care, therefore systematic strategies to assess and manage possible need should be developed, even if calling out remains irresolvable in some cases.

Caring for cognitively impaired older patients in the general hospital: a qualitative analysis of similarities and differences between a specialist Medical and Mental Health Unit and standard care wards.

BACKGROUND: Around half of people aged over 70 years admitted as an emergency to general hospital have dementia, delirium or both. Dissatisfaction is often expressed about the quality of hospital care. A Medical and Mental Health Unit was developed to provide best practice care to cognitively impaired older patients. The Unit was evaluated by randomised controlled trial compared to standard care wards. Part of this evaluation involved structured non-participant observations of a random sub-sample of participants and the recording of field notes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this paper is to compare and contrast the behaviours of staff and patients on the Medical and Mental Health Unit and standard care wards and to provide a narrative account that helps to explain the link between structure, process and reported outcomes. DESIGN: Field notes were analysed using the constant comparison method. SETTING: A large hospital within the East Midlands region of the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Patient participants were aged over 65, and identified by Admissions Unit physicians as being 'confused'. Most patients had delirium or dementia. RESULTS: Sixty observations (360 h) were made between March and December 2011. Cognitively impaired older patients had high physical and psychological needs, and were cared for in environments which were crowded, noisy and lacked privacy. Staff mostly prioritised physical over psychological needs. Person-centred care on the Medical and Mental Health Unit was mostly delivered during activity sessions or meal times by activities coordinators. Patients on this unit were able to walk around more freely than on other wards. Mental health needs were addressed more often on the Medical and Mental Health Unit than on standard care wards but most staff time was still taken up delivering physical care. More patients called out repetitively on the Unit and staff were not always able to meet the high needs of these patients. CONCLUSION: Care provided on the Medical and Mental Health Unit was distinctly different from standard care wards. Improvements were worthwhile, but care remained challenging and consistent good practice was difficult to maintain. Disruptive vocalisation may have been provoked by concentrating cognitively impaired patients on one ward.

Diagnosis and management of traumatic ventricular septal defect.

Four cases of ventricular septal defect secondary to stab wounds of the heart are presented. One of three patients arriving at the Emergency Department in shock and who were resuscitated required an emergency thoracotomy. These patients had immediate repair of their external cardiac wounds in the Operating Room. Cases 1 and 3 developed heart failure and loud systolic murmur postoperatively. Case 4 was treated with chest tube for a left hemothorax and developed heart failure after discharge. In Cases 1, 2, and 3, 2-D echocardiography detected and located a VSD. In Case 3 Doppler measurement showed elevated RV pressure (45 mm Hg) and decreased peak tricuspid to mitral flow ratio (0.36, normal = 0.6). All patients underwent cardiac catheterization. In Case 4 there was associated mitral regurgitation. Cases 1 and 3 had pulmonary to systemic flow ratios greater than 3:1. Cases 1, 3, and 4 underwent operative repair. In Case 1 the VSD was closed with a dacron patch, and in Cases 3 and 4 it was sutured with Teflon pledgets. In Case 4 a puncture wound of the mitral valve annulus was simultaneously repaired. All patients are alive but in Case 1 postoperative 2-D echocardiography demonstrated partial dehiscence of the patch which has not required reoperation and in Case 3 post-repair 2-D echocardiography and Doppler flow studies have shown an intact VSD repair. This series of post-traumatic VSD demonstrates its varying clinical presentation and the diagnostic and followup benefits offered by 2-D echocardiography, especially when combined with Doppler flow measures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The uses of two-dimensional Doppler echocardiographic techniques preoperatively and postoperatively in a ventricular septal defect caused by penetrating trauma.

Doppler echocardiography was used to determine the site and size of a ventricular septal defect in a patient with a penetrating wound of the heart. Additional physiological measurements by Doppler study, including pulmonary artery pressure and degree of left-to-right shunting, were helpful in deciding on surgical closure of the defect as the definitive therapy in this patient. Associated intracardiac defects (e.g., mitral or tricuspid regurgitation) can be excluded by Doppler echocardiography.

Effect of yellow-tinted lenses on contrast sensitivity.

The effectiveness of yellow-tinted lenses (Norton Visitor Wrap-Around) on contrast thresholds for achromatic sinusoidal gratings was measured on a large sample of healthy, young adults. These measurements were compared with those obtained through luminance-matched neutral goggles. Contrast sensitivity functions for stationary and drifting (2 cycles per second) gratings were measured on two groups of subjects. The results of both experiments show that those subjects demonstrating a subjective preference preferred the yellow tint to the neutral lenses by 2:1. Despite the subjective impression, however, contrast thresholds obtained with the yellow and neutral lenses were not statistically different for either the stationary or drifting gratings.

Low electrocardiographic voltage in pericardial effusion.

Although low ECG voltage has been associated with pericardial effusion, its diagnostic usefulness in such patients is unclear. When we examined the relationship between the volume of pericardial effusion and low voltage in 28 patients who underwent pericardial drainage, 14 patients exhibited low voltage (sum of limb lead QRS amplitudes of 30 mm or less). In eight patients, the QRS amplitude was 5 mm or less in each of the standard leads (absolute low voltage). There was no significant correlation between the volume of the effusion and the QRS amplitude (r = -0.30). This correlation did not improve (r = -0.37) when patients with left ventricular hypertrophy were excluded. Following pericardial drainage, the QRS amplitude increased in 21 of 24 patients and decreased in three. Low voltage persisted in nine patients; the pericardium was thickened in seven of the nine. Analysis of the sensitivity and specificity revealed acceptable sensitivity only with large effusions and no left ventricular hypertrophy. Absolute low voltage appeared to be specific in the diagnosis of moderate and large effusions among patients with pericardial effusion selected for this study.