Management of Sickle Cell Pain Using Pregabalin: A Pilot Study.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) pain may have a neuropathic component. Adjuvant drugs used to treat neuropathic pain have not been studied for the treatment of adults with SCD. To determine the safety and feasibility of using pregabalin for chronic SCD pain. A randomized, controlled, double-blind pilot study. Based on random assignment, participants were treated with pregabalin or placebo control for 3 months with monthly follow-up visits. Participants were recruited from the University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System outpatient SCD clinic. Participants/Subjects: A total of 22 participants with SCD (21 African American, 1 other) were included 16 women aged 18-82 (mean age 33.1 ± 9.9). PAINReportIt, Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Signs and Symptoms, Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory, and Short Form 36 Health Survey were completed. Adverse effects were minimal. Mean scores for average pain intensity, composite pain index, and neuropathic pain revealed a reduction for pregabalin and placebo control groups. Although the between-group differences were not significant, sustained reduction in pain over time within the pregabalin group indicated promising effects of pregabalin for SCD pain. Mean quality-of-life scores increased slightly over time (representing better quality of life) in 7 of 8 domains for the pregabalin group and decreased in 4 of 8 domains for the placebo control group. Small sample size made it difficult to interpret quality-of-life findings. This pilot study provided sufficient evidence that further investigation of pregabalin's potential efficacy for treatment of chronic SCD pain in adults is warranted.

Evolution of Patient-Controlled Analgesia: From Intravenous to Sublingual Treatment.

Opioid administration delivered intravenously (IV) by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) devices has been an important development in addressing insufficient management of acute pain in the postsurgical setting. However, IV PCA has several disadvantages, including operator error, risk of patient exposure to analgesic gaps, IV line patency issues, and risk of catheter-related infection, all of which contribute to the total cost of care. Morphine, the most commonly used opioid in IV PCA, has a relatively slow onset of analgesia, which may leave patients with inadequate initial pain control and at risk of opioid dose-stacking. Sufentanil is an opioid with no major active metabolites and a rapid onset of analgesia. The sufentanil sublingual tablet system (SSTS) with a 20-minute lockout and other safety features is a novel noninvasive PCA system in development for on-demand relief of moderate to severe acute pain in the hospital setting. Data from phase 3 trials of the use of SSTS after elective major open abdominal and orthopedic surgery show that analgesia is rapidly achieved, with a longer mean interdosing interval compared with IV PCA morphine (81 vs 47 minutes) and a high level of patient and nurse satisfaction. These data suggest that SSTS may also aid in the avoidance of some of the pitfalls inherent with IV PCA, which may help reduce hospital costs associated with IV PCA-related issues. This article describes the evolution, benefits, issues, and costs associated with IV PCA and reviews data from preclinical studies of sufentanil through SSTS phase 3 trials.

Evolving Role of Local Anesthetics in Managing Postsurgical Analgesia.

PURPOSE: Opioid analgesics, the cornerstone of effective postsurgical pain management, may be associated with risk of opioid-related adverse drug events (ADEs) that may complicate the postsurgical experience. Perioperative multimodal analgesic regimens have the potential to improve postsurgical pain control and may permit use of lower analgesic doses and reduce the incidence of opioid-related ADEs. Utility of traditional local anesthetic formulations to provide analgesia over the entire postsurgical period is limited by their short duration of action. Liposome bupivacaine, a liposomal formulation of bupivacaine indicated for single-dose administration into the surgical site to produce postsurgical analgesia, was evaluated in multiple surgical models as part of multimodal analgesic regimens and was found in clinical trials to provide postsurgical analgesia for up to 72 hours. Here, we provide an overview of the available multimodal analgesic options and recent recommendations for optimal postsurgical pain management. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted, and results from recent clinical trials are included. FINDINGS: The use of a multimodal analgesic regimen, including liposome bupivacaine, can extend the time to first postsurgical opioid use, may reduce postsurgical opioid consumption, and reduce hospital length of stay and costs compared with an opioid-only analgesic regimen. IMPLICATIONS: Use of multimodal analgesic regimens is a practical way to achieve good postsurgical analgesia while minimizing reliance on opioids and associated adverse events. Taken as a whole, evidence from the clinical studies of liposome bupivacaine suggests this local anesthetic formulation may be a useful component of multimodal analgesic regimens for managing postsurgical pain in select patients, with the potential to reduce opioid use and opioid-related ADEs in the postsurgical setting. As with bupivacaine, appropriate use of liposome bupivacaine to optimize clinical effects, economic implications, and patient tolerability will depend on appropriate patient selection, practitioner training, and institutional protocols. As a component of a multimodal analgesic regimen, liposome bupivacaine represents a new approach to extending the duration of postsurgical analgesia. Further studies across a range of surgical settings should help clarify the most appropriate roles for this prolonged-release formulation of bupivacaine.