[Long-term results conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy]. / Otdalennye rezul'taty klassicheskoi i eversionnoi karotidnoi endarterektomii.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze immediate and long-term results of conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEA) within a multicenter registry. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective, multi-center, comparative study included 375 patients who underwent CEA between February 1, 2018 and February 1, 2022. Depending on the type of operation, the sample was stratified into the eversion CEA (group 1, n=218) and conventional CEA with plasty of the reconstruction area with a diepoxy-treated xenopericardium patch (group 2, n=157). The long-term follow-up period was 26.5±18.3 months. Information about the condition of patients and the development of complications was obtained by telephone questioning and calling patients to the clinic for a follow-up examination. RESULTS: No myocardial infarction was diagnosed in the hospital postoperative period. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of acute cerebrovascular accident. The only cause of death after conventional CEA was hemorrhagic stroke. According to the section study, the cause of death was edema with dislocation of the brain stem. The remaining strokes in both groups (1 case each) were of the ischemic type. The probable cause was a distal embolism following the use of a temporary shunt. During conservative treatment, the neurological deficit completely regressed on days 21 and 26, respectively. In the late postoperative period, significant differences were obtained in the incidence of stroke (group 1: n=2; 0.91%; group 2: n=6; 3.8%; p=0.05; OR - 0.23; 95% CI=0.04-1.17) and restenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) more than 60% (group 1: n=0; group 2: n=11; 7.0%; p<0.0001; OR - 0.03, 95% CI=0.001-0.49). CONCLUSION: The eversion CEA technique demonstrated a lower risk of developing hemodynamically significant restenosis of the internal carotid artery in the long-term follow-up period. To obtain convincing evidence of the effectiveness of eversion or conventional CEA, additional randomized multicenter trials with the inclusion of results in clinical guidelines are required.

[Results of carotid endarterectomy in the acutest period of ischemic stroke]. / Rezul'taty karotidnoi endarterektomii v ostreishem periode ishemicheskogo insul'ta.

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of the results of carotid endarterectomy (CEE) in the acute period of ischemic stroke (IS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 128 patients (mean age 65.2±4.7 years, 84 (65.6%) men) who underwent CEE in the acute period. Inclusion criteria were: an ischemic focus in the brain with a diameter of no more than 2.5 cm according to MRI; mild neurological deficit (from 3 to 8 points on NIHSS); ≤3 points on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS); stenosis of ICA over 60%. Exclusion criteria were: severe neurological deficit; presence of decompensated comorbid dependence; contraindications to CEE. RESULTS: In the hospital postoperative period, 3.9% of patients were diagnosed with hemorrhagic transformation of the ischemic focus in the brain with progression of neurological deficit and level of consciousness to coma II. In 3.1% cases, a lethal outcome developed on 4-7 days after the operation. In 2.3% patients after CEE, the progression of neurological deficit was noted with the development of new ischemic foci according to postoperative neuroimaging. The probable cause of this event was a distal embolism that developed during the installation of a temporary shunt. Myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 3.9% of patients. The combined end point (death + myocardial infarction + ischemic stroke + hemorrhagic transformation) was 10.1%. CONCLUSION: CEE in the most acute period of ischemic stroke is accompanied by a high risk of hemorrhagic transformation, myocardial infarction, and death, which characterizes this revascularization option as unsafe.